SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

33,089 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that combines a highly capable 8-core Zen 4 processor with a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The CPU, a 4 nm Phoenix die with 25,000 million transistors, delivers strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, while the GPU, featuring 12,800 shading units and 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, targets professional rendering and compute workloads. The combined percentile ranking of 91 places this build well above the vast majority of desktop configurations, though the pairing leans heavily toward GPU-centric tasks rather than balanced gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 4.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that makes it an efficient choice for a desktop build. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache, which is modest compared to higher-end Ryzen parts but adequate for the target workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a balanced performance profile. In Cinebench R23, the 8700G scores 17,128 in multi-core and 1,817 in single-core, indicating strong sustained throughput for threaded applications and solid responsiveness for lighter tasks. Geekbench results reinforce this with 14,584 in multi-core and 2,337 in single-core. The 3DMark tests reveal scaling efficiency: 2-thread score of 1,978, 4-thread of 3,825, 8-thread of 6,589, and max-thread of 7,917, showing near-linear gains up to 8 threads and only marginal improvement beyond that, which is typical for an 8-core part. The PassMark multi-thread score of 31,690 and single-thread score of 3,928 align with these findings. The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 83, meaning it outperforms 83% of processors in the database.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the 8700G is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, both with an average score of 33,089 and 33,091 respectively, showing a delta of 0%. It also matches the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, a popular gaming chip, with a delta of 0% (33,079). The only rival with a notable difference is the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, which is 0.3% slower. This means the 8700G offers comparable multi-threaded performance to these alternatives, though it lacks the 3D V-Cache of the 7800X3D, which would impact gaming-specific scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the 8700G's single-thread performance is strong, as evidenced by its 1,817 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 3,928 PassMark single-thread score. However, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU, not a gaming card, so frame rates will be limited by the GPU's driver and architecture focus rather than CPU capability.

Streaming workloads benefit from the 8-core/16-thread configuration, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,128 allowing simultaneous encoding and gameplay without significant CPU bottlenecks. The PassMark data compression score of 386,811 further supports smooth streaming performance.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong performance from the CPU's multi-threaded throughput, with Geekbench multi-core of 14,584 and 3DMark max-thread of 7,917 indicating efficient parallel processing. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth accelerate rendering and effects.

3D rendering is where this pairing excels. The RTX 5000 Ada's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 100 RT cores provide massive compute headroom, while the CPU's 16 threads handle scene preparation and physics. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,693 shows competent CPU rendering for less GPU-dependent tasks.

Software development benefits from the CPU's balanced architecture, with PassMark integer math of 103,107 and floating-point math of 63,815 indicating strong performance for compilation and testing. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with repeated code access patterns.

Student and office work is easily handled, with the 8700G's single-thread score of 1,817 in Cinebench R23 ensuring snappy application responsiveness. The integrated Radeon 780M provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU will dominate in this build.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU's percentile of 83 and the GPU's percentile of 98 mean the GPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data encryption (PassMark score of 22,842), the 8700G will be the limiting factor. In GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or compute, the RTX 5000 Ada will saturate its resources while the CPU waits.

For gaming, the bottleneck depends on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread performance (3,928 PassMark single-thread) may limit frame rates, especially in CPU-heavy titles. At higher resolutions, the GPU's compute power becomes the primary driver, but the workstation-oriented drivers may not optimize for gaming frame rates as effectively as GeForce drivers. The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means these are estimates based on benchmark scores.

The GPU's 250 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP suggest a system total of around 315 W, leaving headroom with a suggested 600 W PSU. This means the power supply is not a bottleneck, but the CPU's 65 W envelope could limit boost clocks under sustained all-core loads, as seen in the 3DMark max-thread score of 7,917 versus 8-thread score of 6,589, which shows only a 20% gain from additional threads beyond 8.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals in 3D rendering, scientific computing, and AI inference, where the RTX 5000 Ada's 32 GB VRAM and 400 tensor cores provide unmatched capacity and throughput. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads handle data preparation and orchestration without becoming a bottleneck in most workloads. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

Gamers at 4K resolution who also need workstation-grade GPU compute could consider this build, but the GPU's architecture is not optimized for gaming frame rates, and the lack of measured FPS data makes performance uncertain. The CPU's performance is sufficient for gaming, as shown by its parity with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in average benchmark scores, but the GPU will not deliver the same frame rates as a GeForce RTX 4090 D, which is only 3.7% slower on average in GPU benchmarks.

Small business workstations handling CAD, simulation, or data analysis will find the combination of 16 threads and 32 GB VRAM compelling. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 31,690 and GPU's OpenCL score of 175,286 indicate strong parallel processing for these tasks. Students in engineering or data science fields could use this build for both coursework and research, though the cost of the GPU may be prohibitive for most.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on benchmark scores. The CPU's gaming capability is solid, with single-thread performance matching the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in average benchmarks, but the GPU's workstation focus means gaming performance will lag behind consumer GeForce cards.

Based on the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 100 RT cores, the RTX 5000 Ada should handle 1440p and 4K gaming at high settings in most titles, but driver optimizations for gaming are not the priority for workstation cards. The 32 GB VRAM provides ample headroom for texture-heavy games, and the 256-bit memory bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth avoids bandwidth bottlenecks. However, the lack of measured FPS data means precise frame rates cannot be stated, and users should expect lower performance than a comparable GeForce card like the RTX 4090 D, which is 3.7% faster on average in GPU benchmarks.

For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,817 in Cinebench R23 should sustain high frame rates, but the GPU's driver overhead may limit maximum FPS. At 4K, the GPU's compute power becomes the primary factor, and the RTX 5000 Ada's raw throughput should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though not at the level of dedicated gaming GPUs.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD102 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors. It features 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1155 MHz and boosts to 2550 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute performance is substantial: FP32 and FP16 both reach 65.28 TFLOPS, with pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s. The GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 98, placing it in the top 2% of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 184,664 includes Geekbench OpenCL of 175,286 and Vulkan of 194,041.

Comparing to rivals, the RTX 5000 Ada is 0.5% faster than the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (average score 183,725), 1.3% faster than the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147), 1.4% faster than the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109), and 3.7% faster than the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050). This places it firmly in the upper echelon of GPU performance, though the gap to consumer cards is narrower than expected, suggesting the workstation premium is not primarily about raw speed but about features like 32 GB VRAM and driver certification.

The 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU indicate power efficiency is reasonable for the performance level. The dual-slot design and 267 mm length make it compatible with most ATX cases, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor professional setups.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 33,089, with a percentile of 83. Its best scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core of 17,128 and single-core of 1,817, PassMark multi-thread of 31,690 and single-thread of 3,928, and Geekbench multi-core of 14,584. The GPU's average benchmark score is 184,664, with a percentile of 98, driven by Geekbench OpenCL of 175,286 and Vulkan of 194,041.

The combined percentile of 91 reflects the GPU's dominance in this pairing. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its score, indicating the 8700G sits at a performance plateau where incremental gains are minimal. The GPU's nearest rivals include the A100 SXM4 variants, which are data-center focused, and the RTX 4090 D, which is a consumer card, showing the RTX 5000 Ada bridges workstation and high-end consumer performance.

For real workloads, this means the CPU will handle most tasks competently but not exceptionally, while the GPU will excel in compute-heavy applications. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 386,811 and extended instructions score of 29,067 indicate strong performance in data processing, while the GPU's tensor cores (400) and RT cores (100) accelerate AI and ray tracing workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700G scores 17,128 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with an average benchmark score of 33,089, which is exactly tied with the Intel Core i7-13650HX (33,089) and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33,091), and 0.3% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33,201).

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics usable in this build?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 8700G includes the Radeon 780M integrated graphics, which can serve as a fallback display output or for basic tasks, though the discrete RTX 5000 Ada will handle all demanding workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to consumer cards?

A: The GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 98, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. It is 3.7% faster than the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050) and 0.5% faster than the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725).

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, which accommodates the GPU's 250 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP, leaving headroom for other components.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 8700G does not support ECC memory, despite being paired with a workstation GPU.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance for gaming?

A: The CPU scores 1,817 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3,928 in PassMark single-thread, which is competitive with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (average score 33,079, delta 0%), though gaming frame rates depend on the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700G uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no bottleneck on the bus interface. The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking within the 65 W TDP envelope, though the boost clock of 5.10 GHz is already high.

The motherboard platform supports future AM5 processors, so upgrading to a higher-core-count Ryzen 9 part would be possible without changing the board. The GPU uses a 1x 16-pin power connector and fits in a dual-slot, 267 mm length, so most cases with adequate clearance will work. The 600 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a CPU upgrade that might increase power draw, but a GPU upgrade to a more power-hungry card would likely require a larger PSU.

The memory support for DDR5 means users can upgrade to higher-capacity or faster kits, though the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is fixed by the dual-channel controller. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes limit storage to Gen 4 NVMe drives, which is sufficient for most workloads. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core CPU like a Ryzen 9, which would improve multi-threaded performance in CPU-bound tasks, while the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 400 tensor cores are already near the top of the range, so a GPU upgrade would only be necessary for future workloads requiring more than 32 GB VRAM.