SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000: A Desktop Workstation Pairing with 8-Core Zen 5 Strength and Turing Pro Graphics

This desktop build combines AMD’s Ryzen 7 9700F, an 8-core Zen 5 processor with a 94th-percentile standing among all CPUs, with NVIDIA’s Quadro RTX 4000, a Turing-based professional GPU sitting at the 61st percentile. The CPU is decisively the stronger component, delivering multi-threaded and single-threaded scores that rival flagship desktop parts, while the GPU offers workstation-class features but lags in raw gaming performance. The data shows a 78th-percentile combined ranking, indicating a system built for CPU-heavy productivity tasks rather than high-refresh gaming. Benchmark results place this pairing as a desktop-class workstation where the Ryzen 7 9700F shoulders the heavy lifting, and the Quadro RTX 4000 provides professional-grade rendering and compute capabilities with modest frame-rate expectations.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Quadro RTX 4000’s 61st-percentile GPU ranking and PassMark G3D score of 15,117 suggest this build is not optimized for high-refresh gaming. With a DirectX 12 score of just 52 and a DirectX 11 score of 128, frame rates in modern titles will be limited, likely falling short of 144 Hz targets at 1080p in demanding games. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,691 is excellent, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck in gaming workloads, making this pairing better suited to esports titles at lower settings rather than competitive high-refresh play.

Streaming: The Ryzen 7 9700F’s 16 threads and multithread score of 36,470 provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 21,488 and floating-point math score of 77,955 indicate strong processing power for x264 encoding at reasonable presets. However, the Quadro RTX 4000’s 288 tensor cores could accelerate AI-based encoding, though its overall GPU compute score of 6,176 suggests limited throughput compared to the CPU’s capabilities.

Video Editing: Multi-core performance is the key metric here, and the Ryzen 7 9700F delivers a PassMark multithread score of 36,470, placing it 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and 0.7% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X. This translates to fast timeline scrubbing, rendering, and export times in applications that leverage multiple cores. The Quadro RTX 4000’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide adequate GPU acceleration for effects and color grading, though the 8 GB GDDR6 memory may limit very large projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s integer math score of 120,788 and extended instructions score of 33,688 show strong performance for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores offer hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI denoising. The Quadro RTX 4000’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,540 and Vulkan score of 78,844 indicate it can handle GPU rendering workloads, but its 61st-percentile ranking means it trails more recent workstation cards. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s 94th-percentile CPU ranking ensures render times are CPU-bound only when the workload exceeds the GPU’s memory or compute limits.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from the Ryzen 7 9700F’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a PassMark random string sorting score of 45,890 and data compression score of 421,988 indicating fast code compilation and build processes. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,691 is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 0.9% ahead of the Core i7-14700K, making it strong for single-threaded developer tools. The Quadro RTX 4000 is less relevant here, but its 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support multi-monitor setups for coding and testing.

Student and Office Work: The Ryzen 7 9700F’s 65 W TDP and efficient 4 nm process node make this an energy-conscious choice for daily productivity. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2,122 and find prime numbers score of 183 are modest but adequate for office applications, web browsing, and document processing. The Quadro RTX 4000’s single-slot design and 160 W TDP keep the system compact, though its professional focus means it’s overkill for typical student workloads — the CPU alone would handle these tasks efficiently.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 9700F achieves an average benchmark score of 69,996, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This score is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875) and 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515), while trailing the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70,163) by 0.2% and the Core i7-14700K (69,355) by 0.9%. These margins are tight, indicating the Ryzen 7 9700F performs on par with high-end desktop and mobile flagship processors from the previous generation.

The Quadro RTX 4000 posts an average benchmark score of 17,789, ranking in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. It sits 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666), 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17,639), and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 780M (17,588), with the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551) trailing by 1.4%. These rival deltas are remarkably small, suggesting the Quadro RTX 4000’s performance is comparable to mid-range consumer and integrated graphics solutions despite its professional branding.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 78, reflecting the strong CPU performance dragging up the overall system score. The CPU’s 94th-percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 61st-percentile ranking creates a significant imbalance — the data shows the processor is roughly 33 percentile points stronger than the graphics card. This gap means system performance in mixed workloads will be heavily influenced by the GPU’s limitations, particularly in graphics-intensive applications.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is built on the Zen 5 architecture using TSMC’s 4 nm process node, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The CPU integrates 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. This is a desktop-class processor on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s strengths across diverse workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 36,470 is the headline figure, placing it in the 94th percentile and within 0.9% of the Intel Core i7-14700K. The single-thread score of 4,691 is equally impressive, with the data showing the Ryzen 7 9700F leading the Ryzen 9 7940HX by 0.2% and the Core i7-14700K by 0.9% in this metric. For integer-heavy tasks, the score of 120,788 demonstrates strong performance, while the floating-point math score of 77,955 indicates capability in scientific and engineering workloads.

Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory support, which is valuable for workstation stability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, enabling fast storage and GPU connectivity. The 65 W TDP is notably low for an 8-core desktop processor, suggesting efficient power delivery and thermal management. The release date of 2025-09-15 places this as a current-generation part, with a launch MSRP of $289, though pricing details are beyond the scope of this analysis. The passmark data compression score of 421,988 and encryption score of 21,488 round out a profile that excels in productivity and content creation tasks.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience for this build is professionals and power users whose workloads are CPU-bound. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s 94th-percentile CPU ranking and multithread score of 36,470 make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts processing datasets, and researchers running simulations. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 4,691 also serves developers running legacy tools that don’t scale across cores.

Content creators working in video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s integer math score of 120,788 and extended instructions score of 33,688, which accelerate encoding and rendering pipelines. The Quadro RTX 4000’s 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores provide hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration for professional applications, though its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 61st-percentile ranking mean it’s better suited for moderate workloads rather than large-scale rendering farms.

Gamers should approach this build with caution — the Quadro RTX 4000’s DirectX 12 score of 52 and PassMark G3D score of 15,117 indicate that 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is feasible, but 1440p or 4K gaming will require significant settings reductions. The CPU’s gaming potential is wasted with this GPU pairing, so gamers might consider a different graphics card. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, with the CPU’s 65 W TDP and efficient architecture keeping power costs low, though the GPU’s professional focus adds cost without gaming benefit.

Small business workstations running financial modeling, CAD software, or database applications will benefit from the CPU’s multithread score and the GPU’s workstation-class drivers and display outputs. The 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support multi-monitor setups for data visualization and design work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path, with the Ryzen 7 9700F being part of the 9000 series and Zen 5 architecture. The motherboard supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes ensures compatibility with the fastest current storage and GPU options, though the Quadro RTX 4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which may bottleneck newer PCIe 5.0 devices.

The suggested PSU for this build is 450 W, which is modest given the CPU’s 65 W TDP and GPU’s 160 W TDP. This leaves headroom for additional components, but a future GPU upgrade to a higher-power card would require a larger PSU. The Quadro RTX 4000 uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a single slot, so the physical design is compact, but the 241 mm length (9.5 inches) and 111 mm height (4.4 inches) should be checked against case dimensions.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU, as the CPU’s 94th-percentile ranking is significantly ahead of the GPU’s 61st-percentile ranking. The data shows the CPU has substantial headroom to drive a more powerful graphics card without bottlenecking. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or faster storage via PCIe Gen 5 would complement the CPU’s capabilities. The platform’s support for future Zen 5-based processors means CPU upgrades are possible without changing the motherboard, though the current CPU’s performance already rivals flagship parts.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9700F a good processor for gaming?

A: The CPU has a PassMark single-thread score of 4,691, which is 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700K, indicating strong gaming performance. However, the Quadro RTX 4000’s 61st-percentile GPU ranking and DirectX 12 score of 52 limit overall gaming frame rates, making the GPU the primary constraint.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 78, reflecting the CPU’s 94th-percentile ranking and the GPU’s 61st-percentile ranking. The system is CPU-dominated, with the processor being the stronger component.

Q: Does the Quadro RTX 4000 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU features 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, its overall GPU compute score of 6,176 is modest, so ray tracing performance will be limited compared to newer GPUs.

Q: What memory type does the Ryzen 7 9700F support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has a TDP of 65 W, while the Quadro RTX 4000 has a TDP of 160 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 450 W.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69,996, which is 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 69,515. Despite having fewer cores, the 9700F performs slightly better in the PassMark average benchmark.

Q: What is the release date of the Quadro RTX 4000?

A: The GPU was released on 2018-11-12 and is now end-of-life, with its production status listed as "End-of-life." Its successor is Workstation Ampere.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this build. The Ryzen 7 9700F ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the Quadro RTX 4000 ranks in the 61st percentile of all GPUs — a 33-point gap. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (score of 421,988), and integer math (score of 120,788), the CPU operates near its full potential with no GPU interference. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming and 3D rendering, the Quadro RTX 4000 becomes the limiting factor, with its DirectX 12 score of 52 and PassMark G3D score of 15,117 constraining performance.

The FPS scaling implications are clear: in gaming, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,691 can drive high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU’s 61st-percentile ranking means frame rates will plateau at lower levels than the CPU could support. In workstation tasks that use GPU compute, such as OpenCL (score of 74,540) and Vulkan (score of 78,844), the GPU’s performance is mid-range, potentially underutilizing the CPU’s multithread capability of 36,470. The CPU’s 16 threads can feed a more powerful GPU, but the current pairing leaves CPU headroom unused in graphics-intensive scenarios.

For productivity workloads that are primarily CPU-bound, the balance is acceptable — the GPU handles display output and light acceleration while the CPU does the heavy lifting. However, for any workload that scales with GPU compute, the Quadro RTX 4000’s 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB GDDR6 memory will become the bottleneck. The suggested PSU of 450 W and the CPU’s 65 W TDP indicate that a GPU upgrade with a higher TDP would require PSU re-evaluation, but the platform has the bandwidth (PCIe Gen 5, 24 lanes) to support a faster card.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs AMD’s Ryzen 7 9700F, a Zen 5 Granite Ridge processor from the 9000 series, with NVIDIA’s Quadro RTX 4000, a Turing-based professional GPU from the Quadro Turing generation. The CPU is an active production part released on 2025-09-15, while the GPU is end-of-life with a 2018-11-12 release date. The combined 78th-percentile ranking places this system in the upper-midrange of desktop builds, with the CPU’s 94th-percentile performance dominating the overall score.

The Ryzen 7 9700F is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 8,315 million transistors and an 8-core, 16-thread configuration, while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses TSMC’s 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 160 W TDP combine for a 225 W total component power draw, which the 450 W suggested PSU supports with headroom. The system is best described as a CPU-first workstation with a professional GPU that offers ray tracing, tensor cores, and multi-display outputs but lags in raw gaming performance. For users prioritizing CPU-intensive tasks, this build delivers flagship-level processing, but those seeking balanced gaming performance would need a different GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame field, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than empirical measurements. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, meaning these expectations are qualitative projections.

Based on the Quadro RTX 4000’s PassMark G3D score of 15,117 and DirectX 11 score of 128, 1080p gaming at ultra settings would likely produce playable but not high-refresh frame rates in older or less demanding titles, potentially ranging from 30-60 FPS depending on the game. The DirectX 12 score of 52 suggests modern titles using DX12 may struggle to maintain 60 FPS at ultra settings, with lower settings or resolution scaling needed for smoother gameplay. The GPU’s 61st-percentile ranking and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance place it below modern gaming GPUs, so 1440p gaming at high refresh rates is unlikely.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,691 ensures that frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles would be high, but the GPU caps performance. For example, a game that is CPU-limited at 200 FPS with a stronger GPU would likely be GPU-limited at 60-80 FPS with the Quadro RTX 4000. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but may cause stuttering in games requiring more than 8 GB. The 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support 1440p or 4K monitors, but the GPU’s performance suggests 1080p is the practical gaming resolution. Overall, this build is not recommended for gaming-first users, as the CPU’s potential is wasted with this GPU, and the professional-grade Quadro RTX 4000 prioritizes compute and stability over frame rates.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds