SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

33,667 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration, combining AMD’s Zen 4 mobile architecture with NVIDIA’s latest Blackwell 2.0 GPU design. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, which includes no measured frame rate information for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates based on the CPU and GPU scores. The combined percentile of this pairing sits at the 80th mark relative to all tested configurations, indicating a strong overall tier for a laptop-class system.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, and manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the 8000 series and features a base clock of 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU’s thermal design power is 28 W, which is notably efficient for a mobile chip, and it uses the AMD Socket FP8. The processor integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, and its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 via a dual-channel bus, delivering a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13082 and a single-core score of 1737, while Geekbench multi-core reaches 10104 and single-core 1899. These numbers place the chip at the 84th percentile among all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 33667. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX with an average score of 33668 (0% difference), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT at 33736 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 5 240 at 33542 (0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H at 33537 (0.4%). The data implies that this 8-core mobile chip trades blows with desktop-class processors from previous generations, which is remarkable for a 28 W part. In real workloads, the multi-core score of 13082 in Cinebench R23 suggests strong performance for tasks like video encoding or software compilation, though the single-core score of 1737 indicates that lightly threaded applications will see moderate performance, not class-leading.

PassMark tests provide additional context: multi-thread score of 24990, single-thread score of 3626, integer math at 90382, floating point math at 52582, data compression at 292888, data encryption at 17650, extended instructions at 20714, physics at 1149, and random string sorting at 35517. The high data compression score suggests the CPU handles archival and database-like workloads efficiently, while the physics score is lower, hinting that gaming physics simulations may not be the primary strength. The find prime numbers score of 79 is indicative of integer-heavy single-thread performance, which aligns with the modest single-core Geekbench figure. Overall, the CPU’s architecture is efficient, but it is not a performance monster; it sits comfortably in the upper-midrange for mobile processors, with the 84th percentile reflecting solid, not exceptional, placement.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33667, landing at the 84th percentile versus all CPUs. The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, achieves an average benchmark score of 29928, placing it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 80, which is above the midpoint but not at the top tier. The GPU’s nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 29945 (-0.1% delta), the RTX 2080 Ti scores 29783 (0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30095 (-0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 scores 30433 (-1.7%). This means the RTX 5070 Mobile delivers performance essentially equivalent to a desktop RTX 3070 Ti, which is a strong result for a laptop GPU, but the 75th percentile shows that it is not a top-tier part overall.

Specific GPU benchmarks include Geekbench OpenCL at 122238 and Vulkan at 116960, along with PassMark scores for DirectX 10 (129), DirectX 11 (192), DirectX 12 (93), DirectX 9 (214), G2D (896), G3D (20355), and GPU compute (8279). The DirectX 12 score of 93 is notably lower relative to other API tests, which could indicate that the GPU’s raw rasterization in modern APIs is not its strongest suite, or it may reflect driver maturity. The G3D score of 20355 is the most representative of general 3D performance, and it aligns with the 75th percentile placement. The combined picture shows a CPU that is solidly mid-high tier and a GPU that is similarly positioned, resulting in a system that is balanced for most tasks but not extreme in any single area. The absence of measured FPS data means these scores are the primary quantitative evidence for performance expectations.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 5070 Mobile’s G3D score of 20355 and its equivalence to the RTX 3070 Ti suggest that it can handle competitive titles at high settings, but the DirectX 12 score of 93 and the lack of measured FPS data mean that frame rates at 144 Hz or higher should be treated as estimates. The CPU’s single-core Geekbench score of 1899 is adequate for most game engines, but it may not prevent occasional frame dips in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming is a dual-load scenario where the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s NVENC-like capabilities (implied by the tensor cores) work together. The Ryzen 7 8840HS’s multi-thread score of 24990 in PassMark suggests enough headroom for encoding, while the GPU’s compute score of 8279 indicates it can take on some offload tasks. The lack of measured FPS data means streaming performance is inferred, but the hardware appears capable of 1080p60 streaming with minimal impact on gaming.

Video editing benefits from both components: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13082 handles timeline rendering and effects processing, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 122238 accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and exports. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is a limiting factor for large 4K projects, but for 1080p editing, this pairing is more than sufficient, as the data shows strong compute performance.

3D rendering relies heavily on the GPU for ray tracing and the CPU for scene preparation. The RTX 5070 Mobile’s RT cores (36) and fp32 performance of 13.13 TFLOPS indicate it can handle moderate rendering workloads, but the 75th percentile placement means it will not match desktop high-end cards. The CPU’s 16 threads provide adequate geometry processing, with the Cinebench score suggesting that CPU-bound render stages will not bottleneck the GPU significantly.

Software development involves compiling code, running tests, and virtual machines. The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 90382 and data compression score of 292888 point to strong performance for build tasks and version control operations. The 16 threads handle parallel compilation well, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports multitasking. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute capabilities could assist with GPU-accelerated libraries.

Student and office work is where this pairing is overqualified. The CPU’s single-core score of 1737 in Cinebench R23 handles document processing and web browsing effortlessly, while the GPU’s 2D score of 896 ensures smooth UI rendering. The 28 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP mean the laptop can operate efficiently, but the hardware is far beyond what basic tasks require, making this a premium choice for users who also game or create content.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 75th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data compression, the CPU will be the limiting factor, as its scores (e.g., integer math 90382) define the ceiling. The GPU’s 75th percentile means it is slightly weaker relative to its own pool, so in GPU-heavy tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck. The RTX 5070 Mobile’s nearest rival, the RTX 3070 Ti, is a desktop card with similar average scores, which implies that the laptop GPU can push high frame rates at 1080p, but the lack of measured FPS data prevents definitive scaling analysis.

The CPU’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz is high for a mobile part, suggesting that single-threaded performance is optimized, which helps gaming, but the 28 W TDP limits sustained multi-core loads. In contrast, the GPU’s 50 W TDP is modest, and its boost clock of 1425 MHz is conservative, which likely limits its performance in extended gaming sessions. The combined percentile of 80 suggests that neither component is drastically holding back the other, but the GPU’s lower percentile means that at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the first to saturate. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 93 is particularly low, which could indicate that this GPU struggles with the latest API features, potentially creating a bottleneck in modern games that rely on DirectX 12’s advanced rendering paths.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB206 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s, which is substantial for a mobile GPU. The memory clock is 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed, and the GPU has base and boost clocks of 907 MHz and 1425 MHz, respectively. The GPU includes 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 48 raster output units, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores, with a pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both rated at 13.13 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is unusual and suggests that the GPU can maintain full throughput for both precision levels.

The RTX 5070 Mobile’s benchmark scores show a strong compute presence: Geekbench OpenCL at 122238 and Vulkan at 116960, with PassMark GPU compute at 8279. These numbers indicate that for rendering tasks that leverage OpenCL or Vulkan, the GPU is highly capable, outperforming the RTX 2080 Ti in average score by 0.5%. However, the DirectX 12 score of 93 is a concern, as it is lower than the DirectX 9 score of 214 and DirectX 11 score of 192, suggesting that the GPU’s performance under the latest API may be inconsistent. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p, but for 4K textures or heavy ray tracing, it will be a limiting factor, as the 384.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot compensate for capacity constraints. The tensor cores (144) and RT cores (36) provide hardware acceleration for AI and ray tracing, but the low TDP of 50 W means these features will run at reduced clocks compared to desktop counterparts. Overall, the GPU is a mid-high tier mobile part, as evidenced by its 75th percentile and equivalence to the RTX 3070 Ti, but it is not a flagship.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a versatile laptop for gaming and productivity without requiring extreme performance. Gamers playing at 1080p will find the GPU’s G3D score of 20355 and its parity with the RTX 3070 Ti sufficient for high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be moderate. Content creators working with 1080p video or moderate 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread score and the GPU’s compute capabilities, particularly for GPU-accelerated effects. Developers will appreciate the CPU’s 16 threads and high integer math score for compilation, while the GPU’s compute can assist with machine learning tasks, given the tensor cores.

Students and professionals in office environments will find this system overkill, but it offers headroom for future tasks and occasional gaming. Small business workstations that need to handle data processing, as indicated by the CPU’s data compression score of 292888, will perform well, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit GPU-accelerated database applications. The laptop class means this is a mobile solution, so users who need portability with strong performance are the primary audience. The 80th combined percentile suggests that this is not a budget or entry-level build, but rather a solid mid-to-high tier configuration that will handle most modern workloads without struggle.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s G3D score of 20355 and its equivalence to the RTX 3070 Ti (0% delta in average score) suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 5070 Mobile should deliver high frame rates in most titles, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in AAA games and 100+ FPS in competitive shooters. However, the low DirectX 12 score of 93 raises questions about performance in the latest DirectX 12 titles, where the GPU may underperform relative to its G3D score.

At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth will become constraints, likely forcing lower texture settings in memory-heavy games. The CPU’s single-core score of 1899 in Geekbench should not bottleneck the GPU at these resolutions, but it may limit frame rates in CPU-bound games at 1080p with high refresh rates. The combined percentile of 80 indicates that this system is above average for gaming, but the lack of measured FPS data means these are educated estimates, not definitive results. Users expecting consistent 144 Hz performance at 1080p ultra should temper expectations, as the GPU’s 75th percentile suggests it is good but not elite.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a laptop-specific socket, meaning upgrades are not feasible in the traditional sense; the CPU is soldered or embedded. The platform supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is fixed by the CPU’s design, so upgrading RAM speed would require a new motherboard and CPU. The GPU has a TDP of 50 W and no power connectors, indicating it is an integrated or soldered part, so it cannot be upgraded independently.

The suggested PSU is null in the FACT PACK, and the CPU TDP is 28 W, which means the total system power draw is low, likely under 100 W for the CPU and GPU combined. This makes the system suitable for a laptop chassis with a standard power adapter. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase RAM capacity, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR5, and to add an external GPU enclosure via PCIe, though the GPU’s 50 W TDP limits the benefit of a more powerful external card. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 support means storage upgrades to NVMe SSDs are possible, but the CPU’s 20 lanes are shared between the GPU and other devices. The lack of a launch MSRP for either component means pricing is not available, but the platform’s high-end positioning suggests it is a premium laptop configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, placing it above the majority of tested systems but not in the top tier.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to desktop GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile’s average benchmark score of 29928 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, which scores 29945, a -0.1% delta.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 7 8840HS scores 13082 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is at the 84th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming frame rates are estimates.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory as false for the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the GPU uses a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, an 8-core, 16-thread laptop processor on the Zen 4 architecture, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, a Blackwell 2.0 GPU with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory. The system is classified as a laptop (buildClass), and its combined percentile is 80, indicating an above-average configuration overall. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, so the pairing is well balanced with a slight tilt toward CPU strength. The CPU’s TDP is 28 W and the GPU’s TDP is 50 W, making this an efficient mobile setup. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is inferred from benchmark scores, but the GPU’s equivalence to the RTX 3070 Ti suggests strong 1080p and moderate 1440p capability. This is a premium laptop configuration aimed at users who need a versatile machine for gaming, content creation, and productivity, without reaching the extreme performance of desktop counterparts.