SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 pairing represents a mid-range desktop configuration built on current-generation hardware. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 59th percentile, creating an interesting dynamic where the processor significantly outclasses the graphics card in relative standing. This combination results in a desktop build with a combined percentile of 77, indicating strong overall capability for a specific set of workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. Manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, the chip contains 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, all within a 65 W TDP envelope. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The processor uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,691 is a strong indicator of responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming. The multithread score of 36,470 and the average benchmark score of 69,996 place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 9700F is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, which scores 69,875 (a 0.2% difference). It also sits within a narrow band of the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which scores 70,163 (a -0.2% difference), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69,515 (a 0.7% difference), and the Intel Core i7-14700K at 69,355 (a 0.9% difference). This indicates that the Ryzen 7 9700F delivers performance parity with a wide range of high-end desktop and mobile HX-series processors.

The individual PassMark subtests provide a granular view of its capabilities. The integer math score of 120,788 and floating-point math score of 77,955 suggest strong number-crunching abilities for scientific and engineering applications. The data encryption score of 21,488 and data compression score of 421,988 point to good performance in archival and security-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 33,688 indicates robust SIMD and vector processing capability, which is relevant for media encoding and scientific computing. The physics score of 2,122 and the find prime numbers score of 183 are more modest, but they don't detract from the overall picture of a well-rounded, high-performance processor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69,996 places it in the 94th percentile, making it one of the stronger processors available. The GPU, however, tells a different story. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16,014, which puts it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. This is a significant gap in relative standing between the two components. The GPU’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which scores 16,129, a -0.7% difference, meaning the RX 9060 is essentially on par with that last-generation card. It also sits close to the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15,862, a 1% difference), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15,852, a 1% difference), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15,679, a 2.1% difference).

In specific GPU benchmarks, the RX 9060 scores 3,322 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 17,631, while the compute score is 9,919. The combined picture is a CPU that is performing at a top-6% level, paired with a GPU that is solidly mid-range. This asymmetry is crucial for understanding the system’s behavior in real-world applications, where the CPU is rarely the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,691 enables high frame rates in competitive titles. Data shows Counter-Strike 2 at 171 FPS and Valorant at 391 FPS, which are excellent for high-refresh monitors. The GPU, while not top-tier, can push these titles well past 144 FPS, making this a capable 1080p high-refresh system.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU has ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The multithread score of 36,470 ensures that background tasks like streaming software and chat applications will have minimal impact on game performance. The 65 W TDP also suggests good thermal management, allowing sustained all-core loads without excessive heat.

Video editing: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 77,955 and extended instructions score of 33,688 are relevant for video encoding and effects processing. The data compression score of 421,988 also helps with project file management and export. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and some 1440p editing timelines, though it is not a top-tier rendering card.

3D rendering: The 8-core CPU can handle CPU-based rendering tasks well, as evidenced by its multithread score of 36,470. However, the GPU’s 59th percentile standing and FP32 performance of 21.43 TFLOPS mean it will be a more modest contributor to GPU-accelerated rendering. This system is better suited for occasional rendering rather than professional, continuous workloads.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 4,691 provides fast compilation of single-threaded parts of a codebase, while the 16 threads handle parallel builds. The 32 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth also help with large project data sets. This is a strong platform for developers who need fast iteration times.

Student and office work: The Ryzen 7 9700F is overkill for basic tasks, but the system’s overall responsiveness is excellent. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures that even the most complex spreadsheets or virtual machines run smoothly. The 65 W TDP also implies low power draw, which is beneficial for extended use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates an imbalanced pairing where the CPU is the dominant component. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s 94th percentile ranking is drastically higher than the RX 9060’s 59th percentile. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at low resolutions, the CPU will easily drive high frame rates. The measured FPS in Valorant at 1080p (391 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (171 FPS) demonstrate that the CPU can feed the GPU with enough frames to hit the limits of most displays.

However, in GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions, the RX 9060 becomes the limiting factor. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K in games like Cyberpunk 2077 (50, 38, 25 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (46, 34, 23 FPS) shows a classic GPU bottleneck as resolution increases. The CPU’s performance headroom is not the issue; the GPU’s compute throughput and memory bandwidth are. The pairRankByFps data, which places this system at rank 2,195 out of 3,732 pairs with an average FPS of 111.2 across games, suggests that while the average is healthy, many other pairings achieve higher frame rates, primarily due to more powerful GPUs.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured (dataIsMeasured is true), provides a detailed look at real-world gaming performance across three resolutions. At 1080p, the system delivers high frame rates in many games, with esports titles performing exceptionally well. Valorant leads at 391 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 377 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 171 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 203 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 183 FPS. These numbers indicate a strong 1080p competitive gaming machine. For less demanding single-player games, Inside runs at 147 FPS, Barony at 144 FPS, and Dave The Diver at 142 FPS.

Moving to 1440p, the frame rates drop as expected. Valorant still leads at 334 FPS, with Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 260 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 163 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 133 FPS. However, more demanding AAA titles begin to struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 38 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 16 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, with most AAA titles falling below 30 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 25 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 23 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 8 FPS. Lighter titles like Valorant (267 FPS) and Roblox (83 FPS) still perform well, but the system is not designed for 4K gaming with ultra settings.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p and playable 1440p in competitive or moderately demanding titles. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures that no CPU bottleneck will occur in these scenarios, as evidenced by the high FPS in esports titles like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2. Content creators who work in software development or video editing will benefit from the powerful 8-core CPU, but should note the GPU’s limitations for GPU-accelerated rendering. Students and office workers will find the system extremely responsive, though it is more powerful than necessary for basic tasks. Small business workstations that run complex simulations or data analysis will appreciate the CPU’s integer math and compression scores, but the GPU is not a primary consideration for such workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all tested desktop pairings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69,996, which is 0.2% lower than the Core i7-14700KF’s score of 70,163, indicating essentially identical performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16,014.

Q: What is the measured average FPS across all games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across games is 111.2, which places this pairing at rank 2,195 out of 3,732.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what does it imply?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which suggests it is power-efficient and should not require an aggressive cooling solution.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The GPU has a boost clock of 2990 MHz and a game clock of 2400 MHz.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass is "desktop") featuring the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 9060. The CPU is a high-end 8-core processor with a 94th percentile ranking, while the GPU is a mid-range card at the 59th percentile. The overall tier of this system, based on the combined percentile of 77, is solidly above average, but it is a configuration where the processor is clearly the star of the show. The system is best described as a high-performance CPU platform paired with a competent, but not exceptional, GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a forward-looking upgrade path. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel capability and ECC, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring it is not bandwidth-limited. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 132 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This leaves significant headroom for future upgrades. The most sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a much faster graphics card. The 94th percentile CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck for any GPU upgrade, and the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support will accommodate next-generation cards. A future CPU upgrade is possible on the AM5 socket, but the current 8-core processor is already so strong that a GPU upgrade would yield more noticeable performance gains in gaming.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, codenamed Strix Point. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It features 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The GPU includes 28 ray tracing cores, but has no tensor cores listed. Its base clock is 1700 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are modest for modern standards. It delivers 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance, with a pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and some modern titles. The benchmark scores reflect its mid-range positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322 is moderate, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,183 is respectable. The PassMark G3D score of 17,631 and compute score of 9,919 are consistent with its 59th percentile ranking. The GPU’s performance is essentially tied with the RTX 3060 Ti, as evidenced by the -0.7% deltaPct, which means it is a capable card for 1080p gaming but will struggle with 4K ultra settings. The 28 RT cores suggest it can handle some ray tracing, but its overall compute power means ray tracing will likely require lower resolutions or settings. For rendering workloads, the 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for entry-level tasks, but professional artists will likely need a higher-tier GPU.