SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
74%
VS
GPU
95%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS

3,924 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a laptop configuration that places a high-end Ada Lovelace GPU alongside a capable, but older, Zen 3 processor. This pairing creates a distinct performance profile where the GPU is the clear dominant force. The data shows a combined percentile of 69, indicating this build outperforms the majority of systems in the database, yet the specific characteristics of each component suggest a unique balance of strengths and potential limitations. This analysis examines the individual components, their platform context, and the implications for various workloads based solely on the provided benchmark data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a substantial piece of silicon built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip, designated AD104, contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is robust, comprising 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with an 18 Gbps effective data rate. This configuration provides ample capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures and complex 3D scenes.

The GPU's compute resources are extensive. It features 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 80 render output units (ROPs). For hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, it integrates 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores. The base clock is 1290 MHz, which boosts to 1665 MHz. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s, and a raw FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS. The FP16 rate is identical at 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1), which is notable for workloads that can utilize reduced precision. The GPU's power envelope is rated at 110 W TDP.

Benchmark scores for the RTX 4080 Mobile show a strong graphics performance. In PassMark's G3D test, it scores 24926, which is a high mark indicating excellent DirectX and OpenGL performance. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 11191 shows significant compute throughput for general-purpose tasks. In Geekbench, it scores 159575 in OpenCL and 145807 in Vulkan, demonstrating strong cross-API performance. The GPU holds a percentile of 81 among all GPUs, placing it in the top quintile of the database. Its average benchmark score is 38135.

The nearest rivals in the database, based on average score, are the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (38299, deltaPct -0.4), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38349, deltaPct -0.6), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (37648, deltaPct 1.3), and the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628, deltaPct 1.3). This means the RTX 4080 Mobile performs within 1% of its closest competitors in the aggregated benchmark, despite the fact that the RTX 5080 Mobile is a successor product and the RTX 4070 is a desktop part. This suggests that the mobile variant is well-tuned for its power class. The data clearly indicates that for rendering tasks, this GPU offers top-tier performance, with the high FP32 throughput and 12 GB VRAM being particularly beneficial for 3D rendering and video editing.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform for this build is defined by the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS processor. The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the upgrade path for the processor itself is non-existent in the traditional sense; it is soldered to the motherboard. The memory support is for DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s. This is a deliberate constraint of the platform, as the processor's memory controller is designed for DDR4, not the newer DDR5 standard. The CPU also supports PCIe Gen 3, which is a generation behind the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

This creates an interesting platform mismatch. The RTX 4080 Mobile is designed for a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus, but the Ryzen 9 5900HS only provides PCIe Gen 3. This means the GPU will operate at a reduced bandwidth compared to its full potential on a newer platform. The data shows the GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, but the CPU's pcie field is "Gen 3". This is a potential performance bottleneck for data transfer between the CPU and GPU, though its impact on gaming and rendering is likely minimal. The power supply requirements are not a concern for a laptop, as the GPU TDP is 110 W, but there is no suggestedPsu or launchMsrp data for either component.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the entire platform, including the CPU, motherboard, and memory, would need to be replaced to take advantage of a newer GPU. The current configuration is a self-contained laptop system, so the only realistic upgrade path is to a new laptop. The data does not specify any other upgrade options within this platform. The fact that the CPU is a mobile part with a low 35 W TDP and uses an integrated GPU (Radeon Vega 8) reinforces that this is a complete, non-upgradable system. The memory support for DDR4 and PCIe Gen 3 are the key limiting factors for future expansion.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS is a mobile processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Cezanne. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. This is a high-performance mobile CPU, but it is from the generation preceding the GPU. The TDP is rated at 35 W, which is standard for a high-end laptop processor.

The CPU's benchmark scores show a balanced performance profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12745.5 in multi-core and 1475.5 in single-core. The multi-core score is strong, indicating good performance for threaded workloads, while the single-core score is respectable but not class-leading. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2041 multi-core and 236.5 single-core. The 3DMark tests show scaling with thread count: 2 threads (1690), 4 threads (3133), 8 threads (5049), 16 threads (6011), and max threads (5992). This scaling pattern shows that the CPU efficiently utilizes up to 8 cores, with minimal gains beyond that, which is typical for the 8-core/16-thread design.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 3924, placing it at the 56th percentile among all CPUs. This is a mid-range position, meaning it is outperformed by a significant portion of the CPU market. The nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon E-2278GE (3939, deltaPct -0.4), the AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE (3906, deltaPct 0.5), the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U (3958, deltaPct -0.9), and the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (3959, deltaPct -0.9). These rivals have nearly identical average scores, with deltas of less than 1%, indicating that the 5900HS is in a very tight cluster of CPUs with similar aggregate performance. For real workloads, this means the CPU is well-suited for tasks like software compilation, content creation, and productivity applications, but it is not a top-tier performer in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this laptop build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 69, indicating it outperforms 69% of all systems in the database.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, provided by 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900HS has an average benchmark score of 3924. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E-2278GE, has an average score of 3939, which is a deltaPct of -0.4, meaning the 5900HS is slightly slower.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has a raw FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS, with the same FP16 rate of 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS does not support ECC memory, as indicated by the `eccMemory` field being false.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile holds the 81st percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 7 nm process, while the GPU is manufactured on a 5 nm process, both at TSMC.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance of this build is characterized by a stark contrast between the CPU and GPU. The GPU, the RTX 4080 Mobile, is a top-tier performer, holding the 81st percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 38135. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, has an average score of 37648, which is a deltaPct of 1.3, meaning the 4080 Mobile is 1.3% faster. The CPU, the Ryzen 9 5900HS, is a solid but less exceptional performer, holding only the 56th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 3924.

The CPU's performance is tightly clustered with its rivals, with deltas of less than 1% against the Intel Xeon E-2278GE, AMD Ryzen 5 4600GE, AMD Ryzen 3 7330U, and Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3. This indicates that the CPU is not a performance outlier; it is a dependable mid-range part. In specific tests, the CPU scores 12745.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1475.5 in single-core, while the GPU scores 24926 in PassMark G3D and 11191 in PassMark GPU Compute.

The combined picture is one of a system where the GPU is the primary driver of high performance. The combined percentile of 69 is a weighted measure, but the individual percentiles (56 for CPU, 81 for GPU) show that the GPU is carrying the system's overall ranking. The data suggests that in applications that are heavily GPU-dependent, such as gaming and 3D rendering, this build will perform exceptionally well. In CPU-bound tasks, such as multi-threaded productivity, the performance will be good but not class-leading. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 38135, which is nearly ten times the CPU's average of 3924, although these are different types of benchmarks and are not directly comparable in magnitude.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build is ideally suited for users whose primary workloads are GPU-intensive. The RTX 4080 Mobile's 81st percentile ranking and high FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS make it an excellent choice for 3D rendering, video editing, and other graphics-heavy creative tasks. The 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for handling large textures and complex scenes. For gamers, this system is designed for high-refresh-rate gaming, though the specific FPS data is not measured. The data implies that at high resolutions, the GPU will deliver smooth, playable frame rates in most titles.

Content creators will benefit from the combination of a strong GPU and a capable CPU. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a multi-core score of 12745.5 in Cinebench R23, can handle video encoding and rendering tasks effectively. The GPU's compute score of 11191 in PassMark further accelerates these workloads. Software developers will find the 16 threads useful for compilation tasks, and the GPU's compute capabilities can be leveraged for machine learning and data processing. The system is also suitable for students and small business workstations, as the CPU's 56th percentile performance is more than adequate for office applications, web browsing, and general productivity.

The data shows that this is not a system for users who require the absolute best CPU performance. The 5900HS is a mid-range CPU, and in CPU-bound scenarios, it will be the limiting factor. However, for users who prioritize graphics performance, this build offers a significant advantage. The target user is someone who wants a laptop that can handle demanding creative and gaming workloads without compromise on the GPU front, even if the CPU is a generation behind.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed towards the GPU. The RTX 4080 Mobile is in the 81st percentile, while the Ryzen 9 5900HS is in the 56th percentile. This indicates a potential bottleneck where the CPU may limit the GPU's performance in certain workloads. In gaming, this could manifest as lower frame rates at lower resolutions where the CPU is the primary constraint. The data does not include specific FPS figures, but the percentile gap is a strong indicator of this imbalance.

The CPU's performance in 3DMark tests shows a clear pattern: the score scales from 1690 at 2 threads to 6011 at 16 threads, but the jump from 8 threads (5049) to 16 threads (6011) is only a 19% increase. This suggests that the CPU's architecture is efficient up to 8 cores, but adding more threads yields diminishing returns. This is typical for a mobile chip and means that in heavily multi-threaded scenarios like video encoding, the CPU will perform well but not scale perfectly.

The bottleneck is likely the CPU in gaming scenarios, especially at 1080p or lower resolutions where the GPU is not fully utilized. The GPU's high pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s can be bottlenecked by the CPU's ability to feed it draw calls. The PCIe Gen 3 interface, instead of the GPU's native PCIe 4.0, is another potential bottleneck for data transfer, though its impact is less predictable. For rendering and compute tasks, the GPU is the clear driver, and the CPU is less likely to be a limiting factor, as the workload is primarily on the GPU. The data suggests that for a balanced workload, the CPU is the component that will hold the system back in certain scenarios.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. The CPU is a Zen 3-based 8-core processor from the 5000 series, while the GPU is a high-end Ada Lovelace part from the GeForce 40-series. The system is designed as a high-performance mobile workstation or gaming laptop, with a combined percentile of 69, meaning it is in the top 31% of all systems in the database.

The class of this build is clearly a premium laptop. The GPU is the standout component, with its 81st percentile ranking and robust feature set including 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores. The CPU, while not as high-ranking, is a competent performer. The overall tier of this build, based on the combined percentile, is solidly above average. It is not a flagship-level system (which would be in the 90th percentile or higher), but it is a high-end configuration that will handle demanding tasks with ease. The combination of a previous-generation CPU with a current-generation GPU is unusual but not uncommon in laptops, where manufacturers often use older CPUs to maintain a price point or manage thermals.

The data indicates that this build is a powerful performer, with the GPU being the primary reason for its high ranking. The CPU's lower percentile suggests that the system is not fully balanced, but for users who prioritize graphics, this is a compelling configuration. The lack of measured FPS data and a pairRankByFps value means that its exact gaming performance cannot be quantified, but the benchmark scores provide a strong indication of its capabilities. This is a build that offers high-end GPU power in a mobile form factor, with the CPU being a secondary consideration.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. There are no `measuredFpsUltraByGame` rows, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all FPS discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's high PassMark G3D score of 24926 and its 81st percentile ranking strongly suggest that this system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and it should handle 4K gaming in many titles.

The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern game textures at high settings. The CPU's performance, while lower, is still capable of driving the GPU in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU is the bottleneck. The single-thread score of 1475.5 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for game logic and physics. The potential bottleneck is the PCIe Gen 3 interface, which may slightly reduce performance compared to a PCIe 4.0 system.

Given the GPU's FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS and the lack of measured data, it is reasonable to estimate that this system will deliver high frame rates in esports titles and demanding AAA games. The estimates are that at 1080p ultra settings, frame rates will be very high, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in many games. At 1440p ultra, the system should still achieve high refresh rates. At 4K ultra, the performance will be playable, but may require settings adjustments for the most demanding titles. These are estimates based on the GPU's compute power and the CPU's adequate performance, but the exact figures remain unknown.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking and high pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s indicate it can push high frame rates, while the CPU's 8 cores are sufficient for modern game engines. The lack of measured FPS means the exact performance is unknown, but the data strongly supports this use case.

Streaming: The system can handle game streaming, as the GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) is not explicitly in the data, but the high compute score of 11191 in PassMark can assist with encoding. The CPU's 16 threads can handle the encoding workload, though the lower CPU percentile may limit the ability to stream and play CPU-intensive games simultaneously.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and high memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s are ideal for editing high-resolution video. The GPU's FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS accelerates effects and rendering, and the CPU's multi-core score of 12745.5 in Cinebench R23 can handle video decoding and timeline scrubbing.

3D rendering: The GPU is the dominant force here. With 58 RT cores for ray tracing and 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, it is a powerful renderer. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for complex scenes. The CPU's 16 threads assist with scene setup and simulation, but the GPU will be the primary renderer.

Software development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a multi-core score of 6011 in 3DMark, are adequate for compiling code. The GPU's compute capabilities can be used for parallel processing tasks. The system is a solid choice for developers who also game or do creative work.

Student and office work: This is a capable, albeit overpowered, system for such tasks. The CPU's 56th percentile performance is more than enough for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is excessive for this use case, but it does not detract from the system's usability. The battery life is not specified, but the 35W TDP CPU suggests it may be reasonable.