SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and AMD Radeon 8050S pairing represents a high-tier laptop configuration, combining a 12-core Zen 4 mobile processor with a modern RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, which shows both components ranking at the 89th percentile within their respective categories. The CPU, a Dragon Range part on AMD Socket FL1, delivers strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU, part of the Strix Halo chip, offers integrated graphics capabilities that rival dedicated mobile solutions. Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is built on the AMD Socket FL1, a mobile-specific socket designed for high-performance laptops. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for workstation-class tasks. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), offering substantial bandwidth for future NVMe storage or external GPU enclosures, though the integrated nature of this laptop build limits physical expansion options.

The CPU’s TDP is rated at 55 W, and the GPU also carries a 55 W TDP, giving a combined thermal budget of 110 W for the core components. This is a moderate power envelope for a high-core-count processor and a modern integrated GPU, suggesting that the system likely relies on efficient cooling solutions rather than massive power delivery. The suggested PSU field is null in the FACT PACK, so no specific power supply recommendation can be made, but the combined 55 W TDP for each component implies a system that can be powered by a typical laptop adapter without requiring exotic power delivery hardware.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to memory capacity and speed as the primary lever. The GPU’s memory is system-shared, meaning its performance scales directly with the system’s DDR5 memory bandwidth and capacity. Upgrading to faster or higher-capacity DDR5 modules could improve both CPU multi-threaded workloads and GPU-bound tasks, as the integrated graphics rely entirely on shared system memory. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU also allows for future attachment of high-speed storage, though the laptop form factor limits user-serviceable upgrades. The platform’s support for ECC memory makes it suitable for error-sensitive workloads, and a user upgrading to ECC DDR5 would align the system with professional applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 62108, with a percentile ranking of 89 against all GPUs, which places it in the upper tier of graphics hardware. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46654, also at the 89th percentile, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component severely outclasses the other.

From the benchmark scores, gaming performance is expected to be strong for 1080p and possibly 1440p gaming, but the integrated nature of the GPU means it shares memory bandwidth with the CPU. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, which suggest it can handle modern titles at medium to high settings at 1080p. The CPU’s single-thread score in Geekbench is 2389, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1852, indicating solid per-core performance that can feed the GPU adequately in most games. However, the lack of dedicated VRAM means that texture-heavy games at higher resolutions may suffer from memory bandwidth contention, as the system-shared memory must serve both CPU and GPU workloads simultaneously.

Given the GPU’s percentile ranking (89) and its proximity to rivals like the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% ahead) and AMD Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% behind), the estimated FPS at ultra settings would likely place this system in the high-60s to low-100s range for esports titles at 1080p, and 40-60 FPS for AAA games at the same resolution. These are estimates, not measurements, and actual performance could vary depending on memory configuration and thermal headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count, and how does that affect multitasking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX has 12 cores and 24 threads, which supports heavy multitasking and parallel workloads. Its PassMark multithread score of 45010 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 indicate strong performance for tasks like video rendering or software compilation.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM, and what does that mean for gaming?

A: No, the AMD Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory, with its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as “System Shared” or “System Dependent.” This means gaming performance is tied to the system’s DDR5 memory speed and capacity, and there is no dedicated video memory to offload graphics data.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, with a die size of 308 mm². It includes 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 ray tracing cores.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46654, which is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653, 0% delta), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (46487), 0.5% behind the Intel Core i7-13700K (46881), and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971). This places it in the same performance class as these desktop processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance, and what does that indicate?

A: The GPU delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is a measure of raw single-precision compute throughput. This is suitable for general rendering and compute tasks, but it is not as high as dedicated high-end desktop GPUs, reflecting its integrated nature.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked, and what does that imply?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, but the laptop form factor and 55 W TDP likely limit overclocking headroom. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high, so manual tuning may yield minimal gains while increasing thermal stress.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, matching the individual percentiles of both the CPU and GPU. This indicates that the pairing is well-balanced, with neither component dragging down the overall performance tier.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need high CPU throughput and respectable integrated graphics without the power draw of a discrete GPU. The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876, make it ideal for content creators working on video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest it can handle light to moderate graphics work, such as photo editing or casual 3D modeling, but it is not suited for heavy GPU compute tasks that would benefit from a discrete solution.

Gamers at 1080p resolution would find this build capable, but those targeting 1440p or 4K gaming would likely need to lower settings or accept lower frame rates, given the system-shared memory. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2389, is sufficient for most gaming titles, but the lack of dedicated VRAM is a limiting factor for texture-heavy games. Students or small business workstations would benefit from the ECC memory support and the 89th percentile CPU performance, which handles spreadsheet analysis, programming, and office productivity with ease. Software developers, in particular, would appreciate the PassMark data compression score of 543539 and integer math score of 155118, which indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46654, placing it at the 89th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon w3-2535, scores 46653, a 0% delta, showing that the Ryzen 9 7845HX is statistically tied with a workstation-class processor. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is 0.4% behind, while the Intel Core i7-13700K is 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is 0.7% ahead. These small deltas indicate that the CPU performs in the same league as these desktop parts, which is impressive for a mobile chip.

In specific tests, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 and a single-core score of 1852, with a Geekbench multicore score of 16633 and single-core score of 2389. The PassMark multithread score is 45010, and the single-thread score is 3935. These numbers show a balanced profile: strong multi-threaded performance for productivity, and adequate single-thread performance for everyday tasks. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 62108, at the 89th percentile against all GPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, scores 61896, a 0.3% delta, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2.5% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is 2.6% ahead. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, and its Vulkan score is 58398, indicating strong compute performance for an integrated solution.

The combined percentile of 89 mirrors the individual scores, suggesting that this pairing is well-matched. The CPU’s 89th percentile and the GPU’s 89th percentile mean that neither component is a clear bottleneck in most workloads, though the GPU’s system-shared memory could become a limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a Strix Halo chip, built on RDNA 3.5 architecture with a 4 nm process from TSMC, and a die size of 308 mm². It operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, with a pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is also 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating that it does not have specialized FP16 acceleration. It includes 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores, though it has no tensor cores listed.

The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM size, type, or bus width. The bandwidth is system-dependent, meaning performance scales with the host system’s DDR5 memory. This is a significant factor for rendering workloads: while the GPU’s compute capabilities are solid for an integrated part, the lack of dedicated memory means that large textures or complex scenes will rely on system memory bandwidth, which is shared with the CPU. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs.

In benchmark terms, the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and Vulkan score of 58398 are strong, placing it at the 89th percentile. Its average score of 62108 is only 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, a workstation GPU, which suggests that the Radeon 8050S can handle professional rendering tasks, albeit with the caveat of shared memory. The 32 ray tracing cores indicate some hardware support for ray-traced effects, but the actual performance will be constrained by the integrated memory bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing, with both the CPU and GPU at the 89th percentile. In CPU-heavy workloads, such as multi-threaded rendering or compilation, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 and Geekbench multicore score of 16633 indicate it can sustain high throughput, and the GPU is unlikely to bottleneck these tasks. Conversely, in GPU-heavy workloads like gaming or graphics rendering, the CPU’s single-thread score of 2389 in Geekbench is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s system-shared memory could become the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling is estimated, not measured, so precise bottleneck analysis is speculative. However, the GPU’s performance relative to rivals, such as being 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, suggests that in gaming, the GPU is the primary constraint for frame rates, especially at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth demands increase. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 543539) or integer math (155118), the CPU is clearly the workhorse, and the GPU plays a minimal role. The combined percentile of 89 indicates that neither component falls significantly below the other, but the integrated GPU’s lack of dedicated memory is a structural bottleneck for graphics-intensive applications.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX processor with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread part from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture (Dragon Range), while the GPU is a Strix Halo chip using RDNA 3.5. The combined percentile is 89, placing this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, but not at the absolute top. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 46654 and the GPU’s average score of 62108 both sit at the 89th percentile, suggesting a cohesive performance envelope.

The build class is laptop, and the integrated nature of the GPU means that this is not a gaming laptop with a discrete graphics card, but rather a high-performance workstation or content-creation laptop with capable integrated graphics. The CPU’s 55 W TDP and the GPU’s 55 W TDP combine for a 110 W thermal envelope, which is manageable for a larger laptop chassis. The overall tier, based on the 89th percentile, is high-end, but the lack of a discrete GPU and the system-shared memory are notable limitations for gaming and heavy graphics workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 13,140 million transistors spread across a dual-chiplet design of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 3.00 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and ECC support, and it has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, plus 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 26876, and its Geekbench multicore score is 16633, with a PassMark multithread score of 45010. These numbers are competitive with desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-13700K, which is only 0.5% ahead in average benchmark score. The single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1852 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2389, though it trails some desktop parts in this regard. The PassMark integer math score of 155118 and floating-point math score of 94287 indicate strong compute capability for scientific or financial workloads, while the data encryption score of 32789 and data compression score of 543539 highlight its utility in security and data-heavy tasks.

The CPU’s production status is active, and it was released in early 2023, making it a mature platform. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, but the mobile form factor and 55 W TDP limit practical headroom. For real workloads, this CPU is best suited for multi-threaded applications like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where its core count and high L3 cache provide a significant advantage.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination can likely push high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles, given the CPU’s single-thread score of 2389 and the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking. However, the system-shared memory may cause frame drops in demanding scenes, and 1440p gaming would require reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 providing ample headroom for software encoding. The GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can assist with graphics rendering, though streaming overhead may impact frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 45010 and Geekbench multicore score of 16633 support smooth timeline scrubbing and faster exports. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818 aids in effects processing, but the shared memory may limit 4K editing with multiple layers.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 provides strong CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 can accelerate GPU rendering in compatible software. The lack of dedicated VRAM is a limitation for large scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s data compression score of 543539 and integer math score of 155118 indicate fast code compilation and data processing. The 12 cores and 24 threads allow for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3935 in PassMark ensures responsive general use, and the 12 cores handle multitasking effortlessly. The integrated GPU is sufficient for office applications and web browsing, with no dedicated graphics needed for these tasks.