SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM — Benchmark Database Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM pairing represents a desktop build where an exceptionally strong 8-core Zen 5 processor is matched with an entry-level Ampere GPU. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all processors tested, while the GPU occupies the 57th percentile, creating a substantial performance gap that shapes every workload profile. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows — so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, using a 4 nm TSMC process. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The 65 W TDP is remarkably modest for a processor with this core count and clock headroom, indicating efficient power scaling. Cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, with ECC memory support included. The socket is AMD Socket AM5, and PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes is provided.

The PassMark multithread score of 36,470 places this chip near the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy. Its average benchmark score of 69,996 lands it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 94% of processors in the database. The nearest rivals illustrate its positioning precisely: the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69,875 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70,163 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69,515 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69,355 (0.9% lower). This cluster of scores within a single percentage point shows the 9700F trading blows with flagship-tier HX and desktop parts from the previous generation.

Single-thread performance is where the 9700F excels. With a PassMark single-thread score of 4,691, it delivers outstanding responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The floating-point math score of 77,955 and integer math score of 120,788 both support this strength, while the extended instructions score of 33,688 indicates robust SIMD throughput. Real-world workloads benefit accordingly: spreadsheet calculations, code compilation, and single-threaded game logic all see elevated performance. The data compression score of 421,988 is particularly strong, suggesting the chip handles archival and database workloads with ease. Data encryption scores 21,488, and random string sorting hits 45,890 — both figures pointing to solid memory and cache handling. The physics score of 2,122 and prime number finding score of 183 are lower relative to other metrics, but these are less representative of typical user workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA106 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. The GPU houses 2,304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operations units. Ray tracing is handled by 18 dedicated RT cores, while 72 tensor cores provide AI acceleration. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The card draws a 130 W TDP and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, with a single 8-pin power connector. It is a dual-slot design measuring 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height, using a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The PassMark G3D score of 11,857 places this GPU in the 57th percentile of all graphics cards, which is decidedly mid-pack. Its average benchmark score of 15,199 positions it near several intriguing rivals: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15,171 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 680M integrated GPU scores 15,270 (0.5% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 scores 15,283 (0.5% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 scores 15,290 (0.6% higher). Being within 0.6% of an RTX 2060 and an RX 7600 means the 3050 OEM performs essentially at that tier, despite being nominally a lower-tier product.

Compute performance is modest: FP32 throughput is 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5,779 reflects this limited compute capability. DirectX performance varies: DirectX 9 scores 137, DirectX 11 scores 86, DirectX 10 scores 61, and DirectX 12 scores 58. The higher score on older APIs suggests that legacy titles run relatively better than modern DX12 workloads. Geekbench OpenCL scores 60,740 and Vulkan scores 57,103, indicating reasonable cross-platform compute support. For rendering workloads, the RTX 3050 OEM can handle light ray-traced scenes through its 18 RT cores, but the low overall compute throughput means heavy ray tracing will be constrained. Tensor cores enable DLSS, which can offset some of the raw performance deficits in supported games.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 76, reflecting a system where the CPU carries the performance burden. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 36,470 and single-thread score of 4,691 are both exceptional, placing it in the 94th percentile. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11,857 is far more modest, sitting in the 57th percentile. This 37-percentage-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles defines the system's character.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the 9700F is effectively tied with the Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% higher), the Core i7-14700KF (0.2% lower), the Ryzen 9 7950X (0.7% higher), and the Core i7-14700K (0.9% higher). These deltas are negligible — the 9700F is within one percentage point of four high-end parts from both AMD and Intel. For the GPU, the RTX 3050 OEM is similarly clustered with the RX 7600 (0.2% higher), Radeon 680M (0.5% higher), GTX 580 (0.5% higher), and RTX 2060 (0.6% higher). The GPU's positioning is tighter relative to its peers, but the absolute performance tier is much lower.

The combined picture is a CPU that will not bottleneck any current GPU up to and including top-tier models, paired with a GPU that will limit frame rates in demanding titles. For CPU-bound workloads like compression, encryption, and compilation, the system performs at a high level. For GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The average CPU benchmark score of 69,996 versus the GPU's average of 15,199 illustrates this imbalance quantitatively — the CPU delivers over four times the average benchmark score of the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F uses the AM5 socket, which is an active platform with current-generation support. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, so any memory upgrade path involves DDR5 modules. ECC memory support is included, which benefits workstation-oriented builds that require data integrity. PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes provides substantial bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking within the 65 W TDP envelope — though the modest TDP suggests limited headroom for sustained high clocks.

The RTX 3050 OEM has a 130 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 300 W. The CPU's 65 W TDP means the total system draw is relatively low, leaving ample headroom in any PSU rated for 300 W or higher. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design, so it fits in most mid-tower cases. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, meaning no further driver optimizations or performance improvements are likely. The CPU, by contrast, is active in production and released in September 2025, so it has a long expected service life.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 3050 OEM with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's 94th percentile performance can comfortably drive any current graphics card, and the 300 W suggested PSU would need to be revisited if a more power-hungry GPU is installed. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface on the GPU is not a bottleneck for most workloads, but a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 x16 would fully utilize the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory would benefit memory-intensive workloads given the CPU's strong data compression and sorting scores. The platform itself — AM5 with DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 — is future-proof for several more generations, so the primary upgrade lever is the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is stark. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads — data compression (421,988), integer math (120,788), floating-point math (77,955), and multithreaded tasks (36,470) — the system performs at a top-tier level. These workloads will see negligible GPU involvement, so the CPU's full capability is realized. The data encryption score of 21,488 and extended instructions score of 33,688 further confirm that compute-heavy, non-graphics tasks run at near-flagship speeds.

In GPU-bound workloads, the bottleneck is unambiguous. The RTX 3050 OEM's PassMark G3D score of 11,857 and its 57th percentile ranking mean that any graphics-intensive task — gaming at 1080p ultra, 1440p, or 4K; 3D rendering; video encoding; or GPU compute — will be limited by the GPU. The CPU will be idle waiting for the GPU to finish its work. This is evidenced by the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58, which is low even relative to its own G3D score, suggesting poor scaling in modern graphics APIs.

FPS scaling follows this pattern. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports titles at low settings or high refresh rates, the CPU's 4,691 single-thread score will push frame rates high, but the GPU's limited fill rate (56.16 GPixel/s) and texture rate (126.4 GTexel/s) will cap performance. In GPU-bound scenarios like AAA titles at ultra settings, the GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS compute will be the limiting factor, and the CPU's performance advantage will go unused. The 76th combined percentile reflects this imbalance — the system is stronger than the sum of its parts in CPU tasks, but weaker in GPU tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Software developers and data analysts will benefit from the 9700F's high multithread score (36,470) and strong integer math (120,788) and data compression (421,988) results, which accelerate code compilation, database queries, and data processing. Students in computer science or engineering programs will find the CPU capable of handling heavy compilation workloads while the GPU handles everyday graphics needs adequately. Small business workstations running office suites, spreadsheets, and light database tasks will see excellent responsiveness from the 4,691 single-thread score.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding will appreciate the 9700F's performance, though GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the RTX 3050 OEM. Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings will find the system playable, but those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming will be disappointed. The GPU's 57th percentile means it is not competitive for modern AAA titles at high settings. For users who need a powerful CPU for compute tasks and only occasional gaming, this pairing makes sense. For users whose primary workload is GPU-bound, the CPU is overkill and the GPU is underpowered.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69,996, which is 0.2% lower than the i7-14700KF's 70,163. The difference is negligible, placing both CPUs in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM sits in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15,199. It is within 0.6% of the RTX 2060 and within 0.2% of the RX 7600.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 9700F supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation builds requiring data integrity. It uses DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes. This allows for high-bandwidth storage and expansion cards.

Q: Is the GPU end-of-life?

A: Yes, the RTX 3050 OEM is marked as end-of-life in production status, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. The CPU, by contrast, is active in production.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 76, reflecting a CPU at the 94th percentile and a GPU at the 57th percentile. The CPU dominates the system's overall performance profile.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this GPU?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has a suggested PSU of 300 W and a 130 W TDP. The CPU's 65 W TDP means total system power draw is low, so a 300 W PSU provides adequate headroom.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) 8-core, 16-thread processor on the AM5 socket, released in September 2025, with a 65 W TDP and a launch MSRP of $289. The GPU is an Ampere-based GA106 chip with 8 GB GDDR6, a 130 W TDP, and a 300 W suggested PSU, released in January 2022 and now end-of-life. The combined percentile of 76 indicates a system that is above average overall, but the gap between the CPU's 94th percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile is the defining characteristic. This is a CPU-first build where the processor provides flagship-level compute performance while the GPU handles entry-level graphics duties.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with low or medium settings, the CPU's 4,691 single-thread score can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS compute and 56.16 GPixel/s pixel rate will cap performance below what the CPU can theoretically support. Estimated 1080p medium frame rates would be playable but not competitive with higher-tier GPUs.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multithread score (36,470) can handle software encoding for streaming, while the GPU's 72 tensor cores support NVENC-based encoding. The 130 W GPU TDP keeps the system cool under sustained load.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will benefit from the 9700F's high integer math (120,788) and data compression (421,988) scores. GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be limited by the 3050 OEM's compute performance, making the GPU the bottleneck in effects-heavy projects.

3D rendering: CPU rendering will be fast thanks to the multithread score of 36,470, but GPU rendering (e.g., in Blender or similar) will be slow due to the GPU's 57th percentile ranking and 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Software development: Compilation, testing, and virtual machines all benefit from the CPU's 8 cores, 16 threads, and 94th percentile ranking. The data encryption score of 21,488 aids secure builds, and ECC memory support adds reliability.

Student and office work: Everyday tasks like document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets will feel instant due to the 4,691 single-thread score. The GPU's 973 PassMark G2D score ensures smooth 2D rendering for office applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The CPU's 94th percentile performance and the GPU's 57th percentile performance suggest that gaming results will be GPU-limited in most titles. At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3050 OEM's DirectX 12 score of 58 and G3D score of 11,857 indicate that modern AAA games will run at low-to-medium frame rates, likely in the 30-60 FPS range depending on the title. At 1080p with low or medium settings, the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 86 and DirectX 9 score of 137 suggest better results, with esports titles potentially reaching 60-100+ FPS. At 1440p, the GPU's limited pixel rate (56.16 GPixel/s) and bandwidth (224.0 GB/s) will constrain performance further, making high settings impractical. At 4K, the GPU is not viable for modern gaming. Users seeking higher frame rates should reduce settings or resolution, as the CPU will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario.