SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8840U + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

23,982 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U paired with the AMD Radeon 860M in a laptop configuration. The data indicates a balanced mobile platform with a combined percentile of 74, placing it above the majority of tested hardware. The CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded capabilities, while the GPU offers entry-level discrete-class graphics performance in an integrated package. The following sections break down the benchmark results, platform characteristics, and practical implications for various workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 7 8840U processor and the Radeon 860M integrated graphics is heavily workload-dependent. CPU benchmark scores show a strong scaling pattern from 2 threads to 16 threads. The 3DMark results illustrate a nearly linear progression: 1863 points at 2 threads, 3289 at 4 threads, 4896 at 8 threads, and 5677 at max threads. This indicates the processor efficiently utilizes all 8 cores and 16 threads, with the scaling curve flattening only slightly between the 8-thread and max-thread tests.

The bottleneck analysis reveals that in gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The Radeon 860M's average benchmark score of 26401 places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, but this is significantly lower than what a dedicated high-end graphics card would achieve. The CPU, by contrast, sits at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, meaning the processor has more headroom than the graphics solution in most scenarios.

In productivity workloads, the CPU becomes the primary driver. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12972 and Geekbench multicore score of 9610 demonstrate that the processor can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads. The Passmark multithread score of 23346, combined with the floating-point math score of 48820, indicates the CPU handles compute-heavy tasks without the GPU becoming a limiting factor.

The memory architecture plays a role in this balance. The system uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Since the Radeon 860M shares system memory, the available bandwidth is system-dependent. This shared memory configuration means that memory-intensive applications could create contention between CPU and GPU demands, though the high bandwidth helps mitigate this.

For gaming, the data shows the GPU will bottleneck at lower resolutions. The Radeon 860M has 512 shading units and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, producing 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. This level of compute is sufficient for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but the CPU's capability to feed frames would exceed what the GPU can render in many titles.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 7 8840U demonstrates solid processor performance across multiple benchmark suites. In 3DMark testing, the CPU scores 979 in single-thread, 1863 in 2-thread, 3289 in 4-thread, 4896 in 8-thread, and 5677 in max-thread tests. The Cinebench R23 results show 1703 points in single-core and 12972 points in multi-core tests. Geekbench scores reach 1970 in single-core and 9610 in multi-core.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 23982, which places it at the 76th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G scores 24089 (0.4% higher), the Intel Xeon 6333P scores 23823 (0.7% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U scores 24188 (0.9% higher), and the Intel Core i5-11500 scores 23718 (1.1% lower). This positioning indicates the 8840U performs within 1% of several desktop and mobile alternatives.

The Radeon 860M GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043. Its average benchmark score of 26401 places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26421 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 at 26331 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26553 (0.6% higher), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 at 26683 (1.1% higher).

The combined picture shows a laptop platform that performs competitively with entry-level discrete GPU solutions. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking slightly exceeds the GPU's 72nd percentile, suggesting the processor provides adequate compute for the graphics solution. The combined percentile of 74 reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outperforms the other in overall system tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform uses AMD Socket FP8, which is specific to mobile processors. This socket is not upgradeable in the traditional sense, as laptop CPUs are typically soldered to the motherboard. The production status for both the CPU and GPU is listed as Active, indicating ongoing availability.

Memory support includes DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The system does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8. This provides sufficient bandwidth for the integrated graphics and any additional expansion devices.

The CPU has a TDP of 28 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 15 watts. The combined 43-watt thermal envelope makes this suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The suggested PSU field is null, and the GPU has no power connectors, confirming this is an integrated solution designed for systems without dedicated power delivery for graphics.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would focus on memory capacity and speed, since the GPU performance scales with system memory bandwidth. The 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is the theoretical maximum for the dual-channel DDR5 configuration, and higher-speed memory modules could improve integrated graphics performance. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes would also benefit overall system responsiveness.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Radeon 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 512 shading units suggest capability for 1080p gaming at moderate settings. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it outperforms many integrated solutions, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates cannot be confirmed.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12972 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 5677 provide sufficient headroom for encoding and game capture simultaneously. The Passmark data compression score of 267525 indicates efficient handling of stream encoding tasks.

Video editing performance is supported by the CPU's balanced architecture. The Geekbench multicore score of 9610 and Passmark integer math score of 85740 demonstrate capability for timeline editing and export tasks. The Radeon 860M's RDNA 3.5 architecture with 8 RT cores provides hardware acceleration for compatible editing software.

3D rendering relies heavily on both CPU and GPU compute. The Passmark floating-point math score of 48820 shows strong CPU vector performance, while the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) throughput enables GPU-accelerated rendering workflows. The 16 MB shared L3 cache helps maintain data flow in complex scenes.

Software development tasks benefit from the CPU's single-thread performance of 979 in 3DMark single-thread and 1703 in Cinebench R23 single-core. The Passmark single-thread score of 3543 supports responsive compilation and code analysis. The 16 MB L3 cache and 8-core configuration handle parallel build processes effectively.

For student and office work, the platform provides ample performance for productivity applications. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, while the integrated GPU handles display output and basic graphical needs. The 28W CPU TDP and 15W GPU TDP contribute to efficient battery life in portable systems.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture using TSMC's 4nm process. The chip, codenamed Krackan Point, features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 600 MHz with a boost clock of 3000 MHz.

The memory subsystem is entirely system-dependent, with the GPU sharing the system's DDR5 memory. The bus width is listed as System Shared, and the bandwidth is System Dependent. This design means the memory configuration of the host laptop directly impacts GPU performance.

The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for DirectX Raytracing workloads. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics applications.

The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS matches the FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio. This compute capability positions the GPU for entry-level gaming and acceleration of compute workloads in creative applications.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 exceeds the OpenCL score of 22759, indicating efficient graphics API utilization. The average benchmark score of 26401 places the GPU at the 72nd percentile, with the nearest rival comparison showing it within 1.1% of the NVIDIA RTX A4000 and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, confirming the absence of empirical gaming measurements.

Based on the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512 shading units, 1080p gaming at low to medium settings is the expected sweet spot. The CPU's strong single-thread performance of 979 in 3DMark and 1703 in Cinebench R23 ensures the processor will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, combined with the nearest rival comparison to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, suggests performance in the entry-level discrete GPU range. Games released in recent years would likely run at 1080p with adjusted settings, while esports titles could achieve higher frame rates due to lower graphical demands.

The 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs provide adequate pixel and texture throughput for 1080p rendering. The 8 RT cores enable ray tracing effects, though the 3.072 TFLOPS compute budget suggests ray tracing would require significant settings reductions to maintain playable frame rates.

Who Should Build It

The primary target users for this platform are mobile consumers seeking a laptop that handles both productivity and light gaming. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking serves students and professionals who need responsive performance for office applications, web browsing, and multitasking.

Content creators working with video editing or photo manipulation would benefit from the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with the Passmark multithread score of 23346 supporting demanding creative workloads. The Radeon 860M's RDNA 3.5 architecture provides hardware acceleration for media encoding and effects.

Software developers would find the single-thread performance of 1703 in Cinebench R23 and 979 in 3DMark adequate for compilation tasks. The 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 support efficient code building and testing.

Gamers at 1080p resolution targeting medium settings represent a secondary audience. The GPU's 72nd percentile performance ensures compatibility with a wide range of titles, particularly esports games that favor higher frame rates over graphical fidelity.

Small business workstations requiring a compact, efficient platform would benefit from the 28W CPU TDP and 15W GPU TDP. The Active production status for both components ensures ongoing availability for system integrators.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, placing it above the majority of tested hardware configurations.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8840U compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G?

A: The Ryzen 7 8840U has an average benchmark score of 23982, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 5 8600G's score of 24089.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The Radeon 860M achieves 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with matching FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the Radeon 860M have?

A: The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the TDP for each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Does this platform have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840U is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 8000 series based on the Zen 4 architecture. Codenamed Hawk Point, this mobile processor uses TSMC's 4nm process node with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock runs at 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, confirming the mobile form factor.

The 3DMark scores show scalable performance from 979 in single-thread to 5677 in max-thread tests. The Cinebench R23 results of 1703 single-core and 12972 multi-core demonstrate strong performance for both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. Geekbench scores of 1970 single-core and 9610 multi-core corroborate these results.

The Passmark suite reveals specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 85740 and floating-point math score of 48820 show robust arithmetic processing. Data compression scores of 267525 and encryption scores of 16072 indicate efficient data handling. The extended instructions score of 18654 supports modern instruction set utilization.

The average benchmark score of 23982 places the CPU at the 76th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival comparisons show the processor performing within 1.1% of the Intel Core i5-11500 and within 0.9% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U. The processor has a TDP of 28 watts, appropriate for thin-and-light laptop designs.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U processor with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated graphics in a laptop configuration. The CPU is a mobile processor from the 8000 series using the Zen 4 architecture, while the GPU uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture in the Krackan Point chip.

The combined percentile of 74 indicates a platform that outperforms 74% of tested configurations. The CPU sits at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This modest gap between components suggests a balanced pairing where neither element severely constrains the other.

The platform is designed for portable computing, with the CPU's 28-watt TDP and the GPU's 15-watt TDP combining for a 43-watt thermal envelope. The GPU has no power connectors and lists no suggested PSU, confirming its integrated nature. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU provides sufficient bandwidth for the shared memory architecture.

The overall tier for this build is upper-midrange for mobile platforms. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU's entry-level discrete-class graphics make this suitable for a wide range of applications, from productivity to light gaming and content creation. The Active production status for both components ensures ongoing availability in the laptop market.