SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

25,284 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It belongs to the 6000 series and uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt. The chip has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that positions it for thin-and-light gaming laptops and high-performance ultrabooks. The CPU sits in AMD Socket FP7 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mobile part: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a fallback display output, though this system pairs the CPU with a discrete NVIDIA GPU. The processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is ample for a mobile discrete GPU and NVMe storage. The die measures 208 mm², and ECC memory is not supported.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales predictably with thread count. The 3DMark single-thread score is 915, while the 2-thread score is 1761, the 4-thread score is 3427, the 8-thread score is 5830, and the max-thread score is 6955. The near-linear scaling from 2 to 4 threads (1761 to 3427) and from 8 to max threads (5830 to 6955) indicates that the 16 threads are efficiently utilized. The 16-thread score of 6963 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 6955, suggesting the processor is fully saturated at 16 threads with no thermal throttling in the benchmark environment.

Cinebench R23 scores of 13445 multi-core and 1554 single-core place this CPU in a competitive position for mobile productivity. The single-core R23 score of 1554 is respectable for a 35 W part, and the multi-core result demonstrates that the 8-core configuration with 16 threads can handle heavily threaded workloads without significant degradation. Geekbench scores of 9451 multi-core and 1733 single-core corroborate the Cinebench results. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23152 and single-thread score of 3237 further confirm the balanced performance profile.

The CPU's 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the benchmark database. The average benchmark score of 25284 puts it in the same class as the Intel Core i5-13400F (avg score 25292, delta 0%), the Intel Core 5 120 (avg score 25362, delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (avg score 25365, delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (avg score 25201, delta 0.3%). This is a tight cluster where the 6900HS trades blows with desktop-class mid-range parts and its own sibling, the 6800H. The 6800H is within 0.3% of the 6900HS, meaning the performance difference between these two mobile chips is negligible in aggregate benchmarks.

PassMark sub-tests reveal specific workload characteristics. Integer math scores 86449, floating-point math scores 48239, and extended instructions score 20015. Data encryption scores 18303, data compression scores 292842, and random string sorting scores 30528. Physics scores 1041, and prime number finding scores 58. These numbers indicate a processor that is strong in integer-heavy tasks like compilation and data processing, while floating-point performance is adequate but not exceptional for a mobile part.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25284 places it at the 77th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 29928 places it at the 75th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76th, which reflects a balanced system where neither component dramatically outperforms the other. The data shows a laptop-class platform that sits in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database.

For the CPU specifically, the 3DMark thread scaling results are instructive. The single-thread score of 915 is a baseline for lightly threaded workloads, but the jump to 3427 at 4 threads and 5830 at 8 threads shows strong multi-core scaling. The max-thread score of 6955 is 7.6 times the single-thread score, which is close to the theoretical maximum for 8 cores with SMT. This suggests the Zen 3+ architecture extracts nearly all available performance from its 8 cores under sustained load.

The GPU benchmarks show a different picture. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 indicate strong compute performance. The PassMark G3D score of 20355 and GPU compute score of 8279 round out the picture. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29928 places it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (avg score 29945, delta -0.1%) and 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti (avg score 29783, delta 0.5%). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6800 by 0.6% (avg score 30095) and the RX 6700 by 1.7% (avg score 30433). These are desktop-class GPUs, so the RTX 5070 Mobile matching them in aggregate benchmarks is notable.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussion must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed results. The CPU and GPU scores individually suggest a system capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p and likely playable frame rates at 1440p, but these are inferences from the percentile rankings and aggregate scores, not measured data.

The combined 76th percentile indicates a system that outperforms the majority of laptops in the database, but it is not at the extreme top tier. The CPU's 77th and GPU's 75th percentiles are closely matched, which is unusual for mobile platforms where one component often dominates the other. This alignment suggests the system is well-balanced for a wide range of workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a 50-series mobile GPU built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 21,900 million transistors across 181 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 907 MHz with a boost clock of 1425 MHz, and memory runs at 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed.

The RT and tensor core configurations are substantial: 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. This hardware enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features such as DLSS. The pixel rate is 68.40 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 205.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 13.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 13.13 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The GPU TDP is 50 W, which is low enough for the slot width to be classified as IGP, meaning it can be integrated into a laptop motherboard without a separate power connector. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, and display outputs are portable device dependent.

The PassMark DirectX scores show an interesting pattern. DirectX 9 scores 214, DirectX 10 scores 129, DirectX 11 scores 192, and DirectX 12 scores 93. The lower DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 is unusual and may reflect driver maturity or specific workload characteristics in the benchmark. The G2D score of 896 is modest, but the G3D score of 20355 is the headline number. The GPU compute score of 8279 indicates solid compute throughput for non-graphics tasks.

The GPU's 75th percentile ranking places it in the upper tier of the database. Its nearest rivals are all desktop GPUs: the RTX 3070 Ti at 0.1% ahead, the RTX 2080 Ti at 0.5% behind, the RX 6800 at 0.6% behind, and the RX 6700 at 1.7% behind. Matching or exceeding these desktop parts in aggregate benchmarks is a strong result for a 50 W mobile GPU. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for current games at 1080p and 1440p, though the 128-bit bus width and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy workloads.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 show that the GPU is capable in compute-heavy applications. The Vulkan score being close to the OpenCL score suggests consistent performance across different API levels. For rendering workloads, the 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the RT core count of 36 indicate that the GPU can handle real-time ray tracing, though the 50 W TDP will limit sustained performance compared to higher-power desktop counterparts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 75th percentile are nearly identical, which indicates a well-balanced pairing for most workloads. The combined percentile of 76th reinforces this assessment. In CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or data compression, the 6900HS will be the determining factor. In GPU-bound tasks like rasterization or ray tracing, the RTX 5070 Mobile will set the performance ceiling.

The PassMark physics score of 1041 for the CPU is modest, which could bottleneck games with heavy physics simulation. However, the CPU's integer math score of 86449 and floating-point score of 48239 indicate strong general compute capability. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20355 is the dominant number for gaming performance, and it is roughly 2.5 times the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 23152, suggesting that the GPU is the primary driver for gaming frame rates.

The 3DMark thread scaling data shows that the CPU has a single-thread score of 915 and a max-thread score of 6955. This 7.6x scaling factor from 1 to 16 threads means that the CPU is efficient at parallelizing workloads, but games that rely heavily on single-thread performance may not fully utilize the processor. The single-thread R23 score of 1554 and single-thread Geekbench score of 1733 are adequate for modern games, but they are not class-leading.

For FPS scaling, since no measured FPS data exists, estimates must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 75th percentile suggest that at 1080p, the GPU will likely be the primary limiter in graphically intensive games, while at lower resolutions or with lower graphics settings, the CPU's single-thread performance may become the constraint. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely be the limiting factor in texture-heavy titles. The 16 GB of combined memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s CPU, 384.0 GB/s GPU) indicates the system can feed data to both components without obvious starvation.

The tight deltaPct values among the CPU's nearest rivals (all within 0.3% of each other) and the GPU's nearest rivals (all within 1.7%) mean that the system's performance tier is well-established. The CPU and GPU are both in the mid-to-upper percentile range, and neither component is dramatically stronger than the other, which minimizes the risk of one component bottlenecking the other in most workloads.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is suited for gamers who want high-refresh 1080p performance or playable 1440p frame rates in a laptop form factor. The GPU's 75th percentile ranking and its equivalence to desktop GPUs like the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti mean that it can handle modern titles at high settings. The CPU's 77th percentile ensures that it will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the 8-core, 16-thread CPU and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13445 and Geekbench multi-core score of 9451 indicate strong productivity performance. The GPU's OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 show that it can accelerate rendering and compute workloads. The PassMark data compression score of 292842 and integer math score of 86449 are relevant for developers who compile code or process large datasets.

Students and professionals who need a portable workstation for office tasks, web development, or light programming will find the 35 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP suitable for battery-powered use. The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 75th percentile mean that this system outperforms the majority of laptops in the database, making it a capable all-rounder. Small business workstations that require moderate compute power for data analysis, financial modeling, or CAD software will find the combination sufficient, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit the largest datasets.

The system is not ideal for users who need maximum multi-threaded performance, as the CPU's 77th percentile is solid but not top-tier. Similarly, users who require more than 8 GB of VRAM for AI training or high-resolution texture work should look elsewhere. The 50 W GPU TDP also means that sustained gaming sessions will likely see clock speeds settle below the 1425 MHz boost clock, which could reduce performance over time.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 915 in 3DMark single-thread, 1554 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1733 in Geekbench single-core, and 3237 in PassMark single-thread.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 29928 is within 0.1% of the RTX 3070 Ti, 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, 0.6% behind the RX 6800, and 1.7% behind the RX 6700.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile is 76th, with the CPU at 77th and the GPU at 75th.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What are the CPU's cache specifications?

A: The CPU has 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 5070 Mobile. The system is a laptop (buildClass: laptop), so upgrades are limited to what the OEM allows, typically RAM and storage.

The CPU TDP is 35 W and the GPU TDP is 50 W, giving a combined 85 W for the two primary components. The suggested PSU field is null for the GPU, but the low TDPs mean that the laptop's power adapter will be sized for the total system draw. The slot width for the GPU is IGP, which means it is integrated into the motherboard rather than being a replaceable MXM module. This further limits upgrade potential.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the CPU and GPU are closely matched at the 77th and 75th percentiles respectively. If a user wanted to improve gaming performance, the GPU would be the target, but since it is integrated at the IGP level, the only realistic upgrade path is a new laptop. Similarly, the CPU's socket FP7 is not shared with any desktop platform, so there is no cross-platform upgrade path. The memory support for DDR5 is current, and the PCIe Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for the fastest NVMe SSDs available. The platform will remain viable for several years, but any meaningful performance increase would require a full system replacement.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile in a laptop form factor. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3+ part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 mobile part with a 50 W TDP. The combined percentile of 76th places this system in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database, with the CPU at 77th and the GPU at 75th.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25284 is effectively tied with the Intel Core i5-13400F, Intel Core 5 120, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, all within 0.3% of each other. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29928 is within 1.7% of the RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 2080 Ti, RX 6800, and RX 6700. This is a laptop system that delivers desktop-class performance in a portable form factor, with the caveat that the 50 W GPU TDP will limit sustained performance compared to desktop counterparts.

The system's class is laptop, and the overall tier is upper-middle based on the 76th combined percentile. The CPU and GPU are well-matched, with no single component significantly outperforming the other. This makes the system versatile for a range of workloads, from gaming to content creation to software development. The lack of measured FPS data means that real-world gaming performance cannot be precisely quantified from the FACT PACK, but the benchmark scores indicate a system capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and playable 1440p performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 75th percentile and its proximity to the RTX 3070 Ti (0.1% difference) suggest strong 1080p performance. The CPU's 77th percentile ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. Estimated frame rates at 1080p should be high, though the 50 W GPU TDP may cause clock speeds to drop during sustained sessions.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 144 tensor cores support hardware-accelerated encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23152 and the GPU's compute score of 8279 indicate that the system can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit the game's texture settings while streaming.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13445 and Geekbench multi-core score of 9451 provide strong CPU performance for rendering timelines. The GPU's OpenCL score of 122238 accelerates effects and exports. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing projects, though 4K timelines with heavy effects may exceed it.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 36 RT cores support real-time ray tracing in supported applications. The CPU's 16 threads handle CPU-based rendering tasks. The 50 W TDP will limit render times compared to desktop GPUs, but the system is capable for small to medium projects.

Software Development: The CPU's integer math score of 86449 and data compression score of 292842 indicate strong performance for compilation and data processing. The PassMark extended instructions score of 20015 supports modern instruction sets. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 75th percentile mean that the system is overkill for basic office tasks, but it provides headroom for more demanding academic workloads like data analysis or CAD. The 35 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP contribute to battery life, making it a practical daily driver.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds