SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines a modern Zen 5 desktop processor with a professional Turing-era workstation GPU. The CPU is a current-generation 8-core part with strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU is an end-of-life workstation card with substantial memory and compute capabilities. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not direct measurements.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, meaning the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, any frame-rate expectations are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores of the two components. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 places it in the 67th percentile among all GPUs, which is a modest mid-tier result; its DirectX 12 score of 59 is notably low, while DirectX 11 (140) and DirectX 9 (195) are comparatively stronger. This pattern suggests the Quadro RTX 5000 will handle older DirectX 11 titles more comfortably than modern DirectX 12 games, where its performance may be underwhelming.

For esports and older titles, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 (94th percentile) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU will likely cap performance at 1080p in less demanding games. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with estimated FPS in AAA titles potentially falling below 60 in many cases. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is ample for high-resolution textures, but the raw compute throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 is only around a third of what modern gaming GPUs deliver, so frame rates in graphically intensive scenes will be limited. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 36470 and integer math score of 120788 suggest it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates poor optimization for current APIs, making 1080p medium-to-high settings the realistic ceiling for modern games.

In summary, this is not a pairing designed for high-refresh competitive gaming or maxed-out 4K play. The data implies playable 1080p performance in older or lighter titles, with 1440p possible in less demanding games. For modern AAA releases at high settings, the estimates point to sub-60 FPS experiences, and ray tracing—despite the GPU having 48 RT cores—will be severely limited by the Turing architecture’s first-generation ray tracing performance and the low DirectX 12 score.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the Turing architecture with a TU104 chip fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1620 MHz with a boost of 1815 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores, with a pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s.

The benchmark scores reveal a workstation-oriented profile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 are respectable, indicating solid compute performance for professional workloads. However, the PassMark G3D score of 15616 is only 1% below the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856, delta -1%), which is a stark comparison—a modern entry-level gaming card from years ago outperforms this workstation GPU in rasterization. The DirectX 10 score of 113 and DirectX 11 score of 140 are moderate, but the DirectX 12 score of 59 is particularly weak, suggesting poor async compute or driver overhead issues in modern APIs.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures to fit in memory without swapping. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports data-intensive tasks like 4K video editing or complex 3D scenes. The 384 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like denoising, and the 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, though first-gen Turing RT performance is slow by modern standards. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6525 indicates moderate compute throughput, which is below what current workstation cards offer but sufficient for light-to-medium rendering tasks. The FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and FP16 of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1) are the theoretical ceilings, and real-world rendering will likely run at a fraction of that due to thermal and power constraints (TDP 230 W).

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is current and active. The Ryzen 7 9700F supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation builds where data integrity matters. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 24 lanes, which is forward-looking and allows for high-speed NVMe SSDs or future GPUs. The TDP is 65 W, which is low for an 8-core part, indicating efficient power draw.

The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is two generations older than the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 capability. This means the GPU will run at PCIe 3.0 speeds, but for most workloads, this is not a bottleneck—the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are more limiting factors. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 230 W. Combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, a 550 W power supply provides ample headroom for the whole system, likely leaving room for additional drives or moderate overclocking.

The upgrade path is clear: the AM5 socket has longevity, so a future CPU upgrade to a higher-core-count Ryzen 9000-series part would be straightforward. However, the GPU is end-of-life and its successor in the workstation lineup is Workstation Ampere. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Quadro RTX 5000 with a modern workstation GPU (like an Ampere-based RTX A-series) or a current-generation gaming card, which would dramatically improve DirectX 12 performance and ray tracing. The CPU’s 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that a future GPU upgrade will not be bottlenecked by the interface. Memory-wise, the platform supports DDR5, so users can upgrade to higher-capacity or faster kits (subject to the 89.6 GB/s bus limit) without changing the motherboard.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU is in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile—a clear disparity in relative performance tiers. For gaming, the GPU is the dominant bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 is strong enough to drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616, which rivals the GTX 1060 6 GB, means that in most games, the GPU will saturate well before the CPU reaches its limits. This is particularly true at higher resolutions where the GPU’s workload increases; at 1080p, the CPU may occasionally bottleneck in lightly-threaded games, but the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score (59) suggests that even at 1080p, modern titles will be GPU-limited.

For compute workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 36470 and floating-point math score of 77955 indicate strong general-purpose compute, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 show that the GPU can accelerate certain parallel tasks. However, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS is modest compared to its memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, meaning memory-bound tasks like large data transfers will not be the bottleneck, but compute-heavy tasks may be limited by shader throughput. In mixed workloads like video editing, the CPU will handle encoding and decoding (with its high integer math score of 120788), while the GPU accelerates effects and rendering—but the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking means it will not accelerate these tasks as effectively as a higher-tier card.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured data, but the percentile gap of 27 points (94 vs 67) strongly implies that upgrading the GPU would yield far larger performance gains in gaming than upgrading the CPU. Conversely, for multi-threaded productivity tasks like 3D rendering or software compilation, the CPU is the more critical component, and its 94th percentile ranking means it will not be the limiting factor in most workflows.

FAQ

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-sensitive workloads like scientific computing or database servers.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the GPU compare to a common gaming card?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 is 1% lower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856, delta -1%), indicating similar rasterization performance despite the Quadro’s larger VRAM.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: Is the GPU’s ray tracing hardware usable for gaming?

A: The GPU has 48 RT cores, but its DirectX 12 score of 59 is very low, suggesting that ray tracing performance in modern games would be poor, likely resulting in low frame rates.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, which provides sufficient headroom when paired with the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU’s manufacturing process?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance for productivity tasks but do not require top-tier gaming frame rates. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 36470, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM allows for handling large textures and complex scenes in software like Blender or DaVinci Resolve. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 120788, which indicates fast compilation, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Small business workstations that run CAD or simulation software could use the Quadro RTX 5000’s certified drivers and 16 GB VRAM, though the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking means it is not a high-end compute card. Students in engineering or computer science fields would find this a capable machine for coursework, given the CPU’s high single-thread score of 4691 for responsive daily use and the GPU’s 16 GB memory for educational rendering projects. However, gamers seeking high-refresh or 4K experiences should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s performance is comparable to a GTX 1060 6 GB, limiting modern gaming to 1080p at medium settings.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, packing 8,315 million transistors into a 70.6 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz, and it boosts to 5.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory. It has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) and no integrated graphics. The TDP is 65 W, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded high-end desktop CPU. The PassMark single-thread score of 4691 places it in the 94th percentile, indicating excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks, gaming physics, and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-thread score of 36470 shows strong parallel performance, with the CPU sitting 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875) and 0.2% below the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163) in average benchmark score. The integer math score of 120788 is particularly high, suggesting fast encryption, compression, and general computing tasks. The floating-point math score of 77955 indicates solid scientific computing capability, while the data encryption score of 21488 and data compression score of 421988 further reinforce its strength in data-intensive workloads.

For real-world use, this CPU can handle 4K video editing, software compilation, and multi-tasking with ease. The extended instructions score of 33688 shows good AVX-512 or similar vector processing capability, which benefits workloads like scientific simulations or AI inference. The find prime numbers score of 183 is low, but that is a niche test. The physics score of 2122 is moderate, indicating adequate performance for game physics but not top-tier. Overall, the Ryzen 7 9700F is a high-performance desktop CPU that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of workloads.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a current-generation high-end CPU with an end-of-life professional GPU. The combined percentile is 81, placing this system in the upper tier of all desktop builds, though this is driven almost entirely by the CPU’s strong performance (94th percentile) rather than the GPU (67th percentile). The pairing is unusual: a Zen 5 CPU designed for modern gaming and productivity, paired with a Turing-era workstation GPU that is older and slower in rasterization but offers 16 GB of VRAM and professional drivers.

The build’s overall tier is mid-to-high-end, with the CPU providing excellent compute and the GPU providing adequate graphics for workstation tasks. The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz ensures that the system never feels sluggish in CPU-bound tasks, while the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB memory handle large datasets. However, the GPU’s 67th percentile ranking means this is not a high-end gaming or compute rig; it is a balanced workstation where the CPU outshines the GPU. The combination is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity but need a professional GPU with substantial memory for specific applications like CAD or medical imaging.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69996, with a percentile rank of 94 among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avg score 69875, delta 0.2% higher), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (avg score 70163, delta -0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (avg score 69515, delta 0.7% higher), and the Intel Core i7-14700K (avg score 69355, delta 0.9% higher). This places the Ryzen 7 9700F in a tight competitive group with some of the best CPUs available, showing it is within 1% of these high-end parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21629, with a percentile rank of 67. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (avg score 21856, delta -1% higher), the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (avg score 21379, delta 1.2% lower), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (avg score 21237, delta 1.8% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (avg score 21153, delta 2.3% lower). This shows the Quadro RTX 5000 is positioned among older and mobile GPUs, with its performance roughly equivalent to a GTX 1060 6 GB.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU is a mid-range part. In CPU-bound workloads, this build will outperform most systems; in GPU-bound workloads, it will lag behind systems with modern mid-range or high-end gaming GPUs. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this imbalance—strong overall, but with clear room for improvement on the GPU side. For users who need the CPU for heavy computation and the GPU for occasional rendering or professional applications, this is a sensible pairing, but for gaming, the GPU will hold back the CPU’s potential.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 59 and G3D score of 15616 (comparable to a GTX 1060 6 GB) will cap frame rates well below 144 Hz in modern titles, even at 1080p. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 is sufficient, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a multi-thread score of 36470, can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without major performance drops. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM helps with overlays and scene resources, but the GPU’s low DirectX 12 score means game performance while streaming will be marginal.

Video editing: The CPU’s high integer math score of 120788 and multi-thread score of 36470 accelerate timeline processing and exports, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 78999 OpenCL score provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading. This is a competent editing rig for 1080p and 4K projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 77955 and the GPU’s compute score of 6525 indicate moderate rendering performance. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large scenes, but the GPU’s 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 is slow by modern standards, so final-frame renders will take longer than with a current-gen GPU.

Software development: The CPU’s multi-thread score of 36470 and integer math score of 120788 make compilation and unit testing fast. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds, and the 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory access latency in large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, web browsing, and coding. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is overkill for typical office tasks, but it handles multiple 4K monitors (4x DisplayPort 1.4a) without issue, making this a productive workstation for general use.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds