SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700G

33,089 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing is a study in extreme asymmetry. The data shows a combined percentile of 86, but this is a configuration where the CPU’s integrated graphics are irrelevant and its 8-core Zen 4 architecture is the definitive limiting factor for the GPU’s massive compute capacity. For gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 4090 will dominate the frame rate, but for CPU-bound tasks, the 8700G will cap performance. This is not a balanced system; it is a high-end GPU strapped to a mid-range APU, and every workload analysis must account for this bottleneck.

Balance and Bottleneck

The most critical bottleneck in this configuration is the CPU, specifically in gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The Ryzen 7 8700G scores 1010 in 3dMark single-thread and 1978 in 3dMark 2-thread tests. While these are respectable scores, they are the ceiling for thread-starved workloads. The RTX 4090, with an 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute rating, is capable of rendering at extremely high resolutions and frame rates, but its performance in any game that relies on a single or dual-core game thread will be constrained by the CPU’s single-core throughput. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: the CPU scores 3825 in 4-thread, 6589 in 8-thread, and 7917 in max-thread tests. This indicates that the CPU scales well up to 8 cores, but the jump from 8 to 16 threads yields only 1328 points, suggesting diminishing returns and a hard limit on multi-core scaling.

In contrast, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck for the CPU in massively parallel tasks. The RTX 4090’s PassMark GPU Compute score of 26613 dwarfs the CPU’s PassMark Multithread score of 31690, but the sheer volume of work the GPU can process means that in tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will be waiting for the GPU to finish, or vice versa, depending on the pipeline. The 8700G’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17128 is solid for an 8-core part, but it is not enough to feed the RTX 4090’s 512 tensor cores and 128 RT cores in complex AI or ray-traced workloads. The bottleneck is contextual: the CPU limits high-frequency gaming and physics calculations, while the GPU limits raw throughput in rendering and compute.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent—no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—but benchmark results indicate that the CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 6589 and single-thread score of 1010 will govern minimum frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 38194 will govern maximum frame rates in graphically intense titles. The data suggests a system that is either GPU-limited at 4K or CPU-limited at 1080p, with no resolution where both components are fully utilized.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on AMD Socket AM5, which provides a clear upgrade path within the same motherboard generation. The Ryzen 7 8700G is a Zen 4 (Phoenix) part, and the AM5 socket supports future generations, though the FACT PACK does not specify which ones. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which is the standard for this platform. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU does not support ECC memory, which is typical for a consumer desktop part.

The PCIe configuration is a notable limitation. The CPU provides Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only), while the RTX 4090 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU is running at the correct bandwidth, but the CPU’s total lane count is limited. The RTX 4090 uses 16 of those lanes, leaving only 4 lanes for other devices, which can be a bottleneck for multiple NVMe drives or high-speed expansion cards. The GPU has a TDP of 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low, but the combination of a 450 W GPU and a 65 W CPU means the system can draw significant power under load, so the 850 W PSU rating is a necessary headroom.

A sensible next upgrade is the CPU. The 8700G’s 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for most tasks, but its performance is only 0% delta from the Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, meaning it is on par with those parts. However, for this GPU, a higher-core-count AM5 CPU would be a more balanced pairing, as the current CPU’s single-thread score of 1010 and max-thread score of 7917 are the primary limiters. The motherboard and memory do not need upgrading; the DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 4 are adequate for the RTX 4090. The upgrade path is straightforward: swap the CPU for a higher-tier AM5 part without changing the platform.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data shows this system is capable of high-refresh gaming, but the CPU will be the limiter at lower resolutions. The RTX 4090’s 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth can push massive frame rates, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 1010 and 2-thread score of 1978 will cap performance in games that are not well-threaded. At 1440p and above, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck, allowing the CPU to keep up. This is a 1440p and 4K high-refresh machine, not a 1080p esports machine.

Streaming: The CPU’s PassMark Data Encryption score of 22842 and Data Compression score of 386811 indicate strong performance for encoding and compression tasks. The RTX 4090’s NVENC (not specified in the pack, but implied by the architecture) and 512 tensor cores can handle video encoding offload. The CPU has enough headroom with 16 threads to handle streaming overhead while gaming, but the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17128 suggests that simultaneous gaming and streaming at high bitrates may cause frame drops in CPU-bound games.

Video Editing: This workload is a mixed bag. The CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 14584 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17128 are decent for 8-core parts, but the RTX 4090’s PassMark GPU Compute score of 26613 and FP32 82.58 TFLOPS will accelerate rendering and effects. The 24 GB VRAM is excellent for large timelines and 8K footage. The bottleneck is the CPU during timeline scrubbing and codec decoding, where the 8700G’s single-thread score of 1010 will be felt.

3D Rendering: The RTX 4090 is the star here. Its 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores, combined with a texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s, will dominate ray-traced and GPU-accelerated renders. The CPU’s role is secondary, but its Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2693 and PassMark Floating Point Math score of 63815 will handle physics and simulation. This is a strong rendering machine, but the CPU will slow down CPU-only renderers.

Software Development: The CPU’s PassMark Integer Math score of 103107 and Extended Instructions score of 29067 indicate strong performance for compilation and code execution. The 16 threads and 16 MB of shared L3 cache are sufficient for most build tasks. The RTX 4090 is overkill for this scenario, but it will accelerate GPU compute tasks like machine learning training, where its 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 is a significant asset.

Student and Office Work: This is massively overprovisioned. The CPU’s PassMark Single Thread score of 3928 and the GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 1299 are more than enough for office productivity. The system will be idle most of the time, and the 65 W CPU TDP ensures low power draw, but the 450 W GPU TDP means the system is not energy-efficient for light tasks. For a student, the integrated Radeon 780M graphics would suffice, making the RTX 4090 a waste of resources.

Who Should Build It

This build targets a narrow audience: gamers and creators who prioritize GPU performance at 4K or high-refresh 1440p, and who do not play CPU-intensive esports titles. The data shows the RTX 4090 is the top-tier GPU, with a percentile of 88, and the 8700G is a mid-range CPU with a percentile of 83. For gamers at 4K, the GPU will be the bottleneck, and the CPU will be adequate. For content creators using GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender or DaVinci Resolve, the RTX 4090’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are ideal.

Developers working on GPU compute or AI projects will benefit from the 512 tensor cores and 82.58 TFLOPS FP16 performance. Students and office workers should not build this system; the data shows the CPU’s integrated graphics are sufficient for their needs, and the RTX 4090 adds no value for word processing or spreadsheets. Small business workstations that require CAD or 3D modeling will see a benefit, but the CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache and 8 cores are not ideal for large assembly models. The target user is someone who wants the fastest GPU possible and accepts that the CPU is a placeholder for a future upgrade.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. It is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and includes the Radeon 780M integrated graphics.

Benchmark scores show a processor that is strong in single-thread and decent in multi-thread. The 3dmark single-thread score of 1010 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1817 indicate high per-core performance, which is important for legacy or poorly-threaded applications. The multi-core scores are less impressive: Cinebench R23 multicore is 17128, and Geekbench multicore is 14584. The PassMark Multithread score of 31690 places it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, but its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13650HX (0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0% delta), which are mobile and gaming-focused parts, respectively. The 8700G’s performance is on par with these, but it is not a high-end desktop part.

The CPU’s real-world meaning is that it is a capable mid-range processor for gaming and productivity, but it is not a workstation-class chip. The PassMark Data Encryption score of 22842 and Data Compression score of 386811 show it handles security and compression tasks well. The Find Prime Numbers score of 103 is low, indicating weak integer-heavy single-thread performance in specific workloads. The CPU is a good all-rounder, but it is the bottleneck in this system.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4090’s PassMark G3D score of 38194 and the CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 6589 suggest that at 4K resolution, the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates, and the CPU will be sufficient to maintain 60 FPS in most titles. At 1440p, the CPU may start to limit performance in CPU-bound games, where the single-thread score of 1010 and 2-thread score of 1978 will be the ceiling. At 1080p, the CPU will likely be the bottleneck, preventing the RTX 4090 from reaching its full potential in esports titles.

The RTX 4090’s 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are ideal for 4K textures and high-detail settings. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s indicate it can handle extreme resolutions and geometry. For ray-traced games, the 128 RT cores will accelerate performance, but the CPU’s single-thread score will still govern the game’s physics and AI. The estimated FPS for this system is high at 4K, with the GPU being the limiting factor, but at 1080p, the CPU will cap frame rates, making the RTX 4090’s power wasted. This is a 4K gaming system, not a competitive 1080p one.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33089, and its percentile is 83. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60347, and its percentile is 88. The combined percentile is 86. The CPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13650HX (0% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (0% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0% delta), indicating it is precisely average for its class. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3% delta), which are professional parts, not gaming GPUs.

The CPU scores are spread across various tests: 3dmark scores range from 1010 (single) to 7918 (16 threads), Cinebench R23 scores are 1817 (single) and 17128 (multi), and PassMark scores include 103107 for integer math and 63815 for floating point. The GPU scores are dominated by the PassMark G3D score of 38194 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 255416. The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the dominant component, with a 88th percentile rank, and the CPU is a supporting player at the 83rd percentile. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9223 for the GPU indicates strong DX12 performance, while the CPU’s 3dmark max threads score of 7917 is a modest multi-thread result.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary bottleneck in this system?

A: The data shows the CPU is the primary bottleneck for gaming and lightly-threaded tasks, with a single-thread score of 1010, while the GPU is the bottleneck for compute-heavy workloads, with a PassMark GPU Compute score of 26613.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the RTX 4090’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K, and its PassMark G3D score of 38194 is high, but the CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 6589 may limit performance in CPU-bound titles.

Q: Is the CPU good for video editing?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17128 and Geekbench multicore score of 14584 are decent, but the RTX 4090’s GPU Compute score of 26613 will accelerate rendering, making the CPU sufficient but not ideal.

Q: What memory does this CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, but it does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The RTX 4090 has a TDP of 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its rivals?

A: The CPU has a 0% delta from the Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, and a -0.3% delta from the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, indicating it is on par with these parts.

Q: Is the integrated graphics on the CPU useful?

A: The Radeon 780M integrated graphics are present, but the RTX 4090 is the primary GPU, making the integrated graphics irrelevant for this build.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is an Ada Lovelace architecture GPU, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a chip size of 609 mm² and 76,300 million transistors. It has 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The GPU includes 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and AI workloads. The base clock is 2235 MHz, and the boost clock is 2520 MHz. The memory is 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s.

The benchmark scores are high. The PassMark G3D score is 38194, and the PassMark GPU Compute score is 26613. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 255416, and the Vulkan score is 271631. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 9223. The GPU’s percentile is 88, and its average score is 60347. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3% delta), which are professional-grade cards, not direct gaming competitors.

For rendering, the RTX 4090 is a powerhouse. The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced and AI-accelerated workloads. The FP32 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1) are exceptional for compute tasks. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s ensure it can handle high-resolution textures and geometry. The 24 GB VRAM is beneficial for large 3D scenes and 8K video editing. The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, but it remains a top-tier part. The data shows it is overkill for most users, but for those who need maximum compute performance, it is a capable choice.