SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

41,376 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The measured data shows this pairing is a high-refresh-rate powerhouse at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K performance that is excellent for demanding titles but less consistent for the heaviest simulations. The data is measured, not estimated, and it paints a clear picture of where this system excels.

At 1920x1080, the system is a frame-rate monster. Esports and lighter titles easily clear 300 FPS. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 793 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 427 FPS, and Valorant runs at 437.3 FPS. Even Counter-Strike 2, known for being more demanding, posts 358.6 FPS. This is far beyond the typical 144Hz or 240Hz monitor's capability, leaving massive headroom for the most competitive play. Minecraft: Java Edition runs at 351.7 FPS, and Barony hits 303.9 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptional. Valorant still manages 411 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive drops slightly to 546 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 280 FPS, with Counter-Strike 2 at 240.7 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for ultra-high-refresh gaming, as even demanding AAA titles remain fluid. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 79.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 73.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 118.7 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the 4K experience is strong but requires more compromise for the most graphically intense games. The RTX 4090's 24 GB frame buffer and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensure that most games are still playable at high refresh rates. Valorant hits 385 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X runs at 155.2 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 134 FPS. However, the heaviest simulation and open-world titles see significant drops. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 17 FPS, Microsoft Flight Simulator to 75.5 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 to 50.5 FPS.

The data indicates a clear scaling pattern. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is often smaller than the gap between 1440p and 4K, suggesting that the CPU remains a strong partner at 1440p but the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 4K for most titles. The pair ranks 143rd out of 3732 pairs by average FPS, placing it in the top 3.8% of all tested combinations. The average FPS across all measured games at 1080p is 212.7, a definitive marker of top-tier performance.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined picture is one of a high-end desktop platform, with the CPU and GPU both landing in the 87-88th percentile against all other components. The combined percentile for this pairing is 88, and the average benchmark score for the CPU is 41376 while the GPU averages 60347.

The CPU's benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16262 in multi-core and 1527 in single-core. Geekbench scores are 14118 for multi-core and 2083 for single-core. The 3DMark scores scale from 941 in single-thread to 9075 in 16-thread and 10075 in max-thread tests. This consistency shows the 12-core design scales well with workload.

The GPU's benchmark results are dominated by compute-heavy tests. Its Passmark G3D score is 38194, with a GPU compute score of 26613. In Geekbench, it scores 255416 in OpenCL and 271631 in Vulkan. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 9223. These figures reinforce its position as an elite GPU for both rasterization and compute-heavy workloads.

The percentile positions are telling. The CPU is at the 87th percentile vs all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 87% of all other processors in the database. The GPU is at the 88th percentile vs all GPUs. This near-identical placement means the pairing is well-matched in overall tier. However, the specific workload will determine which component is the limiting factor. The CPU's single-thread score of 941 in 3DMark and its Passmark single-thread score of 3469 are strong, but they are not class-leading in 2024. The GPU, conversely, is near the top of the stack for its generation.

The combined percentiles show a system that is 88% better than the average pairing. It is not the absolute top-of-the-line combination, but it is firmly in the enthusiast tier. The data suggests this is a system built for high-resolution, high-detail gaming and serious content creation, with no single weak link in the core components.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 3 architecture and Vermeer codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The 7 nm process node from TSMC packs 8,300 million transistors across a 2x 74 mm² die size. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262 is a direct indicator of its ability to handle heavy rendering and video encoding tasks. Its Passmark multi-thread score of 39002 and Geekbench multi-core score of 14118 corroborate this. For tasks that can use all 12 cores, this processor is a workhorse.

Single-thread performance is also solid, though not the absolute highest. A 3DMark single-thread score of 941 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1527 are respectable. The Passmark single-thread score of 3469 shows that everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications will feel responsive. This is not a bottleneck for most modern games, which typically rely on 4-8 cores.

The L3 cache of 64 MB is a significant asset for gaming. Many game engines heavily utilize this cache, and the large capacity helps reduce memory latency. The dual-CCX design with 32 MB of L3 per chiplet is a hallmark of the Zen 3 architecture. The data shows this translates to strong performance in latency-sensitive applications.

In real workloads, the scores translate to fast video editing, quick 3D rendering, and smooth software compilation. The Passmark data compression score of 499968 and data encryption score of 31106 show it is capable of handling data-heavy tasks. The floating-point math score of 77700 and integer math score of 140851 demonstrate its raw arithmetic power. The extended instructions score of 33119 indicates strong AVX2 performance for scientific and engineering software.

The CPU's 87th percentile placement against all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (by 0.3%) and behind the Intel Core i7-14650HX (by 0.5%). This places it in a competitive bracket with modern mid-to-high-end mobile and desktop processors.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 9 5900X and RTX 4090 is workload-dependent. At lower resolutions, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor; at higher resolutions, the GPU takes over as the primary bottleneck.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K provides clear evidence. In Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 358.6 at 1080p to 240.7 at 1440p and 134 at 4K. This shows a significant CPU dependency, as the frame rate is so high that the CPU's single-thread performance becomes the constraint. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 33%, while the 1440p to 4K drop is 44%. The larger relative drop at 4K indicates the GPU is becoming the primary limiter.

In Cyberpunk 2077, the scaling is different: 87.7 at 1080p, 79.1 at 1440p, and 50.5 at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is only 10%, while the 1440p to 4K drop is 36%. This is a GPU-bound title, and the data shows the RTX 4090 is the bottleneck even at 1440p. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU's raw rasterization power is the limiting factor at 4K.

The CPU's 87th percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile are nearly identical, suggesting a balanced pairing on paper. However, the nature of the workloads shifts the balance. For esports titles with high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 941) will cap the maximum FPS. For AAA titles with heavy graphics, the GPU's compute power (82.58 TFLOPS FP32) will be the constraint.

The pair's rank of 143 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS places it in the top 3.8% of all combinations. This is a strong overall balance. However, the data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as the GPU is so powerful that it rarely becomes the bottleneck at that resolution. At 4K, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck for the most demanding titles, as shown by the significant FPS drops in games like Ark: Survival Ascended (from 52 at 1080p to 17 at 4K).

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 88, placing it in the top 12% of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900X has an average benchmark score of 41376, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H's score of 41263.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M?

A: The RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60347. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, which is 2.5% higher.

Q: What is the maximum FPS achieved in any measured game at 1920x1080?

A: The highest FPS at 1080p is 793, achieved in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900X has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games at 1920x1080?

A: The average FPS across all games at 1080p is 212.7.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries grounded in the measured performance

This build is for users who demand maximum performance in both gaming and productivity without compromise. The measured data shows it is a top-tier desktop platform, with the CPU at the 87th percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile.

High-refresh 1080p and 1440p gamers are the primary audience. The data shows over 300 FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (793 FPS) and Valorant (437.3 FPS) at 1080p, and over 240 FPS in titles like Counter-Strike 2 (240.7 FPS) and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (280 FPS) at 1440p. This build will easily drive any high-refresh monitor to its maximum potential.

4K gamers who want to play AAA titles at high settings will also benefit. The RTX 4090's 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth allow for 4K gaming at playable frame rates in most titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 50.5 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 46.2 FPS at 4K ultra. While not hitting 144 FPS, these are playable frame rates for a cinematic experience.

Content creators will find this build highly capable. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262 and Passmark multi-thread score of 39002 show it can handle video editing and 3D rendering tasks efficiently. The GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute power and 26613 Passmark GPU compute score accelerate rendering and simulation tasks.

Software developers will benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads for parallel compilation and the large 64 MB L3 cache for data-heavy workloads. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 140851 is a strong indicator of compiler and build performance.

Small business workstations that require a mix of productivity and occasional GPU-accelerated tasks will find this build overkill but future-proof. The ECC memory support on the CPU and the massive 24 GB GPU memory buffer are assets for data integrity and large datasets.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: This is the build's strongest scenario. The data shows 793 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and 437.3 FPS in Valorant at 1080p. At 1440p, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X runs at 281.3 FPS. This system is built to push 240Hz and 360Hz monitors to their limits.

Streaming: The combination of 12 CPU cores and the RTX 4090's NVENC encoder (implied by the 512 tensor cores) allows for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262 ensures there is headroom for streaming software while gaming.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Geekbench multi-core score of 14118) and the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 26613) make for fast timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export times. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with large media files.

3D rendering: The CPU's Passmark floating-point math score of 77700 and the GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 power make this a potent rendering workstation. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16262 shows the CPU can handle CPU-based rendering, while the GPU accelerates GPU-based renderers.

Software development: The 24 threads and Passmark data compression score of 499968 indicate strong parallel build performance. The large L3 cache reduces memory latency for complex projects.

Student and office work: This build is far beyond the requirements for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 3469 in Passmark ensures snappy application launches, but the system's power is wasted on basic productivity. It would be an investment for a student in a demanding field like engineering or 3D art.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture and Vermeer codename. The GPU is a GeForce 40-series card, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and AD102 chip.

The overall tier is firmly in the high-end enthusiast segment. The CPU's 87th percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile place both components in the top 12-13% of all components in the database. The combined percentile is 88, and the pair ranks 143rd out of 3732 pairs by average FPS, placing it in the top 3.8% of all tested combinations.

This is not a budget or mid-range system. The CPU and GPU are both high-performance parts designed for demanding workloads. The CPU's 105 W TDP and the GPU's 450 W TDP indicate a system that requires substantial power delivery and cooling. The GPU is a triple-slot card, measuring 304 mm in length, which requires a spacious case.

The pairing is well-balanced for most scenarios, with the CPU and GPU in the same performance tier. It is a system that can handle any game at high settings and any productivity task with ease. The data shows it is a top-tier build, not a compromise.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on the AMD Socket AM4. This is the final generation of processors for this socket, which means the CPU upgrade path is limited to the 5000 series. The Ryzen 9 5900X is already near the top of the stack for AM4, so a CPU upgrade would offer marginal gains at best.

Memory support is for DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration. The system supports ECC memory, which is a feature for data integrity in workstations. The memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. Upgrading to faster DDR4 memory could provide a small performance boost, but the system is not memory-bandwidth limited for most tasks.

The PCIe interface is Gen 4. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and the CPU supports Gen 4. This is a mature standard that provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 4090. The GPU's 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth is not constrained by the PCIe interface.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 850 W, while the CPU's TDP is 105 W. This leaves significant headroom for other components. The power connectors are a single 16-pin for the GPU. For overclocking, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, which would require a higher-quality power supply and cooling. The GPU's TDP is 450 W, and the system will draw a substantial amount of power under load.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU, as the RTX 4090 is marked as end-of-life with a successor (GeForce 50) already released. However, this would require a new power supply if the current one is at the 850 W minimum. The CPU's upgrade path is effectively sealed with the end of the AM4 platform, so the platform itself would need a motherboard and memory upgrade to move to a newer generation. The data shows this system is well-balanced, so the most impactful upgrade would be to the GPU when a newer, more powerful model becomes available.