SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT form a desktop pairing that occupies the 77th combined percentile of all benchmarked builds. This is a system defined by a stark contrast: a top-tier CPU that outperforms its nearest rivals, paired with a mid-range GPU that delivers solid 1080p performance but struggles to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions. The data shows a 94th percentile processor and a 60th percentile graphics card, making the CPU the clear performance anchor while the GPU sets the practical ceiling for gaming workloads.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh 1080p gaming, this build is exceptionally strong. The 97 FPS in Assetto Corsa, 163 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, and 194 FPS in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 1920x1080 demonstrate that the RX 7600 XT can push well past the 144Hz mark in competitive titles. Esports players will find the 374 FPS in Valorant and 360 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p to be more than sufficient for the fastest panels.

Streaming while gaming is a viable workload for this combination. The Ryzen 7 9700F’s 16 threads and 94th percentile CPU score provide ample headroom for encoding overhead, while the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM prevents texture memory from becoming a bottleneck in modern titles. The 183 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p suggests that even with a stream encoding load, frame rates should remain competitive.

Video editing and content creation are where the CPU shines. The 36,470 Passmark multithread score and 120,788 integer math score place this processor in the top 6% of all CPUs, meaning timeline scrubbing, export rendering, and multi-track processing will be handled with ease. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU also allows for GPU-accelerated effects and large preview buffers without running out of memory, although the 60th percentile GPU score indicates that heavy GPU-accelerated rendering will not be class-leading.

3D rendering workloads benefit from the same CPU strength. The 77,955 floating-point math score and 33,688 extended instructions score indicate strong computational throughput for physics simulations and ray-traced workloads on the CPU. However, the GPU’s 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 2,348 Steel Nomad score mean that GPU-based renderers will produce results at a mid-range level, suitable for hobbyist or student projects rather than professional production houses.

Software development represents an excellent use case for this build. The 421,988 data compression score and 21,488 data encryption score show rapid compile times and fast file I/O processing. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the single-thread score of 4,691 ensures snappy responsiveness in code editors and IDE operations. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large in-memory data structures common in data science and analytics work.

For student and office work, this system is dramatically overqualified. The 94th percentile CPU means spreadsheet calculations, document rendering, and virtual meetings are instant, while the GPU’s 1,030 G2D score handles 2D desktop compositing smoothly. The 65W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low for all-day operation, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for long-running academic computations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks reveal a processor that sits at the top of its class. The average benchmark score of 69,996 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with the nearest rival being the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70,163 (a 0.2% difference). The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.7% at 69,515, and the Intel Core i7-14700K is 0.9% behind at 69,355. This means the 9700F effectively trades blows with flagship processors from the previous generation, despite its lower 65W TDP.

The GPU benchmarks show a different story. The RX 7600 XT achieves an average benchmark score of 17,083, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, scores 17,208 (0.7% higher), while the GeForce GTX 690 sits 0.3% lower at 17,037. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 17,132 and DirectX 12 score of 65 indicate that it handles modern APIs competently but does not excel at the highest settings.

In combined terms, the pair ranks 2,412th out of 3,732 builds, with an average FPS across games of 106.3. The 77th combined percentile reflects the CPU’s strength pulling the average up, while the GPU’s 60th percentile holds the system back from higher overall rankings. The data shows a clear pattern: in CPU-bound tasks, this system competes with the best; in GPU-bound tasks, it performs at a solid mainstream level.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket AM5, which provides a clear upgrade path. The Ryzen 7 9700F uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4nm process from TSMC, with a 70.6 mm² die size containing 8,315 million transistors. The socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support included.

PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The GPU currently uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which means a future GPU upgrade to a PCIe 5.0 model would not be bottlenecked by the motherboard interface. The 65W CPU TDP leaves significant power headroom; the suggested PSU for the GPU is 450W, which is modest for a modern system.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom to drive more powerful graphics cards. The CPU’s 94th percentile score suggests it could pair well with a GPU in the 90th percentile without creating a CPU bottleneck. The AM5 socket also supports future Zen 5 iterations, meaning a CPU upgrade within the same platform is possible without changing the motherboard.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh play will find this system ideal. The data shows 183 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 163 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, and 161 FPS in Minecraft at 1920x1080, all at ultra settings. For 1440p, the system remains playable but drops to 163 FPS in Warzone and 108 FPS in CS2, which is still above 60 FPS for most titles but requires settings adjustments for the most demanding games.

Content creators working with video and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 94th percentile performance. The 36,470 multithread score and 120,788 integer math score handle encoding and compilation tasks rapidly. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU allows for large textures and complex scenes in creative applications without memory overflow errors.

Software developers and data scientists will appreciate the 8 cores and 16 threads for parallel workloads, plus the 421,988 data compression score for fast build artifacts. Students and small business workstations will find the system responsive for office tasks, though the GPU is more powerful than needed for such workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The pair ranks in the 77th combined percentile, with an average FPS across games of 106.3.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU scores 69,996 on average, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70,163, and 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69,515.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for?

A: The data shows the strongest performance at 1920x1080, with 374 FPS in Valorant and 194 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege at ultra settings.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7600 XT has 32 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP, which is low for an 8-core processor, meaning a capable air cooler is sufficient for most workloads.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450W, which is modest given the CPU’s 65W TDP.

GPU Analysis

The RX 7600 XT is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6nm process from TSMC. The die contains 13,300 million transistors across a 204 mm² area, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, providing a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s.

Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, delivering 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a generous amount of VRAM for the GPU’s performance class, which helps with texture-heavy workloads and future game titles that demand more memory. The 16 GB capacity is particularly notable given the GPU’s 60th percentile ranking, as it provides headroom for high-resolution textures even when the raw compute power is mid-range.

The clock speeds are set at a 1980 MHz base, 2470 MHz game clock, and 2755 MHz boost clock. The FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS, with matching FP16 at 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicates balanced compute throughput for both gaming and general-purpose workloads. The GPU has 32 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing under DirectX 12 Ultimate, though the 2,348 Steel Nomad score suggests ray tracing performance is modest compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving 92,426 in Geekbench OpenCL and 48,366 in Geekbench Vulkan, indicating strong compute performance for a mid-range card. The Passmark G3D score of 17,132 places it in the 60th percentile, with the G2D score of 1,030 showing capable 2D acceleration. The 8,987 GPU compute score demonstrates solid general-purpose compute, though not at the level of the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 94th percentile and the GPU’s 60th percentile mean that in gaming workloads, the GPU is almost always the limiting factor. This is evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions: at 1080p, the CPU can push the GPU to its limits, but as resolution increases, the GPU’s work load grows exponentially while the CPU waits.

Evidence from specific titles confirms this pattern. In Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 163 FPS at 1080p to 108 FPS at 1440p and 60 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU struggling with resolution scaling. Similarly, Call of Duty: Warzone drops from 183 FPS at 1080p to 138 FPS at 4K, a 25% decrease that is more attributed to GPU than CPU limitations. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,691 ensures it can feed frames fast enough even at lower resolutions where the GPU is not saturated.

In CPU-bound workloads, the opposite dynamic emerges. The 36,470 multithread score means the CPU can handle heavy multitasking and rendering without breaking a sweat, while the GPU’s 60th percentile score means GPU-accelerated tasks will take longer. For video editing, the CPU handles timeline operations and encoding quickly, but GPU effects and rendering will be slower than on a higher-tier graphics card.

The pair’s average FPS across all games of 106.3 at the combined 77th percentile reflects this balance. The system is well-suited for 1080p gaming where the CPU can push the GPU to its maximum potential, but at 1440p and especially 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the CPU’s extra performance goes unused in gaming scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, based on Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge), while the GPU is a Radeon RX 7000 series card using RDNA 3.0 architecture (Navi 33 chip). The combined percentile rank of 77 places this system in the upper quarter of all benchmarked builds.

The system’s overall tier is defined by its CPU strength. With a 94th percentile CPU and 60th percentile GPU, the build is effectively a top-tier processor paired with a mid-range graphics card. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks like content creation and software development, while still providing a satisfying 1080p gaming experience. The data suggests this is a balanced system for mainstream use, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades without requiring a platform change.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, based on the Zen 5 architecture under the Granite Ridge codename. It is manufactured on a 4nm process at TSMC, with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The CPU has a 65W TDP, which is notably low for an 8-core processor at this performance level.

Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR5 in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory support for error-correcting workloads. The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. It has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show exceptional performance across all workloads. The multithread score of 36,470 and single-thread score of 4,691 place the CPU in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The integer math score of 120,788 and floating-point math score of 77,955 indicate strong computational throughput for both general and scientific workloads. The data encryption score of 21,488 and data compression score of 421,988 show rapid handling of data-intensive tasks, while the 183 prime numbers found and 45,890 random string sorting score round out the processing picture.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all previous-generation flagship processors, with the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70,163 (0.2% higher), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69,515 (0.7% lower), and Intel Core i7-14700K at 69,355 (0.9% lower). This places the 9700F in a performance class that matches or exceeds the best of the previous generation, despite its lower TDP and newer socket. The physics score of 2,122 indicates strong real-world gaming performance, as the CPU can handle complex physics calculations without bottlenecking the GPU.