SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

37,943 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What are the core specifications of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X in this build?

A: The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge), manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features a base clock of 3.80 GHz, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and a 65 W TDP. It has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, plus 1 MB of L2 and 80 KB of L1 per core.

Q: What graphics card is paired with this CPU, and what are its key memory specifications?

A: The build uses an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture. It comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1620 MHz and a boost clock of 1815 MHz.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 37943. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14901E, scores 37911, which is a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 also scores 37904, again a 0.1% delta, indicating these processors are essentially performance peers in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Is the GPU's benchmark performance competitive with other cards in its class?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629 and sits at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, scores 21856, which is 1% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, which is 1.2% lower, showing the Quadro is positioned in a tight performance cluster.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database. This places it in the upper quartile of system performance, though not in the top tier.

Q: Does this system have support for ECC memory and what is the memory standard?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 9700X supports ECC memory. It uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 230 W and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The CPU has a much lower TDP at 65 W.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture workstation card built on a 12 nm process with a die size of 545 mm² and 13,600 million transistors. It packs 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The compute capabilities are substantial: FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 rated at 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s.

Memory is a strong point for this card. With 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is well-suited for large datasets typical of professional rendering and compute workloads. The memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. For a workstation card from this generation, the VRAM capacity is generous, allowing for larger scenes and higher-resolution textures than mainstream cards with 8 GB or even 12 GB.

In terms of specialized hardware, the Quadro RTX 5000 includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, while the tensor cores handle AI-accelerated tasks such as denoising and deep learning inference. The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 are all supported, making it compatible with modern rendering pipelines.

Benchmark scores for the GPU show a mixed picture. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 78999, while the Vulkan score is 92309. However, the PassMark DirectX tests are notably lower: DirectX 12 scores just 59, DirectX 11 scores 140, and DirectX 10 scores 113. The PassMark G3D score is 15616, with a G2D score of 709. The PassMark GPU compute score is 6525.

The GPU sits at the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21629. Its nearest rival, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, scores 21856, putting the Quadro 1% behind. The data suggests that while the Quadro RTX 5000 is not a top-tier gaming card by modern standards, its 16 GB VRAM and RT/tensor core complement make it a capable workstation part. The low DirectX 12 score is curious and may indicate driver limitations or that the benchmark is not fully leveraging the Turing architecture's strengths. For rendering workloads, the combination of 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance is more relevant than the DirectX scores.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 7 9700X and the Quadro RTX 5000 is asymmetric in both directions, depending on the workload. The CPU is a modern, high-performance part sitting at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 67th percentile. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or heavy single-threaded tasks, the CPU will not be the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score is 2241, and the single-thread score is 4654, indicating strong per-core performance.

However, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000 is the weaker link relative to the CPU's capability. The GPU's average benchmark score of 21629 is far below what a modern high-end gaming card would achieve, and its DirectX 12 PassMark score of 59 is particularly low. This means that in DirectX 12 games, the GPU will almost certainly be the bottleneck, holding the system's frame rates back despite the CPU's ability to feed it data quickly.

The TDP disparity reinforces this imbalance. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 230 W TDP, meaning the GPU draws over three times the power of the CPU. In a system with a 550 W suggested PSU, the headroom for the rest of the system is comfortable, but the GPU's power draw indicates where the performance ceiling lies.

The CPU's multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485, show that it can handle demanding compute workloads. But the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 6525 suggests that for compute-heavy tasks like machine learning training or video encoding, the GPU may not keep pace with the CPU's output. In mixed workloads, the CPU will often finish its part of the task and wait on the GPU.

The percentile gap — CPU at 86th, GPU at 67th — is a clear indicator that the GPU is the primary constraint in graphics-intensive operations. For users upgrading, the data implies that the CPU has headroom to support a more powerful GPU. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU (24 lanes) far exceeds the GPU's PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, meaning the CPU is future-proofed for faster GPUs while the current card is already bandwidth-limited by its older interface.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 9700X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream socket for AMD desktop processors. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support enabled, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The platform is actively produced, and the CPU was released on 2024-08-07, making it a modern choice with a clear upgrade path within the same generation and socket.

The GPU, in contrast, is end-of-life. Released on 2018-08-12, the Quadro RTX 5000's successor is Workstation Ampere, and its predecessor was Quadro Volta. This means that while the GPU is functional, it is not a current-generation part. The platform supports PCIe 3.0 x16, which is two generations behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. This is a notable mismatch, as the CPU's PCIe lanes are far faster than the GPU can utilize.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to replacing the GPU first. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore of 20485, Geekbench multicore of 17906) indicate it has years of useful life left. The GPU's 67th percentile and end-of-life status suggest it is the component most in need of replacement. A newer GPU with PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5 support would better leverage the CPU's 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The PSU headroom is adequate. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the CPU's TDP is 65 W, so the total system draw is well within that limit. Upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU would require a PSU upgrade, but the current 550 W recommendation leaves some margin for moderate GPU power increases. Memory is another upgrade path: the system uses dual-channel DDR5, and adding more capacity or faster modules could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, given the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed figure for the current configuration.

# Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 9700X delivers strong benchmark performance across the board. In 3DMark tests, it scores 9824 for 16 threads, 2525 for 2 threads, 4869 for 4 threads, 8184 for 8 threads, 9771 for max threads, and 1280 for single thread. The scaling from 2 to 8 threads is nearly linear, but the jump from 8 to 16 threads is minimal (8184 to 9771), suggesting that the 8-core architecture is well-utilized at 8 threads but additional threads yield diminishing returns.

Cinebench scores reinforce this. The R23 multicore score is 20485, while the single-core score is 2211. The R15 scores are 3178 for multicore and 346 for single-core. Geekbench shows 17906 for multicore and 3023 for single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 37161, a single-thread score of 4654, integer math at 120142, floating-point math at 78999, and extended instructions at 35318. Data compression scores 437140, encryption scores 21815, and random string sorting scores 46782. The CPU's average benchmark score is 37943, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's benchmark performance is more modest. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 78999, and the Vulkan score is 92309. PassMark G3D is 15616, G2D is 709, and GPU compute is 6525. The DirectX scores are low: DirectX 9 at 195, DirectX 10 at 113, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 12 at 59. The average benchmark score is 21629, at the 67th percentile.

The combined percentile for this build is 77. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.4% of its score, indicating a tight cluster at this performance level. The GPU's rivals are similarly close, with the GTX 1060 6 GB 1% ahead and the RTX A4000 Mobile 1.2% behind. The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is held back by the GPU in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU is a top-15% performer, while the GPU is in the top third, creating a system that is stronger in compute and productivity than in pure graphics throughput.

# Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data is not measured, so these figures should be treated as expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, gaming performance is likely to be a mixed experience. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 is concerning for modern games, as most current titles use DirectX 12 or Vulkan. The Vulkan score of 92309 in Geekbench is more promising, suggesting that Vulkan-based games may perform better than DirectX 12 titles. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is ample for high-resolution textures, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p and even 4K gaming, though the raw compute power (11.15 TFLOPS FP32) may limit frame rates in demanding titles.

The CPU is more than capable of supporting gaming. The single-thread score of 1280 in 3DMark and 4654 in PassMark indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for game engines that rely on a few fast cores. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration also handles background tasks like streaming or Discord without impacting game performance.

For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound and less GPU-intensive, the system could deliver high frame rates at 1080p or 1440p, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance. For AAA titles at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The low DirectX 12 score suggests that some modern games may run poorly, while Vulkan-based games could be more playable. Users should expect 1080p gaming to be generally smooth, 1440p to be playable with settings adjustments, and 4K to be challenging for the GPU.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz, boosting up to 5.50 GHz. The TDP is a modest 65 W, which is low for a high-performance desktop CPU, indicating excellent power efficiency.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for workstation and server use. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1280 and PassMark single-thread score of 4654 are strong, indicating excellent per-core performance. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 8184 is close to the max-thread score of 9771, showing that the 8 cores are efficiently utilized. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 is competitive with many higher-TDP processors, thanks to the efficient Zen 5 architecture.

The PassMark integer math score of 120142 and floating-point math score of 78999 show strong ALU and FPU performance. The extended instructions score of 35318 indicates good SIMD capability. Data encryption scores 21815 and data compression scores 437140, making the CPU well-suited for security and archival tasks. The PassMark physics score of 2241 is lower relative to other scores, but this is a specialized test that may not reflect real-world gaming physics performance.

The CPU sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37943. Its nearest rivals — the Intel Core i9-14901E, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Intel Core 5 211E, and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 — are all within 0.4% of its score, indicating that the 9700X is in a highly competitive performance tier. The 65 W TDP makes it an excellent choice for systems where power consumption and heat are concerns, without sacrificing significant performance.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 in a desktop configuration. The combined percentile for this pairing is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database. This places the system in the upper tier of desktop builds, though not at the absolute top.

The CPU is a modern, high-performance part from AMD's 9000 series, released on 2024-08-07, with an 86th percentile ranking. The GPU is an end-of-life workstation card from NVIDIA, released on 2018-08-12, with a 67th percentile ranking. This generation gap is the defining characteristic of the build: the CPU is current-generation and future-proof, while the GPU is older and nearing the end of its useful life.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $359, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 2,299 USD. The build is clearly oriented toward workstation use, given the Quadro branding and the CPU's ECC memory support. The 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth on the GPU make it suitable for professional rendering and compute, while the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads handle multi-threaded workloads efficiently.

The TDP figures — 65 W for the CPU and 230 W for the GPU — show that the GPU dominates power consumption. The suggested PSU of 550 W provides adequate headroom. The build class is desktop, and the system is currently active for the CPU but end-of-life for the GPU, making it a transitional system that could benefit from a GPU upgrade.

Overall, this is a desktop workstation with a strong CPU and a capable but aging GPU. The 77th combined percentile indicates that it is a solid mid-to-upper-tier system, but the GPU's lower percentile relative to the CPU means that graphics-intensive tasks will not reach the same performance level as CPU-bound tasks.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance and are willing to accept a GPU that is good but not great. Gamers at 1080p resolution will likely find the system adequate, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4654) and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM. At 1440p, the GPU's lower DirectX 12 score of 59 may cause issues in some titles, so these users should be prepared to adjust settings. 4K gaming is not recommended, as the GPU's limited compute power (11.15 TFLOPS FP32) will struggle.

Content creators, particularly those working in video editing or 3D rendering, will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 and Geekbench multicore score of 17906 indicate strong rendering capabilities. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is useful for GPU-accelerated rendering, though the older Turing architecture may not support the latest features.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's compile times, given the high integer math score of 120142 and data compression score of 437140. The ECC memory support is a bonus for developers working on critical systems. Students and small business workstations will find the system more than adequate for productivity tasks, with the CPU's 65 W TDP keeping power costs low and the system quiet.

The most likely user is a professional who needs a reliable workstation for CPU-intensive tasks like software development, data analysis, or scientific computing, and who occasionally does GPU-accelerated work. The GPU's end-of-life status means that users who prioritize gaming or modern GPU compute should look elsewhere, but for those who need a balanced system with a strong CPU, this build is a viable option.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1280) can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 59 will likely cap frame rates in modern titles. Esports games at 1080p should run well, but high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming will be limited by the GPU.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously, with the PassMark multithread score of 37161 indicating ample headroom. The GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) can assist with encoding, though the older Turing architecture may not have the latest encoders. Streaming at 1080p should be smooth, but the GPU's gaming performance will still be the bottleneck.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 and PassMark data compression score of 437140 make it well-suited for video editing and exporting. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM can handle large timelines and effects, though the low DirectX 12 score may affect GPU-accelerated effects in some editors. 4K editing is possible, but exports may be slower than with a newer GPU.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded scores (Geekbench multicore of 17906) are excellent for CPU-based rendering. For GPU rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 384 tensor cores can accelerate ray tracing and AI denoising, though the 12 nm process and older architecture limit its performance compared to newer cards. Small to medium scenes should render well, but large scenes may exceed the GPU's capabilities.

Software development: The high integer math score of 120142 and data encryption score of 21815 make this system ideal for compiling code, running tests, and handling encryption workloads. The 32 MB L3 cache and 16 threads speed up parallel builds. ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP CPU keeps the system energy-efficient and quiet, while the 8 cores handle multitasking with ease. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but the system will breeze through spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing. The 86th percentile CPU ranking ensures that even demanding productivity tasks like large data analysis or virtualization will run smoothly.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds