SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

51,947 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a desktop build pairing AMD’s 16-core Ryzen 9 5950X with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 3080, placing it in the 80th percentile for combined performance. The CPU is a Zen 3 (Vermeer) part on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, while the GPU is an Ampere-architecture card from the GeForce 30-series. Together they form a high-end workstation and gaming rig, with the CPU sitting in the 91st percentile among all processors and the GPU in the 68th percentile among all graphics cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM4, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, so both the storage and graphics interfaces are on the current-generation interconnect standard. The board supports ECC memory, a feature that matters for long-running compute tasks where data integrity is critical. The CPU’s 105 W TDP is modest for a 16-core part, but the GPU pulls 320 W, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 700 W, so a quality 700 W unit is the baseline for this pairing.

The upgrade path is limited by the AM4 socket, which is the final generation for that platform. The Ryzen 9 5950X is already near the top of what AM4 supports, so a sensible next step would be moving to a newer platform with DDR5 memory, if higher memory bandwidth or PCIe Gen 5 becomes necessary. For the GPU, the RTX 3080 is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40-series as its successor, so the upgrade path here is a newer graphics card that would drop into the same PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, meaning overclocking headroom exists on the AM4 platform, which can extend its useful life without a motherboard change. The 8,300 million transistors on a 7 nm TSMC process give the CPU a relatively small die footprint, so it runs within the 105 W envelope, leaving thermal and power headroom for the GPU in most desktop cases.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51,947, which places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52,073 (0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52,121 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i9-13900F scores 51,730 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700 scores 52,301 (0.7% higher). This means the 5950X is effectively within 1% of several modern high-end processors, which is notable for a chip released in the same generation as those rivals. In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017 confirms the CPU’s strength, while the single-core score of 1,614 shows it is not just a many-core part.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23,172, placing it in the 68th percentile. Its nearest rivals are surprising: the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23,249 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23,250 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23,273 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23,276 (0.4% higher). This clustering suggests the RTX 3080’s average score is dragged down by its older benchmark results, as the GPU’s raw specifications are significantly stronger than a P106-100 or R9 M290X. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms its peers and a GPU that sits in the upper two-thirds of the field, with the pair landing at the 80th combined percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Zen 3 architecture on the 7 nm process delivers strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 944 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2,083. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,856 and 4-thread score of 3,595 show that scaling is nearly linear at low thread counts, which is typical for a high-core-count part. The 8-thread score of 6,598 and 16-thread score of 10,810 continue this trend, leading to a max-thread score of 11,597. This linear scaling means the CPU is not hitting memory bandwidth or cache bottlenecks until all 32 threads are active.

In Cinebench R15, the multicore score of 4,324 and single-core score of 266.5 confirm the same pattern. The Geekbench multicore score of 15,233 is lower than the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017, reflecting the different workload intensities. PassMark results show the CPU excels at integer math with a score of 185,520 and floating-point math with a score of 100,280, while the data compression score of 624,347 and data encryption score of 39,593 indicate strong throughput in those tasks. The extended instructions score of 40,468 suggests AVX and similar extensions are well-supported. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,470 is respectable, but the multithread score of 45,424 is where the CPU dominates, sitting at the 91st percentile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is skewed toward the CPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 68th percentile means the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming workloads, the measured FPS data shows the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 243 FPS at 1080p to 161 FPS at 1440p and 90 FPS at 4K, indicating the GPU is scaling down with resolution while the CPU has headroom. In Valorant, the drop is smaller: 436 FPS at 1080p, 413 FPS at 1440p, and 380 FPS at 4K, which suggests the game is CPU-bound even at 4K.

In more demanding titles, the GPU bottleneck is clear. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 72 FPS at 1080p, 54 FPS at 1440p, and 35 FPS at 4K, with the CPU having plenty of headroom. Red Dead Redemption 2 shows a similar pattern at 65.2 FPS, 51.1 FPS, and 33.4 FPS across the same resolutions. The average FPS across all tested games is 154.1, and the pair ranks 1,095 out of 3,732 pairs, which places it in the top 29% of all CPU-GPU combinations. This rank indicates that while the CPU is high-end, the GPU is the component that keeps this build from being in the top 10% of all pairs, because many builds pair faster GPUs with this class of CPU.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the data shows strong results. Counter-Strike 2 hits 243 FPS, Valorant hits 436 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 537 FPS, all well above the 240 Hz threshold. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege reaches 289 FPS at 1080p, so esports titles are comfortably CPU-bound at high frame rates.

For streaming, the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, as the 3DMark max-thread score of 11,597 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017 indicate strong multi-tasking capability. The PassMark multithread score of 45,424 confirms the CPU can handle simultaneous workloads without significant frame drops in the measured gaming data.

For video editing, the CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 15,233 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017 point to fast rendering times in software that uses CPU encoding. The GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 272 tensor cores accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and encoding, though the 10 GB VRAM may limit very large timelines.

For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 32 threads deliver high throughput in CPU-based renderers, while the GPU’s 8704 shading units and 68 RT cores handle GPU-based rendering with hardware ray tracing. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423 indicates strong compute performance in OpenCL workloads.

For software development, the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 624,347 and random string sorting score of 65,172 show fast compilation and code parsing. The 64 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory at 51.2 GB/s provide adequate bandwidth for build tools.

For student and office work, this build is overkill, but the CPU’s single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 944, Geekbench single-core 2,083) ensures snappy response in web browsers and office suites. The high core count means background tasks like antivirus scans or system updates will not slow down foreground work.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a gamer who plays at 1440p or 4K and wants high frame rates in AAA titles. At 1440p, the measured data shows Control runs at 77.5 FPS, Doom at 117 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 120 FPS, which is smooth for competitive play. At 4K, the frame rates drop to 53.7 FPS for Control and 102 FPS for Warzone, so the GPU becomes the limiting factor for 4K high-refresh displays.

Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s 32 threads and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26,017 and the PassMark multithread score of 45,424 are strong indicators for CPU-bound work, while the GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 and 465.1 GTexel/s texture rate handle GPU-accelerated tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see fast build times, given the integer math score of 185,520 and the data compression score of 624,347. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. Students in STEM fields will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance in simulation software, though the power draw and size of the GPU make this a desktop-only build.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines or heavy spreadsheet models will find the 16 cores and 32 threads sufficient. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for most business graphics tasks, though the 320 W TDP means the system needs adequate cooling.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 uses the GA102 chip on Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The memory configuration is 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. The base clock is 1440 MHz with a boost clock of 1710 MHz, and the memory runs at 1188 MHz, effectively 19 Gbps. The GPU has 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output processors, giving a pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s.

For ray tracing, the GPU has 68 RT cores, and for AI workloads, it has 272 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 29.77 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so modern games and applications are fully supported. The GPU’s benchmark scores show a PassMark G3D score of 25,086, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 33,620. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4,407.

The GPU’s 68th percentile ranking is lower than expected given its specs, which is likely due to the benchmark pool including newer cards. In the measured gaming data, the GPU delivers strong results at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the 10 GB VRAM and bandwidth become limiting in some titles. The texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s are high, so the GPU is not bandwidth-limited in most scenarios. The 272 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for DLSS, which is not explicitly in the benchmark data but is supported by the architecture.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket and memory type for this CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average score is 51,947, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, 0.3% lower than the AMD EPYC 8124P, 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900F, and 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 19 Gbps.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 700 W.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair ranks in the 80th combined percentile, with a rank of 1,095 out of 3,732 pairs by average FPS.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the highest measured FPS at 1080p in the included game data?

A: The highest measured FPS at 1080p is 537 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, followed by 436 in Valorant and 313.8 in Roblox.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is based on actual testing, so the figures are real, not estimates. At 1080p, the build delivers high frame rates in esports titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 537 FPS, Valorant at 436 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 289 FPS. In AAA titles at 1080p, the performance is still strong: Call of Duty: Warzone at 135 FPS, Doom at 181 FPS, and Control at 102.3 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 72 FPS at 1080p, which is playable but not high-refresh.

At 1440p, the frame rates drop but remain competitive. Warzone runs at 120 FPS, Rainbow Six Siege at 190 FPS, and Doom at 117 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 54 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 51.1 FPS. The most demanding game in the dataset, Ark: Survival Ascended, runs at 23.2 FPS at 1440p, which is below the playable threshold. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor in many titles. Warzone runs at 102 FPS, Valorant at 380 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 105 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 35 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 33.4 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9.6 FPS.

The average FPS across all tested games is 154.1, which places this pair in the top 29% of all CPU-GPU combinations. The data shows that the build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 944) and the GPU’s high texture rate (465.1 GTexel/s) combine for high frame rates. At 4K, the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 68th percentile ranking become apparent, as the frame rates drop below 60 FPS in many AAA titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 3 part with a 105 W TDP, and the GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with a 320 W TDP, requiring a 700 W suggested PSU. The combined percentile is 80, which places this build in the upper quintile of all CPU-GPU pairs. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking indicates it is a top-tier processor, while the GPU’s 68th percentile shows it is a solid but not elite graphics card.

The build class is desktop, and it is designed for high-performance gaming and content creation. The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with the GPU’s 8704 shading units and 10 GB GDDR6X memory, make it a versatile machine for both gaming and productivity. The measured FPS data shows it excels at 1080p and 1440p gaming, with playable frame rates at 4K in less demanding titles. The overall tier is high-end, with the CPU being the standout component and the GPU providing adequate performance for most modern games at 1440p. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, or software development, this pairing is well-balanced. For those who want maximum 4K gaming performance, a newer GPU would be the next upgrade.