SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5900 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

46,971 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 and Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop pairing that targets high-throughput productivity and high-resolution gaming. The processor is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 platform, while the graphics card is a 16 GB RDNA 3 solution. The combined system sits at the 74th percentile across all benchmarked configurations, indicating a well-above-average tier, though the specific role of each component varies significantly by workload.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, all within a 65 W TDP. The chip features a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache, alongside 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core. This cache hierarchy is critical for workloads that repeatedly access large datasets, reducing latency and improving throughput in rendering and compilation tasks.

Benchmark results show the CPU's dual nature. In multi-threaded tests, it is a powerhouse: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 28,834, R20 multi-core scores 12,110, and R15 multi-core scores 2,906. PassMark's multithread score of 33,969 reinforces this, as does the floating-point math score of 69,124 and integer math score of 128,641. These numbers indicate that the processor can handle heavy parallel workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific simulations without breaking a sweat. The 8,300 million transistors packed into dual 74 mm² dies help explain this raw throughput.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive, though relative to its own multi-core might, it is the less dominant aspect. Cinebench R23 single-core scores 4,070, R20 single-core scores 1,709, and R15 single-core scores 410. PassMark single-thread score lands at 3,439. These figures suggest strong responsiveness in everyday tasks and in lightly-threaded applications like older games or certain database queries. The data encryption score of 26,247 and compression score of 411,453 further indicate robust performance in security and archiving tasks.

The CPU's percentile ranking against all processors is 89, placing it in the top tier of available chips. Its average benchmark score of 46,971 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47,022, delta -0.1%) and the Intel Core i9-12900F (47,176, delta -0.4%). It edges out the Intel Core i7-13700K (46,881, delta 0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (46,654, delta 0.7%). This means the 5900 is effectively a performance peer to those chips in aggregate, despite being from an older generation. For real workloads, this means a user upgrading from a mid-range CPU will see massive gains in multi-threaded tasks, while single-threaded performance remains competitive with much newer hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The aggregate benchmark data reveals a system with a clear performance hierarchy. The CPU is the dominant component, sitting at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, by contrast, sits at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 74, which is a weighted average reflecting the CPU's stronger relative standing.

Examining the GPU's specific scores provides context for its percentile position. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 7700 scores 2,865. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 106,028, which is a strong compute result. PassMark G3D score is 20,974, while G2D is 1,206. The GPU's average benchmark score is 15,852. This places it in a tight cluster with the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862, delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16,014, delta -1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15,679, delta 1.1%). It is 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16,129). This suggests the RX 7700 is positioned as a solid mid-range performer, not a flagship.

The combined picture shows a system that is heavily weighted toward CPU compute. In CPU-intensive tasks like video rendering, physics simulation (PassMark physics score of 1,697), or prime number finding (score of 213), the system will perform far above the 74th percentile. In GPU-bound tasks like pure rasterization at high resolutions, the system will perform closer to the 58th percentile. The data indicates a slight imbalance where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in certain scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, utilizing the Navi 32 chip produced on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It houses 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large frame buffer is a significant advantage for high-resolution textures and for workloads that spill over typical 8 GB or 12 GB limits.

Core specifications include 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations pipelines. The GPU also features 40 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds are listed as a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The memory operates at 2438 MHz, effectively 19.5 Gbps. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio of 25.18 TFLOPS.

Benchmark scores indicate the GPU's capabilities in different API environments. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 186 is the highest among the listed DX tests, while DirectX 12 scores 96, DirectX 10 scores 92, and DirectX 9 scores 261. The G3D score of 20,974 is the primary gaming metric. The GPU compute score of 10,963 in PassMark, alongside the high Geekbench OpenCL score, suggests that the card handles compute tasks reasonably well, though it is not its primary strength.

For rendering tasks, the 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth are the standout features. The 40 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the 58th percentile ranking suggests that raw ray tracing performance is not class-leading. The 1.7% delta behind the RTX 3060 Ti in average score indicates that in traditional rasterization, this card trades blows with a previous-generation mid-range competitor. The 5 nm process and 200 W TDP show it is a power-efficient design relative to its performance class.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark data indicates that the Ryzen 9 5900 is the stronger component in this pairing. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 58th percentile creates a situation where the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as the PassMark physics test (score 1,697) or data compression (411,453), the CPU will operate at a level far above the system's combined 74th percentile. The GPU will not bottleneck these tasks.

Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering with heavy shading, the RX 7700 will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 58th percentile means that in these tasks, the system will perform like a mid-range machine, not a top-tier one. The CPU will have significant idle capacity while waiting on the GPU to complete frames or shading passes.

The FPS scaling evidence, or lack thereof, is critical here. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination. Therefore, any FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores. The CPU's massive multi-threaded lead over the GPU's relative score suggests that in games that are CPU-limited (e.g., esports titles at low resolution), the system will perform exceptionally well, likely exceeding the 74th percentile. In games that are GPU-limited (e.g., AAA titles at 4K with ultra settings), the system will perform closer to the 58th percentile, and the CPU's power will be underutilized.

This imbalance is not necessarily a flaw. For a user who prioritizes productivity (video editing, compiling, rendering) and plays games at 1440p or 4K, the pairing makes sense; the CPU ensures fast render times, and the GPU provides adequate gaming performance. For a user who prioritizes maximum FPS at 1080p with a high refresh rate monitor, the GPU will be the bottleneck, and the CPU's potential will be wasted.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 better than the Intel Core i7-13700K?

A: In aggregate benchmark scores, the Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46,971, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13700K's 46,881. The performance is effectively identical in overall average, though individual workload performance may vary.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7700 have, and why does it matter?

A: The RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. This large capacity allows for high-resolution texture packs and future game requirements that exceed 8 GB or 12 GB.

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance like?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the CPU scores 4,070. PassMark single-thread score is 3,439. These figures indicate strong performance for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

Q: Where does the GPU rank compared to all other GPUs?

A: The RX 7700 is at the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 15,852, which is 1.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 5900 supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the processor's manufacturing process?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900 is manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC, containing 8,300 million transistors.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined CPU and GPU pairing is at the 74th percentile of all benchmarked systems. This indicates a machine that outperforms roughly three-quarters of tested configurations.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is heavily GPU-dependent. The RX 7700's 58th percentile ranking suggests that at 1080p with high refresh rates, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU can easily keep up, but the GPU may struggle to hit extremely high FPS in demanding titles. Expect performance in the mid-range tier, not top-tier.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. With 12 cores and 24 threads, it can handle game encoding (x264) alongside gameplay without significant performance drops. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 28,834) indicate it can process the encoding workload while leaving headroom for the game.

Video Editing: This is a primary strength of the system. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export times will be fast. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12,110 and PassMark multithread score of 33,969 support this. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is also beneficial for GPU-accelerated effects and previews.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU dominates here. Render tasks like those in Cinebench R23 (multi-core score 28,834) will complete quickly. The GPU can assist with rendering via OpenCL (Geekbench score 106,028), but the CPU is the clear workhorse in this pairing.

Software Development: Compilation is a multi-threaded task that benefits from the CPU's 12 cores. The PassMark integer math score of 128,641 and data compression score of 411,453 indicate fast code compilation and package management. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for this scenario. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4,070) ensures snappy office applications, but the 12 cores will largely sit idle. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is unnecessary for typical office tasks. However, for students in engineering or creative fields, the CPU power is a significant asset.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need heavy CPU compute power for professional or semi-professional work. Content creators in video editing and 3D rendering will benefit most from the CPU's 89th percentile ranking. Software developers compiling large projects will see significant time savings. Data analysts and scientists running simulations or processing large datasets will leverage the multi-threaded performance.

For gamers, the target is primarily those playing at 1440p or 4K resolution, where the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is an asset. The GPU's 58th percentile means that at 1080p, the system is not ideal for competitive high-refresh gaming, as the CPU will be underutilized. Small business workstations handling CAD, financial modeling, or database management will perform admirably, with the CPU's ECC memory support being a key feature for data integrity.

The build is less suited for esports gamers seeking maximum frame rates at 1080p or for users strictly on a tight budget, as the CPU's power is wasted in purely gaming scenarios. It is an ideal choice for a hybrid machine where productivity is the primary objective and gaming is a secondary, though capable, function.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class configuration pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 processor with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 graphics card. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 3 part on the AM4 socket, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 card with 16 GB of VRAM. The system's combined percentile rank is 74, placing it in the upper-midrange to high-end tier of all benchmarked systems.

The pairing is characterized by a strong CPU (89th percentile) and a mid-range GPU (58th percentile). This makes it a compute-first workstation that can also handle gaming. The CPU's release date is January 2021, while the GPU is a much newer release from September 2025. This generational gap explains the performance discrepancy: the CPU is a proven high-end part, while the GPU is a contemporary mid-range offering. The system is not balanced in terms of raw component tier, but it is balanced in terms of use case, offering a high level of multi-threaded compute performance that is unmatched by the GPU's relative standing.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All FPS figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentiles provided, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 58th percentile and its average benchmark score of 15,852, gaming performance is expected to be in the mid-range tier. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck in most modern titles, with the CPU's 89th percentile ensuring it is never the limiting factor. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 11 score of 186 is its highest DX test, suggesting that DX11 titles may perform relatively better than DX12 titles, which scored 96.

The 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature for gaming. At 1440p or 4K, this capacity prevents texture pop-in and allows for maximum detail settings without memory-related stutters. The memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s is sufficient for high-resolution textures. However, the GPU's raw compute power (25.18 TFLOPS FP32) is not class-leading, so frame rates in demanding titles at 4K ultra will likely be in the playable but not high-refresh territory (e.g., 60 FPS, not 144 FPS).

In CPU-intensive games or at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's power will allow for high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU will still cap the maximum FPS. For example, in a game that is heavily CPU-bound, the system might achieve very high FPS, but in a game that is GPU-bound at 1080p, the performance will align with the GPU's 58th percentile standing. Users should expect a system that delivers smooth 60+ FPS experiences at 1440p in most games, with the ability to push higher frame rates in less demanding or well-optimized titles, but not a top-tier 4K high-refresh machine.