SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX

60,104 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile form a laptop-class pairing that targets the upper mid-range of mobile computing. The CPU is a member of the 8000 series built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace part, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, also on a 5 nm process, with 2,560 shading units and 20 ray tracing cores. Together, this build sits at the 78th percentile for all combined CPU-GPU pairings, indicating a system that is clearly above average but not at the enthusiast apex. The data for this specific combination is synthetic, as no measured frame rates exist in the pack; all performance interpretations are drawn from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8745HX is a high-core-count mobile processor with a 55 W TDP, which is substantial for a laptop chip but necessary to feed its 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The architecture is Zen 4, a significant redesign that emphasizes instructions per clock (IPC) improvements alongside clock speed. With a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, this is a fast chip for single-threaded work, as evidenced by its PassMark single-thread score of 3,879. The CPU has a 32 MB shared L3 cache, backed by 1 MB of L2 and 64 KB of L1 per core, a layout designed to reduce latency for frequently accessed data.

The benchmark data shows a processor that excels at both integer and floating-point math. The PassMark integer math score of 100,328 is robust, while the floating-point math score of 61,972 indicates strong scientific and engineering compute capability. The multithread score of 31,517 is the headline figure, reflecting the combined throughput of the 8 cores. This places the CPU in the 92nd percentile versus all CPUs, a high ranking that puts it in the company of desktop-class parts. The nearest rivals confirm this positioning: the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60,099 on average (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60,008 (0.2% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59,641 (0.8% faster). The only rival that beats it by a meaningful margin is the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, which is 0.8% faster, but that is a server chip with a different power envelope.

For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle heavy compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering without breaking a sweat. The data compression score of 363,759 and data encryption score of 21,840 suggest it is well-suited for archival tasks and secure communications. The extended instructions score of 27,638 shows it can leverage modern SIMD and AVX-512-like instruction sets. The physics score of 1,681 is lower in absolute terms but is a specific test of game physics calculations, where the per-core speed is more relevant. The random string sorting score of 44,494 indicates strong memory subsystem performance, benefiting database and parsing workloads. The find prime numbers score of 159 is a single-threaded integer test, where the 5.10 GHz boost clock helps maintain competitiveness.

Benchmark Performance

The overall CPU average benchmark score is 60,104, which is the figure used for ranking. The GPU, meanwhile, has an average benchmark score of 19,049, placing it in the 63rd percentile versus all GPUs. The combined percentile of this pairing is 78, which suggests the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is more modestly positioned. Breaking down the GPU scores, the PassMark G3D score of 14,423 is the primary gaming metric. The GPU compute score of 5,947 is lower, reflecting that the RTX 4050 Mobile is not a compute powerhouse compared to its gaming capability. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score is 74,748 and the Vulkan score is 75,235, which are close, indicating consistent performance across different compute APIs.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Radeon RX 6600 scores 19,036 (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19,030 (0.1% slower), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18,954 (0.5% slower). The NVIDIA Tesla K20m is slightly faster at 19,089 (0.2% faster). This means the RTX 4050 Mobile is essentially on par with a desktop RX 6600 in raw average score, which is impressive for a laptop part, but the context matters: the RX 6600 has more VRAM and a wider memory bus, while the RTX 4050 Mobile relies on its Ada Lovelace features. The PassMark DirectX scores are telling: DirectX 11 scores 130, DirectX 12 scores 61, and DirectX 9 scores 184. The low DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 suggests that the GPU may not be fully optimized for all modern APIs in every title, but the high DirectX 9 score indicates strong legacy support.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU leads the way, providing a high ceiling for frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU is the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile means that applications heavily reliant on physics, AI, or simulation will see the CPU shine, while pure rasterization at 4K will be constrained by the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates an asymmetric pairing: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is mid-pack. In CPU-bound workloads, such as esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the Ryzen 7 8745HX will rarely be the bottleneck, with its high single-thread score of 3,879 ensuring high frame rates. The physics score of 1,681, while not directly comparable to other CPUs in the pack, suggests adequate performance for game logic. However, in GPU-bound scenarios, the RTX 4050 Mobile’s 63rd percentile ranking means it will cap frame rates well before the CPU is stressed. The PassMark G3D score of 14,423 is the ceiling for gaming performance, and the compute score of 5,947 indicates that GPGPU tasks will be slower relative to the CPU’s compute scores.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because there is no measured FPS data for this pairing. However, based on the percentile delta, the bottleneck is clearly the GPU. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 1% of its score, showing that it is not a weak link. In contrast, the GPU’s nearest rivals include older workstation cards like the Quadro K6000 and Tesla K20m, which are not gaming-focused, suggesting that the RTX 4050 Mobile is positioned for 1080p gaming rather than high-refresh 1440p or 4K. The memory bandwidth of the GPU is 192.0 GB/s, which is limited by its 96-bit bus, and this will be a constraint in texture-heavy scenes. The CPU’s memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s for system memory, which is separate but sufficient for feeding the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in performance?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 60,104, which is practically identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60,099, 0% delta) and the Intel Core i9-14900F (60,008, 0.2% faster). The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T is 0.8% faster.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 20 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database.

Q: Is the CPU’s memory support ECC?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 8745HX does not support ECC memory. It supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19,049, placing it in the 63rd percentile versus all GPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile series. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 50 W, giving a combined thermal budget of 105 W before accounting for other components. The suggested PSU is null in the data, so no specific power supply recommendation is available, but the low TDPs mean a standard laptop power brick should suffice. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking on supported motherboards, though this is rare in laptops.

For an upgrade path, the data suggests that the CPU is already near the top of its class, with its nearest rivals being the Ryzen 9 7945HX and 7945HX3D, which are only 0% to 0.8% faster. Upgrading the CPU would yield negligible gains. The GPU, however, is the weaker link, and a future upgrade to a higher-tier GeForce 40-series mobile GPU would balance the system better, though the data does not specify which specific models are compatible. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support for the CPU means that storage devices can run at high speeds, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is not a bottleneck for its performance class. The memory is DDR5, so a future upgrade to higher-capacity or faster DDR5 modules is possible, but the data does not specify maximum supported speeds.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is based on the AD107 chip, using the Ada Lovelace architecture, and is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a die size of 159 mm², giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 48 raster operation units (ROPs). The ray tracing hardware consists of 20 RT cores, and the tensor cores number 80, which are used for DLSS and AI workloads. The base clock is 1455 MHz, with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. The memory runs at an effective speed of 16 Gbps, and the 6 GB of GDDR6 is accessed via a 96-bit bus, yielding 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.986 TFLOPS, which is identical to the FP16 performance at 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating that the GPU does not have a dedicated FP16 acceleration path.

For rendering, the benchmark scores indicate a GPU that is competent for 1080p gaming but not for high-end compute. The PassMark G3D score of 14,423 is the key gaming indicator. The DirectX 11 score of 130 is higher than the DirectX 12 score of 61, which may suggest that the GPU is better optimized for older APIs, or that the benchmark does not fully utilize the Ada Lovelace features in DirectX 12. The Vulkan score of 75,235 in Geekbench is strong, showing that the GPU can perform well in Vulkan-based titles. The OpenCL score of 74,748 is similar, indicating consistent compute performance across APIs. The GPU compute score of 5,947 is lower, which is typical for gaming-focused GPUs, as they allocate more silicon to shading units than to general-purpose compute cores. The 20 RT cores will enable ray tracing at playable frame rates at 1080p, but the 6 GB VRAM may be a limitation for games that require more memory for high-detail textures and ray tracing effects.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at mobile users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and gaming. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers who compile large codebases, as the multithread score of 31,517 will reduce build times. The 16 threads are also beneficial for virtual machine workloads, where each VM can be assigned a dedicated core. The high single-thread score of 3,879 ensures responsive UI interactions and fast single-threaded application performance. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s math capabilities, as the floating-point score of 61,972 and integer score of 100,328 will handle MATLAB, Python, and simulation tools efficiently.

For content creators, the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p video editing and basic 3D modeling, but the 63rd percentile ranking means it is not a professional-grade rendering card. The CPU, however, will accelerate video encoding through its high core count, making it a good choice for YouTubers who edit 1080p footage. Small business workstations that run database applications will appreciate the CPU’s random string sorting score of 44,494, which indicates fast data manipulation. The GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate AI inference tasks, such as image classification, but the compute score of 5,947 suggests it is not a primary AI workstation. Gamers at 1080p will find this build capable, but those seeking 1440p high-refresh gaming should look for a higher-tier GPU.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing an AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, ranking in the 92nd percentile versus all CPUs. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace part with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, ranking in the 63rd percentile versus all GPUs. The combined percentile is 78, indicating an above-average system. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 60,104 is nearly identical to the Ryzen 9 7945HX, making it a top-tier mobile processor. The GPU’s average score of 19,049 is comparable to a desktop Radeon RX 6600, but with the caveat of reduced VRAM and memory bandwidth. This pairing is unbalanced in favor of the CPU, which is a common trade-off in laptops where thermal constraints limit GPU power. The data shows a system that excels at CPU-intensive tasks and is adequate for 1080p gaming, but will not push high frame rates at 1440p or 4K.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU’s G3D score of 14,423 suggests it can drive high frame rates in esports titles, and the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,879 ensures minimal bottleneck. However, the 63rd percentile GPU ranking means that demanding AAA titles will likely run at medium to high settings to maintain 60 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads are ideal for encoding video while gaming, as the multithread score of 31,517 provides ample headroom for x264 encoding. The GPU’s NVENC encoder, while not explicitly benchmarked, is part of the Ada Lovelace architecture and can offload encoding, though its performance is not directly measured here.

Video editing: The CPU’s floating-point math score of 61,972 and integer score of 100,328 support fast rendering and effects processing. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p timelines, but the compute score of 5,947 may slow down heavy GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads will accelerate CPU-based renderers, with a multithread score of 31,517. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.986 TFLOPS can handle GPU rendering, but the 6 GB VRAM limits scene size, and the 63rd percentile ranking indicates it is not a dedicated render card.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 3,879 and multithread score of 31,517 make this ideal for compiling and running tests. The data compression score of 363,759 is useful for handling large repositories and build artifacts.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking with many browser tabs and office applications. The integrated Radeon 610M GPU provides a fallback, but the discrete RTX 4050 Mobile will handle any light graphics work, such as presentations or basic photo editing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps fields, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 14,423 is the primary indicator of gaming performance. For 1080p gaming, this score suggests the RTX 4050 Mobile can achieve playable frame rates in most titles. The DirectX 11 score of 130 is higher than the DirectX 12 score of 61, which may mean that older games perform better than newer ones, or that the benchmark does not fully utilize the GPU’s features. The DirectX 9 score of 184 indicates strong performance in legacy titles, which are often less demanding. The CPU’s physics score of 1,681 and single-thread score of 3,879 will support high frame rates in CPU-bound games, such as strategy titles or simulators. The combined percentile of 78 suggests that this build is suitable for 1080p high-refresh gaming, but at 1440p, the GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking will be the limiting factor, likely resulting in 40-60 FPS on high settings. At 4K, the 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient for modern AAA titles, and the estimated performance would drop below 30 FPS in demanding scenes. These are estimates, as no measured data is available for this pairing.