SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing—an AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080—is a desktop combination that sits at the 90th combined percentile among all CPU–GPU pairs in the database. The CPU, an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 part with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and a 94th-percentile score, and the GPU, an Ada Lovelace RTX 4080 with 16 GB of GDDR6X and an 86th-percentile rating, together produce an average of 202.8 FPS across the measured game suite. The data is measured, not estimated, and the pair ranks 225th out of 3,732 tested pairs, marking it as a high-end configuration by any contemporary standard.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is built on the Zen 5 architecture using a 4 nm TSMC process, with a transistor count of 8,315 million on a 70.6 mm² die. It runs at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost of 5.50 GHz, and its 8 cores are paired with 16 threads via simultaneous multithreading. The cache hierarchy is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. As a desktop part, it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with an ECC option, and bridges to the rest of the system via 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself. There is no integrated graphics, meaning the RTX 4080 is the only display output in this build.

Benchmark results from the CPU portion of the database show strong compute performance. The multithread score is 36,470, and the single-thread score is 4,691. Integer math posts 120,788, floating-point math 77,955, while encryption, data compression, and extended instructions reach 21,488, 421,988, and 33,688, respectively. The physics score is 2,122, prime numbers 183, and random string sorting 45,890. These figures give the CPU a percentile rank of 94 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69,996.

Compared to its nearest competitors, the 9700F is remarkably close to a mid-range 7940HX (a mobile part) and two Intel desktop offerings. The Ryzen 9 7940HX scores an average of 69,875, a delta of 0.2 higher, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF averages 70,163, a mere 0.2 lower. The Ryzen 9 7950X (69,515) and i7-14700K (69,355) trail by 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively. This places the 9700F right at the top of a 1%-wide band. For a 65 W TDP chip, the multi-threaded score sits noticeably above that of many more power-hungry parts, emphasizing the 4 nm process’s efficiency. The single-thread figure of 4,691 is particularly strong for a mainstream desktop CPU, indicating that the architecture is optimized for latency-sensitive tasks such as gaming, rendering viewport interactions, and compiling single-threaded code.

The 8-core capacity means that workloads that leverage all threads — rendering, video encoding, batch data processing — see near-parity with chips like the i7‑14700K, which uses a hybrid architecture. The lack of integrated graphics is a detail to note: users must have a dedicated GPU, and that is already provided here.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s raw compute scores have been covered, but the full picture requires combining them with the GPU results. The GPU benchmark suite shows an average score of 54,247, based on the 99th-percentile scores from the redundancy:

3DMark Steel Nomad DX12: 6,567
Geekbench OpenCL: 214,739
Geekbench Vulkan: 263,779
Passmark G3D (game GPU): 34,457
Passmark G2D: 1,239
Passmark GPU Compute: 20,671

The Passmark DX10/DX11/DX12 tests give 204, 314, and 132, respectively, but these numbers are scaled differently from the others. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score is a modern, demanding test that shows the card is capable of handling a heavy 4K geometry and compute load.

The GPU’s percentile standing is 86 among all GPUs, while the CPU’s is 94. The combined pair percentile is 90, and from the measured FPS dataset the combination achieves an average of 202.8 FPS across 3,732 pairs, ranking 225th. To put this in perspective, the average frame rate is over 200, but the span is huge: esports titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive run well above 500 FPS at 1080p, while the most demanding title in the list, The Medium, runs only 68 FPS at 1080p and 45 at 4K. The combined picture is one of a high-refresh 1080p/1440p platform, capable of 4K in many titles, and unhindered as the CPU’s 94th percentile keeps up with the GPU’s 86th percentile.

The exact metrics: the CPU’s 36,470-point multithread is a strong match for the GPU’s compute throughput. The pairing is well balanced, with only a small CPU deficit to the two Intel parts, and the AMD chip’s robust single-thread performance helps the overall system beat the immense slow-down seen in many CPU-light scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, an Ada Lovelace (AD103) chip built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, has a base clock of 2205 MHz and a boost of 2505 MHz. Its memory is 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering a very high bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The shader array includes 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 76 RT cores, along with 304 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s and texture rate 761.5 GTexel/s. It offers 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1) compute. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, draws a maximum 320 W, and the suggested power supply is 700 W. It has triple-slot dimensions and is sold with a 16-pin connector. The RTX 4080 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Given these numbers, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,567 represents a very capable GPU for 4K DX12 gaming, while the 263,779 Vulkan score shows excellent cross-API strength. The GPU’s average score is 54,247, just 0.1% below the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209 delta -0.1), and less than 2% below a few AMD cards like the Radeon Pro W5700X and RX 6750 GRE. The compute spills into the PassMark GPU Compute score of 20,671, which reflects strong parallel processing for non-graphics workloads. With memory bandwidth 716.8 GB/s, the card handles large texture and geometry load without bottlenecks, which is evident in its ability to keep frame rates high at 1440p in most games.

The RT and tensor cores are what separate the 40-series from non-RT parts. The 76 RT cores accelerate ray-traced lighting, shadows, and reflections, while the 304 tensor cores enable DLSS (deep learning super resolution). Since the benchmark database does not include DLSS numbers, the base scores show the raw rasterization performance; when DLSS is enabled, performance would presumably rise, but no such data is provided. The 16 GB memory is a large buffer for 4K and HLA and is paired with a 256-bit interface that prevents bandwidth throttling.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Intel Core i7-14700K?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average CPU score of 69,996, while the i7-14700K averages 69,355, a delta of 0.9% — virtually identical. The 9700F achieves this with half the cores of the Intel part (8 vs 16) but executes faster per core in single-threaded tests.

Q: What are the decay rates from 1080p to 4K in gaming?

A: The measured data shows that in most titles, 4K performance falls to roughly two-thirds of the 1080p figure. For instance, in Cyberpunk 2077, the 1920x1080 score is 96, 2560x1440 is 71, and 3840x2160 is 47, a 51% reduction. In a CPU-light game like Valorant, the drop is far smaller: 590 at 1080p, 559 at 1440p, and 507 at 4K, a 14% loss, indicating that the CPU is a more persistent factor at those exceptionally high-frame scenarios.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more of a bottleneck in this system?

A: The CPU has a 94th percentile rank and the GPU an 86th percentile rank. Across the gaming dataset, the combined average is 202.8 FPS. In consistent esports titles, the GPU can sustain hundreds of frames, and the CPU is clearly sufficient; in heavier single-player titles, the GPU demands dominate, as seen with The Medium at only 68 FPS at 1080p. So no single component is a severe bottleneck in most scenarios, but the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor at high resolutions.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming with high settings?

A: At 4K Ultra presets, the measured FPS ranges from 36 (Revolution Idle) to 292 (CS:GO) — most AAA titles land in the 40–80 range. For example, Assetto Corsa runs at 81 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 138, and Red Dead the far end cyberpunk 47. At 4K, very high refresh is not possible in many titles, but 60 FPS is achievable in many.

Q: What is the purpose of the of the RTX 4080’s tensor cores?

A: The 304 tensor cores support DLSS, Vulkan 1.4, and other AI workloads. In gaming, DLSS upscaling can raise frame rates beyond the raw benchmark, but the database does not measure DLSS, so the scores reflect non-DLSS performance.

Q: How does the CPU’s memory bandwidth affect performance?

A: The dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a standard configuration. The CPU and GPU both require high memory bandwidth; the GPU has its own 716.8 GB/s, so the CPU memory bandwidth is not a limiting factor in gaming only.

Q: Is this CPU's 65W TDP suitable for to it?

A: Yes, the 65W TDP is a design point, but the total system PSU requirement is 700W because the GPU draws 320W and the rest of the system contributes. With a 700W power supply, there is adequate headroom for the entire system under load.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 9700F sits on the AMD Socket AM5, which natively supports DDR5 memory dual-channel (as used here) and provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses the 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes provided by the board, and the card has a PCIe 4.0 interface, so there is full compatibility. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, while the GPU is 320 W, and the 700 W suggested PSU leaves room for occasional Turbo spikes and moderate overclocking (the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, though no overclocking data is measured). The RTX 4080 is an end-of-life product on the market segment; however, the build’s GPU is still capable and is in its final phase of production. If a user wanted to stay on AM5, a future CPU upgrade is possible within the same platform (the 9700F is an active part), and the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface is not a bottleneck with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes. There is no custom vStorage from the cache, so no special consideration needed.

For users who would like to upgrade further, the GPU itself can be replaced with a more current-generation movement, but the data shows that the current pairing is already above the 90th percentile of all tested pairs. The other path is to move up to a higher-tier TCPU (e.g., a Ryzen 9 with more cores) if multi-threaded workloads become the primary use, but the current 8 cores are sufficient for the measured benchmarks.

Gaming Performance

All frame rate data is measured in real, non-DLSS Ultra settings. The titles of the dataset cover a wide range of engine loads, from lightweight esports to heavy AAA.

At 1920x1080, the following are representative benchmark numbers: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 717, Valorant 590, Roblox 420, Minecraft 366, and CS2 325. These show that the platform can deliver high refresh to 240+ Hz monitors in esports scenarios. At the other end, the most appealing single-player titles include Cyberpunk 2077 at 96, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 87, The Medium at 6 , and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 117. Those 1080p scores are very playable, typically above 70 FPS.

Scaling to 2560x1440: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive drops to 494, Verdant strikes a 559, Ready or It at 165, and the majority of AAA titles 75-102. This is the sweet spot for this build — the 4080 with 16 GB gets very smooth 1440p performance in most games. At 3840x2160, we see 292, 507, 140, and other. On the competitive side, Valorant runs 507 at 4K, which is fine for even the fastest esports, while top games like Cyberpunk 47, Control 69, and Flight Simulator 70. The data clearly shows that the platform can provide a 4K experience in many games, though “the frame differences between 1440p and 4K” are substantial.

The average FPSacross 49 titles is 202.8, but that average skims the count of esports titles with high counts. The true spread is more informative: the median (the middle, not an average) is lower, but the dataset lacks a median. Therefore, the number alone is a superficial estimate. The overall Rank 225/3732 indicates it sits in the top 6% of all tested pairs by frame rate.

Balance and Bottleneck

When examining the percentiles (CPU 94, GPU 86) and the FPS values across the three resolutions and game types, a clear hierarchy emerges: the CPU is strong enough to utilize the GPU fully. In CPU-bound games like Valorant, the 1908 to 1440p to 4K values remain nearly flat (590 / 559 / 507), which works because the CPU bottleneck is the main thing: the CPU provides a high rate of frames, and the GPU is not a limiting until higher resolution. The game’s single-thread heavy and the 9700F’s 4691 passmark single-thread score allows each core to feed draw to draw. In contrast, a GPU-heavy title like Cyberpunk 2077 sees a 51% reduction from 1080 to 4K (96 to 47), and in The Medium, 68 to 45%, meaning the RTX 4080’s capacity is stretched. The GPU has more effect on resolution scaling.

A precise bottleneck message: at 1080p and 1440p in esports games, the CPU and GPU cooperate to produce huge frame counts; in 4K AAA titles, the GPU is the limiting resource, but never severe enough to fail, as most titles still run above 45 FPS. The CPU never limits the GPU when GPU utilization is high. The only potential CPU strain is in the highest CPU workloads (e.g., 4K in CS:GO where 292 FPS indicates the CPU can still generate frames at 4K because the GPU is still 292 frames, so no constraint).

The 90th percentile combined score places it at the “high good” tier of overall performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build based on the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The CPU is a 8-core / 16-thread Zen 5 part, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace card with 16 GB GDDR6X memory. The combination ranks at 90th percentile for all pairs, with a CPU percentile 94 and GPU 86. Measured FPS across games averages 202.8. The system is intended for a desktop user who prioritizes high-frame, high-resolution gaming, heavy multitasking, and GPU-accelerated work. The four-core CPU is particularly strong within the top 4% of all CPUs, indicating that for a 65 W TDP and a 5.3 GHz boost, it outperforms the traditionally higher-core parts in many single-thread scenarios. The GPU, though end-of-life, continues to deliver impressive in the data.

For a typical mainstream desktop build, this pairing is mated—it’s a top-tier choice—the 90th percentile in the pair ranking is robust across three resolutions. The overall picture is a platform that will not require a CPU upgrade for several years and a graphics card that, while not the newest, already belongs to the top 15% of GPUs.

Who should build it

Given the measured performance, the following groups benefit from this configuration:

High-refresh-rate gamers: At 1080p, many isosporters and open-world titles exceed 200 FPS (e.g., CS 2 at 325, Valorant at 590, Minecraft 1220). These users need a monitor with >165 Hz to stay within the FPS range.
1440p/4K visual enthusiasts: At 1440p, AAA titles are crisp (Cyberpunk 71, Red Depart 60, Project Flight 64). At 4K, the system remains playable in most, with AAA games in the 40–70 range, perfect for 60 Hz 4K panels.
Content creators and streamers: The 65W processor provides decent multi-core performance (multi-core 36,470), and the GPU has a compute score of 20,671. OBS or video editing suites can utilize the 16GB VRAM and 48.74 TFLOPS for GPU-accelerated encoding (the card does have encoders, though not in price).
Advanced hobby and university students: If a student is running CAD, rendering small scenes, or compiling code, the CPU’s high single-thread is a good fit, and the GPU can handle simulations.
Small business workstations: For Windows workstation environments with 3D modeling or GPGPU (OpenCL score 214,739), this system meets the needs without excess cost.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The numbers speak: 590 FPS in Valorant at 1080p, 325 in CS2, 1520 in Roblox, and many others over 150. For 144Hz monitors, this system rarely caps, and for 360Hz ladders, it still hits the highest frame rates in competitive titles.

Streaming and Game Capture: The GPU has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, though the encoding engine specs are not in the pack. The measured compute and the CPU multithread suggest that simultaneous encoding and gaming stay fluid; the 16 threads handle background tasks without compromising the core frame rates.

Video Editing: Passmark floating-point math of 77,755 and data compression 421,988 indicate that data- heavy editing timelines and encoding. The 16GB VRAM allows more material can be resident in GPU memory for effects.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based render, the 8-core/16-thread multiplers yield a decent match for the twin; the GPU’s 20,671 compute performance lets the as the RT forced use for the rendering engine. The 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 indicates real-time preview is fast.

Software and web development: The single-thread 4691 and physics 2122 make the unity editor, visual Studio alike fast for compiles and code analysis. The 4 nm process keeps power to 65W, so developer builds don’t overheat.

Student and office work: The combo is overpowered for productivity, but with zero IGP and a discrete GPU, it is a competent “multi-display, spreadsheet, remote desktop” machine. The low 65W CPU TDP means low system noise and an office can consider it.

End of life: The GPU is marked “end-of-life”, but its benchmarks show it still cools comfortably at the top, so a user building new will still have top-tier performance for another year or two. The CPU is active, allowing future resource-planning.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who should build it

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds