SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and AMD Radeon 860M combination represents a distinctive laptop pairing: a high-end 12-core CPU built for heavy multi-threaded work paired with an integrated GPU that targets modern gaming at modest settings. The data shows a system with a combined performance percentile of 81, indicating it outperforms the majority of laptop configurations in the database, but the specific performance split between the CPU and GPU creates a unique set of capabilities and limitations for potential users.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process node. It belongs to the Dragon Range series, a mobile lineup that prioritizes raw performance. The chip has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a maximum boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache, which is a key factor in its strong multi-threaded performance.

Benchmark scores confirm the CPU's high-tier status. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 26876 points in multi-core and 1852 points in single-core. The multi-core result is particularly telling for workloads like 3D rendering and video encoding, where the 12 cores and 24 threads can be fully utilized. The single-core score, while lower in absolute terms, is still robust for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 89, placing it in the top 11% of all processors tested. Its average benchmark score of 46654 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon w3-2535, which scores 46653 with a 0% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, which scores 46487 with a 0.4% delta. The Intel Core i7-13700K is a close rival, scoring 46881, which is 0.5% higher than the 7845HX. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, which is 0.7% higher. This indicates that the 7845HX competes directly with high-end desktop processors from the previous generation, despite being a mobile part.

In Geekbench, the CPU scores 16633 in multi-core and 2389 in single-core. The multi-core figure reinforces its capability for demanding tasks, while the single-core score is adequate for responsive system operation. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 further confirms the CPU’s strong parallel processing abilities. Specific sub-tests show its character: integer math scores 155118, while floating-point math scores 94287. Data compression performance is exceptional at 543539, and data encryption reaches 32789. The extended instructions score of 41020 suggests solid performance in workloads that leverage modern instruction sets like AVX-512.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU is more than capable of feeding frames for high-refresh displays, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. The Radeon 860M’s estimated performance is not aligned with high-refresh gaming at high detail settings. Users should expect to lower settings and resolutions to achieve playable frame rates, and the data indicates this pairing is not suited for competitive 144Hz+ gaming in modern titles.

Streaming: The 12 cores and 24 threads of the CPU provide ample headroom for software-based encoding while gaming. The strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 suggests that the CPU can handle the encoding load without significantly impacting game performance, which is a significant advantage for streamers using a single-PC setup.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's multi-core might is directly applicable to video rendering and export. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 16633 indicate that timeline scrubbing and final exports will be fast. The GPU, however, will be a bottleneck for effects-heavy timelines or GPU-accelerated encoding, as its integrated nature limits its compute power.

3D Rendering: This is arguably the strongest workload for this pairing. The CPU is the primary engine for CPU-based renderers like those in Blender or Cinema 4D. The 3DMark max threads score of 11108 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 are excellent indicators of rendering performance, placing it in the top tier of mobile processors for this task.

Software Development: Compilation tasks will benefit greatly from the CPU's core count and thread count. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 and the data compression score of 543539 are relevant for large codebases and build processes. The system's memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s also helps in reducing compilation times.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is entirely overqualified for basic tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's single-core performance is sufficient for responsive interface interactions, and the 12 cores ensure that the system remains fluid even with many applications open. The main consideration is the GPU, which is more than adequate for standard productivity workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Krackan Point chip. It is built on a 4 nm process from TSMC. The GPU has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. Its memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's DDR5 memory, with bandwidth that is system dependent.

The GPU features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It also has 8 ray tracing cores, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games, though the overall compute power is limited. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is identical at 3.072 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs well for an iGPU but is not competitive with dedicated graphics cards. In Geekbench, it scores 22759 in OpenCL and 30043 in Vulkan. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 72, meaning it is better than 72% of all GPUs, but this includes many older or entry-level parts. The average benchmark score is 26401.

The nearest rivals paint a clear picture of its performance tier. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, which is 0.1% higher, indicating near-identical performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 26331, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, which is 0.6% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 scores 26683, which is 1.1% higher. This places the 860M in the same performance class as a low-end discrete GPU, which is a significant achievement for an integrated solution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 72nd percentile. This means that in CPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering, software compilation, and data processing, the system will perform exceptionally well, operating at a level comparable to high-end desktop processors.

Conversely, in GPU-intensive workloads like modern gaming at high resolutions and detail settings, the Radeon 860M will be the limiting factor. The CPU will often have significant headroom while the GPU is maxed out, leading to situations where the system's overall performance is capped by the iGPU. The GPU's system-shared memory also means that performance can be affected by system memory speed and capacity, and it shares the same memory bandwidth as the CPU.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this analysis. In lighter or older games, the CPU can push the GPU to its limits, but in demanding titles, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates. The pairing is thus not balanced for gaming but is highly balanced for productivity, where the CPU is the primary driver. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this split, showing that the system is better than average overall but not top-tier in any single discipline.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is intended for users who prioritize heavy multi-threaded CPU performance in a laptop form factor. The primary targets are content creators and professionals who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where the Ryzen 9 7845HX's 12 cores and 24 threads are a significant asset.

3D Artists and Animators will benefit from the CPU's exceptional Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876, which directly translates to faster render times in CPU-based render engines. Video Editors working with high-resolution footage will appreciate the CPU's power for export and encoding, though they will need to rely on the CPU for acceleration rather than the GPU. Software Developers compiling large codebases will see significant time savings thanks to the high PassMark multi-thread score of 45010.

Gamers are not the primary target for this specific pairing. While the CPU is excellent for gaming, the Radeon 860M limits the experience to 1080p gaming with reduced settings. The system is more suited for gamers who also have a heavy productivity workload. Students and office workers would find this system overpowered for their needs, with more performance than required for typical tasks, but it would provide a very smooth experience for multitasking and running virtual machines.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate discussions here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the components.

The gaming performance of this system is dictated almost entirely by the Radeon 860M integrated GPU. Based on its benchmark scores, which place it in the same performance class as entry-level discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, users should have modest expectations.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, League of Legends, or Valorant, the system can likely achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with medium-to-high settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2389) ensures that frame times will be consistent, but the GPU will still be the limiting factor for maximum FPS.

For triple-A games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Mirage, the system will struggle. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is not sufficient for high detail settings at 1080p. Users would need to lower settings to low or medium and potentially use upscaling technologies like FSR to achieve a playable 30-60 FPS. The 8 RT cores are present, but the limited shading power means ray tracing effects will have a significant performance cost.

The CPU will not be a bottleneck in any gaming scenario; it will always have performance to spare. The system is best suited for gamers who play less demanding titles or are willing to make significant compromises in visual fidelity to achieve playable frame rates.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with a significant performance disparity between its two main components.

The CPU is a top-tier performer. Its average benchmark score is 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 26876 points multi-core and 1852 points single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 16633 multi-core and 2389 single-core. The 3DMark scores show strong scaling from 1025 in single-thread to 11108 in max threads, indicating good multi-core efficiency. The PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 confirms its high standing.

The GPU is a competent integrated solution but is far behind the CPU in relative performance. Its average benchmark score is 26401, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. In Geekbench, it scores 22759 in OpenCL and 30043 in Vulkan. These scores are closely matched by the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is a low-end dedicated card.

The combined picture is one of a system built for compute-heavy tasks. The CPU is the star of the show, while the GPU is merely adequate for graphical tasks. The system's combined percentile of 81 reflects the high CPU performance pulling up the overall score, while the GPU's lower percentile prevents it from being a top-tier gaming or graphics workstation.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX mobile processor with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated graphics processor in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a high-end, 12-core part from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture and designed for maximum performance in a mobile chassis. The GPU is a modern integrated solution based on RDNA 3.5, designed to provide a step up from basic integrated graphics.

Overall, this is a high-performance productivity laptop configuration. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking makes it one of the most powerful mobile processors available, suitable for demanding professional workloads. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking means it can handle light gaming and general graphics tasks, but it is not a substitute for a discrete graphics card for high-end gaming. The combined percentile of 81 indicates that this system is better than the majority of laptops, with a clear focus on CPU-centric performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor in this configuration?

A: The processor is the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, a 12-core, 24-thread mobile CPU based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: What is the graphics solution in this configuration?

A: The graphics solution is the AMD Radeon 860M, an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 46654, which is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653) and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (46487). It is slightly behind the Intel Core i7-13700K (46881) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971).

Q: How does the GPU performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401. It is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331). It is slightly behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (26683).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU uses System Shared memory, meaning it draws from the system's main memory (DDR5) and has a bandwidth that is system dependent.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this configuration?

A: No, the data for this specific CPU+GPU combination is not measured. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the component benchmark scores.