SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

51,947 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

This desktop pairing combines AMD's 16-core Zen 3 flagship from the 5000 series with NVIDIA's professional Turing-based Quadro RTX 4000, creating a workstation-oriented build that prioritizes multi-threaded compute and certified graphics performance over raw gaming throughput. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 61st percentile, making this a lopsided pairing where the processor dramatically outclasses the graphics card in relative standing. The data shows a system built for productivity first, with gaming as a secondary consideration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on TSMC's 7 nm process with the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, drawing a 105 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache. The chip supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support—a feature that appeals to workstation users who need data integrity. PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark results show a clear progression: 944 in single-thread, 1856 in 2-thread, 3595 in 4-thread, 6598 in 8-thread, 10810 in 16-thread, and 11597 in max-thread tests. This scaling from 944 to 11597 represents roughly a 12.3x improvement from single-thread to max-thread, indicating excellent multi-core efficiency given the 16-core/32-thread design. The Cinebench R23 scores reinforce this picture with 1614 in single-core and 26017 in multi-core—a 16.1x scaling factor that approaches the theoretical 16-core limit. The Geekbench results show 2083 single-core and 15233 multi-core, while PassMark lists 3470 single-thread and 45424 multithread scores.

In real workloads, these numbers translate to a processor that excels at heavily parallelized tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 624347 and floating-point math score of 100280 indicate strong performance in data-intensive and scientific computing scenarios. The integer math score of 185520 and extended instructions score of 40468 suggest robust performance in encryption, code compilation, and engineering simulations. The data encryption score of 39593 shows capable AES and cryptographic throughput, which matters for secure communications and database operations.

The nearest rival comparison places the 5950X within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-14700, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900F, 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, and 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 8124P. This clustering indicates that the 5950X remains competitive with newer generation parts despite being released earlier, though it no longer holds a commanding lead. The average benchmark score of 51947 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 91% of processors in the database.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component characteristics.

The CPU's gaming potential is strong based on its single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark and 1614 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which indicate excellent per-core performance for game logic and physics. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6598 suggests that even games optimized for fewer threads will see substantial headroom. However, the GPU becomes the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The Quadro RTX 4000's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 place it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, which is modest by modern gaming standards.

At 1080p resolution, the system should handle most esports and older titles at high settings, but the GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will constrain frame rates in graphically demanding games. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus will likely become a bottleneck for modern AAA titles, pushing settings down to medium or high rather than ultra. At 4K, the system would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding games, as the GPU's compute resources are better suited for professional visualization than high-resolution gaming. The CPU would rarely be the limiting factor in gaming, as even the most demanding game engines rarely utilize all 32 threads effectively.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X good for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and 3DMark max-thread score of 11597 demonstrate exceptional scaling across 16 cores and 32 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 45424 confirms strong parallel performance.

Q: How does the Quadro RTX 4000 compare to consumer GPUs?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 17789 places it within 0.9% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, 0.7% of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, and 1.1% of the AMD Radeon 780M. This suggests performance roughly equivalent to a mid-range consumer card.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X supports ECC memory, which is confirmed in the FACT PACK. This is beneficial for workstation tasks where memory errors could corrupt data.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 76, meaning this pairing outperforms approximately 76% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, weighted toward the CPU's strong 91st percentile position.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which provides double the bandwidth of PCIe 3.0 for compatible storage devices and expansion cards. However, the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

Q: Is the Quadro RTX 4000 still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as "End-of-life." The GPU was released on 2018-11-12 and has been succeeded by Workstation Ampere. The CPU remains "Active" in production.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark and 1614 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance. The scaling to 11597 in max-thread 3DMark and 26017 in multi-core Cinebench shows that efficiency holds up well as more cores are utilized.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of imbalance in this pairing. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile of all processors, while the GPU rests in the 61st percentile—a 30-point gap that strongly suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in most workloads. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this compromise, pulled down from the CPU's high standing by the more modest GPU performance.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and data processing, the Ryzen 9 5950X will operate near its full potential. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15233 indicate that the processor can sustain heavy parallel loads without the GPU interfering. The PassMark physics score of 1878 and floating-point math score of 100280 further confirm strong compute capabilities.

In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming, GPU rendering, and machine learning inference, the Quadro RTX 4000 will cap performance. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 are modest figures that will limit frame rates and rendering times. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for professional workloads but will constrain high-resolution gaming and large scene rendering. The GPU's DirectX 12 PassMark score of 52 is notably low, suggesting that modern DirectX 12 titles may perform disproportionately poorly.

The FPS scaling story is one of CPU headroom going unused. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6598 indicates that the CPU can feed frames at a high rate, but the GPU's rendering throughput will not match that pace. At lower resolutions where CPU-bound scenarios dominate, the system will feel more balanced; at higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced. For workstation tasks that use the GPU's compute capabilities, the balance shifts toward the CPU, as the GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 288 tensor cores provide professional-grade acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X achieves an average benchmark score of 51947, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX at 52073 (-0.2%), the AMD EPYC 8124P at 52121 (-0.3%), the Intel Core i9-13900F at 51730 (+0.4%), and the Intel Core i7-14700 at 52301 (-0.7%). This clustering indicates that the 5950X performs essentially on par with these newer and different-tier processors, making it a competitive choice despite its age.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 achieves an average benchmark score of 17789, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666 (+0.7%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 at 17639 (+0.9%), the AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (+1.1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (+1.4%). The GPU's performance is remarkably close to its rivals, with a maximum delta of just 1.4%, suggesting that it performs in a tight band around the 61st percentile.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU carries the performance weight. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile creates a combined percentile of 76, which reflects the geometric compromise of pairing a top-tier processor with a mid-tier graphics card. In compute-heavy applications, the system will perform near the CPU's level; in graphics-heavy applications, it will perform near the GPU's level. The average benchmark score of 51947 for the CPU and 17789 for the GPU indicates that the CPU contributes roughly 74.5% of the total benchmark score, underscoring its dominance in this pairing.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need exceptional CPU compute power but have modest GPU requirements. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development will benefit most from the 16-core/32-thread processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and PassMark multithread score of 45424 indicate strong performance in rendering engines, code compilers, and simulation tools. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute jobs.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find acceptable performance, though the GPU's 61st percentile ranking means frame rates will be moderate rather than high. The CPU's single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark and 1614 in Cinebench R23 ensure that game logic and physics will not bottleneck, but the GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 will limit graphics throughput. Gamers at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere, as the GPU will struggle to maintain playable frame rates at high settings.

Software developers and data scientists will appreciate the CPU's parallel compute capabilities. The PassMark data compression score of 624347 and integer math score of 185520 indicate strong performance in build pipelines, database operations, and numerical analysis. The 64 MB of L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data, improving overall responsiveness. Students and small business users performing office work, web development, and light content creation will find the system more than capable, though the GPU's professional features may go underutilized.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a professional workstation GPU built on the Turing architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, 36 ray tracing cores, and 288 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, and the memory runs at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The compute capabilities are substantial for professional workloads. The FP32 performance of 7.119 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1) indicate strong throughput for scientific computing and AI inference. The 288 tensor cores accelerate deep learning operations, making this GPU suitable for machine learning development despite its age. The pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering tasks.

Benchmark scores reveal a mixed picture. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 show strong compute performance for professional applications. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are concerning: DirectX 9 at 205, DirectX 10 at 108, DirectX 11 at 128, and DirectX 12 at 52. These figures suggest that gaming performance is not this GPU's strength, particularly for modern DirectX 12 titles. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 and GPU compute score of 6176 reinforce the notion that this is a compute-oriented card rather than a gaming card.

The GPU's nearest rival comparison shows it performing within 1.4% of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, AMD Radeon 780M, and AMD Radeon Pro 560. This clustering with consumer and integrated graphics suggests that the Quadro RTX 4000's raw gaming performance is not exceptional, but its professional features—certified drivers, ECC memory support (though not listed, the workstation class implies it), and optimized compute APIs—justify its workstation positioning.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, a 16-core desktop processor from the 5000 series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, a professional workstation GPU. The build class is desktop, meaning this is a stationary system rather than a laptop or mobile workstation. The combined percentile of 76 indicates that this pairing outperforms approximately 76% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The overall tier is characterized by a CPU in the 91st percentile and a GPU in the 61st percentile. This puts the system in the upper mid-range tier overall, with the CPU pushing it toward high-end territory for compute tasks while the GPU keeps it grounded in mid-range for graphics workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 51947 is more than double the GPU's average of 17789, giving the system a compute-heavy profile that suits workstation use cases.

The CPU is a desktop-class processor with a TDP of 105 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 160 W and requires a 450 W suggested PSU. The total system power draw is manageable for a standard desktop build, but the single 8-pin power connector on the GPU limits overclocking headroom. The GPU is single-slot, making it suitable for compact builds or multi-GPU configurations, though the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes may limit expansion options.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and expansion cards. The socket has been a long-lived platform in AMD's lineup, but the 5950X is a high-end part that represents near the top of what AM4 offers. A sensible next upgrade would be moving to a newer platform with DDR5 support and more PCIe lanes, though this would require a motherboard and memory replacement.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 slots. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Workstation Ampere. Upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant performance gains for this system, as the CPU has substantial headroom. A newer GPU with higher FP32 performance and more VRAM would better complement the CPU's compute capabilities, especially for gaming and GPU rendering.

The suggested PSU of 450 W provides a baseline for power supply headroom. The CPU's 105 W TDP and GPU's 160 W TDP total 265 W, leaving approximately 185 W for the rest of the system. This headroom is sufficient for standard components but may be tight for multiple drives, high-end cooling, or overclocking. The GPU's single 8-pin power connector limits its power draw, so a PSU upgrade would only be necessary if adding more components or upgrading the GPU. The system's memory support for ECC suggests a workstation orientation, and upgrading to more DDR4 memory (up to the platform's limits) would be a straightforward path for increasing capacity.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark and 1614 in Cinebench R23 ensure that game logic runs smoothly, but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking and low PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 will limit frame rates. Expect moderate performance at 1080p with high settings, but not competitive-level frame rates in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 624347 indicates efficient encoding throughput, and the multithread score of 45424 supports simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads without significant performance degradation.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26017 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15233 indicate strong performance in video editing software that utilizes multiple cores. The GPU's 288 tensor cores and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 accelerate effects and color grading, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit work with very high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores excel at CPU-based rendering, with PassMark floating-point math score of 100280 supporting complex scene calculations. The GPU's 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 2304 shading units provide decent GPU rendering performance, but the 8 GB VRAM may constrain large scenes.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 185520 and extended instructions score of 40468 indicate strong performance in code compilation and execution. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code, and the 32 threads allow parallel build processes.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and communication tools. The ECC memory support adds reliability for academic research and data analysis, while the GPU's professional drivers provide stability for CAD and scientific visualization applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds