SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

37,943 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 86th percentile among all CPU and GPU combinations, with a combined benchmark profile that places it firmly in the high-end enthusiast tier. The CPU, built on the Zen 5 architecture, and the GPU, based on Ada Lovelace, deliver a balanced platform where neither component consistently starves the other across the measured workload spectrum, though specific titles reveal where the bottleneck shifts between the processor and the graphics card.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system that is well-matched for most scenarios, but the bottleneck analysis reveals distinct patterns depending on resolution and game engine. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance—a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1280 and a passmark_single_thread score of 4654—often becomes the limiting factor in esports titles, where frame rates are extremely high. For example, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 717 FPS at 1080p, a figure that far exceeds what the GPU alone would cap, indicating the CPU is driving the frame generation. Conversely, at 3840x2160, the GPU’s workload becomes dominant, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077, which drops from 96 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS at 4K, a reduction that scales with the GPU’s rendering load.

The 3dmark thread scaling results show the CPU’s performance curve: 2,525 points with 2 threads, 4,869 with 4 threads, 8,184 with 8 threads, and 9,824 with 16 threads. This scaling pattern, where the jump from 8 to 16 threads yields only a 20% improvement, suggests that while the 8-core/16-thread configuration is adequate for gaming, it does not provide the massive multi-threaded headroom seen in higher-core-count processors. In games like Ark: Survival Ascended, which is notoriously demanding, the system achieves only 47 FPS at 1080p and 16 FPS at 4K, indicating that both the CPU and GPU are heavily taxed, with the GPU likely being the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

FPS scaling across resolutions provides further evidence. For lighter titles like Valorant, the frame rate remains remarkably stable: 583 FPS at 1080p, 553 FPS at 1440p, and 507 FPS at 4K. This minimal drop-off (13% from 1080p to 4K) indicates the CPU is the bottleneck even at high resolutions, as the GPU has ample headroom. In contrast, heavier titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 show a steep decline from 87 FPS at 1080p to 43 FPS at 4K, a 51% reduction that clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor. The average FPS across all games is 202.5, with the pair ranking 231st out of 3,732 pairs, suggesting this configuration is in the top 6% of all tested pairings, a position that reflects the balance between the two components.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU supports ECC memory, a feature beneficial for workstation tasks that require data integrity. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU utilizes PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring the graphics card is not bandwidth-limited. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is notably low for an 8-core processor, while the GPU has a TDP of 320 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W. This 65 W CPU TDP means that a modest air cooler is sufficient for the processor, allowing more of the PSU headroom to be dedicated to the GPU.

The upgrade path is straightforward. The AM5 socket is current-generation, and the CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the stock 65 W TDP already provides strong performance. For a next upgrade, the data suggests that moving to a higher-core-count Ryzen 9000 series processor would improve multi-threaded workloads, as the current CPU’s cinebench_r23_multicore score of 20,485 is respectable but leaves room for growth. The GPU, being end-of-life with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, is the component that would benefit most from a generational upgrade, as the RTX 4080’s 16 GB of VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are already substantial but will eventually be surpassed. The 700 W PSU recommendation provides headroom for a future GPU upgrade, though a more power-hungry card would require a larger PSU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong across synthetic tests. In 3dmark, the max_threads score of 9,771 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 9,824, confirming that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is fully utilized. The single-thread score of 1,280 is a standout, placing the CPU in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. In cinebench r23, the multicore score of 20,485 and single-core score of 2,211 demonstrate a 9.3:1 ratio, which is typical for an 8-core part. Geekbench scores of 17,906 (multi) and 3,023 (single) reinforce the strong per-core performance. Passmark tests show a multithread score of 37,161 and a single-thread score of 4,654, with the integer math score of 120,142 being particularly high, indicating strong general-purpose compute.

The GPU’s benchmark results are equally impressive. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 places it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 214,739 and 263,779, respectively, show strong compute performance. Passmark G3D score of 34,457 and GPU compute score of 20,671 indicate that the card excels in both rasterization and compute tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37,943, while the GPU’s is 54,247, and the combined percentile is 86th, placing this pairing in the top tier of desktop systems. The nearest CPU rival is the Intel Core i9-14901E with an average score of 37,911 (0.1% delta), showing that the 9700X is competitive with Intel’s highest-end embedded parts. For the GPU, the closest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER with a score of 54,209 (0.1% delta), indicating that the 4080 is nearly identical in performance to its SUPER variant.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for gamers seeking high-refresh-rate experiences at 1440p and playable 4K performance. The measured FPS data shows that at 2560x1440, most titles exceed 60 FPS, with esports titles like Valorant reaching 553 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 hitting 215 FPS. For 4K gaming, the system delivers 60+ FPS in many titles, including Call of Duty: Warzone at 136 FPS and Fortnite at 52 FPS, though the most demanding games like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 16 FPS, indicating that 4K ultra settings are not universally achievable. Content creators will benefit from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, which provide solid multi-threaded performance for video editing, as evidenced by the cinebench r23 multicore score of 20,485.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, which is critical for compilation and code execution, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds. Students and small business workstations will find the 65 W CPU TDP allows for efficient operation, while the GPU’s compute capabilities (48.74 TFLOPS FP32) can accelerate workloads like data analysis or machine learning inference. However, the GPU’s triple-slot design and 310 mm length require a spacious case, and the 700 W PSU recommendation means this is not a low-power build. The data suggests this pairing is best suited for users who prioritize gaming performance and are willing to invest in a high-end GPU while maintaining a moderately powered CPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The memory clock is 1400 MHz, with an effective data rate of 22.4 Gbps. The GPU has 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The base clock is 2205 MHz, with a boost clock of 2505 MHz, and the pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s.

The benchmark scores indicate that the GPU is well-suited for rendering tasks. The 3dmark Steel Nomad score of 6,567 shows strong DX12 performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 263,779 suggests excellent API efficiency. The Passmark G3D score of 34,457 places it in the top tier, and the GPU compute score of 20,671 indicates that compute-heavy workloads, such as 3D rendering with ray tracing, will benefit from the 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern textures at 4K, and the 716.8 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in high-resolution scenarios. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and upcoming titles. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, allowing for multi-monitor setups.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance relative to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700X has a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1,280 and a passmark_single_thread score of 4,654, placing it in the 86th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14901E, has an average benchmark score of 37,911, which is 0.1% higher than the 9700X’s 37,943.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 have, and is it sufficient for 4K gaming?

A: The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 716.8 GB/s bandwidth. Measured FPS at 3840x2160 shows many games running above 60 FPS (e.g., Call of Duty: Warzone at 136 FPS), but demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 47 FPS, indicating VRAM is sufficient but not the limiting factor.

Q: Can this system handle high-refresh-rate esports gaming?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, Counter-Strike 2 achieves 325 FPS, Valorant reaches 583 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 386 FPS, all well above 144 Hz refresh rates.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP, and does it require a high-end cooler?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for an 8-core processor. This allows for a capable air cooler, as the thermal output is modest compared to higher-TDP parts.

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 320 W, and the suggested PSU is 700 W. This is a significant requirement, but the CPU’s low TDP means the total system power draw is manageable within that 700 W budget.

Q: Does the CPU support memory overclocking or ECC?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and has ECC memory support. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for CPU overclocking, though the memory bus is fixed at 89.6 GB/s.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 54,209. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% higher, and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE is 2.6% higher, indicating the 4080 is competitive with these parts.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This pairing excels at 1080p and 1440p with frame rates often exceeding 200 FPS in esports titles. At 2560x1440, Valorant runs at 553 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 215 FPS, while more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 still achieve 71 FPS. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures minimal bottleneck in these scenarios.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU can handle game streaming workloads, as the passmark_multithread score of 37,161 indicates adequate multi-threaded capacity. The GPU’s NVENC encoder, part of the 304 tensor cores, offloads encoding tasks, allowing for smooth streaming without significant FPS impact.

Video Editing: The cinebench r23 multicore score of 20,485 and Geekbench multicore score of 17,906 provide solid performance for video editing software that utilizes multi-threading. The GPU’s 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and rendering, while the 16 GB VRAM handles large timelines and 4K footage.

3D Rendering: The GPU’s 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are well-suited for ray-traced rendering, as evidenced by the 3dmark Steel Nomad score of 6,567. The CPU’s 8 cores provide adequate geometry processing, though scenes with heavy physics may benefit from more cores.

Software Development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,280 (3dmark) and 4,654 (passmark) ensures fast compilation times for single-threaded build steps. The ECC memory support provides error correction for long-running processes, and the high integer math score of 120,142 indicates strong general-purpose compute.

Student and Office Work: The 65 W CPU TDP allows for efficient operation, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The multi-threaded performance is overkill for office tasks, but the system’s responsiveness benefits from the fast SSD and high memory bandwidth.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, an 8-core/16-thread processor on the AM5 socket with Zen 5 architecture, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, a 16 GB GDDR6X GPU on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The combined percentile is 86th, meaning this build outperforms 86% of all tested CPU-GPU pairs. The average FPS across all games is 202.5, with a pair rank of 231 out of 3,732, placing it in the top 6% of all pairings. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 37,943, and the GPU’s is 54,247, with the nearest rival for the CPU being the Intel Core i9-14901E (0.1% delta) and for the GPU the RTX 4080 SUPER (0.1% delta). This pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration suitable for demanding workloads and gaming, with the CPU’s low TDP offsetting the GPU’s high power draw.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is part of the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is remarkably low for this performance level. The CPU is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support.

Benchmark results show strong performance across the board. The 3dmark scores scale from 2,525 (2 threads) to 9,824 (16 threads), indicating that the 8-core design provides a 3.9x improvement from 2 to 16 threads. The cinebench r23 multicore score of 20,485 and single-core score of 2,211 place it in the 86th percentile. Geekbench scores of 17,906 (multi) and 3,023 (single) further confirm its position. The passmark tests show a multithread score of 37,161, with specific workloads like integer math at 120,142 and floating-point math at 78,999. The single-thread score of 4,654 is particularly strong, rivaling higher-clocked parts. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14901E, has an average score of 37,911, which is 0.1% higher, indicating that the 9700X is competitive with Intel’s top embedded processors. The average benchmark score of 37,943 places it in the top 14% of all CPUs.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing, shows that this system delivers exceptional gaming performance across a wide range of titles. At 1920x1080, the system achieves high frame rates in most games: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 717 FPS, Valorant at 583 FPS, and Minecraft at 320 FPS. Even demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 manage 96 FPS at 1080p. At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong, with Valorant still hitting 553 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 161 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 65 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system can handle most games at playable frame rates: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 120 FPS, Fortnite at 52 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 47 FPS.

However, the most demanding titles show significant drops at 4K. Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 16 FPS, and The Medium runs at 45 FPS, indicating that 4K ultra settings are not always feasible. The average FPS across all games is 202.5, with the pair ranking 231st out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the top 6% of all tested configurations. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor in esports titles, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck in graphically intensive games. For a balanced experience, 1440p is the sweet spot, where frame rates are high enough for competitive play and visual quality is preserved.