SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

46,971 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs AMD’s 12-core Ryzen 9 5900 desktop processor with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4010, a combination whose benchmark profile is sharply split: the CPU sits near the top of the desktop stack, while the GPU lands near the bottom. The data shows a system that can crush multi-threaded productivity workloads but will struggle to drive modern games at high settings, especially at higher resolutions. Below is a breakdown of the components, their measured scores, and what that means for real-world use.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is built on the Ampere architecture (chip GA107) using an 8 nm process from Samsung, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The GPU’s memory subsystem is its most limiting factor: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a small frame buffer by 2024 standards, and it directly caps texture-heavy workloads and high-resolution rendering. The memory clock runs at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective), while the base clock is 1417 MHz and the boost clock reaches 1762 MHz.

Compute resources are modest: 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. The RTX 4010 includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, so it supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style tensor operations, but the raw throughput is low. Pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. FP32 performance sits at 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same figure (1:1). That makes the card competent for light 3D work or entry-level rendering, but far from a compute powerhouse.

The single benchmark score in the FACT PACK is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the RTX 4010 scores 2893. That result places it at the 18th percentile of all GPUs, indicating that it outperforms only a small fraction of the database. For rendering, this means the GPU can handle basic viewport work and low-complexity scenes, but long render times should be expected for any serious production workload. The 4 GB VRAM also limits texture sizes and scene complexity; larger assets will spill over into system memory, causing stutters or outright failures. The card’s TDP is 50 W, requires no power connectors, and fits a single-slot form factor, so it is clearly designed for low-power or compact desktop builds rather than high-end gaming or workstation rendering.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks are strong across the board. In Cinebench R15, the Ryzen 9 5900 scores 2906 multi-core and 410 single-core. Cinebench R20 results are 12110 multi-core and 1709 single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 28834 multi-core and 4070 single-core. PassMark results include multi-thread score of 33969, single-thread of 3439, integer math at 128641, floating point math at 69124, data compression at 411453, data encryption at 26247, extended instructions at 26859, prime number finding at 213, random string sorting at 43386, and physics at 1697. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46971, putting it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs — a very strong showing.

The GPU’s 3DMark score of 2893 places it at the 18th percentile, which is a stark contrast to the CPU’s 89th percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 54, reflecting the massive imbalance. When comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 5900 is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (deltaPct -0.1), the Intel Core i7-13700K (deltaPct 0.2), the Intel Core i9-12900F (deltaPct -0.4), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (deltaPct 0.7). So the CPU is right in the middle of a tight pack of top-tier processors. The GPU, meanwhile, is within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (deltaPct -0.5), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (deltaPct -0.6), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (deltaPct -0.7), and the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (deltaPct -1). That is a strange cluster — the RTX 4010’s 3DMark score is nearly identical to much more capable cards, but its 18th percentile rank shows how low the absolute score is.

The combined picture is a system that can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks with ease but will bottleneck severely in GPU-bound scenarios. For productivity, the CPU carries the load; for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 4010 becomes the clear limiting factor.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU’s 18th percentile rank and 3DMark score of 2893 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 4010 will deliver playable but unimpressive frame rates in most titles — likely in the 30–60 FPS range for modern games, depending on optimization. At 1440p, expect a significant drop, with many games falling below 30 FPS on ultra presets. At 4K, the 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will be overwhelmed; frame rates would be too low for smooth play in all but the lightest esports titles.

The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4070 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread of 3439 means that in CPU-limited scenarios (e.g., low resolution, high refresh rate with a lighter GPU load), the Ryzen 9 5900 will not hold back performance. However, the GPU is the bottleneck in almost every gaming scenario. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the RTX 4010 might push 60–100 FPS at 1080p with medium settings, but for AAA games, ultra settings at 1080p will be marginal, and higher resolutions are not viable. These figures are estimates based on the GPU’s percentile and score; actual results will vary by title and driver optimization.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is not for gamers seeking high-refresh or high-resolution experiences. The RTX 4010’s 18th percentile GPU rank and 4 GB VRAM make it unsuitable for 1440p or 4K gaming, and even 1080p ultra settings will be a struggle. Instead, the target user is someone whose primary workload is CPU-bound. Content creators doing video editing, software compilation, or data analysis will benefit from the Ryzen 9 5900’s 12 cores, 24 threads, and 89th percentile CPU rank. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28834 and PassMark multi-thread score of 33969 indicate strong parallel performance — enough for 4K video export, large dataset processing, or multi-tasking with many applications open.

Students and small business users running office applications, web development, or light programming will find the CPU more than sufficient, while the GPU handles basic display output and 2D acceleration. For developers, the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 411453 and encryption score of 26247 suggest fast compile times and secure data handling. However, anyone needing GPU-accelerated rendering, machine learning training, or serious 3D work should look elsewhere — the RTX 4010 simply lacks the VRAM and compute power. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level GPU, so it fits a niche: high-throughput computing with minimal graphics demands.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The imbalance is stark: the CPU sits at the 89th percentile, the GPU at the 18th, and the combined percentile is 54. In any GPU-bound workload — gaming, 3D rendering, video encoding with GPU acceleration — the RTX 4010 is the bottleneck. Its 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will saturate quickly in modern games, and the 3DMark score of 2893 (18th percentile) confirms that even synthetic benchmarks place it in the lowest tier. For gaming, FPS scaling is directly tied to the GPU; the CPU’s high single-thread score (4070 in Cinebench R23) means it will not cause frame drops, but the GPU will cap performance at low levels.

In CPU-bound workloads — video editing, software compilation, data processing — the Ryzen 9 5900 is the star. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance, as shown by the 89th percentile rank and average benchmark score of 46971. The GPU becomes irrelevant for these tasks, except for display output. The bottleneck is therefore workload-dependent: for productivity, the CPU leads; for graphics, the GPU holds everything back. This is not a balanced build; it is a CPU-heavy system with a placeholder GPU.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer) using a 7 nm process from TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W — impressively low for the core count. The chip uses the AM4 socket and supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration, offering 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It includes 64 MB of L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 64 KB of L1 per core. The CPU supports ECC memory and has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. It was released on 2021-01-11 and remains in active production.

The benchmark scores confirm its high-end status. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 28834 is strong for a 65 W part, and the single-core score of 4070 is competitive with newer chips. PassMark single-thread of 3439 and multi-thread of 33969 show balanced performance across integer and floating-point workloads (128641 and 69124, respectively). The data compression score of 411453 is particularly notable for file archiving and database tasks. The 89th percentile rank means it outperforms 89% of all CPUs in the database, and its average benchmark score of 46971 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022, deltaPct -0.1) and the Intel Core i7-13700K (46881, deltaPct 0.2). For real workloads, this CPU handles video editing timelines, 3D scene simulation, software builds, and heavy multitasking without breaking a sweat.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907, deltaPct -0.5), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910, deltaPct -0.6), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913, deltaPct -0.7), and the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (2923, deltaPct -1).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component in this build?

A: The CPU is far stronger, ranking at the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46971, while the GPU ranks at the 18th percentile with a score of 2893.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900 has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz and a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the RTX 4010 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor operations, though raw performance is low.

Q: What is the build’s combined percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 54, reflecting the large gap between the CPU’s 89th and GPU’s 18th percentile ranks.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010. The CPU is a high-end 12-core processor from the 5000 series, while the GPU is an entry-level Ampere card with 4 GB VRAM. The overall tier is mixed: the CPU is top-tier (89th percentile), the GPU is bottom-tier (18th percentile), and the combined percentile of 54 places the system in the middle of the database. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a CPU-centric workstation with a minimal GPU for display and light graphics tasks. The CPU’s release date of 2021-01-11 and the GPU’s release date of 2024-04-15 show a generational gap, with the CPU older but more powerful relative to its peers.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The RTX 4010’s 18th percentile rank and 3DMark score of 2893 mean frame rates will be low even at 1080p. The CPU’s strong single-thread score (4070 in Cinebench R23) cannot compensate for the GPU bottleneck, so expect 30–60 FPS in modern titles at best.

Streaming: Mixed. The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads (PassMark multi-thread 33969) can handle software encoding at high quality, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and low compute (2.706 TFLOPS) limit game capture quality. Streaming at 1080p with a light game might work, but any GPU-heavy title will struggle.

Video editing: Strong. The Ryzen 9 5900’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28834 and PassMark data compression of 411453 accelerate export times and timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s low VRAM may limit effects and color grading, but for standard editing, this is a capable system.

3D rendering: Weak. The RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for complex scenes. CPU-based rendering would use the 12 cores effectively, but GPU rendering will hit memory and compute limits quickly.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU’s integer math score of 128641 and extended instructions score of 26859 speed up compilation and code analysis. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a solid dev machine.

Student and office work: Overkill but effective. The CPU’s 89th percentile rank ensures smooth multitasking across browsers, documents, and spreadsheets. The GPU handles 2D acceleration fine, though its 18th percentile rank is irrelevant for typical office workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds