SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

69,996 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 6400 pairing represents a stark contrast in capability: an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor built on a 4 nm process, paired with a 4 GB entry-level GPU based on RDNA 2.0. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands in the 35th percentile, a gap that defines every workload discussed below. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all frame-rate figures are estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from AMD’s 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, all within a 65 W TDP. The chip is fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process, containing 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. This is a high-end desktop part with an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking headroom, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the upper echelon. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4691 and multithread score of 36470 contribute to an average benchmark score of 69996, which ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355 (0.9% ahead). This means the 9700F is effectively neck-and-neck with those flagship parts, differing by less than 1% in either direction.

For real workloads, the data shows a strong all-rounder. The integer math score of 120788 and floating-point math score of 77955 indicate robust number-crunching for productivity tasks. The extended instructions score of 33688 suggests good SIMD performance, which benefits scientific computing and media encoding. Data compression scores 421988, while encryption scores 21488, the latter being modest but adequate. The find prime numbers score of 183 is a single-threaded test that reflects the high boost clock. The physics score of 2122 and random string sorting score of 45890 round out a balanced profile. With 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 per core, the 9700F avoids the latency penalties that plague smaller caches, making it responsive in both bursty and sustained workloads.

Gaming Performance

The data contains no measured FPS figures for this CPU-GPU combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance discussed here is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not from direct frame-rate testing. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4691 and the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 7673 provide the basis for these projections.

For gaming, the GPU is the clear limiting factor. The RX 6400’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus yields 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is constraining for modern titles at high detail settings. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 7673 places it in the 35th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (score 6000, 0% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (score 5996, 0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W4100 (score 5987, 0.2% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (score 5986, 0.3% ahead). These are older or low-end parts, indicating the RX 6400 is entry-level by modern standards.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 6400’s 3.565 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 74.27 GPixel/s pixel rate will struggle with demanding AAA titles. Expect playable frame rates only in esports or older games, while newer releases will require lowered settings. At 1440p or 4K, the 4 GB VRAM becomes a bottleneck, likely causing texture pop-in and stuttering. The CPU, by contrast, is overkill for gaming — its 94th percentile ranking ensures it will not constrain the GPU at any resolution. The practical takeaway: this build is for CPU-heavy workloads, not high-refresh gaming, and the estimated FPS figures reflect that imbalance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a severe bottleneck imbalance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69996 places it in the 94th percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 6001 lands in the 35th percentile. This 59-percentile gap means the CPU is roughly 10 times more powerful by raw benchmark averages — the CPU’s score is 69996 versus the GPU’s 6001. In gaming, the GPU will be saturated long before the CPU reaches 50% utilization, making the RX 6400 the definitive limiting factor in any frame-rate scenario.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the opposite holds true. The 9700F’s multithread score of 36470 and integer math score of 120788 indicate it can process heavy parallel tasks without breaking a sweat, while the RX 6400’s compute score of 2812 (PassMark GPU compute) is irrelevant to those tasks. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU has ample headroom (16 threads) to handle encoding, but the GPU’s low FPS output means the stream quality will suffer from the source frame rate, not the encoding overhead.

The memory subsystem reinforces this divide. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, which is ample for its 8 cores. The GPU’s 128.0 GB/s bandwidth is low for its class, and the 64-bit bus width is half of what mid-range cards use. The PCIe interface for the GPU is Gen 4 with x4 lanes, which further limits data transfer in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. Overall, the system is a study in asymmetry: a top-tier CPU paired with an entry-tier GPU, with the bottleneck shifting entirely based on workload type.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU computation over graphics. The 94th percentile CPU ranking and 65 W TDP make it ideal for professionals who need multi-threaded horsepower without the power draw of higher-TDP parts. The target audience includes:

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software, where the CPU’s multithread score of 36470 and floating-point score of 77955 provide the necessary compute for rendering frames or encoding footage. The GPU’s low score is irrelevant in these CPU-centric tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases, where the integer math score of 120788 and data compression score of 421988 indicate fast build times and archive operations. The 16 threads allow parallel compilation, and the single-thread score of 4691 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

Students and researchers running simulations or data analysis, where the CPU’s extended instructions score of 33688 accelerates scientific libraries. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity in long-running calculations.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, or virtualization, where the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads handle concurrent workloads, and the 65 W TDP keeps cooling costs low. The GPU is sufficient for basic 2D output, with a PassMark G2D score of 722.

Not for gamers at high refresh rates — the GPU’s 35th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM make it unsuitable for modern titles beyond 1080p low settings. Gamers should look at builds with a stronger GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The RX 6400’s 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain high frame rates at 1080p ultra in modern games. Estimated FPS would be below 60 in most AAA titles, and the 4 GB VRAM forces texture quality down. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4691 is excellent, but the GPU holds everything back.

Streaming: The CPU handles encoding effortlessly with 16 threads and a multithread score of 36470. However, the GPU’s low frame output means the stream’s source footage will be choppy. This scenario is CPU-capable but GPU-limited, so streaming older or esports titles at 720p would work, but not modern games at high settings.

Video editing: Strong. The CPU’s floating-point math score of 77955 and multithread score of 36470 accelerate timeline rendering and export. The GPU’s compute score of 2812 offers some acceleration but is not essential. The 65 W TDP keeps the system cool during long renders, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large media files.

3D rendering: Excellent for CPU-based renderers. The integer math score of 120788 and extended instructions score of 33688 feed well into ray-tracing workloads that rely on CPU computation. The GPU’s 12 RT cores and 3.565 TFLOPS provide minimal GPU-accelerated rendering, but the CPU carries the load. Expect competitive render times against systems with similar CPUs, regardless of the GPU.

Software development: Very good. The data compression score of 421988 and random string sorting score of 45890 indicate fast file operations and sorting algorithms. The single-thread score of 4691 ensures quick UI response in IDEs. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses during builds, and the 16 threads allow parallel test execution.

Student and office work: Excellent. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking handles any office suite or web browsing with ease. The 65 W TDP means low electricity costs, and the ECC memory support protects against data corruption in spreadsheets or documents. The GPU’s 722 G2D score is sufficient for 2D displays, and the single-slot design with no power connectors simplifies installation in compact cases.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is built on the Navi 24 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, with a transistor density of 50.5M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 1923 MHz, with a boost clock of 2321 MHz and a game clock of 2039 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) on a 64-bit bus, providing 4 GB of GDDR6 and 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The benchmark data shows this is a low-end part. The PassMark G3D score of 7673 and average benchmark score of 6001 place it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all older or workstation parts: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (score 6000, 0% delta), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (score 5996, 0.1% ahead), AMD FirePro W4100 (score 5987, 0.2% ahead), and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M (score 5986, 0.3% ahead). This means the RX 6400 performs at the level of a mid-range laptop GPU from a decade ago.

For rendering, the GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.565 TFLOPS and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s limit its usefulness to basic 3D tasks or light gaming. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard ceiling for modern textures, and the 64-bit bus constrains memory-intensive operations. The 12 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but with such low compute throughput, ray-traced effects will be unplayable at any reasonable resolution. The PCIe 4.0 x4 interface further reduces bandwidth compared to a x16 slot, which can impact performance in some titles. The GPU is end-of-life, with a launch MSRP of 159 USD, and requires a suggested PSU of 250 W, drawing 53 W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69996 places it in the 94th percentile, with a multithread score of 36470 and single-thread score of 4691. Its nearest rivals are separated by less than 1%, making the 9700F a top-tier processor. The GPU’s average score of 6001 places it in the 35th percentile, with a G3D score of 7673 and a compute score of 2812. The combined percentile for this pairing is 65, reflecting the CPU’s dominance dragging the average up.

In individual benchmarks, the CPU excels: integer math at 120788, floating-point at 77955, extended instructions at 33688, data compression at 421988, and random string sorting at 45890. The GPU lags across the board: DirectX 12 scores 30, DirectX 11 scores 70, DirectX 10 scores 54, and DirectX 9 scores 93. The GPU’s best result is Geekbench OpenCL at 32011, but that is still far below what a modern mid-range card would achieve. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is indicative of low-end performance.

The combined picture suggests a system that will excel in CPU-bound tasks and stumble in GPU-bound ones. For a user who runs heavy computations, the 9700F delivers near-flagship performance. For a user who plays games, the RX 6400 will be the bottleneck in every title. The 65th combined percentile reflects this compromise — it is a system with one exceptional component and one weak link.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream platform from AMD. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is future-proof for high-speed storage and GPUs. The 65 W TDP means the motherboard’s power delivery is not stressed, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking with a suitable cooler.

The GPU is the primary upgrade target. It uses PCIe 4.0 x4, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 slots, but the x4 limit will bottleneck a faster card. The suggested PSU of 250 W and the GPU’s 53 W TDP mean the current power supply is likely sufficient for a modest upgrade, but a higher-end GPU would require a stronger PSU. The GPU has no power connectors, relying on slot power, so any upgrade will need to account for additional power cables.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth. The current 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus is the limiting factor in gaming and GPU compute. Replacing the RX 6400 with a card that has 8 GB or more of memory and a wider bus would unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential, since the 9700F has headroom to drive much faster GPUs. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures the platform can handle future cards without a motherboard change. Memory upgrades are also possible, as the system supports dual-channel DDR5, and the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth can be increased with faster modules.

FAQ

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 9700F include integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is marked "N/A" for this CPU, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and type?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: Is the RX 6400 suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No, the GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 128.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is insufficient for 4K textures. Its PassMark G3D score of 7673 places it in the 35th percentile, indicating entry-level performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996 on average, while the i7-14700KF scores 70163, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the Intel chip is 0.2% faster. This is within the margin of error.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement?

A: The RX 6400 has a TDP of 53 W and requires a suggested PSU of 250 W. It has no power connectors, drawing power directly from the PCIe slot.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The base clock is 3.80 GHz and boost clock is 5.50 GHz, with a 65 W TDP providing thermal headroom.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The RX 6400 has 12 ray tracing cores based on RDNA 2.0, but with an FP32 throughput of 3.565 TFLOPS, ray-traced workloads will be very slow in practice.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds