SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop-class pairing that targets the top of the performance stack, sitting at the 96th combined percentile across all CPU and GPU configurations. This is a system built around a Zen 5 processor designed for high single-thread responsiveness paired with a workstation-grade Ada Lovelace GPU that prioritizes massive memory capacity and compute throughput. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming performance discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores and percentile positions rather than direct empirical testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4691 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, which is the primary driver for frame pacing in esports and fast-paced titles. The RTX 5000 Ada’s 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is more than sufficient for high-refresh 1440p gaming, though its workstation focus means it is not optimized for the same rasterization efficiency as a dedicated gaming GPU. Estimated FPS at 1440p ultra would be well above 100 in most titles, but the GPU’s 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate suggest it handles resolution scaling better than raw polygon throughput.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 36470, provide enough headroom for software encoding while maintaining game performance. The GPU’s 400 tensor cores are available for hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding, which offloads the streaming workload from the CPU entirely. Benchmark results indicate the CPU is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX in average score, so it holds its own against a mobile 16-core part when handling simultaneous game and encode tasks.

Video editing: The 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on the GPU with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is the standout feature here, allowing large timelines and 8K footage to reside entirely in VRAM without spilling to system memory. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 421988 and extended instructions score of 33688 indicate strong performance in codec-heavy workloads, while the 89.6 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth keeps the CPU fed during multi-stream playback. This combination lands 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF in average CPU score, making it competitive with a top-tier gaming desktop processor.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, paired with 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance, position this for serious offline rendering workloads. The RTX 5000 Ada’s average benchmark score of 184664 places it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, and it sits 0.5% behind the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB — a data-center-class accelerator — in average score. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 8 Zen 5 cores provide adequate geometry preparation for the GPU, though the 0.7% gap to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in average CPU score suggests a 16-core part would feed a render engine more efficiently.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 120788 and floating point math score of 77955 reflect strong compile throughput for both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy code. The 4 nm Zen 5 architecture with a 5.50 GHz boost clock gives excellent single-thread latency for interactive development tools, and the 65 W TDP means sustained all-core builds do not require exotic cooling. The GPU’s 12,800 shading units and 400 TMUs are useful for shader compilation and GPU compute debugging, though most developer workloads will lean on the CPU.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively overprovisioned for document editing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing, but the CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2122 and random string sorting score of 45890 indicate snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP combine for a 600 W suggested PSU, which is modest for the performance class. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is double what typical office systems offer, though most productivity software will not utilize it.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69996, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 69875 (0.2% slower), followed by the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70163 (0.2% faster), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69515 (0.7% slower), and the Intel Core i7-14700K at 69355 (0.9% slower). This means the 9700F is effectively a statistical tie with a top-tier 16-core mobile processor and a high-core desktop i7, despite having only 8 cores. The single-thread score of 4691 is the strongest indicator of its gaming and application-launch capability, while the multithread score of 36470 demonstrates that 8 Zen 5 cores scale well beyond their core count.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 184664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB at 183725 (0.5% slower), followed by the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB at 187147 (1.3% faster), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell at 182109 (1.4% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D at 178050 (3.7% slower). This places the RTX 5000 Ada in the same performance tier as data-center accelerators and ahead of the most powerful consumer gaming GPU by a meaningful margin. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 194041 is higher than the OpenCL score of 175286, suggesting the GPU is better optimized for Vulkan-based workloads.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the dominant component — it sits 4 percentile points higher than the CPU and outperforms its nearest rival by a larger margin than the CPU does. The 96th combined percentile reflects a balanced pairing, but the GPU clearly carries the heavier load in compute-intensive scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory enabled. The socket is current-generation and active, meaning future Zen 5 and potentially newer Zen architecture CPUs should fit without a motherboard change. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the latest standard and offers double the bandwidth of PCIe 4.0 for storage and GPU connectivity. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it does not fully utilize the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, but this is not a bottleneck since the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is well within PCIe 4.0 x16 capacity.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 250 W TDP combine for a suggested PSU of 600 W, which is conservative for a system with this performance level. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Zen 5 CPU on the same AM5 socket, such as a 16-core part, which would improve multithread scores beyond the current 36470. The GPU’s 1x 16-pin power connector and dual-slot form factor (267 mm length, 112 mm height) mean most mid-tower and full-tower cases will accommodate it without modification. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor workstation setups.

The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking despite the 65 W TDP, which is unusual for a power-efficient part. The 5.50 GHz boost clock is already high, so manual overclocking headroom is likely limited, but the option exists. The 32 MB shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core provide a solid foundation for memory-intensive workloads, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is the ceiling for dual-channel DDR5 on this platform.

Balance and Bottleneck

The GPU is the limiting factor in gaming scenarios, but not because it is weak — rather, the CPU’s 94th percentile single-thread score is so strong that it will rarely be the constraint. In CPU-bound titles at 1080p with lower graphics settings, the 4691 single-thread score and 2122 physics score suggest the CPU can drive frame rates that exceed the GPU’s rendering capabilities at high refresh rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate becomes the bottleneck, which is expected given its workstation orientation.

In compute workloads like 3D rendering and machine learning, the GPU dominates entirely — its 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 output is roughly two orders of magnitude higher than the CPU’s floating point math score of 77955 (which is measured in operations per second). The CPU’s role is to prepare data and feed the GPU, and its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is the transfer ceiling. The GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is 6.4 times higher, meaning the CPU cannot saturate the GPU’s memory system if data must pass through system RAM.

In mixed workloads like video editing, the balance shifts depending on the codec. The CPU’s data compression score of 421988 and encryption score of 21488 handle container muxing and encryption, while the GPU’s tensor cores accelerate AI-based filters and denoising. The 0.2% delta to the Ryzen 9 7940HX in average CPU score shows this 8-core part trades blows with a 16-core mobile part, but the 0.7% gap to the Ryzen 9 7950X reveals the ceiling for AM5 CPU upgrades.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1440p and 4K who prioritize resolution scaling and high-quality textures will benefit from the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM, which eliminates texture memory limits in modern titles. The CPU’s 94th percentile single-thread score ensures consistent frame pacing, though the GPU’s workstation drivers may not deliver the same day-one optimization as consumer gaming drivers.

Content creators working with 8K video, large 3D scenes, or AI-assisted workflows will find the 32 GB VRAM and 400 tensor cores indispensable. The GPU’s 98th percentile rank and 0.5% delta to the A100 80 GB mean it handles production workloads at near-data-center speeds, while the CPU’s 8 fast cores keep the timeline responsive.

Software developers who compile large codebases and run containerized workloads will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 120788 and 65 W TDP, which allows for quiet, efficient all-day builds. The 16 threads and 32 MB L3 cache handle parallel compilation well, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity in long-running test suites.

Students and small business workstations are better served by less powerful hardware, but this system will never struggle with any academic or office task. The 600 W suggested PSU and dual-slot GPU footprint make it buildable in a standard mid-tower, and the AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path for years to come.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Ryzen 9 7940HX?

A: The 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996, which is 0.2% higher than the 7940HX’s 69875. Despite having 8 cores versus the 7940HX’s 16 cores, the 9700F edges it out in average performance.

Q: Is the RTX 5000 Ada faster than the RTX 4090 D?

A: Yes. The RTX 5000 Ada’s average benchmark score is 184664, which is 3.7% higher than the RTX 4090 D’s 178050. It also has 32 GB VRAM versus the 4090 D’s unspecified capacity.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 96, meaning this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 96% of all configurations in the database.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory. The dual-channel DDR5 memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is ECC-capable.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.50 GHz with a base clock of 3.80 GHz, and has a 65 W TDP. The GPU has a 250 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 600 W.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada’s average score of 184664 is 0.5% higher than the A100 80 GB’s 183725, making them statistically equivalent in benchmark performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename, fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It integrates 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die, which is a remarkably high transistor density for a desktop CPU. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and the 65 W TDP is low enough for a capable air cooler, though the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking if the cooling allows.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3, totaling a substantial 8 MB L2 and 32 MB L3 for the full processor. This cache configuration is well-suited for workloads that exhibit data locality, such as gaming and database operations. The PassMark data compression score of 421988 is particularly strong, indicating excellent memory-latency handling and prefetch behavior.

The CPU’s benchmark results reveal a processor that punches above its core count. The multithread score of 36470 is within 0.9% of the Intel Core i7-14700K’s 69355 average score (which includes the i7’s higher core count), and 0.2% faster than the Ryzen 9 7940HX’s 69875. The single-thread score of 4691 is the 94th percentile, which is exceptional for a desktop part. The floating point math score of 77955 and integer math score of 120788 show balanced compute across both domains, and the extended instructions score of 33688 indicates strong AVX-512 or similar vector processing capability.

The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is the standard for dual-channel DDR5, and the ECC support makes this a viable option for workstation builds where memory errors are unacceptable. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide ample connectivity for the latest NVMe SSDs and expansion cards, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs an 8-core Zen 5 CPU with a workstation Ada Lovelace GPU. The combined percentile of 96 places it in the top 4% of all configurations, making it a high-end system by any measure. The CPU’s 94th percentile and GPU’s 98th percentile are both strong, but the GPU is the more dominant component.

The build is characterized by a low-power CPU (65 W TDP) paired with a high-power GPU (250 W TDP), which creates an interesting thermal profile: the CPU runs cool and quiet, while the GPU generates the bulk of the heat. The 600 W suggested PSU is modest for this performance class, leaving headroom for overclocking or additional drives. The dual-slot GPU at 267 mm length fits in most cases, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor workstation setups.

This is not a typical gaming build — the GPU’s workstation orientation means it prioritizes compute and memory capacity over rasterization efficiency. However, the 96th combined percentile means it will still handle gaming at high settings, especially at 1440p and 4K where the 32 GB VRAM eliminates texture loading bottlenecks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD102 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It integrates 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The GPU has 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, with 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration.

The memory subsystem is the defining feature: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is not the fastest memory configuration (a 384-bit bus would offer more bandwidth), but the capacity is exceptional for a workstation GPU, allowing entire datasets to reside in VRAM. The base clock is 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The GPU’s compute capabilities are staggering: 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio) make it suitable for both single-precision and half-precision workloads. The pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s are among the highest for any GPU in the database. The 250 W TDP is reasonable for this performance level, and the 1x 16-pin power connector is the modern standard.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, is 0.5% slower in average score, which is remarkable given that the A100 is a data-center accelerator with HBM memory. The RTX 5000 Ada is also 3.7% faster than the RTX 4090 D, the most powerful consumer gaming GPU, making it the superior choice for compute-heavy workloads. The 400 tensor cores provide significant AI acceleration, and the 100 RT cores handle real-time ray tracing, though workstation drivers may not prioritize gaming ray tracing performance.