SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

39,768 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a study in extremes. The CPU is a top-tier gaming and productivity processor, while the GPU is an entry-level, low-power card designed for basic tasks. The benchmark data shows a massive capability gap between the two components, making this a highly specialized build for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads and only need modest graphics output. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not from direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) built on a 4nm TSMC process. It features a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 120W. The CPU integrates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a massive 96 MB of shared L3 cache, a hallmark of the X3D series for gaming performance. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability and offers a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, alongside PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a CPU that is strong in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, it scores 2080 points single-core and 23230 points multi-core. The multi-core score is particularly strong, indicating that the 8-core configuration scales well under load. The Geekbench multicore score of 18696 and single-core score of 2964 reinforce this picture, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 39768 places it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (0.4% higher), AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.7% lower), AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (0.7% higher), and AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (0.8% lower). This suggests the 9800X3D delivers performance nearly identical to those chips in aggregate, but its specific advantage lies in its large L3 cache, which benefits gaming workloads more than the raw average score indicates.

The PassMark tests show a processor adept at a wide range of tasks. The integer math score of 116709 and floating point math score of 79456 are high, indicating strong performance in scientific and financial computations. Data compression score of 468017 and encryption score of 22158 are also substantial, suggesting the CPU can handle file archiving and security-related workloads efficiently. The single-thread score of 4430 confirms that the high boost clock of 5.20 GHz is effective for lightly-threaded applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 96 MB L3 cache and high boost clock provide a strong foundation for gaming, but the GPU is the limiting factor. With the RTX 4010, high-refresh gaming at 1080p with high settings is likely not achievable in modern titles, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and low compute power will bottleneck the system.

Streaming: The CPU has ample multi-threading capability with 16 threads and a strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23230, which could handle encoding workloads. However, the lack of a modern GPU encoder on the RTX 4010 (Ampere architecture) means streamers would likely rely on CPU encoding, which is feasible but adds load to the processor.

Video Editing: The 8-core/16-thread configuration and high multi-core scores (Geekbench 18696) suggest decent performance for video editing timelines and effects. However, the GPU’s low FP32 performance of 2.706 TFLOPS will struggle with GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, making this a CPU-dependent workflow with mixed results.

3D Rendering: The CPU is well-suited for CPU-based rendering tasks, evidenced by its strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23230. However, the RTX 4010 with only 768 shading units and 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 will be very slow for GPU-based rendering, making this a poor choice for modern render engines that rely on GPU compute.

Software Development: The high single-thread score of 2964 in Geekbench and 4430 in PassMark indicates snappy compilation for single-threaded tasks. The 16 threads and high encryption score of 22158 also support parallel builds and secure coding practices, making this a capable development machine.

Student and Office Work: This is a strong use case for the pairing. The CPU handles document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease, while the RTX 4010’s low power draw (50W TDP) and single-slot design make it a quiet, efficient addition for basic display output and 2D acceleration.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so the following figures are estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark score and CPU performance. The RTX 4010 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low score, indicating that the GPU is not designed for modern AAA gaming at high settings.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 4010 would likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern titles, especially those with high VRAM requirements, given its 4 GB GDDR6 memory. The 64-bit memory bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth further limit texture streaming and high-resolution assets. In esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance might push frame rates higher, but the GPU would still be the bottleneck at higher settings. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be completely overwhelmed, and the system would be unusable for gaming at playable frame rates. The data suggests users should treat this as a CPU-centric build where gaming is a secondary, low-resolution, low-settings consideration.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a niche user: one who needs extreme CPU performance for productivity but has minimal GPU requirements. The target audience is a developer or researcher who compiles code, runs simulations, or processes large datasets (evidenced by high PassMark integer math of 116709 and floating point math of 79456) and needs a display output for basic 2D work. It is also suitable for a student or office worker who wants a responsive system for multitasking and office applications, where the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking ensures smooth operation.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering (e.g., using Cinebench R23’s 23230 multi-core score) and only need GPU for previews could find this viable. However, it is not suitable for gamers at 1080p or higher resolutions, 3D artists using GPU-accelerated renderers, or video editors relying on GPU effects. The GPU’s 18th percentile ranking makes it a workstation card for basic display, not a gaming or rendering accelerator. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and web applications would find this pairing overkill on the CPU side but perfectly adequate for their graphical needs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is severely unbalanced, with the CPU being the dominant component and the GPU a severe bottleneck for any graphics-intensive workload. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 39768 is dramatically higher than the GPU’s 2893, indicating a massive disparity in processing capability. In gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, the RTX 4010 will limit the system’s performance to a fraction of what the CPU is capable of supporting.

The CPU percentile of 87 vs the GPU percentile of 18 illustrates this clearly. For tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU will finish its part of the workload quickly, but the GPU will be unable to keep up with any GPU-based rendering, leaving the system idle waiting on the GPU. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 468017) or encryption, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU’s full power is available.

The FPS scaling, if it were measured, would show that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p would have a disproportionate impact on frame rates, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and low bandwidth (96.00 GB/s) would be saturated quickly. The CPU’s performance headroom would go unused in most gaming scenarios. This is a system where the CPU is a race car engine and the GPU is a bicycle wheel; the data suggests the CPU is underutilized in any GPU-dependent workload.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is a low-end Ampere architecture GPU built on an 8nm Samsung process. It features 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). It is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. The card uses a single-slot design, requires no power connectors, and has a TDP of 50W, with a suggested PSU of 250W.

Benchmark results show the RTX 4010 scoring 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This score is remarkably close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (0.5% higher), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (0.6% higher), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (0.7% higher), and Quadro P600 (1% higher). This is an unusual clustering, suggesting that the RTX 4010’s raw compute power is comparable to these cards in this specific test, despite having far less memory and bandwidth. However, in real-world gaming, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will severely limit performance compared to the 8 GB or 16 GB options.

For rendering, the RT 4010’s 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores provide basic ray tracing and DLSS support, but the low FP32 throughput of 2.706 TFLOPS means that any complex rendering task will be slow. The pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s are modest, indicating the card is best suited for light 2D work or as a display adapter. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs are useful for multi-monitor setups, but the card is not designed for high-end graphics workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently high across all tests. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 2394 (2 threads) to 10081 (16 threads), with a single-thread score of 1212. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23230 is a strong result for an 8-core chip, and the PassMark multithread score of 40009 confirms its multi-threaded prowess. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 39768 places it in the 87th percentile, a strong position for a desktop processor.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is minimal, with only a single 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893. This places it in the 18th percentile, a low ranking that reflects its entry-level status. The combined percentile for this build is 53%, which is dragged down significantly by the GPU. The data shows a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer and the GPU is a bottom-tier performer, resulting in a combined score that is roughly average. The combined picture is one of a severely imbalanced system, where the CPU’s capability is wasted in GPU-bound tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current and active socket. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the CPU’s 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for high-speed NVMe SSDs and future GPUs. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a plus for workstation use. The CPU has a TDP of 120W, suggesting that a capable air cooler or a modest liquid cooler would be sufficient.

The GPU is a PCIe 4.0 x8 card, which is compatible with the AM5 platform but will not utilize the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes fully. The RTX 4010 has a TDP of 50W and requires no power connectors, making it easy to install in any system. The suggested PSU of 250W is very low, indicating that the system draws minimal power.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU has enormous headroom to support a much more powerful graphics card. Replacing the RTX 4010 with a higher-tier GPU would unlock the system’s full gaming potential, as the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking would not be a bottleneck for most mid-range to high-end GPUs. The AM5 platform also supports future CPU upgrades, but the 9800X3D is already a top performer, so a CPU upgrade would be unnecessary for most users. Adding more DDR5 memory or faster NVMe storage would also be beneficial, but the GPU is the clear primary upgrade target.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D a good processor for gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU’s 96 MB of L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.20 GHz are designed for gaming. Its single-thread score of 2964 in Geekbench and 4430 in PassMark indicate excellent performance for game logic. However, in this specific build, the GPU severely limits actual gaming performance.

Q: Can the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 handle modern games at 1080p?

A: No, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 and 18th percentile ranking, the RTX 4010 is not suitable for modern AAA gaming. Its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are insufficient for high-resolution textures and settings.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 120W, and the GPU has a TDP of 50W. The suggested PSU for the entire system is 250W, indicating low overall power consumption.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. Its base clock is 4.70 GHz and boost clock is 5.20 GHz, but overclocking may require additional cooling beyond the 120W TDP specification.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The AM5 platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data integrity in workstation tasks.

Q: How does the RTX 4010 compare to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad test, the RTX 4010 scores 2893, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB’s score of 2907. However, the RTX 4010 has 4 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB, and a 64-bit bus versus a wider bus, making the RTX 4060 Ti far superior in real-world gaming.

Q: Is this build suitable for video editing?

A: The CPU’s 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23230 are good for CPU-based editing. However, the GPU’s low FP32 performance of 2.706 TFLOPS will hinder GPU-accelerated effects, making the workflow CPU-dependent and potentially slower than a build with a stronger GPU.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds