SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + AMD Radeon 880M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 880M

8,436 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and AMD Radeon 880M pairing represents a striking asymmetry in mobile computing: a desktop-class 12-core processor paired with an entry-level integrated GPU. This combination targets users who prioritize CPU throughput for productivity and development work, while accepting that gaming and graphics-accelerated tasks will operate at integrated-graphics levels. The data indicates a system that excels at compute-heavy workloads but remains constrained by its graphics subsystem, making it a specialized tool rather than a general-purpose gaming rig.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is not a practical target for this build. The Radeon 880M sits at the 43rd percentile among all GPUs, placing it in the lower half of the performance spectrum. With no measured FPS data available for this combination, estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark scores suggest that even at 1080p with low settings, maintaining high refresh rates would be challenging. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 7615 and its proximity to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (0.1% ahead) indicate a GPU that is roughly a decade old in performance terms, making 60+ FPS in modern titles unlikely at any resolution above 720p.

Streaming presents a mixed picture. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding, but the integrated GPU lacks dedicated encoding hardware that would offload this work efficiently. The Ryzen 9 7845HX’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 suggests that software encoding (x264) would perform well, but the lack of a discrete GPU means the system must handle both encoding and rendering on the same silicon. For 1080p60 streaming of less demanding games, the CPU could manage, but the overall experience would be hampered by the GPU’s low 43rd percentile position.

Video editing benefits significantly from the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess. The Geekbench multi-core score of 16633 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 indicate strong performance in timeline rendering, effects processing, and export tasks. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 12 cores provide a solid foundation for 4K video editing in software like DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro, though GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering would suffer due to the Radeon 880M’s limited compute capabilities.

3D rendering is where this CPU shines. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 places the processor in the top tier for mobile chips, with the nearest rival comparison showing it within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-13700K. For CPU-based rendering engines like Blender’s Cycles (CPU mode) or V-Ray, this system would deliver strong performance, though GPU rendering (OptiX, CUDA, or HIP) would be severely limited by the integrated graphics’ 4.454 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Software development is arguably the ideal use case for this build. The PassMark data compression score of 543539 and integer math score of 155118 indicate excellent performance in compilation, code analysis, and data processing tasks. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds and testing, while the 89th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsiveness even under heavy load. The Radeon 880M’s 43rd percentile is largely irrelevant for most development workflows, making this a logical choice for developers who need a laptop CPU that can handle large codebases.

Student and office work represents a more moderate fit. The single-thread score of 3935 in PassMark and 2389 in Geekbench indicate strong everyday responsiveness, while the 12 cores provide headroom for multitasking. The integrated GPU is sufficient for document rendering, web browsing, and video playback, though the 880M’s 43rd percentile suggests it may struggle with 4K video acceleration or complex web applications. For a student who also does programming or data analysis, this pairing is well-suited; for general office use, the CPU is massively over-provisioned.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 7845HX delivers exceptional CPU performance, with an average benchmark score of 46654 and a percentile ranking of 89 against all CPUs. The nearest rival comparison shows a dead heat with the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (0.4% ahead), making this mobile chip competitive with desktop parts from previous generations. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 and single-core score of 1852 demonstrate strong scaling from 2 threads (1988 in 3DMark) to 16 threads (10068) to max threads (11108), with the 24-thread configuration showing a 10.3% improvement over 16-thread performance.

The Radeon 880M presents a stark contrast, with an average benchmark score of 8436 and a 43rd percentile ranking. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (0.1% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (0.3% behind), both of which are entry-level parts from several generations ago. The PassMark G3D score of 7615 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 31285 indicate a GPU that handles basic graphics tasks but is not designed for modern gaming. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 535 confirms this, suggesting minimal DirectX 12 gaming capability.

The combined percentile of 66 reflects the significant gap between CPU and GPU performance. This is a system where the processor operates at near-desktop levels while the graphics perform at entry-level mobile standards, creating a 46-percentage-point disparity between the two components. The overall picture is of a workstation-class CPU in a laptop chassis, with the GPU serving as a basic display output and light acceleration solution rather than a gaming component.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7845HX compare to desktop CPUs?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46654 puts it within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-13700K, indicating desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor.

Q: What is the Radeon 880M’s performance tier?

A: The GPU sits at the 43rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 8436, placing it between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (0.1% ahead) and the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (0.3% behind).

Q: Can this system handle modern games?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this combination, but the GPU’s low 43rd percentile and PassMark DirectX 12 score of 32 indicate that modern gaming at playable framerates is unlikely beyond very low settings and resolutions.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 26876, and the PassMark multi-thread score is 45010, placing the processor in the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Ryzen 9 7845HX features 64 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 1 MB of L2 cache and 64 KB of L1 cache per core.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 880M has 12 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), though the overall GPU performance is too low for practical ray-traced gaming.

Q: What memory type does this system use?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the GPU uses system-shared memory, making memory performance system-dependent.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a profound imbalance where the CPU overwhelmingly outpaces the GPU. The Ryzen 9 7845HX operates at the 89th percentile, while the Radeon 880M languishes at the 43rd percentile—a 46-point gap that defines this system’s character. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data processing, and 3D rendering, the processor will be the limiting factor only in the sense that it is the component doing the work; the GPU is irrelevant to these tasks. However, in any graphics-oriented workload, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck.

The 3DMark thread scaling data illustrates this asymmetry: the CPU’s 16-thread score of 10068 is 9.4% lower than the max-thread score of 11108, showing good scaling, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 535 is a tiny fraction of what a discrete GPU would achieve. The PassMark GPU compute score of 3719 versus the CPU’s floating-point math score of 94287 shows the massive compute gulf—the CPU is over 25 times faster at FP math than the GPU is at general compute. This means that any workload that can leverage the CPU (rendering, encoding, analysis) will perform well, while any workload that requires GPU acceleration (gaming, CUDA/HIP compute, GPU-accelerated effects) will be severely constrained.

In practical terms, this system will bottleneck on the GPU for gaming at any resolution, with the CPU sitting idle waiting for the integrated graphics to catch up. For productivity, the CPU is the clear workhorse, and the GPU’s role is limited to display output and basic acceleration. The measured FPS data is absent for this pairing, but the benchmark scores indicate that FPS in games would be GPU-limited to the 30-60 range at best on low settings at 720p or 1080p, depending on the title’s optimization.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7845HX uses the AMD Socket FL1 platform, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only). The integrated Radeon 610M is present, but the system pairs it with the discrete Radeon 880M (which is actually an IGP on the Strix Point chip), creating a potential configuration where both IGPs are available. The 880M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 as its bus interface, which is sufficient for an integrated part.

The TDP for the CPU is 55 W, with the GPU rated at 15 W, suggesting a combined thermal envelope of around 70 W. Since the GPU is integrated, there is no discrete GPU power connector or suggested PSU requirement, as this is a laptop build. The upgrade path is limited by the laptop form factor; users cannot swap the GPU or CPU independently in most designs. The sensible next upgrade would be to a system with a discrete GPU, as the CPU’s 89th percentile performance means it has years of useful life ahead, but the GPU’s 43rd percentile will limit it to basic tasks. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 would benefit the shared-memory GPU, potentially improving graphics performance.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets a specific niche: users who need maximum CPU performance in a mobile form factor and do not require gaming or GPU-accelerated work. Software developers will find the 24 threads and 89th percentile CPU ranking ideal for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and analyzing data. The PassMark integer math score of 155118 and data encryption score of 32789 indicate strong performance in security and crypto workloads. Students in computer science or engineering fields would benefit from the CPU’s power, though they may find the GPU limiting for any graphics-heavy coursework.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications—such as audio production, text-based work, or CPU-rendered 3D—would find this system capable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 ensures fast exports, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 16633 supports complex multitasking. However, video editors using GPU-accelerated effects would be disappointed by the 880M’s 43rd percentile performance. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity would rarely stress the CPU, making this overkill for such tasks, but the 89th percentile ensures years of headroom.

The 66th combined percentile places this system in the upper-middle range overall, but the CPU’s 89th percentile is the primary selling point. Users should build this only if they are certain their workloads are CPU-bound; anyone needing graphics performance should look elsewhere.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Ryzen 9 7845HX paired with the Radeon 880M, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Radeon 880M’s 43rd percentile GPU ranking and PassMark DirectX 11 score of 73 (out of a possible scale where higher is better) suggest that modern games will run at low settings with reduced resolutions.

Based on the GPU’s average score of 8436 and its proximity to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, users can expect roughly 30-40 FPS in esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends at 1080p with low settings. For more demanding AAA games, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 32 indicates that 720p with all settings at minimum would be necessary to approach playable framerates, likely in the 20-30 FPS range. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 535 is indicative of a GPU that struggles with modern rendering techniques, including ray tracing, despite the 12 RT cores being present.

The CPU will not be a limiting factor in gaming; the Ryzen 9 7845HX has more than enough headroom for any game, even with the integrated graphics. The bottleneck is entirely the GPU, and users should treat this system as capable of only light or older gaming, not as a primary gaming machine.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX—a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor on the Dragon Range architecture—with the AMD Radeon 880M, an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU on the Strix Point chip. The combined percentile of 66 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds, but this ranking is heavily skewed by the CPU’s exceptional 89th percentile position. The GPU’s 43rd percentile reveals the fundamental imbalance: this is a CPU-first system with a basic graphics solution.

The CPU is a 5 nm part with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die, running at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The 64 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 support (83.2 GB/s) make it a formidable workstation processor. The Radeon 880M, built on a 4 nm process with 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, offers 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2900 MHz and 4.454 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

The system is a clear example of asymmetric hardware pairing. It would serve as an excellent development machine, a capable CPU-rendering workstation, or a high-end productivity laptop, but it is not a gaming system. The 66th combined percentile reflects the strengths of the CPU and the weaknesses of the GPU, making this a specialized build for users who prioritize processor performance above all else.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes. It includes ECC memory support and an unlocked multiplier for enthusiast tuning.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 1988 at 2 threads to 3807 at 4 threads (91.5% scaling), 7140 at 8 threads (87.6% scaling), 10068 at 16 threads (40.5% scaling from 8 threads), and 11108 at max threads (10.3% scaling from 16 threads). This indicates that the 12-core design is efficient up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that. The single-thread 3DMark score of 1025 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1852 demonstrate strong per-core performance, which is essential for lightly threaded applications.

The PassMark results paint a picture of a balanced high-end CPU. The multi-thread score of 45010 and single-thread score of 3935 place it in the top tier, while the integer math score of 155118 and floating-point math score of 94287 show strong arithmetic capabilities. The data compression score of 543539 is particularly notable, indicating excellent performance in archiving, database operations, and storage-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 41020 and find prime numbers score of 329 reflect solid AVX-512 and general math performance.

Compared to rivals, the Ryzen 9 7845HX is effectively tied with the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (0.4% ahead), while slightly behind the Intel Core i7-13700K (0.5% behind) and AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (0.7% behind). This places the mobile CPU on par with high-end desktop parts from the previous generation, making it one of the most powerful mobile processors available. The 89th percentile ranking confirms its position in the top 11% of all CPUs, a remarkable achievement for a laptop chip with a 55 W TDP.