SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + AMD Radeon 740M

This pairing combines a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 mobile processor with a 256-shader RDNA 3.0 integrated graphics solution in a laptop platform. The CPU is a high-end Dragon Range part with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 64 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU is a modest IGP that shares system memory. The combined percentile rank of 71 places this build above the majority of tested configurations, but the performance profile is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound work, with the integrated graphics representing a clear secondary element.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance distribution in this build is strongly asymmetric. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU ranks at the 53rd percentile among all tested graphics cards. This 36-point gap indicates that the processor is the dominant component, and for any workload that engages both units, the Radeon 740M will be the limiting factor. Benchmark results confirm this imbalance: the CPU's average benchmark score of 46654 dwarfs the GPU's average of 12870, a ratio of roughly 3.6-to-1 in raw compute output.

Thread scaling data from the CPU benchmarks illustrates where the bottleneck shifts. The 3DMark suite shows a progression from 1988 with 2 threads to 11108 with max threads, a 5.6x increase. The jump from 8 threads (7140) to 16 threads (10068) represents a 41% improvement, while the jump from 16 to max threads (11108) adds only 10.3%, indicating that the 12-core, 24-thread configuration begins to saturate around 16 threads for this particular test. This suggests the CPU itself is not the bottleneck in heavily threaded workloads; rather, the GPU becomes the constraint in any graphics-intensive scenario.

The FPS scaling picture is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so frame rate expectations must be derived from the benchmark scores. Given the GPU's 53rd percentile rank and its 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, the integrated graphics will cap performance well below what the CPU could otherwise drive. For gaming, the bottleneck is unequivocally the Radeon 740M, while for productivity tasks such as compilation, rendering, or data processing, the CPU's 89th percentile standing means the processor is rarely the constraint.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a consistent pattern of strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 1852 in single-core and 26876 in multi-core, a multi-thread scaling factor of 14.5x from the single-core result, which is impressive for a 12-core part. Geekbench results follow a similar trajectory: 2389 single-core and 16633 multi-core. The 3DMark tests span from 1025 in single-thread to 11108 in max threads, with intermediate scores of 3807 (4 threads), 7140 (8 threads), and 10068 (16 threads).

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's capabilities. The multi-thread score of 45010 and single-thread score of 3935 are complemented by specialized tests: integer math at 155118, floating-point math at 94287, extended instructions at 41020, and data compression at 543539. The processor's average benchmark score of 46654 places it at the 89th percentile, and the nearest rivals are tightly clustered. The Intel Xeon w3-2535 matches at 46653 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X scores 46487 (0.4% behind), the Intel Core i7-13700K scores 46881 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971 (0.7% ahead). This grouping indicates the 7845HX is competitive with desktop-class processors from the previous generation.

The GPU's benchmarks are far more modest. Geekbench OpenCL yields 10172, while Vulkan yields 15568, producing an average benchmark score of 12870. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (12847, 0.2% behind), AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12831, 0.3% behind), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12830, 0.3% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 580 (12928, 0.4% ahead). These deltas, all under half a percent, place the Radeon 740M in a performance tier comparable to older discrete graphics cards, not modern gaming GPUs.

The combined picture is a system that excels at processor-intensive tasks but falls short in graphics-heavy applications. The CPU's 89th percentile rank means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, while the GPU's 53rd percentile rank is essentially median. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level integrated GPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die size is 2x 71 mm², containing 13,140 million transistors. Base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 is 14.5x the single-core score of 1852, indicating excellent utilization of the 12 cores. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10068 is 90.6% of the max-thread score of 11108, meaning the processor is nearly fully utilized at 16 threads and gains only another 10.3% when all 24 threads are active. This suggests that for most real-world multi-threaded workloads, the 7845HX delivers near-peak performance without requiring all threads.

The PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 places the processor in the upper echelon, and the specialized scores indicate strong performance in specific workloads. Integer math at 155118 and floating-point math at 94287 show balanced arithmetic capability. Data compression at 543539 is particularly strong, suggesting good performance in archiving and database workloads. The single-thread score of 3935 is competitive, though the 3DMark single-thread score of 1025 is relatively modest; this is likely due to the test's sensitivity to memory latency and other factors.

Real-world implications: the 7845HX can handle heavy compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing with ease. Its 89th percentile rank means it outperforms roughly 89% of all processors in the benchmark database, and its proximity to desktop-class rivals like the Ryzen 9 3900X and Core i7-13700K indicates that mobile users are not sacrificing much compute power for portability.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7845HX compare to the Intel Core i7-13700K?

A: The two processors are nearly identical in average benchmark score. The 7845HX scores 46654, while the i7-13700K scores 46881, a delta of 0.5% in favor of the Intel part.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Radeon 740M sits at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 12870. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590, with performance deltas under 0.4%.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported. The processor uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 4 nm process. Both are produced by TSMC.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-thread performance scale?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 is 14.5x the single-core score of 1852. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10068 is 90.6% of the max-thread score of 11108, indicating near-saturation at 16 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5. The GPU's memory bandwidth is system-dependent since it uses shared system memory.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on supported platforms.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 12870 and 53rd percentile rank suggest that gaming performance will be modest, roughly comparable to older discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 or AMD Radeon RX 580, based on deltaPct values of 0.3% and -0.4%, respectively.

The Radeon 740M's 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 256 shading units indicate it is designed for light gaming rather than high-refresh or high-resolution play. At 1080p with low to medium settings, esports titles and older games should be playable, but modern AAA games will likely require significant settings reductions to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1852 in Cinebench R23) will help in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will cap overall FPS in graphics-intensive scenes.

Given the GPU's 53rd percentile rank, users should expect roughly median performance among all GPUs. The 8 ROPs and 44.80 GTexel/s texture rate are low figures that will limit fill-rate-dependent scenarios. For competitive esports at 1080p, frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range are plausible estimates for titles like CS:GO or Valorant, but these are estimates and not measured values.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, chip codename Phoenix2, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The chip contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The GPU has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with 4 RT cores. Base clock is 800 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. Memory is system-shared, with type, bus width, and bandwidth all system-dependent.

The GPU's compute capabilities are limited: FP32 performance is 2.867 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has a TDP of 45 W. Display outputs are motherboard-dependent, and power connectors are none.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is adequate for basic graphics tasks but not for demanding workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568 produce an average of 12870, placing it at the 53rd percentile. The nearest rivals are all older discrete GPUs: the FirePro W5100, Radeon Pro 455, GTX 590, and RX 580, with performance deltas all under 0.5%. For rendering, the 4 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low shading unit count and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will limit ray-traced performance significantly.

The GPU's 4 nm process is more advanced than the CPU's 5 nm process, but the architectural focus is on efficiency rather than raw performance. The 256 shading units are a fraction of what modern discrete GPUs offer, and the 8 ROPs are a severe constraint for high-resolution rendering. The system-shared memory architecture means performance is also dependent on the CPU's DDR5 memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which is far below what discrete GPUs with dedicated VRAM achieve.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suited for users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive rather than graphics-intensive. The Ryzen 9 7845HX's 89th percentile rank and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 make it ideal for content creators who render video or 3D scenes, software developers compiling large codebases, and data analysts running compute-heavy scripts. The GPU's 53rd percentile rank means it is sufficient for basic display output and light graphics acceleration, but not for serious gaming or GPU compute.

Students and professionals who need a laptop with strong processor performance for academic or business workloads will find the 7845HX capable. The 12 cores and 24 threads handle multitasking well, and the 64 MB L3 cache aids in data-heavy applications. Small business workstations that run database queries, spreadsheet analysis, or virtualization can benefit from the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 and data compression score of 543539.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless their library consists of older or less demanding titles. The Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile rank places it in the median tier, and its nearest rivals are all older discrete GPUs. For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, a dedicated GPU is necessary. However, for users who occasionally play light games or emulators, the integrated GPU is adequate, and the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1852 in Cinebench R23) helps in CPU-bound game scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. The socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for future expansion, though the integrated GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is the current connection.

The GPU is an integrated part with a TDP of 45 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W. No suggested PSU is provided, but the combined power draw is modest for a laptop platform. There are no power connectors for the GPU, and the slot width is IGP, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard. A sensible next upgrade would be adding a discrete GPU via external GPU enclosure or selecting a laptop variant with a dedicated graphics card, since the CPU can clearly drive a much more powerful GPU without bottlenecking.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking on supported platforms, and its 5.20 GHz boost clock already provides high single-thread performance. Memory upgrades are possible within the DDR5 standard, and the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most workloads. The platform's active production status means drivers and BIOS updates should continue, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for high-speed storage and expansion.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining a high-end AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX processor with a mid-tier AMD Radeon 740M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 part from the 7000 series, based on the Dragon Range architecture, while the GPU is a 256-shader RDNA 3.0 IGP from the Phoenix family. The combined percentile rank is 71, indicating the system outperforms 71% of tested configurations.

The performance profile is dominated by the CPU, which ranks at the 89th percentile among all processors. Its average benchmark score of 46654 is competitive with desktop-class CPUs like the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. The GPU ranks at the 53rd percentile with an average score of 12870, placing it in the median tier of graphics cards. The overall tier is best described as a processor-first system where the GPU is a secondary consideration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile rank and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will not sustain high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. Estimated performance is comparable to the GTX 590 or RX 580, both of which are outdated for high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads handle encoding well, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26876. However, the GPU's limited performance will constrain game capture at high quality, making this a marginal scenario.

Video editing: The CPU excels at this workload. The 3DMark max-thread score of 11108 and PassMark multi-thread score of 45010 indicate strong rendering and export performance. The GPU will accelerate some effects but is not a primary driver.

3D rendering: Excellent CPU performance with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26876, placing it near desktop-class rivals. The GPU's 4 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low shading unit count limits complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU's high integer math score of 155118 and data compression score of 543539 speed up compilation and build times. The 89th percentile rank means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in this use case.

Student and office work: Overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU handles multitasking effortlessly. The 64 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth ensure smooth operation in spreadsheet, document, and browser workloads. The integrated GPU is sufficient for display output and light graphical tasks.