SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

29,955 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS + AMD Radeon 8050S: A High-Performance Mobile Pairing

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and AMD Radeon 8050S form a laptop-class combination that sits at the 85th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU pairings tracked in this database. The CPU alone ranks in the 81st percentile against all processors, while the GPU achieves an 89th percentile position against all graphics cards. This pairing represents a balanced mobile platform built around AMD's Zen 4 architecture and RDNA 3.5 graphics, with the CPU delivering strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU providing capable rasterization and ray tracing features. The data shows a system designed for demanding workloads in a portable form factor, though the exact gaming frame rates remain unmeasured for this specific combination.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The chip contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, designed for the AMD Socket FP8 platform, and it supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the processor itself.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 990 in single-thread to 1,924 in 2-thread, 3,690 in 4-thread, 6,085 in 8-thread, and 7,404 in 16-thread tests, with max-thread performance reaching 7,413. This scaling pattern indicates efficient utilization of all 16 threads, with the 8-thread score representing roughly 82% of the max-thread result, suggesting strong multi-core efficiency. Cinebench R23 results show 1,769 in single-core and 16,192 in multi-core, while Geekbench reports 2,081 single-core and 12,212 multi-core scores. PassMark tests further characterize the chip: integer math scores 97,747, floating-point math reaches 59,254, data encryption hits 20,416, and extended instructions score 25,642.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 29,955, placing it in the 81st percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS with an identical average score of 29,955 and a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29,879 (0.3% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H also scores 29,868 (0.3% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29,713 (0.8% behind). This places the 8845HS at the top of its immediate competitive cluster, though the margins are narrow. For real workloads, the multi-threaded performance suggests strong capabilities in compilation, rendering, and other parallel tasks, while the single-thread score of 990 in 3DMark indicates solid responsiveness for everyday applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform socket, meaning upgrades are limited to replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping individual components. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and it does not support ECC memory. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides adequate bandwidth for modern storage and expansion in a mobile context.

The GPU in this pairing is the AMD Radeon 8050S, which has a TDP of 55 W and is classified as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and a slot width of "IGP." The suggested PSU field is null, which is expected for an integrated solution that draws power from the laptop's existing power delivery system. The combined TDP of the CPU (45 W) and GPU (55 W) totals 100 W for the core compute components, leaving headroom within typical laptop power budgets for memory, storage, display, and other system components. This is not a platform designed for user-upgradeable graphics; instead, the integrated nature of the Radeon 8050S means the entire system is the upgrade path. A sensible next upgrade for users of this platform would be moving to a newer laptop generation with improved CPU and GPU architectures, as the socket and integrated design preclude component-level upgrades.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks establish the Ryzen 7 8845HS as a strong mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 16,192 represents a roughly 9.2x scaling over the single-core score of 1,769, indicating excellent multi-threaded utilization. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12,212 is about 5.9x the single-core score of 2,081. The 3DMark thread scaling shows a similar pattern: 16-thread performance (7,404) is about 7.5x the single-thread score (990). These ratios demonstrate that the processor maintains efficiency as more threads are engaged, with diminishing returns only appearing between 8-thread (6,085) and 16-thread (7,404) results.

The GPU benchmarks show the Radeon 8050S achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and a Vulkan score of 58,398. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 62,108, placing it in the 89th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with an average score of 61,896 (0.3% behind). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693 (2.5% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775 (2.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63,830 (2.7% ahead). This positions the 8050S slightly below the top of its immediate comparison group but still in the upper tier of mobile graphics solutions.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU and GPU are both above the 80th percentile in their respective categories, with the overall pairing at the 85th percentile. The CPU's performance is competitive with desktop-class processors like the Ryzen 5 9600X (0.8% difference), while the GPU's performance sits within a few percentage points of several discrete mobile and workstation GPUs. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile position and the CPU's 81st percentile ranking suggest the ability to drive high-refresh displays in less demanding titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact performance at 1080p or 1440p cannot be confirmed. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate solid rasterization throughput.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-threaded scores (16,192 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, though the integrated GPU shares system memory, which could impact performance in memory-intensive scenarios.

Video editing: The multi-threaded CPU performance, combined with the GPU's 32 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, suggests capable handling of timeline editing and effects rendering. The PassMark data compression score of 344,439 and random string sorting score of 41,446 indicate efficient data processing.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,192 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65,818 both point to reasonable rendering performance for a laptop platform, though dedicated workstation GPUs with more memory bandwidth would outperform in complex scenes.

Software development: The single-thread score of 990 in 3DMark and 3,738 in PassMark single-thread indicate responsive compilation of smaller projects, while the multi-threaded scores accelerate parallel builds. The 16 threads and 16 MB of L3 cache provide a solid foundation for code compilation.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance and the integrated GPU's capabilities handle productivity applications with ease. The 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life expectations for a performance-oriented laptop.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU's performance tier suitable for many titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact settings and frame rates cannot be guaranteed. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-threaded scaling shown in the benchmark results. Students and office workers in need of a responsive system for everyday tasks will find the single-thread performance more than adequate. Small business workstations requiring a balance of CPU and GPU power in a portable package are well served by this combination, given the 85th percentile overall ranking and the strong relative performance in both CPU and GPU benchmarks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture with the Strix Halo chip, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with a die size of 308 mm². The GPU features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. Ray tracing is supported through 32 dedicated RT cores. The clock speeds are 1,295 MHz base and 2,800 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Memory is system shared, meaning the GPU uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU with system-dependent bandwidth and bus width. The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The TDP is 55 W, and it operates as an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors required. The benchmark results show an OpenCL score of 65,818 and a Vulkan score of 58,398, with an average of 62,108. The 89th percentile ranking against all GPUs places this integrated solution in the upper tier of graphics performance. For rendering workloads, the 32 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles traditional rasterization efficiently. The system-shared memory architecture means performance will scale with the laptop's memory configuration, making dual-channel DDR5 essential for optimal GPU performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 8845HS has an average benchmark score of 29,955, which is identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (0% delta), 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 7 5800XT and Ryzen 7 7840H, and 0.8% higher than the Ryzen 5 9600X.

Q: How does the GPU compare to similar mobile graphics solutions?

A: The Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62,108, placing it 0.3% above the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, 2.5% below the Radeon Pro Vega 56, 2.6% below the Radeon RX 7600M, and 2.7% below the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 8050S includes 32 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What type of memory does this system use?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU uses system shared memory, meaning its memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are system dependent.

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined pairing ranks at the 85th percentile against all tracked CPU-GPU combinations, with the CPU at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile individually.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop platform?

A: This is a laptop platform, as indicated by the build class designation. The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8 mobile socket, and the GPU is classified as an integrated graphics processor with a slot width of "IGP."

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 55 W, for a combined 100 W across the two primary compute components.

Build Overview

This pairing consists of the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS mobile processor and the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU, forming a laptop-class system. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor with a 45 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with a 55 W TDP. The combined performance places this pairing at the 85th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile. This is a high-tier mobile platform that outperforms a majority of tracked systems in both CPU and GPU benchmarks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 29,955 puts it on par with the Ryzen 7 7840HS and slightly ahead of several desktop-class processors, while the GPU's 62,108 average score positions it within a few percentage points of several discrete mobile GPUs. The integrated nature of the GPU and the mobile socket mean this is a complete laptop solution rather than a component-level build, but the performance data indicates a system capable of handling demanding workloads in a portable form factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU in this pairing are reasonably balanced, with the GPU ranking slightly higher (89th percentile) than the CPU (81st percentile). In CPU-intensive workloads such as multi-threaded rendering or compilation, the processor's 16 threads and strong scaling (from 990 single-thread to 7,413 max-thread in 3DMark) provide ample compute headroom. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 32 RT cores support graphics-heavy tasks, but the system-shared memory architecture means the GPU's memory bandwidth is dependent on the laptop's DDR5 configuration, which could become a bottleneck in texture-heavy or high-resolution scenarios.

In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (990 in 3DMark single-thread) is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the lack of measured FPS data prevents precise bottleneck analysis. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking suggests it will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive titles, while the CPU's 81st percentile position indicates it may constrain performance in CPU-bound games or at lower resolutions. The narrow performance deltas among the CPU's nearest rivals (all within 0.8%) suggest that CPU performance is well-established for this tier, while the GPU's slightly larger deltas (up to 2.7%) indicate more variation in the graphics comparison group. For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts depending on the task: video encoding leverages both components, while data compression and encryption tasks rely primarily on the CPU's 16 threads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. Therefore, all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest capable performance at 1080p for many titles, with the 32 RT cores enabling ray-traced effects in supported games. The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-threaded scores provide adequate processing power for gaming workloads, though the single-thread score of 990 in 3DMark indicates that very high refresh rates in CPU-bound titles may be limited. The system-shared memory architecture means gaming performance will be influenced by the laptop's memory configuration, with dual-channel DDR5 providing the necessary bandwidth. Given the GPU's position relative to the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% behind) and the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (2.7% behind), users can expect performance in the range of these comparable mobile GPUs, though the exact frame rates will vary by game, resolution, and system configuration. These figures should be treated as estimates until direct FPS measurements for this specific pairing become available.