SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

29,955 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Radeon RX 7600M form a mobile pairing aimed at a wide range of laptop workloads. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part built on a 4 nm process, while the GPU is a Navi 33-based RDNA 3.0 chip with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile for this pair is 85, placing it above most laptops in the database. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is skewed toward the processor in heavily threaded tasks, but the GPU holds its own in graphics-centric workloads. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 7413 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16192 show a strong multi-threaded foundation, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 indicates a capable mid-range mobile graphics solution. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or data compression, the processor will be the limiting factor only if the workload saturates all 16 threads; the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7404 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7413, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, which is expected for an 8-core part.

The GPU’s percentile of 89 is higher than the CPU’s 81, meaning the graphics chip is relatively stronger among its peers than the processor is among CPUs. This implies that in gaming at moderate resolutions, the CPU can usually keep up with the GPU, but at lower resolutions or with high frame-rate targets, the CPU’s single-thread performance—3DMark single-thread score of 990 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1769—may become the constraint. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz is high for a mobile chip, which helps in lightly threaded games, but the 45 W TDP limits sustained all-core boost behavior compared to desktop parts.

For FPS scaling, the data suggests that at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 8 GB memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle most titles, but the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3738 will determine peak frame rates in esports-style games. The CPU’s PassMark find prime numbers score of 87 is notably low, indicating that pure integer-heavy single-thread loops are not its strength, but that is an edge case. Overall, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task: multi-threaded productivity leans on the CPU, while rasterized gaming leans on the GPU, with the CPU’s single-thread capabilities acting as a ceiling for very high refresh rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread scores (990 in 3DMark single-thread, 1769 in Cinebench R23 single-core) are strong enough for 120 Hz or 144 Hz displays in most titles, but the GPU’s performance—ranking at the 89th percentile—will likely cap frame rates below that in demanding AAA games. For lighter esports titles, the combination should push well beyond 60 FPS at 1080p, but exact figures cannot be confirmed without measured FPS data.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 20416 and data compression score of 344439 indicate solid throughput for stream encoding tasks. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 780M can also serve as an additional encoder, though the discrete GPU handles the main rendering load.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 16192 and Geekbench multi-core of 12212 suggest this CPU can handle 4K video timelines with effects. The GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates rendering and effects, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large projects. The PassMark floating point math score of 59254 further supports compute-heavy editing tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU’s max-thread score of 7413 in 3DMark and the GPU’s 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) position this for moderate rendering workloads. For CPU-based rendering, the 16 threads will process scenes efficiently, but for GPU rendering, the 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus may be a constraint on complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 97747 and multithread score of 28498 indicate strong compile performance. The 16 threads handle parallel builds well, while the single-thread score of 3738 ensures responsive UI interactions. Data compression score of 344439 helps with version control and packaging tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1924 and single-thread score of 990 are more than adequate for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 780M provides a fallback for display output, and the 45 W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a laptop. The GPU’s presence adds capability for light photo editing or CAD work, though it is not necessary for basic productivity.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600M in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rates discussed below are estimates based on the benchmark scores, and they should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 and its 89th percentile ranking suggest performance roughly comparable to other mobile GPUs in that tier, but exact FPS cannot be derived from these numbers alone.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle most modern titles at 60 FPS or above, assuming the CPU does not bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread performance (990 in 3DMark) is sufficient for most games, but in CPU-heavy titles like simulation games, the frame rate may dip below 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU will be the primary limiter, and ultra settings may require adjustments to maintain playable frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM could be a limiting factor for textures in newer titles at this resolution.

For esports games like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock and PassMark single-thread score of 3738 should allow for very high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p, but again, this is an estimate. The GPU’s 64 ROPs and 112 TMUs are adequate for pixel pushing, but the absence of measured data means these figures remain speculative. The CPU’s 3DMark 4-thread score of 3690 suggests that four-thread-optimized games will run well, but the lack of measured FPS prevents any definitive statement.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets laptop buyers who need a balanced system for both productivity and gaming without reaching for desktop-class components. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking places it above average for all CPUs, making it suitable for content creators who work with video or 3D models. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of mobile GPUs, so gamers at 1080p will find it capable for most titles, though not for maxed-out 4K gaming.

Content creators who edit video in 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the 16 threads and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The PassMark multithread score of 28498 indicates solid render times, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core of 16192 is competitive for a mobile chip. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 97747, which suggests fast build times.

Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks, but it provides headroom for future needs like running virtual machines or light 3D modeling. Small business workstations that handle data analysis or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 344439 and encryption score of 20416. The 8 GB GPU memory is adequate for CAD or GIS applications, though not for heavy simulation workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3, totaling 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Benchmark results show a balanced performance profile. The 3DMark score scales from 1924 at 2 threads to 7413 at max threads, indicating good multi-threading efficiency. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 16192 and single-core of 1769 place it in a strong position for both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. Geekbench scores of 12212 multi-core and 2081 single-core confirm this dual strength.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: integer math at 97747 and floating point math at 59254 show robust arithmetic performance, while data compression at 344439 and encryption at 20416 indicate strong throughput for data-heavy tasks. The extended instructions score of 25642 suggests good AVX-512 or similar vector processing capability, though the find prime numbers score of 87 is surprisingly low, indicating a weakness in certain integer loops. The single-thread score of 3738 is consistent with the 3DMark and Cinebench single-thread results.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, with a deltaPct of 0. It is 0.3% slower than the Ryzen 7 5800XT and 7840H, and 0.8% slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. This means the 8845HS is not a generation-over-generation leap over the 7840HS, but it offers the same performance in a newer package. The 5.10 GHz boost clock is the highest among these rivals, which could give it an edge in lightly threaded tasks despite the near-identical average scores.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS have?

A: It has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with a 4 nm process.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS?

A: The average benchmark score is identical at 29955, with a deltaPct of 0, meaning they perform at the same level.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The TDP is 45 W, which is typical for a high-performance mobile processor.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes the Radeon 780M integrated GPU, which can handle display output and light graphics tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The FP32 performance is 17.27 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 34.55 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio).

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, indicating it outperforms 85% of all other CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means upgrades are limited to replacing the entire laptop, not swapping the CPU. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU has a TDP of 90 W, and no suggested PSU is listed because this is an integrated laptop component with no power connector requirements.

For memory, the system supports DDR5, and the dual-channel bus is essential for maximizing the CPU’s performance, especially in memory-sensitive workloads like gaming. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for fast NVMe SSDs, but the exact number of M.2 slots is not specified in the FACT PACK. The GPU’s 8 GB memory is soldered or integrated, so there is no upgrade path for VRAM. A sensible next upgrade for a user with this laptop would be to add more system memory if the laptop supports it, as the CPU’s performance scales with memory bandwidth, and the 89.6 GB/s figure is modest by current standards.

The platform’s power delivery is designed around the 45 W CPU TDP and 90 W GPU TDP, so there is no room for a more powerful GPU without a new laptop. The lack of a suggested PSU confirms this is a sealed mobile platform. For users seeking more performance, the nearest CPU rival is the Ryzen 7 7840HS, which offers identical performance, so upgrading within the same generation would not yield gains. A future upgrade would require moving to a different socket and platform, which is not feasible in a laptop form factor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 7600M GPU. The combined percentile of 85 places it above the vast majority of systems in the database, making it a high-mid-range mobile configuration. The CPU’s 81st percentile and the GPU’s 89th percentile indicate that the graphics card is relatively stronger than the processor, which is a common trade-off in gaming laptops.

The CPU is a modern 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is a Navi 33 chip with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The pairing is designed for users who want a single laptop that can handle both demanding productivity tasks and modern games at 1080p. The 45 W CPU TDP and 90 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop with decent thermal headroom, but no measured FPS data exists, so real-world gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

This build sits in a competitive tier where it competes with other mobile systems using similar components. The CPU’s performance is statistically identical to the Ryzen 7 7840HS, which means users upgrading from that chip will see no benefit, but new buyers get a current-generation part. The GPU’s performance is comparable to desktop cards like the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (0.1% slower) or the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (0.1% slower), indicating that it punches above its mobile class in raw compute.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS achieves an average benchmark score of 29955, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its best scores include a 3DMark max-thread score of 7413, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16192, and a Geekbench multi-core score of 12212. Single-thread performance is strong with a 3DMark score of 990, Cinebench R23 single-core of 1769, and Geekbench single-core of 2081. PassMark results show a multithread score of 28498 and a single-thread score of 3738.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (0.1% slower), NVIDIA CMP 30HX (0.1% slower), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (0.1% faster), and AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (0.7% slower). The GPU’s FP32 performance is 17.27 TFLOPS, and its memory bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU, but both are above average. The CPU’s 81st percentile and the GPU’s 89th percentile combine to an overall percentile of 85, indicating a well-balanced laptop that should handle most tasks without a clear bottleneck. The lack of measured FPS data means that the actual gaming experience is an estimate, but the benchmark scores suggest a system capable of 1080p gaming at high settings and productive multi-threaded work. The CPU’s performance is effectively tied with the Ryzen 7 7840HS, while the GPU outperforms 89% of all GPUs, making this a strong choice for users who prioritize graphics performance in a mobile form factor.