SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

29,955 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Radeon 860M pairing represents a modern laptop configuration built around the efficiency of TSMC’s 4 nm process. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution. Benchmark results indicate a balanced system with a combined percentile of 77, placing it above the majority of tested configurations. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and percentile positions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 860M’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, which suggests it is capable of driving esports and older titles at playable frame rates. However, with a shading unit count of 512 and an FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS, the data indicates that high-refresh gaming at maximum detail will be limited to less demanding games. The CPU’s single-thread score of 990 in 3DMark and 1769 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing will not be CPU-bound in most lighter scenarios.

Streaming: The Ryzen 7 8845HS’s multi-threaded performance is solid, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16192 and a 3DMark max-thread score of 7413. This headroom allows for simultaneous game capture and encoding, though the integrated GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores means any AI-assisted encoding features are absent. The Passmark data encryption score of 20416 and data compression score of 344439 indicate that background tasks will not significantly impact the CPU’s ability to handle a stream workload.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 97747 and floating-point math score of 59254 provide the computational muscle for timeline scrubbing and effect processing. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the Radeon 860M’s OpenCL score of 22759 is modest, suggesting that while 1080p editing is feasible, complex 4K compositions will rely heavily on the CPU’s 16 threads. The system’s dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for feeding the integrated GPU with frame data.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2575 and Geekbench multicore score of 12212 indicate strong performance for CPU-based rendering tasks. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor in this scenario. Its FP32 compute of 3.072 TFLOPS is far below what dedicated rendering GPUs offer, and the nearest rival data shows the RTX 5060 is only 0.3% ahead in average score, which is a statistical tie, but this does not translate to equal rendering capability due to driver optimizations. For hobbyist renders, the CPU will carry the load.

Software development: The 8-core, 16-thread layout with a 3.80 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost clock is well-suited for compilation workloads. The Passmark extended instructions score of 25642 suggests good SIMD throughput for code that leverages modern instruction sets. The single-thread performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2081, ensures snappy response in IDEs and text editors. The lack of ECC memory support is a minor consideration for developers running containers or VMs.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU’s 72nd percentile among all GPUs make this a highly capable system for productivity. Passmark single-thread score of 3738 and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 1924 indicate fast application launches and smooth multitasking. The system’s laptop class and the GPU’s 15 W TDP suggest excellent battery efficiency for all-day use, with the CPU’s 45 W TDP providing a balance between performance and power draw.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This immediately limits upgradeability — the CPU is soldered, and the GPU is an integrated part of the chip (Radeon 860M). The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The system supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) , which allows for fast NVMe SSDs and potentially an external GPU enclosure, though the bus interface for the integrated GPU is fixed at PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU’s TDP is 45 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 15 W. The suggested PSU field is null, meaning no specific power supply headroom is provided in the data. For a laptop, this is largely irrelevant, but for a potential mini-PC configuration, the combined 60 W draw is modest. A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not a CPU or GPU swap, but rather ensuring the system has adequate DDR5 capacity and speed to maximize the dual-channel bandwidth. The data shows the GPU’s memory is system shared, meaning faster RAM will directly improve graphics performance.

The Ryzen 7 8845HS has a production status of Active and a release date of December 2023. The GPU has a release date of February 2025. This suggests the platform is current. The CPU’s architecture is Zen 4 with the Hawk Point codename, and the GPU is RDNA 3.5 with the Krackan Point chip. Given the socket is mobile-only, the upgrade path is essentially to a new laptop. The performance data shows the CPU is nearly identical to the Ryzen 7 7840HS (0% deltaPct) and only 0.3% ahead of the Ryzen 7 5800XT, meaning users upgrading from those parts will see negligible gains.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29955, which places it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS with an identical average score of 29955 (0% deltaPct). The Ryzen 7 5800XT trails by 0.3% with a score of 29879, and the Ryzen 7 7840H also trails by 0.3% with 29868. The Ryzen 5 9600X is 0.8% behind with 29713. This clustering indicates that the 8845HS is at the top of a performance tier, but not a generational leap over its immediate predecessors.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the 3DMark single-thread score is 990, the 4-thread score is 3690, and the 8-thread score is 6085. The scaling from 8 threads to 16 threads is minimal — the max-thread score is 7413 versus 7404 for the 16-thread test. This suggests that the additional threads beyond 8 provide only a 0.1% improvement in 3DMark, likely due to the test’s scaling limits. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 16192 is nearly 9.2 times the single-core score of 1769, indicating excellent multi-threading efficiency. The Geekbench multicore score of 12212 is 5.9 times the single-core score of 2081.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26401, at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with a score of 26421, which is 0.1% ahead of the 860M. The RTX 5060 is 0.3% ahead with 26331, and the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.6% ahead with 26553. The RTX A4000 leads by 1.1% with 26683. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 is notably higher than its OpenCL score of 22759, a 32% difference, suggesting the RDNA 3.5 architecture is particularly strong in Vulkan workloads.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers (81st percentile) than the GPU (72nd percentile). This creates a CPU-forward configuration that will excel in multi-threaded productivity tasks but will be held back in graphics-intensive scenarios.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the Radeon 860M sufficient for modern titles, provided they are willing to adjust detail levels. The GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput place it in the class of entry-level discrete GPUs, as evidenced by its near tie with the MX550. Esports titles will run comfortably at high refresh rates given the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 990 in 3DMark.

Content creators working with 1080p footage will benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and strong Cinebench R23 score of 16192. The Passmark data compression score of 344439 is particularly useful for archive operations. However, GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the 860M’s compute power, so creators should plan for CPU-centric workflows.

Developers will appreciate the 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The Passmark integer math score of 97747 and extended instructions score of 25642 indicate strong performance for code compilation and scientific computing. The dual-channel DDR5 support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth ensures memory-bound workloads are not starved.

Students and small business workstations are the ideal target for this build. The 81st CPU percentile ensures snappy responsiveness in office suites, and the 72nd GPU percentile is more than adequate for presentations and video calls. The 45 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP make this an efficient system for daily use, with the laptop class form factor providing portability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a CPU-favored imbalance. The CPU’s 81st percentile versus the GPU’s 72nd percentile means the CPU is comparatively stronger. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, the 8845HS will perform admirably, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16192 placing it well above the median CPU. However, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming, the 860M will be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the GPU’s compute specifications. With an FP32 rate of 3.072 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s, the GPU can handle 1080p rendering but will struggle at 1440p or higher. The CPU’s ability to feed the GPU is not in question — the 3DMark 8-thread score of 6085 and single-thread score of 990 are sufficient to avoid CPU bottlenecks in most games. The bottleneck is purely graphical.

In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU’s 16 threads will manage the encoding overhead. The Passmark data encryption score of 20416 suggests that encryption-related tasks (common in secure streaming) are handled efficiently. The system’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared between CPU and GPU, which could be a secondary bottleneck in memory-heavy scenes, but the data does not specify a specific point of failure.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Radeon 860M suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU’s FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, which are far below the requirements for 4K gaming. The 72nd percentile ranking indicates it is an entry-level part, best suited for 1080p.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8845HS compare to the Ryzen 7 7840HS?

A: The two CPUs have identical average benchmark scores of 29955, resulting in a 0% deltaPct. They are effectively the same performance part, with the 8845HS being a later revision.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of this system?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the FACT PACK lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The GPU’s memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning it relies on this same shared memory.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M have dedicated tensor cores?

A: No. The tensorCores field is null, and the architecture is RDNA 3.5. The GPU relies on standard shading units (512) and ray accelerators (8 RT cores) for its compute.

Q: What is the process node for both the CPU and GPU?

A: Both components are manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The CPU uses the Zen 4 architecture, and the GPU uses RDNA 3.5.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes, but primarily through the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16192 is strong for CPU rendering. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS is insufficient for GPU-accelerated rendering, making CPU-based renderers the better choice.

Q: What is the socket type, and can I upgrade the CPU later?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket. The production status is Active, but the socket is not designed for user upgrades. The GPU is integrated into the same package, so the entire chip would need to be replaced.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is 45 W, which is typical for a high-performance mobile part.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is standard for Zen 4 and provides low latency access to frequently used data. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark 2-thread score is 1924, the 4-thread score is 3690, and the 8-thread score is 6085. The jump from 8 to 16 threads (7413 max threads) is only 21.8%, which is lower than ideal, suggesting some workloads do not fully utilize all 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16192 is indicative of strong sustained multi-threaded performance, likely sustained by the 45 W TDP.

The single-thread performance is robust, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 990 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2081. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1769 is competitive. The Passmark single-thread score of 3738 confirms that this CPU will not bottleneck everyday applications. The Passmark physics score of 1347 is relatively low, suggesting that complex physics simulations may be a weak point.

The average benchmark score of 29955 places the CPU at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong result for a mobile part. Its nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, has an identical score, indicating that this is a mature, well-optimized design. The 0.3% lead over the Ryzen 7 5800XT and 7840H shows it is at the top of its class. The CPU’s release date of December 2023 and active production status confirm it is a current product.

Build Overview

This is a laptop class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS with the AMD Radeon 860M. The combined percentile is 77, indicating that this system outperforms 77% of all tested configurations. The CPU is the dominant component, with an 81st percentile ranking, while the GPU trails at the 72nd percentile.

The overall tier of this build is upper-midrange for a laptop. The CPU’s performance is comparable to desktop parts like the Ryzen 7 5800XT, which is 0.3% behind in average score, and the Ryzen 5 9600X, which is 0.8% behind. This means the 8845HS is a high-end mobile processor. The GPU’s performance is more modest, matching entry-level discrete GPUs like the MX550 and the RTX 5060 within a 0.3% margin.

This configuration is a sensible pairing for a thin-and-light gaming laptop or a powerful ultrabook. The 45 W CPU TDP combined with the 15 W GPU TDP creates a thermal envelope that is manageable in a laptop chassis. The system is not designed for extreme gaming performance but offers a balanced experience for productivity and light gaming. The lack of measured FPS data means these conclusions are drawn from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, which are slightly CPU-favored.

The GPU’s release date of February 2025 is newer than the CPU’s December 2023 release, indicating that the integrated graphics are a more recent addition. The system’s production status is Active for both components, meaning it is currently available in the market.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, with the chip codenamed Krackan Point. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, but has no dedicated tensor cores.

The clock speeds are a base of 600 MHz and a boost of 3000 MHz. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). This suggests that the GPU does not have specialized FP16 acceleration, which is common in integrated graphics.

Memory is system shared, meaning there is no dedicated VRAM. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." This is typical for an IGP, and it means the GPU’s performance is directly tied to the speed of the system’s DDR5 memory. The memory bus is PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is 0.1% ahead with a score of 26421. The RTX 5060 is 0.3% ahead with 26331, and the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.6% ahead with 26553. This puts the 860M in a very tight performance cluster, indicating that it is a solid entry-level discrete GPU competitor.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 is significantly higher than the OpenCL score of 22759. This 32% gap suggests that the RDNA 3.5 architecture excels in Vulkan, which is good news for gamers using Vulkan-based titles. The DirectX support is 12 Ultimate (12_2), meaning it supports modern features like ray tracing and variable rate shading, though the performance with 8 RT cores will be limited. The GPU’s TDP is 15 W, which is very low, making it highly efficient for a laptop.

The rendering capabilities are modest. With 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, it is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light creative workloads. The lack of tensor cores means no AI upscaling or DLSS-type features, relying instead on traditional rendering methods. The GPU’s 15 W TDP and IGP form factor make it an excellent choice for battery-powered devices where discrete GPU power draw is undesirable.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds