SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX

71,797 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a laptop configuration that favors multi-threaded productivity over high-refresh gaming, with the CPU acting as the primary performance driver. The processor sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is exactly at the 50th percentile, creating a significant gap that defines this system's character. Data indicates the CPU is the dominant component, with the GPU positioned as a capable but not class-leading companion.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this configuration is heavily skewed toward the CPU, as evidenced by the percentile rankings. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX achieves a 94th percentile ranking against all CPUs, placing it in the top tier of mobile processors, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs. This 44-point gap suggests that in CPU-bound workloads—such as compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded rendering—the system will perform exceptionally well, but in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or heavy 3D rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide substantial parallel processing capability, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25265. This is a strong indicator that the processor can feed the GPU effectively in most scenarios, but the GPU's mid-pack percentile means it cannot fully exploit the CPU's potential in graphics-intensive tasks. Benchmark results indicate that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this pairing; instead, the GPU's 50th percentile position suggests it will constrain frame rates in graphically demanding applications.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 71797 places it in close competition with several Intel Xeon server processors. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF by only 0.2%, leads the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 by 0.6%, and trails the Intel Xeon 6517P and Intel Xeon 6724P by 0.8% each. This clustering indicates that the 8840HX delivers performance comparable to enterprise-grade server silicon, reinforcing that CPU-side bottlenecks will be rare. The GPU, with no nearest rivals listed and an average benchmark score of zero, lacks comparative data, but its 50th percentile ranking positions it as an average performer in the current GPU landscape.

For workloads that rely on single-threaded performance, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1857 and Passmark single-thread score of 3958 suggest responsive day-to-day operation. However, the system's overall character is defined by multi-core throughput, with the Passmark multi-thread score of 41732 and the Cinebench multi-core score of 25265 both indicating that the CPU is the star of this show. The GPU's 110 W TDP versus the CPU's 55 W TDP shows the GPU consumes more power, but the CPU's performance advantage relative to its peers is far more pronounced.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a Turing-architecture professional mobile GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines provide a solid foundation for compute and rendering tasks. The GPU includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-enhanced workflows, which is typical for the Quadro line's professional focus.

Clock speeds are set at 1035 MHz base and 1530 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). These clocks produce pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s. The GPU achieves 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 18.80 TFLOPS FP16 via a 2:1 ratio, which is modest by modern standards but adequate for professional applications. The 12 nm process node and 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die indicate this is a mature design, and the GPU is classified as end-of-life production status.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. With a 50th percentile ranking, it sits exactly in the middle of all GPUs, meaning half of all GPUs perform better and half perform worse. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM capacity is substantial and will handle large texture sets and complex scenes without memory pressure, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive tasks compared to higher-tier GPUs.

The 48 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests that ray-traced workloads will be processed at moderate speed. Tensor cores numbering 384 enable DLSS and other AI-accelerated features, but the GPU's overall mid-pack performance means these features will be more about capability than leading-edge speed. The GPU's predecessor is Quadro Pascal-M and its successor is Ampere-MW, placing it in the middle of NVIDIA's professional mobile GPU evolution.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU demonstrates strong multi-core performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25265 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 41732. Single-thread performance is more modest, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 1857 and Passmark single-thread at 3958. The Passmark suite shows specialized strengths: data compression scores 496427, data encryption scores 29919, and extended instructions score 36527. Floating-point math achieves 86747, integer math reaches 146506, and find prime numbers scores 304. Physics tests score 2185, and random string sorting achieves 57971.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 71797 places it in the 94th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF at 71910 (0.2% ahead of the 8840HX), the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 at 71370 (0.6% behind), the Intel Xeon 6517P at 72350 (0.8% ahead), and the Intel Xeon 6724P at 72396 (0.8% ahead). These deltas are minimal, showing the 8840HX competes directly with server-class processors.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed and no nearest rivals, with an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking. This lack of data means direct GPU performance comparisons are impossible from the provided information. The combined system percentile is 72, which reflects the CPU's strong showing pulling up the GPU's average position. The system's overall tier is mid-to-high, driven primarily by CPU performance.

The combined picture shows a system where CPU-bound tasks will perform at top-tier levels, while GPU-bound tasks will perform at average levels. This asymmetry is important for understanding the system's capabilities. The lack of any measured FPS data for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows—means all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who prioritize multi-threaded CPU performance over graphics throughput. The 94th percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for developers compiling large codebases, researchers running simulations, and data analysts processing large datasets. The 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25265, indicate strong parallel processing capabilities that benefit these workloads.

Content creators working with video encoding, 3D modeling, or software rendering will find the CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth beneficial for CPU-based tasks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides ample capacity for GPU-accelerated rendering, though its 50th percentile performance means it will handle moderate workloads rather than extreme ones. The system suits professionals who need a mobile workstation with strong CPU compute and adequate GPU acceleration.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU's performance for compilation and simulation tasks, while the GPU's professional Quadro driver support ensures stability in CAD and scientific visualization applications. Small business workstations running database workloads, virtualization, or office productivity will see strong CPU performance, though the GPU's mid-pack position means it is not optimized for graphics-heavy tasks.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU capable of running most titles, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests it will not deliver top-tier frame rates. The CPU's 94th percentile ensures no CPU-side bottlenecks, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios. The system is better suited to productivity and professional applications than high-refresh gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename. It operates with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die size. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, though ECC memory is not supported.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking and uses AMD Socket FL1. It includes integrated Radeon 610M graphics, providing basic display output capability. The 55 W TDP is modest for a 12-core processor, indicating efficient power management. PCIe Gen 5 support with 28 lanes from the CPU enables fast connectivity for storage and expansion.

Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25265 places it among high-end desktop and mobile processors, while the single-core score of 1857 is respectable but not class-leading. Passmark data compression score of 496427 indicates strong throughput for compression and decompression tasks. Data encryption score of 29919 shows solid cryptographic performance. Extended instructions score of 36527 supports advanced SIMD workloads.

The 94th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms 94% of all CPUs tested. Its average benchmark score of 71797 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF at 71910, differing by only 0.2%. This near-tie indicates the 8840HX competes directly with modern desktop-class processors, despite being a mobile part. The CPU's performance profile suits multi-threaded workloads, with the Passmark multi-thread score of 41732 reinforcing this strength.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX ranks in the 94th percentile against all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 94% of tested processors.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the system have measured FPS data?

A: No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so FPS figures must be treated as estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 72, reflecting the CPU's strong performance relative to the GPU's mid-pack position.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX uses AMD Socket FL1 and supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's nearest rival?

A: The GPU has no nearest rivals listed in the data, and its average benchmark score is zero, making direct comparisons unavailable.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX does not support ECC memory, based on the FACT PACK data.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows—so all frame rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking positions it as an average performer, which translates to playable frame rates at 1080p in most titles, with reduced settings needed for higher resolutions. The CPU's 94th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck gaming performance.

The GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides headroom for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest that 1080p gaming will be the sweet spot, with 1440p possible in less demanding titles. Ray tracing is supported via 48 RT cores, but the GPU's mid-pack performance means ray-traced effects will require significant compromises to maintain playable frame rates.

The combined 72nd percentile system ranking indicates that gaming performance will be above average but not top-tier. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3958 in Passmark ensures consistent frame pacing, while the GPU's 3072 shading units handle standard rasterization workloads adequately. The GPU's 110 W TDP suggests it can sustain reasonable boost clocks, but the 50th percentile position caps overall gaming potential.

For esports titles and less demanding games, this system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p. For AAA games with heavy graphics requirements, moderate settings will be necessary. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and 64 MB L3 cache help maintain minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU remains the limiting factor for overall gaming performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and expansion. The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe 5.0 support.

The system is a laptop build class, meaning upgrades are largely limited to memory and storage rather than CPU or GPU swaps. The GPU's 110 W TDP and the CPU's 55 W TDP combine for 165 W of processor power draw, which is manageable in a mobile form factor. The GPU is end-of-life, so future driver support may taper off, but the 16 GB VRAM remains relevant for professional workloads.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity, as dual-channel DDR5 support allows for larger configurations. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would leverage the CPU's 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for faster data access. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles all graphics work.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for performance tuning, potentially extracting additional performance from the 55 W TDP envelope. The platform's 2025 release date for the CPU means it is current-generation technology, while the GPU's 2019 release date and end-of-life status indicate it is a legacy component. This mismatch suggests the GPU will be the first component to become a performance liability.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, a 12-core Zen 4 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, a Turing-architecture professional GPU. The build class is laptop, making it a mobile workstation rather than a desktop system. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile create a combined percentile of 72, placing the system in the upper-mid range of all tested configurations.

The CPU is the standout component, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25265 and an average benchmark score of 71797 that rivals server-class processors. The GPU, with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, provides competent but not exceptional graphics performance. The system's overall tier is defined by its CPU strength, making it well-suited for compute-heavy professional workloads.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP indicate a balanced power profile for a laptop. The CPU's 5 nm process efficiency contrasts with the GPU's older 12 nm process, reflecting the generational gap between components. The system targets professionals who need strong multi-threaded performance with adequate GPU acceleration, rather than gamers seeking maximum frame rates.

Data confirms this is a CPU-first configuration. The 44-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles is substantial, and benchmark results consistently show the CPU operating at top-tier levels while the GPU performs at average levels. This pairing makes sense for users who spend most of their time in CPU-bound applications, with the GPU providing sufficient acceleration for occasional graphics tasks.