SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing delivers a desktop platform that sits at the 78th combined percentile, with a CPU that ranks in the 94th percentile against all processors and a GPU in the 61st percentile. This configuration is built for high-refresh 1080p gaming and productive multi-threaded work, though its 8 GB VRAM and mid-tier GPU percentile define clear boundaries at higher resolutions. This analysis uses only the measured data from the provided fact pack to interpret what this build can and cannot do.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, the measured FPS data shows this build excels in esports and competitive titles. Valorant runs at 422 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 184 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 219 FPS. These figures are far beyond the 144 Hz threshold, making this an ideal pairing for players who prioritize response time and smoothness in fast-paced shooters. Even demanding titles like Call of Duty: Warzone hit 183 FPS at this resolution, confirming that the RTX 4060 has enough headroom for high-refresh monitors in most competitive scenarios.

Streaming: The Ryzen 7 9700F’s multi-threaded score of 36470 in PassMark, combined with the RTX 4060’s dedicated tensor cores (96) and Ada Lovelace architecture, supports a solid streaming foundation. While no specific streaming benchmark is provided, the CPU’s 16 threads and high integer math score of 120788 suggest that software encoding is viable, while the GPU’s NVENC-capable hardware (implied by the tensor cores) offers an alternative. The 61st GPU percentile means the encoding workload will not cripple gaming performance, but users should expect to tune settings for simultaneous play and broadcast at 1080p.

Video Editing: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4691 and floating-point math score of 77955 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 provide compute acceleration for effects and exports. However, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus (272.0 GB/s) may limit work with very large 4K timelines or complex multi-layer compositions, where the GPU could become the bottleneck before the CPU is fully utilized.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-thread score of 36470 places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and 0.7% of the Ryzen 9 7950X, making it a genuinely capable render engine for CPU-based workloads like Blender’s Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 and 96 tensor cores offer respectable GPU rendering acceleration, but the 8 GB VRAM is a hard constraint for large scenes. For architectural visualization or product renders that fit in memory, this build is competent; for massive simulations, the GPU will show its mid-tier percentile.

Software Development: With 8 cores and 16 threads, the Ryzen 7 9700F handles compilation, testing, and virtualization well. The data encryption score of 21488 and extended instructions score of 33688 show strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, which accelerates build tools and code analysis. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking means developers will rarely wait on the processor for typical workloads; the GPU’s role is secondary here, making this a balanced choice for full-stack development with occasional local testing.

Student and Office Work: This build is wildly overqualified for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 ensures instant application response, while the GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 1037 handles 2D desktop compositing without strain. The 65W CPU TDP and 115W GPU TDP mean the system runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial for shared spaces. For students who also game or run data analysis, this configuration offers a future-proof foundation, though the 8 GB GPU memory is the only long-term concern for non-gaming academic workloads like machine learning.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a processor that is consistently near the top of the desktop heap. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36470 places the Ryzen 7 9700F in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69996. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700KF, scores 70163, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 9700F is effectively tied with that chip. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 (0.2% behind the 9700F), while the Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (0.7% behind). This is a remarkable result for a 65W part, showing that the Zen 5 architecture delivers flagship-level throughput without flagship power draw.

Single-thread performance is equally strong. The PassMark single-thread score of 4691 is a leading indicator for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The integer math score of 120788 and floating-point math score of 77955 underscore broad computational strength, while the data compression score of 421988 indicates excellent file archiving and decompression throughput. The physics score of 2122 and prime number finding score of 183 are more niche, but they confirm the CPU handles both complex simulations and algorithmic workloads without issue.

The GPU benchmarks tell a different story. The RTX 4060 sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its PassMark G3D score is 19545, which places it within 0.2% of the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (score 17666) and 0.3% of the AMD Radeon 780M (score 17588). These rivals are not modern high-end cards, which reveals the RTX 4060’s true position: it is a competent mid-range GPU, not a high-end one. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 show it has enough compute power for 1080p gaming and light creative work, but the 61st percentile is a clear ceiling.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU dramatically outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The 94th percentile CPU vs. 61st percentile GPU gap means the processor is never the limiting factor in any workload; the GPU will hit its limits first in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this imbalance, positioning the build as a CPU-first workstation with a capable but not outstanding graphics component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear asymmetric bottleneck: the GPU is the primary constraint in graphics-bound workloads, while the CPU has significant headroom. In gaming, the measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K confirms this. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 54 FPS at 1080p, drops to 41 FPS at 1440p, and falls to 27 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop of 24% and the 1440p to 4K drop of 34% indicate the GPU is running out of steam as resolution increases. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, evidenced by the high FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (184 FPS) and Valorant (422 FPS).

In CPU-bound scenarios, the bottleneck flips. The PassMark physics score of 2122 and multi-thread score of 36470 show that heavy simulation or rendering workloads will use the CPU fully, while the GPU idles. However, this is less common in real-world use. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is another bottleneck point: in texture-heavy games like Ark: Survival Ascended (27 FPS at 1080p), the GPU is likely hitting memory limits rather than compute limits, as evidenced by the severe FPS drop compared to lighter titles. The GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, and the 8 GB capacity is the hard ceiling for modern AAA titles at high textures.

The FPS data across all games shows that the CPU can push very high frame rates when the GPU allows. The average FPS across all measured games is 119.5, and the pair ranks 2000th out of 3732 pairs by FPS, which is better than the 46th percentile. This suggests that while the GPU is the bottleneck, the CPU is doing its part to maximize the GPU’s output. For users who upgrade the GPU later, the Ryzen 7 9700F will not hold back a more powerful card, making this a balanced platform with a temporary GPU constraint.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9700F faster than the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The 9700F scores 69996, while the i7-14700KF scores 70163, a delta of -0.2%. In practical terms, they are tied, with the AMD chip having a slight edge in some workloads and the Intel chip in others.

Q: Can this build run Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K?

A: At 4K with ultra settings, the measured FPS is 27, which is playable but not smooth. For a better experience, users should lower settings or use resolution scaling, as the 8 GB VRAM and GPU compute limits are the primary constraints.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light 1440p, but it can be a limiting factor in 4K or with high-resolution textures.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking. The base clock is 3.80 GHz and the boost clock is 5.50 GHz, so there is some headroom for users who want to push performance further.

Q: What is the power consumption of this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65W and the GPU has a TDP of 115W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300W, which is modest and allows for a compact, efficient system build.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to the AMD Radeon 780M?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, which is 0.3% higher than the 780M’s score of 17588. They are essentially performance equals in raw benchmarks, but the RTX 4060 is a discrete card with dedicated VRAM, making it more suitable for sustained gaming.

Q: Is the CPU good for video editing?

A: Yes, the 8-core/16-thread configuration with a multi-thread score of 36470 and single-thread score of 4691 is well-suited for video editing. The GPU’s compute capabilities (OpenCL score of 95057) also help with effects and rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit 4K timelines.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p with high refresh rates. The measured FPS in esports titles (Valorant at 422 FPS, Rainbow Six Siege at 219 FPS) and AAA games (Call of Duty: Warzone at 183 FPS) makes it a strong choice for competitive and casual gamers alike who do not plan to move to 1440p or 4K soon. Content creators who work with 1080p or 1440p video, photo editing, and light 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 94th percentile performance more than adequate, with the GPU providing acceleration for effects and exports.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threaded strength for compilation and testing, while the GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and light local testing. Students building a do-everything machine for coursework, gaming, and programming will find this build handles all three without compromise, thanks to the low TDPs (65W CPU, 115W GPU) that allow for a quieter system. Small business workstations that need fast data processing (the data compression score of 421988 is notable) and occasional graphical work would also benefit, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a hard limit for advanced CAD or video work.

The build is not ideal for 4K gaming, as the FPS data shows most titles fall below 40 FPS at that resolution. It is also not suited for professional 3D rendering with large scenes that exceed 8 GB VRAM. For users who plan to upgrade the GPU later, this CPU has enough headroom to support a much faster card, making it a sensible foundation for a long-term system.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD107 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation pipelines. The GPU has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which support real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The base clock is 1830 MHz with a boost clock of 2460 MHz, and the memory runs at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is the defining characteristic of this GPU. While it is sufficient for 1080p gaming, the 128-bit bus and 8 GB capacity are below the standards of higher-tier cards. The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s, which are modest figures that align with its 61st percentile ranking. The FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating that the GPU is not optimized for heavy compute workloads like those found in data centers.

Benchmark results show a capable mid-range GPU. The PassMark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 place it in the same tier as older or integrated graphics solutions (within 0.2% of the Radeon HD 7790 and 0.3% of the Radeon 780M). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 show decent compute performance for creative applications. The PassMark GPU compute score of 9213 is respectable but not exceptional. In gaming, the GPU delivers playable FPS at 1080p in most titles, but the ultra settings in games like Ark: Survival Ascended (27 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (54 FPS) reveal its limits. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The 12-pin power connector and 300W suggested PSU make it easy to integrate into a wide range of systems.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU supports ECC memory, a feature that appeals to workstation users. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes (CPU only) provides ample bandwidth for current and future GPUs, though the RTX 4060 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is adequate for its performance level.

The CPU’s 65W TDP and the GPU’s 115W TDP mean the suggested PSU of 300W is sufficient for this configuration, leaving headroom for modest upgrades. The RTX 4060 is listed as end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, so the most sensible next upgrade is a newer GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth. The CPU, however, is current and active, with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz and 8 cores, which will not be a bottleneck for several generations of GPUs.

Upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier model would require a PSU with more wattage, but the CPU and motherboard would not need changes. Users could also add more DDR5 memory (the CPU supports dual-channel), though the base configuration is already well-balanced. The socket AM5 platform is expected to support future AMD processors, so a CPU upgrade is also possible without changing the motherboard. The 4 nm process node and 8,315 million transistors in the CPU show it is a modern, efficient design that will age well.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, an Ada Lovelace GPU. The CPU is a flagship-tier part in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range part in the 61st percentile. The combined percentile is 78, which indicates a system that is better than the majority of builds but not at the top tier.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69996 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163), showing that this is a high-performance processor for its 65W TDP. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17639 puts it in the same class as the AMD Radeon 780M, which is an integrated GPU, highlighting that the discrete RTX 4060 is not a high-end part. The measured FPS data confirms this: the build excels at 1080p gaming but struggles at 4K. The pair ranks 2000th out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average of 119.5 FPS across all games, which is a strong showing for 1080p-focused users.

This is a system for users who want a powerful CPU for productivity and a capable GPU for 1080p gaming. It is not a 4K gaming rig, nor is it a professional rendering workstation. It is a balanced, efficient desktop that maximizes value for mainstream users.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz and the boost clock is 5.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is 65W, which is remarkably low for this performance level.

The PassMark benchmarks show a processor that excels in every category. The single-thread score of 4691 is exceptional, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The multi-thread score of 36470 is also 94th percentile, with the average benchmark score of 69996. The integer math score of 120788 and floating-point math score of 77955 show strong performance in both integer and floating-point workloads. The data encryption score of 21488 and extended instructions score of 33688 highlight its cryptographic and SIMD capabilities. The data compression score of 421988 is particularly strong, indicating excellent performance in file archiving and compression tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 9700F is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-14700KF (delta of -0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (delta of 0.2%). It also beats the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.7%, which is a remarkable achievement for a 65W chip. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with ECC, has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and is unlocked for overclocking. It was released in September 2025 with a launch MSRP of $289. The integrated graphics are listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU is required. For real-world workloads, this means the CPU will not be a bottleneck in gaming, video editing, software development, or 3D rendering. It is a top-tier processor that can handle any task thrown at it, with the only limitation being the 8 GB VRAM of the paired GPU.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured (dataIsMeasured is true), shows a system that is optimized for 1080p gaming. Across 52 games, the average FPS is 119.5, with the pair ranking 2000th out of 3732 pairs. At 1920x1080, the build delivers high refresh rates in esports titles: Valorant runs at 422 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 407 FPS, and Roblox at 238 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 219 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 184 FPS. These numbers are well above the 144 Hz threshold, making this an excellent choice for competitive gaming.

In AAA titles at 1080p, performance is still strong but more variable. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 183 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 109 FPS, and Thief at 101 FPS. Minecraft runs at 181 FPS, showing the GPU handles voxel renderers well. However, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (54 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (49 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (27 FPS) show the limits of the 8 GB VRAM and mid-tier GPU. At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 41 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 37 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 17 FPS. Esports titles remain playable, with Valorant at 360 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 122 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the build is not viable for most games. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 27 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 24 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS. Only light titles like Valorant (288 FPS) and Roblox (90 FPS) remain smooth. The data shows that this build is strictly a 1080p gaming machine, with some 1440p capability in less demanding titles. For users who want to play at higher resolutions, a more powerful GPU with more VRAM is necessary. The CPU, however, is more than capable of supporting such an upgrade.