SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

51,947 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop-class pairing that targets workstation-grade processing and professional rendering. The CPU, a 16-core Zen 3 part, and the GPU, a single-slot Ada Lovelace workstation card, are both high-percentile performers in their respective categories. This analysis relies strictly on the benchmark data provided, which contains no measured FPS rows for this specific combination; all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the underlying CPU and GPU scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer) and fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, drawing up to 105 W TDP. The chip features a substantial 64 MB L3 cache and a dual-channel DDR4 memory bus delivering 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. It supports ECC memory and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, all on the AMD Socket AM4 platform.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51947. The multi-threaded performance is its dominant strength: it scores 26017 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4324 in Cinebench R15 multicore. This places it in close competition with the Intel Core i9-13900F, which scores 51730 on average (a 0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i7-14700 at 52301 (a -0.7% delta). The data shows the 5950X is essentially tied with these modern Intel parts in aggregate workload performance, though the AMD chip achieves this with more physical cores.

Single-thread performance is also strong but less exceptional. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1614, and the 3dmark_single_thread score is 944. In the 3dmark multi-threaded scaling tests, the chip shows consistent scaling from 1856 at 2 threads to 6598 at 8 threads, reaching 10810 at 16 threads and 11597 at max threads. This scaling pattern indicates that the chip efficiently utilizes its core count without significant degradation in the transition from 8 to 16 threads.

The Passmark suite provides insight into specialized workloads. The integer math score is 185520, floating point math is 100280, and extended instructions (SIMD) hits 40468. Data compression scores 624347, while data encryption reaches 39593. The multi-thread Passmark score is 45424, reinforcing the chip's high-throughput capability. The 8,300 million transistors on a 2x 74 mm² die size indicate a mature design with efficient power characteristics relative to its core count.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The card features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. Boost clock is 2175 MHz, with a base of 1500 MHz.

The GPU's benchmark scores are equally impressive. It achieves 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan, placing it in the 95th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 135218. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A10M (135230, a 0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135396, a -0.1% delta), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 (136472, a -0.9% delta). This indicates the RTX 4000 Ada is essentially performance-equivalent to these competitors in compute benchmarks, though its feature set differs.

For rendering workloads, the 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) performance is critical. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s. The 48 RT cores handle ray-tracing acceleration, while the 192 tensor cores are available for AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS and denoising. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern graphics APIs. Display output is four DisplayPort 1.4a connections, and the card runs on a single 16-pin power connector with a suggested 300 W PSU. The single-slot design at 245 mm length makes it suitable for dense workstation builds.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing. Treat these as projections based on component capabilities.

At 1080p, high-refresh gaming estimates are strong but not class-leading. The CPU's single-thread score of 1614 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 146593 OpenCL score suggest that the pairing can push high frame rates in most titles. The 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 compute is more than adequate for traditional rasterization. However, the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth and 20 GB VRAM indicate this card is optimized for resolution and memory capacity rather than raw frame throughput. Expect high frame rates in e-sports titles, but the system may not match dedicated gaming GPUs with higher bandwidth in the same price tier.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU. The 5950X's multi-thread score of 26017 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even CPU-bound titles have ample headroom. The RTX 4000 Ada's 48 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though the estimated performance impact will be significant in heavy RT workloads. The 192 tensor cores can offload DLSS frame generation, which could recover some frame rate. Estimated performance here is solid for high refresh at 1440p in most titles, with some exceptions for the most demanding RT-heavy games.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The 20 GB VRAM is ample for 4K textures, and the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for most current titles. However, the 160-bit bus width limits memory throughput compared to wider-bus gaming cards. Estimated 4K performance will be playable in optimized titles but may require DLSS or reduced settings to maintain 60+ FPS in the most demanding games. The data indicates this is a professional workstation card first, with gaming as a secondary capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The 5950X's single-thread score of 944 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1614 in Cinebench R23 provide a strong foundation for high-refresh gaming at 1080p. The RTX 4000 Ada's 26.73 TFLOPS compute can drive high frame rates in competitive titles. However, the GPU's professional orientation means it is not optimized for gaming-specific features like high memory clocks, so expect solid but not exceptional performance.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU is ideal for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The Passmark data encryption score of 39593 and integer math score of 185520 indicate robust processing power for x264 encoding. The GPU's 192 tensor cores and NVENC capabilities (implied by Ada architecture) can offload encoding tasks, freeing CPU resources for gameplay. This is a capable streaming setup.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 provides excellent timeline performance in editors like Premiere Pro. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM allows for large preview caches and complex effects. The FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS accelerates effects processing. The 360.0 GB/s bandwidth supports multiple high-resolution video streams. This is a strong combination for professional video work.

3D Rendering: This is the pairing's primary strength. The CPU's 32 threads handle CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray, while the GPU's 48 RT cores and 26.73 TFLOPS accelerate GPU-based renderers. The 20 GB VRAM allows for large scenes and complex textures. The 95th percentile GPU ranking confirms its capability in this domain.

Software Development: The 5950X's multi-thread performance (45424 Passmark multi-thread) speeds up compilation and testing. The 64 MB L3 cache improves code cache locality. The GPU's compute capabilities are less relevant here, but the 20 GB VRAM can be used for local AI model testing. The 91st percentile CPU ranking indicates strong developer productivity.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance is high, but the cost and power requirements are unnecessary for word processing or spreadsheets. The GPU's workstation features are unused in this scenario. Students may benefit from the GPU's 20 GB VRAM for CAD or scientific computing, but general office work does not justify this hardware.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation have?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the CPU's benchmark scores in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 26017 in multicore and 1614 in single-core in Cinebench R23.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 135218, placing it 0% from the NVIDIA A10M, -0.1% from the AMD Radeon PRO W6800, and -0.9% from the AMD Radeon PRO V620.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The CPU is in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51947.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 48 RT cores, and the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and transistor count?

A: It is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC with 35,800 million transistors.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is designed for professionals who need both high CPU throughput and GPU compute power. The 16-core CPU and 20 GB GPU make it suitable for 3D rendering, where the CPU handles scene preparation and the GPU accelerates final frames. Video editors working with 4K or higher footage will benefit from the 26.73 TFLOPS GPU compute and the CPU's 26017 Cinebench R23 multicore score. Content creators who use AI-based tools will leverage the 192 tensor cores for acceleration.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K will find this system capable, but it is not optimized for pure gaming. The GPU's 160-bit bus and professional drivers favor compute workloads over frame rate maximization. High-refresh 1080p gamers will be limited by the GPU's bandwidth, not the CPU. For software developers working on large codebases, the 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache provide fast compilation times. Students in engineering or scientific fields will appreciate the 20 GB VRAM for simulations and CAD, though the cost is significant.

Small business workstations in architecture, product design, or media production will benefit from the single-slot GPU form factor and the CPU's ECC memory support. The 5950X's 105 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP allow for a reasonably power-efficient workstation build. The 91st percentile CPU and 95th percentile GPU rankings indicate this is a top-tier professional setup.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing for compute-heavy workloads, but the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. In multi-threaded CPU tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the 5950X's 45424 Passmark multi-thread score and 26017 Cinebench R23 multicore score are the limiting factors. The GPU's compute is not fully utilized in these scenarios. Conversely, in GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning, the RTX 4000 Ada's 26.73 TFLOPS and 146593 OpenCL score dominate, and the CPU's 32 threads are idle.

For gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU's single-thread score of 944 in 3dmark_single_thread is sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, but at 4K, the GPU's 360.0 GB/s bandwidth and 160-bit bus limit frame rates. The FPS scaling from the 3dmark tests (10810 at 16 threads vs 11597 at max threads) shows the CPU has headroom; the GPU cannot translate that into FPS at high resolutions.

In mixed workloads, the balance is excellent. The 5950X's 64 MB L3 cache and the GPU's 20 GB VRAM allow both components to operate without memory contention. The CPU's 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and the GPU's 360.0 GB/s bandwidth are separate, so neither starves the other. The combined percentile of 93 confirms that this pairing is stronger than either component alone, indicating minimal bottleneck overlap.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 3 processor on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is a single-slot workstation card based on Ada Lovelace with 20 GB GDDR6 memory. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU ranks in the 95th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 93, placing this system in the upper tier of desktop workstations.

The pairing is intended for professional use rather than gaming. The CPU's 105 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP keep power requirements moderate, with a suggested 300 W PSU for the GPU alone. The 5950X supports ECC memory and PCIe Gen 4, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The single-slot GPU at 245 mm length fits in most workstation cases, and the four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. This is a high-end, balanced system for compute-intensive tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 51947, placing it in the 91st percentile. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, which scores 52073 (a -0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 8124P at 52121 (a -0.3% delta). The CPU is also 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900F and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700. Key scores include 26017 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 1614 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 45424 in Passmark multi-thread.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 135218, placing it in the 95th percentile. It is exactly 0% from the NVIDIA A10M, 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6800, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. The GPU scores 146593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123842 in Geekbench Vulkan. Combined, the system's percentile is 93, indicating that the CPU and GPU are both above-average performers that complement each other well. The data shows no significant weak point in either component; both are near the top of their respective categories.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds