SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing represents a 2025-era desktop configuration built around AMD’s Zen 5 architecture and RDNA 2.0 graphics. The data positions this combination at the 83rd percentile overall, with a measured average of 126.6 FPS across a broad game suite. This analysis examines the benchmark results, component balance, and workload suitability based solely on the provided metrics.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the Navi 22 chip using a 7 nm TSMC process, packing 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. Its memory subsystem features 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The shading unit count stands at 2560, paired with 160 TMUs and 64 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance checks in at 13.31 TFLOPS for FP32 and 26.62 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1). The card includes 40 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration but has no tensor cores listed, indicating a reliance on standard RDNA 2 compute units for any AI-related tasks.

In benchmark terms, the GPU achieves a Passmark G3D score of 20700 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 9550. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs is 71, placing it above the majority of discrete graphics solutions. The nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X at 25891 (0.5% delta), AMD FirePro W7100 at 25856 (0.6% delta), AMD FirePro D700 at 25842 (0.7% delta), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25740 (1.1% delta). The RX 6750 XT’s average benchmark score of 26011 sits slightly above these, though the deltas are minimal, suggesting the card operates in a tightly contested performance band. For rendering workloads, the 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 figure indicates solid raw compute for rasterization, while the 40 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability that will lag dedicated RT-focused architectures. The 12 GB VRAM at 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes, but the 192-bit bus width limits memory bandwidth compared to wider implementations. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 offers a modern API benchmark reference, while Vulkan and OpenCL scores of 98089 and 16360 respectively show compute versatility.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 7 9700F and RX 6750 XT reveals distinct workload-dependent behavior. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4691 and multithread score of 36470 place it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s 71st percentile ranking is notably lower. This asymmetry suggests the processor has headroom to drive the graphics card in most scenarios, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. Examining measured FPS across games at 1920x1080, the average frame rates are often high—Counter-Strike 2 hits 195 FPS, Valorant reaches 448 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 183 FPS. These numbers indicate the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently at 1080p. However, as resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, FPS drops proportionally, with Cyberpunk 2077 falling from 58 FPS at 1080p to 43 FPS at 1440p and 28 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern points to the GPU becoming the primary constraint in pixel-heavy workloads.

The pair rank by FPS places this configuration at 1732 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 126.6 across all tested games. This mid-tier ranking indicates that while the combination is capable, it does not lead the field. The CPU’s 94th percentile versus the GPU’s 71st percentile creates a gap where the processor is rarely the bottleneck in graphics-intensive titles. Data compression score of 421988 and integer math score of 120788 show the CPU excels in compute-heavy tasks, which can offload work from the GPU in certain physics or simulation scenarios. Conversely, the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 80 is relatively low compared to its G3D score, suggesting API-specific inefficiencies. For gaming, the 1080p results often exceed 100 FPS in esports titles, but demanding AAA games like Red Dead Redemption 2 (52 FPS at 1080p) and Ark: Survival Ascended (29 FPS at 1080p) show the GPU struggling. The bottleneck analysis indicates that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU are relatively balanced in lighter titles, but the GPU limits performance in graphically intensive games and at higher resolutions.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and has no integrated graphics. The die size is 70.6 mm² with 8,315 million transistors, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $289.

Benchmark scores reveal a strong all-rounder. The Passmark multithread score of 36470 places it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avg score 69875, 0.2% delta), Intel Core i7-14700KF (avg score 70163, -0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (avg score 69515, 0.7% delta), and Intel Core i7-14700K (avg score 69355, 0.9% delta). The 9700F’s average benchmark score is 69996, which sits within 1% of these competitors, indicating that it trades blows with higher-core-count parts. Single-thread performance is exceptional at 4691, driven by the 5.50 GHz boost clock, which benefits latency-sensitive workloads like gaming and desktop responsiveness. The floating-point math score of 77955 and extended instructions score of 33688 show strong SIMD throughput, valuable for scientific computing or media encoding. The find prime numbers score of 183 is modest, but this is a niche test. Data encryption at 21488 and random string sorting at 45890 indicate solid cryptographic and sorting performance, relevant for database and server tasks. The physics score of 2122 suggests adequate performance for game physics simulations. For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration with high single-thread speed handles both lightly-threaded applications and parallel tasks effectively. The 65 W TDP is notably efficient, allowing for lower cooling requirements and power consumption. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, but the PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs storage and expansion.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The measured performance profile targets specific user segments. Gamers at 1920x1080 will see high frame rates in competitive titles—Valorant at 448 FPS, CS:GO at 432 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS—making this a strong choice for esports enthusiasts who prioritize responsiveness. At 2560x1440, the RX 6750 XT still delivers playable results, with Warzone at 163 FPS and Fortnite at 60 FPS, but demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 fall to 43 FPS. For 4K gaming, the GPU struggles, with most games dipping below 60 FPS, so this build is not suited for ultra-high-resolution enthusiasts. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multithread score of 36470 and the GPU’s compute score of 9550, though the lack of tensor cores limits AI-accelerated workflows. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the integer math score of 120788 and data compression score of 421988, which speed up build times and data handling. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks, but the 65 W CPU TDP and efficient design make it a quiet workstation. Small business workstations handling databases or virtualization can leverage the 16 threads and ECC memory support, though the GPU is more than necessary for typical office workloads. The 94th CPU percentile and 71st GPU percentile mean this build shines in CPU-bound scenarios but is modest in GPU-heavy applications, making it ideal for users who prioritize processor performance over graphics.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Ryzen 7 9700F achieves a Passmark multithread score of 36470, with a single-thread score of 4691, placing it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 69996, with nearest rivals showing deltas of 0.2% (Ryzen 9 7940HX), -0.2% (i7-14700KF), 0.7% (Ryzen 9 7950X), and 0.9% (i7-14700K). This indicates the 9700F is within 1% of flagship-level processors from AMD and Intel, a remarkable result for an 8-core part. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score is 20700, with a compute score of 9550, placing it at the 71st percentile. Its average benchmark score of 26011 puts it slightly ahead of the R9 M395X (0.5% delta) and RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (1.1% delta). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 83, reflecting a strong but not elite configuration.

The pair rank by FPS is 1732 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 126.6 across all measured games. This mid-pack ranking suggests that while individual component scores are high, the combination does not translate to top-tier gaming performance, likely due to the GPU’s lower percentile. The data shows a CPU that outperforms its direct rivals in average score, but the GPU lags behind higher-end graphics cards. The combined picture is a system that excels in productivity and CPU-intensive tasks, as evidenced by the 94th percentile CPU score, but is held back in gaming at higher resolutions by the 71st percentile GPU. For users who prioritize multitasking, compilation, or content creation, this pairing is excellent. For gamers seeking maximum FPS, the CPU provides ample headroom for a future GPU upgrade. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 1080p, the average is high, but at 4K, many titles fall below 30 FPS, indicating the GPU is the performance ceiling.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Ryzen 7 9700F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity. The 65 W CPU TDP is low, while the RX 6750 XT has a 250 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 600 W. This leaves substantial headroom for upgrades. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length. The memory bus is 192-bit, which is a limitation for higher resolutions but adequate for 1080p and 1440p. The platform supports ECC memory, which is rare for consumer builds and beneficial for workstation use.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 94th percentile performance indicates it can drive higher-tier graphics cards without bottlenecking. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures compatibility with future GPUs, and the 600 W PSU provides enough power for a mid-range upgrade, though a higher-wattage PSU would be needed for top-end cards. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract more performance, and the 65 W TDP means there is thermal headroom for higher boost clocks. Memory can be upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 modules, and the dual-channel support maximizes bandwidth. The platform’s longevity is supported by the AM5 socket, which is expected to support future AMD processors. The RX 6750 XT is end-of-life, so a GPU upgrade is the most logical next step, taking advantage of the CPU’s headroom. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for current titles, but future games may require more, so a 16 GB or higher card would be a sensible choice. The PSU headroom from the 600 W suggested PSU and 65 W CPU TDP allows for a GPU with up to around 350 W TDP without changing the PSU, though higher-power cards would require an upgrade.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data provides measured FPS at ultra settings for a wide range of games across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the RX 6750 XT delivers excellent performance in esports titles: Valorant hits 448 FPS, CS:GO reaches 432 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege achieves 232 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 195 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 183 FPS. These numbers indicate a smooth experience for competitive gaming. In single-player titles, performance varies: Assetto Corsa runs at 116 FPS, Doom at 145 FPS, and Minecraft at 192 FPS, all playable. However, demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (58 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (52 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (29 FPS) show the GPU’s limits at ultra settings, with the latter being nearly unplayable. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 71 FPS, which is acceptable but not high-refresh.

At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly. Warzone still runs at 163 FPS, and Valorant at 382 FPS, making 1440p viable for esports. CS:GO at 297 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege at 152 FPS remain high. But AAA titles suffer: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 43 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS, and Ark to 18 FPS. Control runs at 62 FPS, and The Medium at 34 FPS, indicating that 1440p ultra is only suitable for less demanding games. At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles across the board. Valorant remains playable at 305 FPS, and CS:GO at 175 FPS, but most games fall below 60 FPS. Warzone runs at 138 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 (28 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (26 FPS), and Ark (9 FPS) are not viable. The data shows that 1080p is the sweet spot for this GPU, with 1440p being a compromise for high-refresh esports, and 4K being unsuitable for anything but the lightest titles. The measured FPS data confirms the GPU’s 71st percentile ranking, as it excels in lighter loads but falls short in heavy rasterization. For gamers with 1080p monitors, this is a strong pairing, but 1440p and 4K users will need to adjust settings or upgrade the GPU.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in a desktop configuration, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a Zen 5 architecture part with 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is an RDNA 2.0 architecture card with 12 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile for this pair is 83, placing it in the upper tier of all possible CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU’s individual percentile is 94, which is excellent, while the GPU’s percentile is 71, which is above average but not top-tier. This imbalance defines the build’s character: it is a CPU-dominant system where the processor outperforms its graphics companion.

The average FPS across all measured games is 126.6, and the pair ranks 1732 out of 3732 pairs, indicating a mid-pack position for gaming performance. The desktop class means it is a stationary system, and the 65 W CPU TDP combined with the 250 W GPU TDP suggests a total system power draw that is manageable with a 600 W PSU. The build is best suited for users who value CPU performance for productivity tasks, such as content creation, software development, or data processing, while still enjoying solid 1080p gaming. The 83rd combined percentile places it above 83% of all possible pairings, making it a capable and balanced system for most users. However, the gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles means that the graphics card is the limiting factor for high-end gaming, and a future upgrade to a higher-tier GPU would unlock the CPU’s full potential. This is a mid-high tier desktop build with a strong foundation for upgrades, particularly on the GPU side.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F ranks at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 69996, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875), 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163), 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515), and 0.9% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700K (69355).

Q: Does the RX 6750 XT have ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: The GPU includes 40 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. It does not list any tensor cores, meaning AI-accelerated features rely on standard compute units. The FP32 performance is 13.31 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1).

Q: What is the measured average FPS across all games, and what does the pair rank indicate?

A: The average FPS across all measured games is 126.6. The pair ranks 1732 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the 46th percentile of all tested CPU+GPU combinations for gaming performance.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, most games run below 60 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS. Only lighter titles like Valorant (305 FPS) and CS:GO (175 FPS) remain playable, so 4K is not suitable for demanding games.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 250 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 600 W, which provides headroom for upgrades.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, this build excels in esports titles, with Valorant at 448 FPS, CS:GO at 432 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 ensures low latency, and the GPU’s performance supports high-refresh monitors in competitive games. However, AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 58 FPS will not hit 144 FPS, so this scenario is limited to lighter games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and multithread score of 36470 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 9550 can assist with encoding tasks. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for game capture and streaming overlays, making this a viable streaming setup for 1080p content.

Video editing: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 77955 and extended instructions score of 33688 speed up video processing and effect rendering. The GPU’s 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates timeline previews and exports. The 12 GB VRAM handles 4K footage, though 4K editing may see slower previews in complex projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multithread score of 36470 and the GPU’s compute score of 9550 support CPU and GPU rendering workloads. The 40 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing in supported renderers, though the GPU’s 71st percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with scene data, and the 16 threads allow for efficient multi-frame rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 120788 and data compression score of 421988 are strong for code compilation and data handling. The single-thread score of 4691 ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel builds, and the 65 W TDP keeps the system cool during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU’s 94th percentile ensures snappy performance for multitasking. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large spreadsheets and databases. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-intensive work, and the 65 W CPU TDP means low power consumption for all-day operation. The GPU is unnecessary for office tasks, but it enables occasional light gaming or media creation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds