SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

37,943 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing forms a high-performance desktop combination that sits in the 77th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairs. The 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, delivers strong single-threaded performance with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the Ampere-based RTX 3080 provides substantial rasterization and ray tracing capability. This combination targets 1440p high-refresh gaming and productive multi-threaded workloads, with the CPU’s 86th percentile rank among all CPUs and the GPU’s 68th percentile rank among all GPUs indicating a well-matched, if slightly CPU-favored, system.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosts up to 5.50 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that underscores its efficiency. The chip features a 4 nm process node from TSMC, housing 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample data locality for compute-heavy tasks. Memory support extends to DDR5 with dual-channel operation and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, alongside ECC memory support for workstation-grade stability.

Benchmark results reveal a processor with exceptional single-threaded capability and solid multi-threaded scaling. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,280 in single-thread, 2,525 in 2-thread, 4,869 in 4-thread, 8,184 in 8-thread, 9,771 in max-thread, and 9,824 in 16-thread, demonstrating near-linear scaling up to 8 threads and only modest gains beyond that point. Cinebench R23 scores of 2,211 single-core and 20,485 multi-core place it in strong contention with higher-core-count rivals, while Geekbench scores of 3,023 single-core and 17,906 multi-core reinforce the same narrative. The PassMark suite shows a single-thread score of 4,654 and a multithread score of 37,161, with specialized workloads like integer math at 120,142, floating-point math at 78,999, and data compression at 437,140 indicating robust general-purpose performance.

The CPU’s 86th percentile rank among all CPUs places it above the vast majority of processors. Its nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core i9-14901E (avg 37,911, delta 0.1%), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (avg 37,904, delta 0.1%), and Intel Core 5 211E (avg 37,829, delta 0.3%). The 9700X’s average benchmark score of 37,943 is effectively identical to these competitors, separated by less than 0.4%. For real workloads, this means the 9700X excels in tasks that benefit from high single-threaded throughput, such as gaming, spreadsheet calculations, and code compilation, while its 16 threads handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software development builds efficiently. The 65 W TDP is notably low for the performance class, suggesting thermal headroom and lower power consumption compared to higher-TDP rivals, though the data does not specify comparative power draw figures.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How does the 9700X compare to its nearest rival in multi-threaded performance?

A: The 9700X’s average benchmark score is 37,943, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-14901E’s 37,911 and 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370’s 37,904, indicating near-identical multi-threaded performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s and a memory clock of 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing has a combined percentile of 77 among all CPU+GPU pairs, with a pair rank of 991 out of 3,732 pairs by average FPS.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 9700X supports ECC memory, alongside DDR5 dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The RTX 3080 is marked as End-of-life, with a release date of 2020-08-31, and it uses the GA102 chip on Samsung’s 8 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded benchmarks?

A: The 9700X scores 1,280 in 3DMark single-thread, 2,211 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 3,023 in Geekbench single-core, indicating top-tier single-threaded performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 37,943, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This score is achieved through consistent performance across multiple test suites: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20,485, Geekbench multi-core at 17,906, and PassMark multithread at 37,161. The single-threaded scores are equally impressive, with 3DMark single-thread at 1,280 and PassMark single-thread at 4,654, confirming that the Zen 5 architecture excels at low-thread-count workloads. The nearest rival comparisons show the 9700X within 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-14901E, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, and Intel Core 5 211E, meaning that any of these CPUs would deliver virtually indistinguishable performance in real-world tasks.

The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, has an average benchmark score of 23,172, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and PassMark G3D score of 25,086 highlight its DirectX 12 capabilities, while Geekbench OpenCL at 152,423 and Vulkan at 33,620 show strong compute performance. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 (avg 23,249, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (avg 23,250, delta -0.3%), and AMD Radeon RX 6600M (avg 23,273, delta -0.4%), with the RTX 3080 only 0.3-0.4% below these scores, indicating that it sits at the edge of a tightly clustered group of GPUs.

Combined, the pair’s percentile rank of 77 reflects a system that outperforms the majority of desktop configurations. The average FPS across all tested games is 158.3, with a pair rank of 991 out of 3,732, putting it in the top 26.5% of all pairs. The CPU’s higher percentile (86 vs 68) suggests that the processor has more headroom relative to the GPU, meaning the RTX 3080 is the more likely bottleneck in GPU-bound scenarios, but the overall balance remains favorable for high-refresh gaming and productivity.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s strong single-threaded performance (3DMark single-thread 1,280, PassMark single-thread 4,654) combined with the GPU’s high FPS output supports 1080p and 1440p esports titles at very high frame rates. In Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 242.4 FPS at 1080p and 159.5 FPS at 1440p, while Valorant hits 553.5 FPS at 1080p and 472.8 FPS at 1440p, making this pairing ideal for competitive gaming where frame rates above 144 Hz are required.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads handle encoding and game capture simultaneously without significant performance degradation, as evidenced by the 3DMark max-thread score of 9,771 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,485. The GPU’s NVENC-capable Ampere architecture (68 RT cores, 272 tensor cores) further offloads encoding tasks, allowing for smooth streaming at 1080p or 1440p while maintaining high game FPS, such as 182.9 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p.

Video Editing: The combination of 8 cores/16 threads and 32 MB L3 cache provides strong multi-threaded performance for rendering timelines and exporting footage. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20,485 and PassMark data compression at 437,140 indicate efficient handling of codec-intensive tasks. The GPU’s 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects processing and preview rendering, making this a capable setup for 1080p and 1440p video projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Geekbench multi-core 17,906, PassMark multithread 37,161) handle CPU-based rendering workloads, while the GPU’s compute performance (Geekbench OpenCL 152,423, PassMark GPU compute 14,397) accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers. In Cyberpunk 2077, the system produces 72.9 FPS at 1080p and 53.9 FPS at 1440p, showing that even demanding real-time rendering tasks are manageable, though offline rendering would benefit from more cores.

Software Development: The CPU’s high single-threaded speed (Geekbench single-core 3,023) speeds up compilation of single-threaded build steps, while its 16 threads handle parallel builds effectively. PassMark integer math at 120,142 and extended instructions at 35,318 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing tasks. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during long build sessions.

Student and Office Work: The 9700X’s efficient 65 W TDP and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback for basic tasks, while the RTX 3080 handles any GPU-accelerated workloads. Office applications benefit from the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,525 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,654, ensuring responsive performance in spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsing, with the system’s thermal efficiency making it suitable for sustained office use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing exhibits a CPU-favored balance, with the processor ranking in the 86th percentile of all CPUs and the GPU in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. This 18-percentage-point gap suggests that the RTX 3080 is the primary limiter in workloads that scale with GPU compute, such as high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. In gaming, the FPS scaling across resolutions demonstrates this: in Cyberpunk 2077, performance drops from 72.9 FPS at 1080p to 53.9 FPS at 1440p and 33.2 FPS at 4K, a pattern consistent with GPU-bound performance where the CPU can feed the GPU faster than it can render. Conversely, in CPU-light titles like Valorant, the system maintains 553.5 FPS at 1080p, showing that the CPU is not the limiting factor even at very high frame rates.

The GPU’s 68th percentile rank, while lower than the CPU’s, still places it above 68% of all GPUs, meaning it is not a weak component but rather a mid-to-high-tier part that can be pushed to its limits by the 9700X’s strong single-threaded performance. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 4,407, which is competitive with its nearest rivals (within 0.4%), indicating no anomalous bottleneck. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,824 and max-thread score of 9,771 show that it can sustain high multi-threaded throughput, but in gaming, the GPU’s rendering capacity is the ceiling for FPS in demanding titles. For a balanced upgrade path, the GPU would need to be replaced first to unlock higher frame rates at 1440p and 4K, as the CPU has headroom to support more powerful GPUs.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings across a wide range of games reveals strong 1080p and 1440p performance, with 4K remaining playable in many titles. At 1920x1080, the system achieves high frame rates in esports and lighter titles: Valorant at 553.5 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 538.5 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 242.4 FPS. Heavier titles also perform well at 1080p, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 182.9 FPS, Minecraft at 240 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 66.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, frame rates remain high for competitive games—Valorant at 472.8 FPS, CS:GO at 372.7 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 190 FPS—while demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 53.9 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 47.5 FPS. At 3840x2160, only lighter titles maintain high FPS: Valorant at 376 FPS, CS:GO at 221.2 FPS, and Roblox at 119.1 FPS, while heavy games like Cyberpunk 2077 (33.2 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (33 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

The average FPS across all games is 158.3, with a pair rank of 991 out of 3,732 pairs, indicating better-than-average performance. The data shows that this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers consistently high frame rates in both competitive and AAA titles. At 4K, the system can handle esports and older games well but struggles with modern AAA titles, where settings would need to be lowered to achieve smoother gameplay. The GPU’s 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures, but the 68th percentile rank limits 4K performance in the most demanding releases.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel operation and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for next-generation GPUs and NVMe storage. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, leaving significant thermal headroom for the platform, while the GPU’s 320 W TDP and suggested PSU of 700 W indicate the system’s power requirements. The RTX 3080 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and its dual-slot design with a 1x 12-pin power connector fits standard desktop cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the primary candidate due to the CPU’s higher percentile rank (86 vs 68). Replacing the RTX 3080 with a more powerful GPU would allow the 9700X to push higher frame rates, particularly at 1440p and 4K, where the current GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, while not the highest core count available, are sufficient for gaming and productivity, so a CPU upgrade would yield diminishing returns unless workloads require more cores. The platform’s DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that the AM5 socket is future-proof for several more generations of AMD processors, making the 9700X a long-lived foundation. The 700 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, though the current system’s combined TDP of 385 W (65 W CPU + 320 W GPU) is well within this limit.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in a desktop configuration. The CPU, from the 9000 series with Zen 5 architecture, ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 37,943. The GPU, from the GeForce 30-series with Ampere architecture, ranks in the 68th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 23,172. The combined percentile of 77 places this pairing in the upper quarter of all CPU+GPU combinations, with an average FPS of 158.3 across all tested games at various resolutions.

The build’s overall tier is high-midrange to upper-midrange, excelling in 1080p and 1440p gaming while offering competent 4K performance in less demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-threaded performance and efficient 65 W TDP make it a versatile choice for both gaming and productivity, while the GPU’s 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide solid rasterization and ray tracing capabilities. The system is well-suited for users who prioritize high frame rates at 1440p and want a CPU that can handle multi-threaded workloads without excessive power draw, though the GPU’s end-of-life status suggests that newer alternatives may offer better features.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and demand high frame rates in competitive titles. The CPU’s single-threaded score of 3,023 in Geekbench and the GPU’s FPS output in esports games (Valorant 553.5 FPS at 1080p, CS:GO 538.5 FPS) make it ideal for players of shooters and MOBAs where responsiveness is critical. AAA gamers at 1440p will find solid performance, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 163.1 FPS and Assetto Corsa at 101 FPS, though 4K gamers will need to compromise on settings in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (33.2 FPS at 4K).

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s compute capabilities. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20,485 and PassMark GPU compute at 14,397 indicate strong performance for rendering and effects work, while the 10 GB VRAM handles large textures and timelines. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s fast single-threaded performance for compilation and its 16 threads for parallel builds, with PassMark integer math at 120,142 and data encryption at 21,815 suggesting robust code processing. Students and small business users in need of a capable workstation will find the system handles office tasks, data analysis, and light rendering with ease, while the 65 W CPU TDP and 700 W suggested PSU keep power costs manageable. The system is less suitable for users who require maximum 4K gaming performance or who work with extremely large datasets that benefit from more than 16 threads, as the CPU’s 8 cores may limit scaling in heavily multi-threaded professional applications.