SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

25,284 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S presents an intriguing balance of compute resources, with the data revealing a system where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in most workloads, though the GPU holds a slight edge in overall benchmark standing. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU achieves the 89th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined system lands at the 83rd percentile. This 12-point gap in percentile positions suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios, the Radeon 8050S will be the primary performance driver, while the CPU remains a capable partner that rarely becomes the limiting factor in real-world applications.

Examining the CPU's threading scaling provides insight into workload distribution. The 3DMark scores show a progression from 915 in single-thread to 1,761 in 2-thread, 3,427 in 4-thread, 5,830 in 8-thread, and 6,955 at max threads. The scaling from 8 threads to 16 threads is modest—only about 19% improvement—indicating that the 8-core, 16-thread configuration hits diminishing returns beyond eight active threads. This suggests that applications optimized for 8 cores or fewer will extract nearly all available performance, while heavily threaded workloads see only incremental gains. The CPU's percentile ranking of 77 aligns with this interpretation: it is a solidly mid-to-upper-tier mobile processor, not a workstation-class monster, but far from a bottleneck for most gaming and content creation tasks.

The GPU's benchmark scores—65,818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58,398 in Vulkan—place it comfortably ahead of the CPU's capabilities. The deltaPct comparisons show the Radeon 8050S trailing the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by just 2.7%, a negligible difference that places this integrated graphics solution within striking distance of dedicated mobile GPUs. The nearest rival, the Radeon Pro W6600M, is only 0.3% behind, indicating that the 8050S delivers workstation-class compute performance. For gaming, the bottleneck analysis points to the CPU's single-thread performance as the more constrained resource: a 3DMark single-thread score of 915 is modest, and in titles that rely heavily on single-core performance, the CPU could limit frame rates before the GPU reaches its ceiling.

Memory bandwidth is another factor in the balance equation. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, while the GPU's memory is system-shared and its bandwidth is system-dependent. This shared memory architecture means the GPU competes with the CPU for memory resources, potentially creating contention in memory-intensive workloads. The 35W TDP of the CPU combined with the 55W TDP of the GPU indicates a power envelope of roughly 90W for the compute components, which is modest for a laptop and suggests thermal headroom is adequate for sustained loads without aggressive throttling.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and Vulkan score of 58,398 suggest strong potential for 1080p high-refresh gaming, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates. The CPU's 4.9 GHz boost clock and 3,237 PassMark single-thread score provide sufficient headroom for most esports titles at high refresh rates, though the modest 915 single-thread 3DMark score could limit performance in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a PassMark multithread score of 23,152 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,445 provides ample parallel resources for encoding while gaming. The GPU's 32 RT cores and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance can offload encoding tasks, and the RDNA 3.5 architecture supports modern media engines, making simultaneous gaming and streaming feasible without severe frame rate penalties.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,445 and Geekbench multicore score of 9,451 indicate solid performance for timeline editing and export tasks. The GPU's OpenCL score of 65,818 accelerates effects rendering and color grading. The 16 MB shared L3 cache aids in handling large media files, though the system-shared memory architecture means total RAM capacity is a consideration for serious editing workloads.

3D Rendering: The combination of 8 cores with 16 threads and a GPU offering 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance creates a capable rendering rig for laptop use. The CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 48,239 and the GPU's compute scores suggest render times that are respectable for a mobile platform, though not competitive with high-end desktop workstations. The 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for compatible renderers.

Software Development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 86,449 and data compression score of 292,842 indicate strong performance for compilation and code analysis tasks. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 4.9 GHz boost clock accelerates single-threaded tooling. The data encryption score of 18,303 provides hardware-accelerated security operations, benefiting tasks like secure development pipelines.

Student and Office Work: The 77th percentile CPU ranking and 89th percentile GPU ranking make this system significantly overqualified for productivity applications. PassMark single-thread score of 3,237 ensures responsive application use, while the integrated Radeon 680M graphics (the CPU's iGPU) provides a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially extending battery life in light workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP7, a mobile-specific socket that offers limited upgradeability by design. The CPU is a 6 nm TSMC part, and the GPU is a 4 nm TSMC part, both representing current-generation manufacturing processes. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16. This PCIe 5.0 connection ensures the GPU has ample bandwidth for its system-shared memory architecture, which is critical because the GPU's memory bandwidth is system-dependent.

The power delivery situation is straightforward: the CPU's 35W TDP and the GPU's 55W TDP combine for a modest 90W of compute power, and the GPU has no power connectors, relying entirely on the system's power delivery. The suggested PSU field is null, which is expected for a laptop-class component, but the low power draw means this system can operate with a relatively compact power adapter. For upgrades, the primary lever is memory: increasing system RAM directly increases the GPU's available memory, since the GPU uses system-shared memory. A sensible next upgrade would be maximizing DDR5 capacity and speed to improve both CPU and GPU performance, particularly for memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

The socket being FP7 means the CPU is soldered or otherwise non-upgradeable in most laptop implementations. The GPU is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a slot width of "IGP," confirming it is not a discrete, replaceable component. Thus, the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage, with the platform's longevity depending on whether the system's cooling and power delivery can accommodate future components—though with the CPU and GPU both being active production parts, the platform is current. The CPU's integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a secondary display output capability, which could be useful for multi-monitor setups without burdening the main GPU.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a laptop that can handle both demanding GPU workloads and substantial CPU compute without compromising on portability. The 83rd combined percentile places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, suitable for gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with high settings, given the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and the CPU's 4.9 GHz boost clock for responsive gameplay. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or graphic design will find the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,445) combined with the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 RT cores sufficient for professional-grade work.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's high integer math score (86,449) and data compression score (292,842), which accelerate compilation and data processing tasks. Students in engineering, computer science, or digital arts programs will find the system overqualified for coursework but future-proof for advanced projects. Small business workstations that require reliability and consistent performance for tasks like data analysis, financial modeling, or light CAD work would be well-served by this configuration, given the CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the GPU's compute capabilities that rival dedicated mobile workstation GPUs (the Radeon Pro W6600M is within 0.3% of the 8050S's score).

The laptop form factor (build class is laptop) means this is not a system for desktop builders but rather for those purchasing a pre-configured portable workstation. The 4 nm GPU process node and 6 nm CPU process node indicate a modern, power-efficient design that suits mobile use where battery life and thermal management are priorities. The 55W GPU TDP is modest for the performance level, making this an excellent choice for users who need sustained performance without the bulk and noise of larger gaming laptops.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25,284, placing it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-13400F scores 25,292 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 scores 25,362 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D scores 25,365 (-0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25,201 (+0.3% delta). This indicates the 6900HS is essentially performance-equivalent to these desktop and mobile competitors, with less than a 1% spread across all four. The CPU's key benchmark results include a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,445 and single-core score of 1,554, a Geekbench multicore score of 9,451 and single-core score of 1,733, and a PassMark multithread score of 23,152 with a single-thread score of 3,237.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 62,108, placing it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61,896 (+0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63,693 (-2.5% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63,775 (-2.6% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63,830 (-2.7% delta). The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 65,818 and Vulkan score is 58,398. The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is comparatively stronger than the CPU relative to their respective markets—the GPU outperforms its nearest rivals by a wider margin than the CPU does, and the GPU's percentile (89) exceeds the CPU's (77) by a significant margin.

The combined percentile of 83 reflects the system's overall position, balancing the CPU's mid-upper-tier placement with the GPU's upper-tier placement. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance must be inferred from these benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU's 3DMark scores show strong scaling from single-thread (915) to 8-thread (5,830) with only modest gains to max threads (6,955), while the GPU's compute scores suggest it can handle modern game rendering workloads efficiently.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation, fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 308 mm². It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster output units, and 32 ray tracing cores, with a base clock of 1,295 MHz and a boost clock of 2,800 MHz. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s, delivering 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance with FP16 at 1:1 ratio (also 11.47 TFLOPS). The GPU's memory is system-shared with system-dependent bandwidth, meaning its performance is intrinsically linked to the system's DDR5 memory configuration.

The GPU's benchmark scores—65,818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58,398 in Vulkan—indicate strong compute performance for an integrated solution. The 89th percentile ranking places it above many dedicated mobile GPUs, and its nearest rival comparisons confirm this: it outperforms the Radeon Pro W6600M by 0.3% and comes within 2.7% of the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP. For rendering workloads, the 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is increasingly important for both gaming and professional 3D applications. The 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance is significant for compute-heavy tasks like video processing, scientific simulations, and machine learning inference (the tensor cores field is null, but the FP16 performance at 11.47 TFLOPS indicates capable half-precision computation).

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs. The PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface provides ample bandwidth for the system-shared memory architecture, and the 55W TDP is remarkably efficient for the performance level. The GPU's release date is January 5, 2025, and its predecessor is Polaris Mobile. The 4 nm process node and 308 mm² die size indicate a substantial integrated GPU, which is consistent with its performance class. For rendering, the combination of 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs with a boost clock of 2,800 MHz suggests strong fill-rate performance, which translates to good rasterization throughput in games and efficient texture-heavy workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the pairRankByFps is null, so there are no direct frame rate measurements for this CPU+GPU pairing. Consequently, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and the CPU's 77th percentile ranking provide the basis for these estimates.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, the Radeon 8050S should deliver high frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings in most titles. The Vulkan score of 58,398 and OpenCL score of 65,818 are strong indicators of raw graphics compute, and the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests the GPU can handle modern game rendering workloads without significant compromises. The 32 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though the performance impact of ray tracing at higher resolutions may be noticeable given the system-shared memory bandwidth constraints.

The CPU's gaming-relevant performance comes from its single-thread capabilities: a 3DMark single-thread score of 915 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,237, with a boost clock of 4.9 GHz. These numbers suggest the CPU can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios, though CPU-bound titles that rely heavily on single-core performance may see frame rate limitations. The 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming, and the 16 MB shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency. For esports titles that favor high frame rates, the combination should support 144Hz+ refresh rates at 1080p with competitive settings, while AAA titles at 1440p may require settings adjustments to maintain high frame rates. The system-shared memory architecture means the amount and speed of system RAM will directly impact gaming performance, with faster DDR5 providing better GPU memory bandwidth.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU system?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing it in the upper tier of laptop configurations. The CPU is at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU is at the 89th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 6900HS compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 25,284, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-13400F (25,292, 0% delta), Intel Core 5 120 (25,362, -0.3%), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25,365, -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25,201, +0.3%). All are within 1% of each other.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to dedicated mobile GPUs?

A: The Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62,108, which is 0.3% ahead of the Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896), and within 2.7% of the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63,830). Its 89th percentile ranking places it above many dedicated mobile GPUs.

Q: Does this system support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU features 32 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing capabilities. The GPU also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What memory type does this platform use?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU uses system-shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, and bandwidth are system-dependent.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35W, and the GPU has a TDP of 55W, for a combined compute power draw of approximately 90W. The GPU has no power connectors and relies on system power delivery.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the 6000 series, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt codename, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with a die size of 208 mm². It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 35W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and includes integrated Radeon 680M graphics. It is not multiplier-unlocked and has a production status of Active.

The CPU's benchmark scores reveal its performance profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13,445 multicore and 1,554 single-core; in Geekbench, 9,451 multicore and 1,733 single-core; and in PassMark, 23,152 multithread and 3,237 single-thread. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 915 single-thread to 6,963 at 16 threads, with 8 threads scoring 5,830. The PassMark sub-scores provide insight into specialized workloads: data compression at 292,842, data encryption at 18,303, extended instructions at 20,015, floating-point math at 48,239, integer math at 86,449, and physics at 1,041.

The average benchmark score of 25,284 places it at the 77th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its score, indicating that the 6900HS is competitively positioned against both desktop (i5-13400F, Ryzen 5 5600X3D) and mobile (Core 5 120, Ryzen 7 6800H) alternatives. For real workloads, the 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel tasks efficiently, as evidenced by the strong Cinebench and PassMark multithread scores. The 4.9 GHz boost clock provides responsive single-threaded performance for everyday tasks and gaming. The 16 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, which helps with data sharing in multithreaded applications. The 6 nm process node contributes to the 35W TDP, making this a power-efficient processor for laptops. The lack of ECC memory support and the locked multiplier indicate this is a mainstream mobile part rather than a workstation or enthusiast offering.

# Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS mobile processor with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3+ part on a 6 nm process, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 architecture IGP on a 4 nm process with 2,048 shading units and 32 RT cores. The system achieves a combined percentile of 83, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile, indicating a well-balanced configuration where the GPU is comparatively stronger relative to its market segment.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,284 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including desktop processors like the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, demonstrating that this mobile chip delivers desktop-class compute performance. The GPU's average benchmark score of 62,108 places it in the upper echelon of GPUs, outperforming the Radeon Pro W6600M by 0.3% and coming within 2.7% of the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP. The 55W TDP of the GPU combined with the 35W TDP of the CPU creates a power-efficient package suitable for high-performance laptops.

The system's class is laptop, and its tier is upper-midrange to high-end based on the combined 83rd percentile. The CPU+GPU pairing is notable because the GPU is an integrated solution that performs like a dedicated GPU, making this a compelling option for users who want strong gaming and compute performance without the bulk of a discrete GPU laptop. The shared memory architecture means system RAM configuration directly impacts GPU performance, so buyers should prioritize high-speed DDR5 memory. The platform uses AMD Socket FP7 with PCIe Gen 4 (CPU) and PCIe 5.0 (GPU) connectivity, and both components are in active production, ensuring ongoing availability and support. This is a current-generation configuration that balances CPU and GPU capabilities effectively for a wide range of demanding applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds