SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F pairs an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 desktop processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, a 4 GB entry-level GPU built on the Ampere architecture. This combination lands at the 56th percentile overall for desktop builds, driven by a CPU that ranks in the 94th percentile among all processors but a GPU that sits in just the 18th percentile. The data shows a stark performance imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier compute engine, while the GPU is a modest entry-level part. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 9700F is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process node, with a die size of 70.6 mm² and 8,315 million transistors. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The thermal design power is 65 W, and the processor is unlocked, allowing overclocking. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the high-performance tier. The PassMark multithread score is 36,470, while the single-thread score is 4,691. Integer math scores 120,788, floating point math scores 77,955, and extended instructions score 33,688. Data compression scores 421,988, data encryption scores 21,488, and random string sorting scores 45,890. Physics simulation scores 2,122, and finding prime numbers scores 183. The average benchmark score is 69,996, which places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 9700F is essentially neck-and-neck with high-end desktop and mobile parts. It sits 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avg score 69,875) and 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (avg score 69,515). Against Intel, it trails the Core i7-14700KF by 0.2% (avg score 70,163) and the Core i7-14700K by 0.9% (avg score 69,355). These deltas are tiny, meaning the 9700F trades blows with flagship-grade silicon from the previous generation. For real workloads, this translates to excellent multi-threaded performance for rendering, compiling, and heavy productivity, while the single-thread score of 4,691 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly threaded applications.

The Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge codename) brings a 4 nm process and a modern design that emphasizes both IPC gains and power efficiency. The 65 W TDP is notably low for an 8-core part with this level of performance, suggesting the chip can sustain high clocks without demanding extreme cooling solutions. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is standard for dual-channel DDR5, and the PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for storage and expansion.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,691 and multithread score of 36,470 indicate it can feed a fast GPU in most titles, but the RTX 4010’s 18th percentile standing will cap frame rates. At 1080p, the GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth will likely limit high-refresh targets; the CPU is not the constraint in this pairing.

Streaming: Encoding and gaming simultaneously rely on multi-threaded headroom. The 9700F’s 16 threads and 36,470 multithread score provide ample capacity for software encoding while the GPU handles rendering. The RTX 4010’s 24 tensor cores and 6 RT cores can assist with hardware encoding and AI features, but its low shader count (768) will limit gaming performance during a stream.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects, and export benefit from both CPU and GPU. The CPU’s integer math score of 120,788 and floating point score of 77,955 indicate strong processing for codecs and filters. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth may struggle with large 4K timelines, but the CPU can compensate in many export workloads.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will excel here. The multithread score of 36,470 puts the 9700F within 0.2% of the Ryzen 9 7940HX and 0.7% of the Ryzen 9 7950X, both flagship-class parts. GPU rendering, however, is limited by the RTX 4010’s 2.706 TFLOPS and 4 GB memory, which will restrict scene complexity and resolution.

Software development: Compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the 9700F’s 8 cores and 16 threads with a 36,470 multithread score will handle large codebases efficiently. The single-thread score of 4,691 speeds up incremental builds and IDE responsiveness. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong fit.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance and low 65 W TDP make it ideal for productivity suites, web browsing, and multitasking. The RTX 4010’s 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for basic 2D acceleration and light media tasks. The combination is overkill for office workloads on the CPU side, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking means it is not a gaming or rendering asset.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69,996, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, scores 69,875, a delta of 0.2% in favor of the 9700F. The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70,163, putting the 9700F 0.2% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515 (0.7% behind the 9700F) and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69,355 (0.9% behind). These near-identical scores mean the 9700F delivers performance parity with some of the strongest desktop and mobile CPUs available.

The GPU’s only benchmark result is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, which scores 2,907, a delta of -0.5% (the RTX 4010 is 0.5% slower). The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2,910 (-0.6%), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2,913 (-0.7%), and the NVIDIA Quadro P600 scores 2,923 (-1%). This clustering shows the RTX 4010 is statistically tied with these parts in this specific benchmark, despite the massive difference in memory capacity (4 GB vs 16 GB) and market positioning.

The combined picture is one of extreme CPU dominance. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 18th, a gap of 76 percentile points. The build’s combined percentile is 56, reflecting that the GPU drags down an otherwise exceptional processor. In any workload that is GPU-bound, the system will perform like a low-end machine; in CPU-bound workloads, it will outperform most desktops.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need maximum CPU compute for productivity but have minimal GPU requirements. The 9700F’s 94th percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers compiling large projects, researchers running data compression or encryption workloads (scores of 421,988 and 21,488, respectively), and students or office workers who want a responsive system for many concurrent applications. The low 65 W TDP also appeals to those building compact or power-efficient workstations.

Gamers at 1080p will find the GPU limiting; the RTX 4010’s 18th percentile and 4 GB VRAM are not suited for modern titles at high settings. Content creators who rely primarily on CPU rendering—such as 3D artists using CPU-based renderers—will benefit from the 36,470 multithread score. However, GPU-accelerated workflows in video editing or 3D rendering will hit the 4 GB memory ceiling quickly. Small business workstations running databases, spreadsheets, and light virtualization will see excellent CPU performance, but the GPU offers no compute advantage beyond basic display output.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this system is unequivocally the GPU. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 18th percentile means that in any workload using both components, the RTX 4010 will saturate long before the 9700F reaches its limits. The GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth are entry-level figures, while the CPU’s 36,470 multithread score is flagship-tier. In gaming, the GPU will limit frame rates across all resolutions; the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish each frame.

Conversely, in CPU-only workloads like data compression, encryption, or physics simulation, the GPU is irrelevant, and the 9700F delivers performance within 0.9% of the Intel Core i7-14700K and 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. The FPS scaling in gaming will be flat across resolutions because the GPU is the constraint—lowering resolution will not improve frame rates beyond what the RTX 4010 can produce. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is not a bottleneck for its performance class, but the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support (24 lanes) is wasted with this GPU. The 250 W suggested PSU indicates the system draws minimal power, further confirming the GPU is the weak link.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,691 suggests it can handle modern game logic and physics without issue, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893 (18th percentile) indicates it will struggle with demanding titles.

At 1080p, the RTX 4010’s 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will likely cap frame rates in the low-to-mid range for AAA games, even with reduced settings. The 768 shading units and 24 texture mapping units limit fill-rate-heavy scenes. At 1440p, the GPU will be further strained, and 4K gaming is effectively out of reach except for very light indie titles. The CPU’s performance is not the limiting factor; the GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS and 16 ROPs will dictate results. For esports titles with low graphical demands, the CPU’s high single-thread score can help push frame rates, but the GPU’s 18th percentile standing means even these games will not hit high-refresh territory consistently. Users should expect a 1080p experience with medium-low settings for modern games, with performance scaling down as VRAM usage exceeds 4 GB.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA107 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. The die measures 200 mm² and contains 8,700 million transistors, with a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. It includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features. The base clock is 1417 MHz with a boost clock of 1762 MHz. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s and an effective speed of 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

The GPU’s FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). Pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. The card is single-slot, draws 50 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 250 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893, placing it in the 18th percentile. It is within 1% of several higher-tier cards: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2,907 (-0.5%), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2,910 (-0.6%), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2,913 (-0.7%), and the Quadro P600 scores 2,923 (-1%). This indicates the RTX 4010 delivers raw compute in line with those parts in this test, but its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will cause severe limitations in modern games and rendering workloads that exceed the memory capacity. The 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores are present for ray tracing and DLSS, but their effectiveness is constrained by the low overall shader count and memory bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69,996.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The 9700F scores 0.7% higher than the Ryzen 9 7950X (avg score 69,515), putting them at near-parity.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The desktop build with this CPU and GPU lands at the 56th percentile overall.

Q: What are the CPU’s cache sizes?

A: The 9700F has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4010 is 250 W, and the GPU draws 50 W TDP with no power connectors required.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 9700F uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream platform for AMD desktop processors. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The 65 W TDP means the CPU runs cool and efficiently, leaving thermal headroom for the platform.

The RTX 4010 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is a fraction of the CPU’s available lanes. The GPU’s 50 W TDP and suggested PSU of 250 W indicate the system draws very little power. The most sensible next upgrade is replacing the GPU with a more powerful model; the CPU’s 94th percentile performance will support a significantly faster GPU without bottlenecking. The AM5 platform supports future AMD processors, so upgrading the CPU later is also possible. However, the 4 GB VRAM on the RTX 4010 is the primary limitation for gaming and GPU rendering, and addressing that first will yield the largest performance gain. The memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s and 64-bit bus are the GPU’s structural limits, so any workload exceeding 4 GB VRAM will fail regardless of CPU strength. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a future GPU upgrade will have sufficient bandwidth, and the 65 W CPU TDP leaves room for a larger PSU if a higher-power GPU is installed.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds