SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

33,667 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

This pairing combines AMD’s 8-core Zen 4 mobile processor with a dedicated RDNA 3.0 discrete GPU in a laptop-class build, targeting the upper tier of mobile performance. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile of all processors, while the GPU reaches the 89th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined system lands at the 87th percentile — a consistently high-performing mobile platform. With no measured FPS data for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on TSMC’s 4 nm process node, part of the 8000 series with the Hawk Point codename and Zen 4 architecture. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, drawing a 28 W TDP — notably efficient for a mobile part. The 25,000 million transistors are packed into a 178 mm² die, and the cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier (not unlocked), so overclocking headroom is not part of the equation, but the high boost clock compensates in single-threaded workloads.

Benchmark results reveal a strong multi-core performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 13,082 multi-core and 1,737 single-core. The Geekbench results align: 10,104 multi-core and 1,899 single-core. PassMark’s multithread score of 24,990 and single-thread score of 3,626 reinforce this picture. The average benchmark score of 33,667 places it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX at essentially identical performance (0% delta), followed by the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT at -0.2% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H at +0.4%. This means the 8840HS trades blows with desktop-class processors from a generation ago, which is remarkable for a 28 W mobile chip.

The PassMark sub-tests show specific strengths: integer math at 90,382, floating-point math at 52,582, and extended instructions at 20,714. Data encryption scores 17,650, while data compression hits 292,888 — a very high figure that suggests excellent throughput for compression algorithms. The physics score of 1,149 and prime number finding at 79 are more modest, but the random string sorting at 35,517 indicates strong memory-bound operations. For real workloads, this CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded compilation, rendering, and scientific computing tasks that scale across 16 threads, while the 5.10 GHz boost ensures snappy single-threaded response in everyday applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s aggregate benchmark score of 33,667 places it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals clustered tightly: the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX matches it exactly (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is 0.2% slower, and both the AMD Ryzen 5 240 and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H are 0.4% faster. This tight grouping indicates that the 8840HS sits at a performance plateau where small architectural differences matter more than core counts or clock speeds.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7600M, delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, placing it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at -0.1%, the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at -0.1%, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at +0.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at -0.7%. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 63,775, identical to its OpenCL result, which reflects a single benchmark data point. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 87, meaning the system as a whole outperforms 87% of all builds in the database — a strong indication of balanced high-end mobile performance.

When interpreting these numbers together, the picture is one of synergy: the CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile both sit in the upper tier, and the combined 87th percentile reflects that neither component drags the other down significantly. In multi-threaded CPU tasks like Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 13,082 score suggests it can handle serious productivity work, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 63,775 points to capable compute acceleration for tasks like video encoding or GPU-accelerated rendering. The data suggests this is a laptop that can do both CPU-heavy and GPU-heavy work without a glaring weak link.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and component specifications, not direct measurements. The GPU’s 89th percentile standing and the CPU’s 84th percentile both suggest strong gaming potential, but the absence of measured data means precise frame rates cannot be stated.

Based on the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and its 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 compute, this pairing should handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles. The CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost clock and 16 MB of shared L3 cache provide adequate single-thread performance for game logic, while the 16 threads offer headroom for background tasks like streaming or Discord. The GPU’s 28 ray tracing cores and 64 ROPs suggest ray-traced effects are possible at reduced resolutions or with upscaling, but the modest 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at 1440p in VRAM-heavy titles.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 17.27 TFLOPS are sufficient for medium-to-high settings in many games, but the 8 GB VRAM could become a constraint in the most demanding recent releases. The CPU’s 84th percentile ranking means it will rarely bottleneck the GPU at these resolutions, as frame rates are more likely to be GPU-limited. For competitive esports titles at 1080p, the high boost clock should drive very high frame rates, but without measured data, exact numbers remain speculative. The lack of measured FPS data is a significant gap — the benchmark scores imply strong performance, but the absence of direct measurements means all game-specific expectations are inferential.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets mobile users who need both CPU and GPU horsepower in a laptop form factor. Gamers at 1080p seeking high refresh rates will appreciate the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the CPU’s ability to keep up, while those at 1440p can expect solid performance at reduced settings. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 13,082 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 63,775 OpenCL score — the combination of 16 threads and a dedicated RDNA 3.0 GPU accelerates both CPU-bound and GPU-accelerated workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 8 cores and 16 threads useful, particularly given the high PassMark integer math score of 90,382 and data encryption score of 17,650. Students and small business workstation users get a capable all-around machine: the CPU’s 84th percentile ensures smooth multitasking, while the GPU’s 89th percentile handles occasional graphics work or light gaming. The 28 W CPU TDP suggests good battery life potential for productivity tasks, while the 90 W GPU TDP indicates this is not a thin-and-light device but rather a performance-oriented laptop. This is not a build for ultra-portability or extreme battery endurance; it is for users who prioritize performance and are willing to accept a larger chassis.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket that is not upgradeable in the traditional sense — it is soldered or BGA-mounted. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and fast NVMe storage. The GPU has a 90 W TDP and uses no power connectors, drawing power entirely from the motherboard slot, which is typical for mobile discrete GPUs.

The suggested PSU field is null, which is expected for a laptop build where power delivery is handled by the system’s internal power brick rather than a user-installed PSU. A sensible next upgrade within this platform would be increasing system RAM from the base DDR5 configuration or adding a faster Gen 4 NVMe SSD, as the CPU’s PCIe lanes support these without bottleneck. The GPU’s slot-width designation of "IGP" is unusual but suggests it is integrated into the motherboard layout rather than being a replaceable MXM module. For a future system upgrade, the user would likely need to change the entire laptop or platform, as neither CPU nor GPU is field-upgradeable in a conventional sense.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It uses TSMC’s 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s bandwidth — a solid figure for 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads. Clocks are 1500 MHz base, 2410 MHz boost, and 2070 MHz game clock, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

The compute configuration includes 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. Pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS and FP16 of 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate strong compute capability for both gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The GPU includes 28 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 places it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals being the RX 9060 XT LP and NVIDIA CMP 30HX at -0.1% each.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 and FP16 throughput figures suggest good performance in applications that utilize OpenCL or Vulkan compute. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most 1080p textures and moderate 1440p assets, but large scenes or high-resolution textures could exceed capacity. The lack of tensor cores (null field) means AI acceleration relies on the GPU’s shader-based compute, which is less efficient than dedicated tensor hardware. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning the laptop’s specific ports determine connectivity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a well-balanced pairing. The CPU is at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile, a 5-point gap that indicates neither component severely limits the other. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation or multi-threaded rendering, the CPU’s 13,082 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 90,382 integer math score will be the primary driver, with the GPU providing acceleration for GPU-compute portions. In GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or heavy graphics rendering, the GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS and 89th percentile ranking will dominate, while the CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost ensures it can feed the GPU with draw calls without becoming a bottleneck.

At 1080p gaming, the CPU’s high single-thread performance (1,737 Cinebench R23 single-core, 3,626 PassMark single-thread) suggests it can maintain high frame rates, but the GPU’s 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM may limit texture-heavy scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as its bandwidth and compute are stressed more heavily, while the CPU has ample headroom. For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU’s 16 threads can handle encoding (given the PassMark data encryption score of 17,650) while the GPU renders frames, but the absence of measured FPS data means exact scaling is uncertain. The combined 87th percentile indicates that the system’s weakest link is still above most other builds, making it a balanced high-tier mobile platform.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS with the AMD Radeon RX 7600M. The CPU is a mobile 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part with a 28 W TDP, while the GPU is a discrete RDNA 3.0 chip with a 90 W TDP. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper tier of all builds, outperforming 87% of the database. The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a coherent performance target: high-end mobile gaming and productivity.

The system is designed for users who need desktop-class performance in a portable package, but it is not an ultra-thin device — the GPU’s 90 W TDP requires adequate cooling. The 8 GB VRAM and 89.6 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth are competitive for the mobile segment, and the PCIe Gen 4 support ensures fast storage and GPU communication. Overall, this is a well-matched pair that sits just below the top-tier mobile offerings but above the mainstream, offering a strong balance of CPU and GPU capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does this pairing support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 87, meaning it outperforms 87% of all builds in the database, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and GPU at the 89th percentile.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What process nodes are used for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU uses TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors, while the GPU uses TSMC’s 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS and 89th percentile ranking, combined with the CPU’s 5.10 GHz boost, should drive high frame rates in competitive titles, though exact figures are estimates since no measured FPS data exists.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and PassMark data encryption score of 17,650 suggest it can handle encoding overhead while gaming, with the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM managing game assets simultaneously.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,082 accelerates timeline processing, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 63,775 supports effects and GPU-accelerated encoding.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads handle scene preparation, while the GPU’s FP32 17.27 TFLOPS and 28 RT cores provide substantial compute for rendering and ray-traced previews.

Software Development: The high PassMark integer math score of 90,382 and multithread score of 24,990 indicate fast compilation times for large codebases, with the 16 MB L3 cache aiding repetitive build tasks.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s 84th percentile ensures smooth multitasking across productivity suites, while the GPU’s 89th percentile provides headroom for occasional graphics work, all within a laptop form factor with a 28 W CPU TDP for reasonable battery life.