SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

37,943 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around AMD’s latest Zen 5 architecture and NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 GPU design. The CPU, an 8-core/16-thread part from the 9000 series, is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process and targets the AM5 platform. The GPU, based on the GB205 chip, is built on a 5 nm process and sits in the GeForce 50-series lineup. Together, this build achieves an 84th percentile combined score, placing it well above the majority of tracked configurations. The data shows a system that is balanced for high-refresh 1440p gaming and capable of handling demanding multi-threaded workloads, though its performance profile varies significantly across different types of applications.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 9700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge), it features a 65 W TDP and is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well from lightly threaded to fully threaded workloads. In 3DMark tests, the single-thread score is 1280, which climbs to 2525 for 2 threads, 4869 for 4 threads, and 8184 for 8 threads. The max-thread score of 9771 is only slightly higher than the 16-thread score of 9824, indicating that the 16 threads are efficiently utilized but that the architecture’s scaling flattens out beyond 8 cores. This pattern is typical of a desktop CPU designed for gaming and mainstream productivity rather than heavily parallel server workloads.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 20485 and single-core score of 2211 show strong performance per thread. The single-core figure is particularly notable, as it reflects the high boost clock and architectural efficiency of Zen 5. Geekbench results corroborate this: a multicore score of 17906 and a single-core score of 3023. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: integer math scores 120142, floating point math 78999, and extended instructions 35318. Data compression is a standout at 437140, while data encryption hits 21815. These numbers suggest the CPU handles encryption, compression, and complex instruction sets with ease, which is relevant for database work, scientific computing, and content creation.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37943, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14901E, which scores 37911, a delta of 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is equally close at 37904 (0.1% delta), while the Intel Core 5 211E trails by 0.3% (37829) and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 by 0.4% (37804). These are all within a 0.4% margin, meaning the 9700X is statistically tied with several competing parts. In real terms, the 9700X does not dominate its rivals but rather matches them, which means workload-specific features like the 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier (true) become differentiators.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined system percentile is 84, which indicates that both components perform above average but neither is a runaway leader. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 82nd percentile are closely aligned, suggesting a balanced pairing where neither component is severely limiting the other. However, the benchmark data reveals distinct bottleneck patterns depending on the workload and resolution.

At lower resolutions, the CPU becomes the primary constraint. In games like Counter-Strike 2, the 1080p frame rate of 271 FPS versus 100 FPS at 4K shows that the GPU is not the limit at 1080p; the CPU’s single-thread performance (1280 in 3DMark single-thread) is what drives those high frame rates. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2525 and 4-thread score of 4869 support this, as many competitive games rely on 2-4 threads. At 1440p, the balance shifts: frame rates in most titles drop by roughly 30-40% from 1080p, indicating that the GPU’s rendering load is becoming more significant. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, with frame rates often halving again, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 dropping from 80 FPS at 1080p to 39 FPS at 4K.

The PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 and the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 37161 provide a quantitative view of this balance. For a workload like 3D rendering, the GPU’s FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS will dominate, but the CPU’s multicore score ensures it can feed the GPU without stalling. In contrast, for data encryption (CPU score 21815), the GPU plays no role, and the CPU’s performance is the sole determinant. The data shows a system that is GPU-limited at high resolutions and CPU-limited at low resolutions, with a sweet spot around 1440p where the two are best matched.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37943, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival in terms of average score is the Intel Core i9-14901E at 37911, a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is also at 0.1% delta, meaning the 9700X effectively ties these parts. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 40377, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40063, an 0.8% delta, while the AMD Radeon Pro 580 is at 0.1% (40318) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 1.2% higher (40870). The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile trails by 2% (39568).

Looking at specific GPU benchmarks, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5077, which is a modern DirectX 12 test. Geekbench OpenCL scores 172660 and Vulkan scores 178923, showing strong compute performance across APIs. PassMark G3D scores 29137, while GPU compute is 15787. The GPU’s DirectX 11 score of 277 and DirectX 12 score of 108 are lower relative to the G3D number, which reflects legacy API overhead. The combined picture is a system that performs in the top 16% of all configurations (84th percentile), with both components contributing roughly equally to that position.

The pair’s rank by FPS across all measured game pairs is 643 out of 3732, placing it in the top 17% of all CPU-GPU pairs. The average FPS across games is 176.1. This is a strong result, but it is important to note that the average is skewed by very high frame rates in lightweight titles like Valorant (583 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (605.7 FPS at 1080p), while demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (80 FPS at 1080p) and Ark: Survival Ascended (40 FPS at 1080p) pull it down.

Gaming Performance

The data is measured, not estimated, so the following frame rates are actual results from the specified games at ultra settings. At 1080p, the system excels in competitive shooters: Counter-Strike 2 hits 271 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 327.9 FPS, and Valorant achieves 583 FPS. These numbers are driven by the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1280 in 3DMark single-thread) and high boost clock. The GPU is not the limiting factor here; the CPU’s 2-thread and 4-thread scores (2525 and 4869) are what enable such high frame rates.

At 1440p, the system remains highly capable. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 60 FPS, which is exactly the threshold for smooth gameplay. Call of Duty: Warzone hits 161 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 manages 57.4 FPS. The 1440p results show a more balanced workload, with the GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth becoming more relevant. The GPU’s pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 482.3 GTexel/s support these frame rates.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 39 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended to 13 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34.7 FPS. However, some titles remain playable: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 136 FPS, and Valorant at 424 FPS. The 4K results demonstrate that this build is not a true 4K gaming system for demanding titles, but it can handle competitive games at 4K. For the most demanding games, the data suggests that 1440p is the optimal resolution, where the system delivers 60+ FPS in the majority of titles tested.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming. The data shows that at 1440p, the system achieves over 100 FPS in most games, with only the most demanding titles (Cyberpunk 2077, Red Dead Redemption 2) falling below that threshold. Competitive esports players will find the 1080p performance exceptional, with frame rates above 270 FPS in CS2 and above 580 FPS in Valorant. The system is also well-suited for content creators who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for video editing (Cinebench R23 multicore 20485) and GPU compute for rendering (PassMark GPU compute 15787).

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 437140 and encryption score of 21815, which are relevant for code compilation and secure data handling. Students and small business users will find the system overkill for office work, but the 65 W CPU TDP and dual-slot GPU make it a relatively efficient build for its performance class. The CPU’s integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks when the dedicated GPU is not needed.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and what memory does it support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37943, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-14901E (37911) and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904). It is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core 5 211E.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 84, meaning it outperforms 84% of all tracked configurations.

Q: How many RT and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, supporting real-time ray tracing and AI acceleration.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. The GPU’s TDP is 250 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 600 W.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The GPU’s launch MSRP is 549 USD.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB205 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.3 million per mm². The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It features 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads.

The GPU’s clocks are 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 482.3 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 30.87 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The GPU supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and has a TDP of 250 W, requiring a 600 W PSU and a single 16-pin power connector.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs well in modern APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench Vulkan scores 178923, slightly higher than OpenCL at 172660. PassMark G3D scores 29137, while GPU compute is 15787. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 40377 places it in the 82nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, scores 40318 (0.1% delta), while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% lower. For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS is the key metric, supporting detailed 3D scenes. The 48 RT cores enable ray-traced effects in games, and the 192 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other AI-based features. The 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K textures.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 250 W TDP. The combined percentile is 84, placing it in the top 16% of all tracked configurations. The pair ranks 643 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average of 176.1 FPS across games.

The build’s overall tier is high-end mainstream. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 82nd percentile are both above the 80th percentile mark, indicating strong performance in their respective categories. The system is not a top-tier enthusiast build (which would typically exceed the 95th percentile), but it is firmly in the upper echelon of gaming and productivity systems. The 65 W CPU TDP makes it more power-efficient than many high-core-count rivals, while the GPU’s 250 W TDP is moderate for its performance level.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and ECC. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The suggested PSU is 600 W, which provides headroom for the 65 W CPU and 250 W GPU, along with other components.

The platform supports future upgrades within the AM5 socket, though the specific compatibility of future CPUs is not specified in the data. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, and the dual-slot design (245 mm length, 115 mm height, 40 mm width) fits in most mid-tower cases. A sensible next upgrade would be adding more of the same DDR5 memory, as the dual-channel bus can be fully utilized. For users who need more GPU performance, the 600 W PSU provides room for a more power-hungry card, though the current GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM is adequate for 1440p gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p, the system delivers over 100 FPS in most titles, and at 1080p, competitive shooters exceed 270 FPS. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1280 and the GPU’s 5077 Steel Nomad score support high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide headroom for encoding while gaming, and the GPU’s 192 tensor cores can offload AI-based encoding tasks. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9824 indicates sufficient multi-threaded performance.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20485 and Geekbench multicore of 17906 show strong CPU performance for timeline operations and exports. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 172660 accelerates effects and rendering.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS and 48 RT cores provide substantial rendering power. The PassMark GPU compute score of 15787 confirms this capability.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 437140 and integer math score of 120142 speed up compilation and data processing. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in iterative builds.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but the CPU’s 65 W TDP and integrated Radeon Graphics allow for efficient low-load operation. The 12 GB GPU memory is irrelevant for such tasks, but the system handles them without strain.