SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

51,947 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop combination that pairs a 16-core, 32-thread workstation-grade CPU with a mainstream 8 GB graphics card. This pairing targets users who need immense processing power for productivity but are willing to accept a more modest frame rate ceiling in modern games. The data shows a combined percentile of 76, placing it above the majority of tested configurations, with the CPU being the clear performance leader in this duo.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build is a mixed bag. In esports and lighter titles, the RTX 4060 delivers excellent frame rates, as evidenced by Counter-Strike 2 hitting 182.1 FPS and Valorant reaching 422.9 FPS at 1920x1080. However, in more demanding AAA titles, the 8 GB VRAM and mid-range GPU die become limiting, with Cyberpunk 2077 only reaching 55.3 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 49 FPS on ultra settings, meaning a high-refresh monitor will only be fully utilized in competitive shooters.

Streaming and content creation are where this pairing shines, as the Ryzen 9 5950X’s 32 threads provide abundant headroom for encoding and multitasking. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 45424 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 ensure that game capture and streaming software can run alongside the game without significant performance degradation, though the GPU may still be the frame-rate bottleneck in the game itself.

Video editing in programs like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits heavily from the CPU’s 16 cores, with Geekbench multicore score of 15233 indicating strong parallel processing capabilities. The 5950X’s 64 MB of L3 cache and Zen 3 architecture deliver responsive timeline scrubbing and fast export times, while the RTX 4060’s 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores can accelerate effects and AI-based tools, making this a capable editor for 1080p and 1440p projects.

3D rendering workloads are almost entirely CPU-bound, and this build excels there. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 places it in the top 9% of all CPUs (91st percentile), meaning Blender or Cinema 4D renders will be substantially faster than on mainstream 6-core or 8-core processors. The GPU also contributes to rendering via its 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 compute, useful for GPU-accelerated render engines, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large scenes.

Software development is a strong use case, as compilation and testing benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads. The Passmark data compression score of 624347 and integer math score of 185520 suggest rapid code builds and efficient handling of large codebases, while the single-thread score of 3470 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. The RTX 4060 is sufficient for UI rendering and basic GPU computing tasks, though developers working on large machine learning models may find the 8 GB VRAM restrictive.

For student and office work, this build is massively overpowered but extremely responsive. The 5950X’s single-thread score of 944 in 3DMark and 1614 in Cinebench R23 handle spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing with ease, while the GPU’s G2D score of 1037 ensures smooth 2D desktop acceleration. The 105W TDP CPU and 115W TDP GPU keep power draw moderate, making it a practical, if expensive, choice for a versatile workstation.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5950X still a competitive CPU for productivity in 2024?

A: Yes, the data shows it holds a 91st percentile ranking against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51947. It trades blows with modern chips like the Intel Core i9-13900F, which scores 51730 (0.4% slower), and the Intel Core i7-14700 at 52301 (0.7% faster), indicating it remains a top-tier multi-threaded processor.

Q: Can the RTX 4060 handle 4K gaming with the Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: 4K gaming is possible but not ideal. Measured FPS at 3840x2160 on ultra settings shows older or lighter titles like Valorant at 287.6 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 69.4 FPS, but demanding games struggle, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 26.8 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 24 FPS, which is below playable thresholds.

Q: How does this CPU+GPU combo compare to other builds in the benchmark database?

A: The pair ranks 2121 out of 3861 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS across all tested games of 117.8. Its combined percentile of 76 indicates it outperforms three-quarters of all tested configurations, though the GPU’s individual 61st percentile drags down the overall ranking relative to the CPU’s 91st percentile.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4060, and does it bottleneck the CPU?

A: The RTX 4060 has 272.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth over a 128-bit bus. This is sufficient for its 8 GB GDDR6 memory but is a limiting factor in high-resolution gaming, as evidenced by the significant FPS drops from 1080p to 1440p and 4K in titles like Control (77 to 58 to 39 FPS).

Q: Is the RTX 4060 good for ray tracing workloads?

A: The GPU includes 24 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its performance is constrained by its mid-range class. In Cyberpunk 2077, a title known for heavy ray tracing, it only achieves 55.3 FPS at 1080p ultra without upscaling, suggesting ray tracing should be used with lower settings or DLSS.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 5950X support ECC memory for professional workstations?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature often required for scientific computing and data integrity in professional environments. This, combined with its PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes and dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, makes it suitable for workstation builds.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 105W TDP, making it a power-efficient powerhouse for its core count. The CPU contains 8,300 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a total die size of 2x 74 mm², and it is built for the AMD Socket AM4 platform.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a massive 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming performance, as it reduces latency when fetching data from the dual-channel DDR4 memory, which operates at 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU also supports ECC memory and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, ensuring high throughput for NVMe SSDs and professional GPUs.

Benchmark results show the 5950X’s dominance in multi-threaded tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 is roughly 16 times its single-core score of 1614, demonstrating excellent scaling across all 16 cores. The 3DMark max threads score of 11597 versus a single-thread score of 944 further confirms this scaling efficiency. In Passmark, the multithread score of 45424 and floating-point math score of 100280 indicate strong performance in scientific and engineering workloads.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is still very capable, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 944 and Geekbench single-core score of 2083. This ensures that everyday tasks and games that rely on fewer cores remain responsive. Compared to its nearest rivals, the 5950X’s average score of 51947 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52073, -0.2% delta) and AMD EPYC 8124P (52121, -0.3% delta), showing it still competes with newer silicon despite its 2020 release date.

Who Should Build It

Gamers who primarily play competitive esports titles at 1080p will find this build exceptional, as the RTX 4060 delivers 182.1 FPS in CS2, 219 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, and 422.9 FPS in Valorant at that resolution. The 5950X ensures these high frame rates are never CPU-limited, providing smooth and consistent performance in fast-paced shooters. However, those seeking 4K ultra settings in AAA games should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile ranking will cause frame rates to drop below 30 FPS in many titles.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, are the ideal users for this pairing. The 16-core CPU excels at rendering and encoding, with Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 and Passmark physics score of 1878 indicating strong simulation performance. The RTX 4060 adds hardware acceleration for video effects and AI denoising, making this a balanced system for a freelance creative professional who games occasionally.

Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the 5950X’s 32 threads, which accelerate compilation times significantly. The Passmark integer math score of 185520 and data encryption score of 39593 show proficiency in cryptographic and algorithmic workloads. The RTX 4060’s Vulkan score of 48643 and OpenCL score of 95057 also make it useful for GPU computing experiments and prototyping in machine learning or graphics programming.

Students and small business users who need a long-lasting, versatile machine will find this build future-proof on the CPU side, though the GPU may age faster. The 5950X’s 91st percentile CPU ranking ensures it will handle productivity software for years, while the RTX 4060 is adequate for office work, CAD, and light creative tasks. The combination of ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR4 makes it a reliable choice for data-intensive academic research.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the RTX 4060 is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads, while the 5950X is the dominant component in productivity tasks. The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 61st percentile creates an imbalance where the GPU limits frame rates in most games. This is evident in the FPS scaling: from 1080p to 1440p, average FPS drops by roughly 30-40% across titles, and from 1440p to 4K, another 40-50% drop occurs, reflecting GPU-side constraints rather than CPU limitations.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or data processing, the 5950X is never the limiting factor. The Passmark physics score of 1878 and single-thread score of 3470 show it can handle even the most demanding game logic. The bottleneck only manifests in GPU-bound situations, where the RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-detail 4K rendering.

The 128-bit memory bus of the RTX 4060 is a structural bottleneck, as it halves the memory bandwidth compared to wider-bus GPUs. This is reflected in games like Microsoft Flight Simulator, where FPS drops from 63.8 at 1080p to 55.8 at 1440p and 40.2 at 4K, showing diminishing returns as resolution increases. The 8 GB VRAM also becomes a limitation in modern games like Ark: Survival Ascended, which only achieves 27 FPS at 1080p, likely due to memory capacity constraints.

For a balanced build, the data suggests that the 5950X would be better paired with a higher-tier GPU, while the RTX 4060 would be more balanced with a 6-core or 8-core CPU. However, as a configuration, this pairing offers the unique advantage of a CPU that will remain relevant for many years, allowing users to upgrade only the GPU later while retaining the same motherboard and memory platform.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the AD107 chip, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process node with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines, delivering 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is the primary limitation of the card, as it restricts performance at higher resolutions and in texture-heavy scenes. The card includes 24 RT cores for ray tracing and 96 tensor cores for AI and DLSS acceleration, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Benchmark performance shows the RTX 4060’s mid-range positioning. Its Passmark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 place it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 indicate solid compute capabilities, though the Passmark GPU compute score of 9213 shows it is not a compute powerhouse.

In comparison to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4060’s performance is remarkably close to much older and lower-class hardware. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (0.2% faster), and the AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU scores 17588 (0.3% slower), suggesting that the 4060’s architectural efficiency is offset by its modest specs. This means the card excels in power efficiency (115W TDP) but does not offer a significant generational leap over previous mid-range offerings in raw compute.

The card’s 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, but their performance is constrained by the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus. For 1080p gaming, the GPU is generally sufficient, but at higher resolutions, the memory bandwidth becomes a severe bottleneck, as seen in the FPS data across multiple titles.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings shows this build is a strong 1080p gaming machine with clear limitations at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, esports titles achieve exceptionally high frame rates: Valorant at 422.9 FPS, CS:GO at 406.9 FPS, and CS2 at 182.1 FPS. Even demanding AAA games are playable, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 55.3 FPS and Control at 77 FPS, though some poorly optimized titles like Ark: Survival Ascended only manage 27 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably across all titles. Counter-Strike 2 falls to 124.4 FPS, Valorant to 357.1 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 to 42.6 FPS. This represents a 20-30% performance loss from 1080p, which is consistent with the GPU’s memory bandwidth limitations. Some games remain playable, like Call of Duty: Warzone at 122.1 FPS, but the experience is less consistent for high-refresh monitors.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4060 is clearly out of its depth, with most AAA titles falling below 30 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 26.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 24 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 9 FPS. Even lighter titles like Fortnite only achieve 30 FPS, meaning 4K gaming is only viable in esports or older games like CS:GO (166.7 FPS) and Valorant (287.6 FPS).

The pair’s average FPS across all tested games is 117.8, ranking 2121 out of 3861 pairs. This indicates that while the build is above average overall, it is not exceptional for gaming, as the CPU’s power is not fully utilized in most titles. The data confirms that for the best gaming experience, users should stick to 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings, as the GPU is the definitive limiting factor.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, a 16-core Zen 3 processor from the 5000 series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, an Ada Lovelace architecture GPU from the GeForce 40-series. The CPU was released on 2020-11-04 with a launch MSRP of $799, while the GPU followed on 2023-05-17 with a launch MSRP of 299 USD, representing two different generations of technology paired together.

The combined percentile of this build is 76, placing it in the top quarter of all tested configurations. This reflects the CPU’s exceptional 91st percentile ranking and the GPU’s more modest 61st percentile, resulting in a system that is better suited for productivity than pure gaming. The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with full-size components.

The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with 64 MB of L3 cache, make it one of the most powerful consumer processors available, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 115W TDP make it a power-efficient mainstream option. This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads but still want a capable gaming GPU, though the performance imbalance is clear in the benchmark data.

As a production system, this build is actively maintained, with the CPU in active production status and the GPU marked as end-of-life. This suggests that the GPU may become harder to find in the future, while the CPU platform (AM4) is mature and well-supported. The 105W CPU TDP and 115W GPU TDP together require a modest power supply, with the suggested PSU for the GPU being 300W.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X delivers exceptional benchmark scores across all test suites. In 3DMark, it scores 10810 with 16 threads, 1856 with 2 threads, 3595 with 4 threads, 6598 with 8 threads, 11597 with max threads, and 944 single-threaded. Cinebench results show 4324 multicore and 266.5 single-core in R15, and 26017 multicore and 1614 single-core in R23. Geekbench scores are 15233 multicore and 2083 single-core.

The CPU’s Passmark results are particularly strong: data compression at 624347, data encryption at 39593, extended instructions at 40468, prime numbers at 228, floating-point math at 100280, integer math at 185520, multithread at 45424, physics at 1878, random string sorting at 65172, and single-thread at 3470. These scores contribute to an average benchmark score of 51947, with a 91st percentile ranking against all CPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 shows more modest results. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, Geekbench OpenCL score is 95057, and Vulkan score is 48643. Passmark scores include DirectX 10 at 103, DirectX 11 at 175, DirectX 12 at 76, DirectX 9 at 236, G2D at 1037, G3D at 19545, and GPU compute at 9213. The average benchmark score is 17639, with a 61st percentile ranking.

The combined picture shows a significant performance gap between the two components. The CPU outperforms 91% of all processors, while the GPU only outperforms 61% of all graphics cards. This results in a combined percentile of 76, meaning the build as a whole is better than 76% of tested systems, but the GPU drags down the overall gaming potential relative to the CPU’s capabilities. For users who demand top-tier gaming performance, the RTX 4060 should be upgraded, but for those who need maximum CPU compute power with acceptable gaming, this is a balanced compromise.