SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

58,386 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combine the strongest sub‑enthusiast CPU and GPU classes—the CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all desktop processors, the GPU at the 86th, and the pairing lands at the 89th combined percentile. In multi‑core performance the CPU holds a Cinebench R23 score of 22807, while single‑core reaches 2228; the GPU, meanwhile, delivers a PassMark G3D score of 34245 and an average 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6600. Across the 69 measured games at ultra settings, the pair averages 201.9 FPS, placing it 241st out of 3732 CPU+GPU combinations. This is a system built to excel at 1440p high‑refresh gaming, to render without waiting, and to keep even the busiest workstation tasks moving; it also brings enough compute headroom that 4K gaming is playable, though not always at a locked 60 FPS in the heaviest titles.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 9850X3D uses the Zen 5 architecture on the Granite Ridge codename, fabricated on a 4 nm process with 8,315 million transistors across a 70.6 mm² die. It is a 8‑core, 16‑thread processor that posts a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. That 120 W TDP is modest for a top‑back CPU, and the chip is unlocked for multiplier overclocking. The L3 cache is the standout feature: 96 MB shared, with 80 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core. For real workloads, that extremely large L3 makes it ideal for data‑heavy, latency‑sensitive applications such as physics simulation, large PHP codebases, or any task where the working set doesn't fit in a typical 32 MB L3. The CPU supports dual‑channel DDR5 memory with an 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it has ECC memory support, which suits workstation builds that need bit‑level integrity. PCIe Gen 5 is present with 24 CPU‑only lanes, so expansion and storage speeds are not the bottleneck. Graphics are integrated via Radeon Graphics, which canserve as a display output or backup if a desktop GPU is not present.

The benchmark scores quantify this. In Cinebench R23 it pulls 22807 multi‑core and 2228 single‑core. In PassMark, the multi‑thread score is 41318, single‑thread is 4704, integer math score 123140, and floating point math 81998. These results indicate a CPU that is approximately 30% faster in multi‑core than a typical 8‑core competitor, though the exact nearest rivals show a tight margin: an Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M runs 0.1% slower (avg 58323), an Intel Core i9‑14900 is 0.5% slower (58115), and an Intel Xeon w5‑571 5‑series is 0.6% faster (58454) — all are within the same performance band. The 3D V‑Cache, which we know exists as an "X3D" model, adds substantial multithreading advantage, but the dataset also reveals a single‑thread score that is exceptionally high, backing the CPU's suitability for coding, spreadsheets, and the occasional low‑latency task.

Benchmark Performance

Objectively, the numbers place the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all processors, the GPU in the 86th, and the pair in the 89th combined percentile. The CPU's average benchmark score across all tests is 58386, with the nearest competitor in performance being the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (delta +0.1%), the Intel Xeon w5‑8065M (delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i9‑03600K (delta -0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (delta -0.7%). These deltas are the relative score difference—positive means the Ryzen is faster. For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the original RTX 4080 (score 54247, delta -0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, -1.1%), Radeon RX 6750 GRE (55698, -2.7%), and AMD Radeon 8060S (55857, -2.8%). Thus the RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms four of those but has one fastest in the same percentile level. The CPU also performs perf math: PassMark data compression 474501, data encryption 22856, extended instructions 39272, integer math 123140, floating point 81998, find prime numbers 435, physical index 4171, random stringsorting 49764. These numbers tell a single‑thread performance story—the Ryzen 7 9850X3D has balanced and consistent performance across integer/FLOAT and instruction‑heavy tasks.

The GPU adds a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600, GeekBench OpenCL 219065 and Vulkan 260075, and PassMark G3D of 34245 plus GPU compute 19822. The compute performance—52.22 TFLOPS for FP32 and FP16—is identical at 1:1, which is typical of modern desktop graphics and directly applies to rendering, AI inference, and other parallel workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

In most tasks, the CPU is not the limiter at high resolution. The pair's 1080p average FPS across all games at ultra is 201.9, and the 1440p scores often remain high. For example, Counter‑Strike 2 scores 323 FPS at 1080p, 214 at 1440p, and 120 at 4K. Similarly, Valorant shows 592 / 562 / 505 across resolutions. These esports‑title numbers drop very little from 1440p to 4K, indicating that the CPU can supply frames far above the GPU's ceiling. In contrast, heavy AAA games drop more sharply: Cyberpunk 2077 goes from 95 FPS (1080p) to 71 (1440p) to 47 (4K), and Ark Survival Ascended from 47 / 30 / 16. The decreasing gain with resolution is the classic signature of a GPU‑bound scenario. So the bottleneck is the GPU in most 500W AAA titles, especially at 1440p and up. At 1080p high refresh, neither component bottlenecks; the game engine will often have FPS limited by the CPU single‑thread, but the pair top out the most esports titles well over 300 FPS.

The pair rank is 241st of 3739 tested pairs by average FPS, meaning it sits at the top 6.5% of all‑comers. That position is indicative of a well‑matched pair, not a disproportionate CPU or GPU. For games where the average FPS pushes above 370 (such as Valorant at 1080p/1440p), the CPU provides the feeding; for money in rendering or compute, the GPU's 52 TFLOPS and 16 GB VRAM command the workload.

Who Should Build It

This system is aimed at a particular gamer: someone who wants high refresh‑gaming at 1440p, or 1080p with settings maxed, and who intends to keep the build strong for four or five years. In esports titles with extremes GPU demands—CS2, Valorant, Rainbow Six Siege—the pair easily clears 200 FPS at 1440, with CS2 at 214 and Valorant at 562, making it a great match for a 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitor. It also suits AAA 1440p, where Cyberpunk 2077 hits 71 FPS on ultra, Red Dead Redemption 2 65 FPS, and Call of Duty 163 FPS. At 4K ultra the system is not a blanket leader: Cyberpunk at 47, Assetto Corsa at 82, but with Ray Tracing or high refresh capped there are enough frames to play. The CPU's 8 cores/16 threads, 96 MB L3, and memory bandwidth also make it a strong performer for content creation: video compression, 3D rendering, code compilation, and data science. A built start without ded GPUs, the architecture also has a Radeon Graphics IGP, which is useful for error‑checking or chassis work.

The target audience is that typical builder who is not restrained by cost—this is not an entry‑level rig. Small business users running large spreadsheets, CAD, video and audio editing will see the Cinebench R23 22807 multi‑thread score and the 89.6 GB/s memory throughput translate into snap load times and responsive multitasking. A student can use it for computer science compiling code, and a data scientist can find the CPU's crypto and integer math advantageous. In all cases, it supports the 24 Gen5 lanes for fast storage and high-end expansion.

Usage Scenarios

High‑refresh gaming: The measured frame rates support a high‑refresh monitor. In the FPS‑esports sector, Valorant averaged 592 FPS at 1080p and 562 at 1440p, exactly what is required for a 360 Hz panel. CS:GO even hit 714 FPS at 1080p. At 1440p, CS2 214 FPS still exceeds 240 Hz, and Overwatch 111. These numbers indicate the CPU and GPU are never a constraint for responsiveness.

Streaming: The 8‑core, 16‑thread CPU gives you a parallel compute margin. While streaming, several games still thousands. E.g., Rust 123 FPS, Fortnite 155 FPS at 1080p with other apps open. The Cinebench multicore 22807 is enough for a game, OBS, and Discord simultaneously, notably during a game load. The GPU also has 52 TFLOPS of compute that can handle encoding and decoding; although the dataset does not include an encoder count, the high G3D score and integer math suggest it can parallelize the encoding pipeline.

Video editing: For non‑linear editing, the CPU's 16 threads and memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s) help preview without rendering. The Cinebench R15 multi 3551, R23 22807, and PassMark multithread 41318 all point to fast H.265/H.264 encode, with PassMark encryption and integer scores strong. A 4K edit in DaVinci Resolve will use large cache (96 MB) for multi‑layer timelines, and the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM gives 4K and high‑bit depth previews.

3D rendering: Using a GPU renderer, the SUPC's FP32 compute (52.2 GPU TFLOPS) and 320 Tensor cores ran real‑based denoising. The CPU's multi‑thread (PassMark 41318) is enough for a 3D scene generation, and the a run of the render will be fast. The GPU compute score of 19822 in PassMark and 6600 in Steel Nomad reinforcement.

Software development: The single‑thread score 2228 (Cinebench R23) means snappy code compile preprocess. The system has 8 user cores for parallel build, and the cache 96 MB L3 to handle a large build tree. The CPU's 4.7/5.6 GHz mental is within gaming.

Student and office work: Integrated Radeon graphics, the CPU is actually useful without dGPU for report and web, but with the dGPU, it's over‑spec. Small business users will gain from the 24 PCIe Gen5 lanes for quick NVMe‑based database queries, and the ECC memory support (dual level) ensures no data corruption after a 4‑hour math or CAD session.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4080 SUPER uses the AD103 chip on an Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process with 45.9 billion transistors on a 379 mm² die. It runs a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2550 MHz, with memory at 23 Gbps effective. It has 16 GB of GDDR6X across a 256‑bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. Functional units include 10240 shading units, 320 TAUs, 112 ROPs, 80 RT cores and 320 Tensor cores. The pixel rate is 285.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 816.0 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 compute both hit 52.22 TFLOPS—the same value for each, indicating a robust parallel path between FP32 and FP16, which is useful in DLSS-like upscaling and render workloads.

In compute benchmarks, the GPU scores 219065 in GeekBench OpenCL and 260075 in Vulkan, demonstrating consistent execution across varied APIs. 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) yields 8210, far above the average GPU, which is why it is ranked in the 86th percentile. PassMark G3D 34245 and GPU compute 19822 confirm high throughput in DX12 and compute. The card has a triple-slot cooler, one 16-pin power connector. Its TDP is 320 W, and the manufacturer recommends a 700 W power supply—those are the power requirements. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, covering current‐gen monitors.

Gaming Performance

The system is measured, so all FPS numbers below are actual data not estimates. Since `dataIsMeasured` is `true`, these frame rates are based on the typical ultra settings. At 1080p ultra, the lowest sample: Cyberpunk 2077 95 FPS, extremely playable. At 1440p ultra: MSFS 94, Cyber Park 71, and 4K drops to 16–47 for the heaviest games. The positive side: esports rarely limit. In At-up Genesis: Fortnite 155, Apex 144, Overwatch 87, Tom Clancy R6 384. Even a heavy title like Assetto Corsa (201) runs 191/134/81. Bright games like Minecraft empty 318 at 1080 and 201 at 1440, due to the high single‑thread.

The jump from 1440p to 4K shows the user the realistic limits

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds