SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 pairing is a desktop build that combines a high-end 8-core Zen 5 processor with a professional-grade Ada Lovelace GPU. This analysis uses only synthetic benchmark scores and hardware specifications, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data — all frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the CPU and GPU scores rather than direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data is available for this specific CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains an empty `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field, and `dataIsMeasured` is set to false. Consequently, all gaming performance statements here are estimates based on the CPU’s PassMark scores and the GPU’s specifications and percentile ranking, not on actual gameplay benchmarks.

The CPU delivers a PassMark single-thread score of 4691, which sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs — this indicates excellent per-core performance that should drive high frame rates in games that rely on single-threaded logic. The multithread score of 36470 further supports strong overall throughput, but for gaming, the single-thread figure is the more relevant indicator. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada GPU, meanwhile, is based on the AD103 chip with 9728 shading units, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores, and it has a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. That percentile is mid-pack, suggesting the GPU will handle 1080p and 1440p gaming well but may not be the top-tier choice for 4K ultra settings.

At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU’s 4691 single-thread score and the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput should combine for high frame rates in most titles, likely exceeding 100 FPS in esports and competitive shooters. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for modern game assets, but the GPU’s mid-pack percentile suggests it may be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1440p, the GPU’s 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 510.7 GTexel/s texture rate become more important, and the estimate is that frame rates will remain playable but will drop from 1080p figures by roughly 20–30%. At 4K, the 50th percentile GPU ranking indicates that ultra settings would likely push frame rates below 60 FPS in demanding AAA titles, and users may need to lower settings to medium or high.

Ray tracing performance is supported through 76 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, but the GPU’s overall percentile suggests that enabling ray tracing at high resolutions will carry a significant performance cost. DLSS is not explicitly mentioned in the FACT PACK, but the 304 tensor cores imply support for AI-accelerated upscaling, which could recover frame rates in RT-enabled titles. Overall, this pairing is estimated to be a solid 1080p and capable 1440p gaming machine, with 4K gaming possible but not at maximum settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 4691 single-thread score and 94th percentile ranking position this build well for 144Hz or 165Hz monitors at 1080p. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate should sustain high frame rates in competitive titles, though the GPU’s 50th percentile means it may not consistently hit maximum refresh rates in the most demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a multithread score of 36470, provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The 304 tensor cores on the GPU also offer hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities, though the FACT PACK does not specify NVENC details. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory helps with multitasking between game, capture software, and streaming output.

Video editing: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 77955 and integer math score of 120788 indicate strong computational throughput for rendering and effects. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP16 and FP32 performance supports hardware-accelerated previews and exports, and the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines with multiple layers. The 94th CPU percentile suggests this build handles professional video editing workloads comfortably.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multithread score of 36470 places it in the 94th percentile, which is strong for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 9728 shading units and 304 tensor cores provide substantial compute for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane, though the 50th GPU percentile means it is not a top-tier render monster. The 16 GB VRAM is a practical advantage for scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s data encryption score of 21488 and random string sorting score of 45890 indicate solid performance for code compilation and data processing tasks. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel builds well, and the 5.50 GHz boost clock aids single-threaded compilation steps. The 65 W TDP keeps power draw low during long development sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 4691 single-thread score and 94th percentile ensure snappy responsiveness in office suites, web browsing, and multitasking. The 16 GB GDDR6 GPU memory is overkill for typical office tasks, but the build runs them without any performance concern. The 65 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP keep the system quiet and efficient for shared workspaces.

FAQ

Q: Does the FACT PACK include any measured gaming frame rates for this build?

A: No, the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false, so all FPS figures in this analysis are estimates based on benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875), 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163), 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515), and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700K (69355).

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, indicating mid-pack performance relative to the broader GPU market.

Q: What memory type and capacity does the GPU have?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and power draw?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz and a TDP of 65 W. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support, and how many lanes?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only). The GPU, in contrast, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 50th percentile. This 44-percentage-point gap means the processor is far stronger relative to its competition than the graphics card is relative to its peers. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where the 50th-percentile GPU cannot keep pace with the CPU’s single-thread score of 4691.

At 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread performance and the GPU’s moderate pixel rate (188.2 GPixel/s) mean the bottleneck is likely the GPU in demanding scenes, but the CPU can push high frame rates in CPU-bound games. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 112 ROPs become the primary constraint, and the CPU will be underutilized. The CPU’s multithread score of 36470 also vastly exceeds what most games need, so in gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 94th percentile and strong integer math score (120788) make it the dominant component for software compilation, data compression (score of 421988), and encryption tasks (21488). The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB VRAM support GPU-accelerated tasks, but its 50th percentile means it is not the strongest compute card. For 3D rendering, the CPU and GPU are both engaged, but the CPU’s higher relative standing suggests it will carry more of the workload in CPU-based renderers, while the GPU handles GPU-accelerated paths. The combined percentile for the build is 72, reflecting the CPU pulling the average up and the GPU pulling it down.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process node with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz, boosting to 5.50 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The 65 W TDP is notably low for a desktop 8-core part, making it power-efficient.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the high single-thread score of 4691, which is in the 94th percentile. The multithread score of 36470 reflects strong scaling across the 8 cores. The data compression score of 421988 indicates exceptional throughput for compression workloads, while the floating-point math score of 77955 and integer math score of 120788 show balanced computational strength. The extended instructions score of 33688 and find prime numbers score of 183 round out the synthetic picture.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69996, putting it 0.2% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7940HX and 0.7% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X, while trailing the Core i7-14700KF by 0.2% and leading the Core i7-14700K by 0.9%. This places it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs, just below the very top tier. For real workloads, this means the CPU will not bottleneck modern games, compiles code quickly, and handles multi-threaded productivity tasks with ease. The lack of integrated graphics (N/A) means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is already present in this build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5, which is the current platform for AMD desktop processors. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is forward-looking for high-speed storage and GPUs. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it will not take full advantage of the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, but it remains fully compatible.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low, and the GPU’s 150 W TDP is moderate, so the combined power draw is manageable. The suggested PSU field is null in the FACT PACK, but the TDP figures imply a system that does not require an oversized power supply. The GPU has no power connectors and is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with portable device-dependent display outputs, which is unusual for a desktop build — this suggests the GPU is designed for embedded or mobile use, but it is paired here in a desktop context per the build class.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-percentile GPU, as the CPU’s 94th percentile leaves significant headroom. Replacing the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada with a GPU in the 80th or 90th percentile would better match the CPU’s performance tier and alleviate the gaming bottleneck at 1440p and 4K. The AM5 socket also allows future CPU upgrades within the same platform, and the DDR5 memory support means the RAM can carry over. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes are ready for next-generation GPUs, though the current GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface does not saturate them.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s PassMark scores are comprehensive: single-thread at 4691, multithread at 36470, data compression at 421988, data encryption at 21488, extended instructions at 33688, find prime numbers at 183, floating-point math at 77955, integer math at 120788, physics at 2122, and random string sorting at 45890. The average benchmark score is 69996, and the percentile vs all CPUs is 94. The nearest rivals are within 0.9% of this score, indicating a tightly contested tier.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK — its benchmarks array is empty, and its average benchmark score is 0. The percentile vs all GPUs is 50, and there are no nearest rivals listed. This means the GPU’s performance must be inferred from its specifications: 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, 304 tensor cores, 32.69 TFLOPS FP32, and 32.69 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1). The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The combined percentile for the build is 72, which reflects the CPU’s strong showing pulling the average up from the GPU’s mid-pack position. The pair rank by FPS is null, as no FPS data exists. The combined picture is a system with a top-6% CPU and a median GPU, resulting in a build that excels in CPU-heavy tasks but is average in GPU-bound scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system, combining the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (a 9000-series Zen 5 processor) with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 (an Ada Lovelace architecture GPU). The CPU is a mainstream high-end desktop part with a 94th percentile ranking, while the GPU is an embedded/mobile-oriented part that has been placed in a desktop context, ranking only in the 50th percentile.

The overall tier from the percentiles is mixed: the CPU is in the top 6% of all CPUs, the GPU is exactly at the median, and the combined percentile is 72. This places the build in the upper-middle tier of overall performance, with the CPU providing the majority of the system’s strength. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 32.69 TFLOPS compute are respectable, but its 50th percentile means it is not a competitive gaming card at the highest levels. The build is best described as a CPU-dominant workstation with a capable but not exceptional GPU, suitable for tasks where processor performance matters more than raw graphics throughput.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This build is well-suited for gamers targeting 1080p ultra settings, where the CPU’s 4691 single-thread score and the GPU’s moderate pixel rate combine for high frame rates. The GPU’s 50th percentile is less of a concern at this resolution, and the CPU’s 94th percentile ensures no processor bottleneck.

Gamers at 1440p: Those who play at 1440p will find the GPU becomes the limiting factor, but the 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth handle most titles at high settings. Frame rates will be lower than 1080p, but the build remains playable for most games.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit from the CPU’s 94th percentile and strong multithread score of 36470, along with the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM for large scenes. The build handles rendering and editing workloads well, though the GPU’s median percentile means it is not the fastest for GPU-accelerated rendering.

Software developers: The CPU’s integer math score of 120788 and data compression score of 421988 support fast code compilation and data processing. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel builds, and the 65 W TDP keeps power draw low during long sessions.

Students and office workers: For general productivity, the CPU’s high single-thread score ensures snappy performance in everyday apps. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but the system runs such workloads without any effort. The low TDP of both components contributes to a quiet and efficient workstation.

Small business workstations: The combination of a high-percentile CPU and a GPU with 16 GB VRAM supports tasks like database management, financial modeling, and light CAD work. The CPU’s 94th percentile and the system’s overall 72nd combined percentile make it a reliable choice for professional environments that need strong processor performance without extreme graphics demands.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds