SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 form a desktop-class pairing that sits at the 66th combined percentile against all CPU+GPU builds, with the processor contributing an 82nd percentile rank among all CPUs and the graphics card landing at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This is a configurator-level estimate, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data; all gaming figures below are projections derived from the component benchmark scores rather than empirical frame captures.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance tier?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F scores 26,646 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 11,191 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 30,746, which is within 0.9% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30,468) and 0.6% above the Intel Core i5-13600H (30,548).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS with an average score of 30,879, which is 0.4% higher than the 8700F. The Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31,028, 0.9% higher. The 8700F sits between these two, with the Intel Core i5-13600H and Core Ultra 5 225T both slightly lower (0.6% and 0.9% below, respectively).

Q: What memory and expansion features does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F uses AMD Socket AM5, supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, matching the platform’s available lanes.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No. The integrated graphics field is listed as “N/A,” meaning this processor relies entirely on a discrete GPU for display output. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 fills that role in this build.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How does the GPU rank among all graphics cards?

A: The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating a mid-pack position. It has no benchmark scores or nearest rivals listed in the data, so its ranking is based on its hardware specifications rather than measured tests.

Q: What is the combined build percentile?

A: The CPU+GPU combination achieves a combined percentile of 66, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all tracked desktop pairings. The CPU’s 82nd percentile drives this result, while the GPU’s 50th percentile pulls the overall figure downward.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform begins with the AMD Socket AM5, which supports the Ryzen 7 8700F’s 8 cores and 16 threads. The CPU uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a 65 W TDP. Memory support covers dual-channel DDR5 with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the integrated memory controller does not support ECC. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses via a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s 150 W TDP and lack of power connectors (listed as “None”) suggest it draws power through the board, so PSU headroom is not specified in the data; however, the CPU’s 65 W TDP plus the GPU’s 150 W TDP indicate a modest total draw for a desktop system.

A sensible next upgrade would involve the GPU, given that it sits at the 50th percentile while the CPU sits much higher. Swapping the 16 GB RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 for a higher-percentile card would better match the CPU’s 82nd percentile capability in GPU-bound workloads. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory beyond the dual-channel base would not change bandwidth, but increasing capacity could help memory-heavy tasks. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the 65 W TDP limits headroom without a capable cooler. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 support means any future GPU using PCIe 4.0 or earlier will work without bottlenecking the interface.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,008 in 3DMark and 3,761 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates strong per-core performance, which supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s 50th percentile rank, however, limits the ceiling; at 1080p or 1440p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely become the limiting factor in demanding games, so high-refresh (144 Hz+) gaming is possible in esports titles but may require lower settings in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,883 and max-thread score of 7,861, provide enough parallel throughput for encoding alongside gameplay. The GPU’s 304 tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding features, though the 50th percentile GPU rank suggests that simultaneous gaming and encoding at high bitrates may strain the graphics card in graphically intense scenes.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 26,646 and Geekbench multi-core of 13,523 position the CPU well for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth handle large frame buffers and effects, but its 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance is mid-range, so GPU-accelerated effects will process slower than top-tier cards.

3D rendering: The CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 62,629 and integer math score of 100,371 indicate strong CPU-based rendering throughput. The GPU’s 9,728 shading units and 304 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI denoising, but its 50th percentile rank means render times will be average compared to other GPUs.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 378,160 and random string sorting score of 45,425 show solid performance in compile and data-processing tasks. The 16 threads allow parallel builds, and the 82nd percentile CPU rank ensures fast compilation. The GPU is less relevant for most development workloads unless targeting graphics or machine learning.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3,872 and 2-thread 3DMark score of 1,989 handle everyday productivity with ease. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but the 65 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP keep the system efficient for sustained use. The 82nd percentile CPU rank means spreadsheet, browser, and document workloads will never strain the processor.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates will appreciate the CPU’s 82nd percentile single-thread performance, though they should expect the GPU’s 50th percentile rank to limit ultra settings in modern titles. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s 26,646 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM for timeline scrubbing and previews, but final renders will be slower than with higher-tier GPUs. Software developers compiling large codebases will see fast iteration times from the 16 threads and 100,371 PassMark integer math score. Students and office workers get a responsive system for daily tasks, with the CPU’s 3,872 PassMark single-thread score ensuring snappy application launches. Small business workstations handling data processing or light 3D modeling can leverage the CPU’s 378,160 data compression score and the GPU’s 304 tensor cores for AI inference, though the 50th percentile GPU rank suggests avoiding heavy GPU rendering workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU ranks at the 82nd percentile while the GPU ranks at the 50th. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (378,160 PassMark), integer math (100,371), and multi-threaded rendering (26,646 Cinebench R23), the processor will operate near its full potential. In GPU-bound workloads such as high-resolution gaming or ray-traced rendering, the GPU’s mid-pack position will limit overall performance. For gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score (1,008 in 3DMark single-thread) can push frame rates high, but the GPU may cap FPS in graphically intensive scenes. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, as its 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 are modest by current standards. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 150 W TDP mean neither component is thermally constrained, so the bottleneck is purely performance-based. The 3DMark thread scaling — from 1,989 at 2 threads to 7,883 at 16 threads — shows near-linear scaling, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU consistently in multi-threaded games.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 uses the AD103 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It packs 9,728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. The base clock is 930 MHz with a boost of 1680 MHz. Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU’s FP32 throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). Pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. The 76 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, while the 304 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has no benchmark scores in the data, so its 50th percentile rank comes from specification comparisons. For rendering, the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 places it in the mid-range of desktop GPUs; 3D artists will find it capable for real-time viewports but slower than high-end cards for final frame rendering. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for large textures and multi-app workflows, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution assets without stuttering.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Base clock is 4.10 GHz with a 5.00 GHz boost. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it is unlocked for overclocking. Single-thread performance is strong: 1,008 in 3DMark single-thread, 3,761 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 2,290 in Geekbench single-core. Multi-threaded scores are equally robust: 26,646 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 13,523 in Geekbench multi-core, and 30,893 in PassMark multithread. The 3DMark scaling from 1,989 (2 threads) to 7,883 (16 threads) shows efficient core utilization. PassMark data encryption scores 22,117 and extended instructions score 28,474, indicating solid AES and AVX performance. The 82nd percentile rank among all CPUs confirms it outperforms most processors, including its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (0.4% higher), Intel Core i7-13700TE (0.9% higher), Intel Core i5-13600H (0.6% lower), and Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (0.9% lower). For real workloads, this translates to fast compilation, quick video exports, and responsive general computing.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F (desktop class, 8 cores, 16 threads, Zen 4) with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 (16 GB GDDR6, Ada Lovelace). The combined percentile is 66, placing it above the median desktop pairing. The CPU’s 82nd percentile is the highlight, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is the weaker link. The platform uses AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4. The build class is desktop, and the GPU is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor with no power connectors, suggesting a board-integrated design despite the desktop classification. This is a mid-range pairing: the CPU can handle high-end productivity tasks, but the GPU limits gaming and rendering performance to average levels.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30,746, with a percentile rank of 82 among all CPUs. Key scores include: Cinebench R23 multi-core 26,646, single-core 3,761; Geekbench multi-core 13,523, single-core 2,290; 3DMark max-threads 7,861, single-thread 1,008; PassMark multithread 30,893, single-thread 3,872. The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, so its 50th percentile rank is derived from hardware specifications alone. The combined percentile of 66 reflects the CPU’s strength offsetting the GPU’s mediocrity. The nearest CPU rivals are all within 0.9% of the 8700F’s average score, indicating that the processor is competitively positioned in its tier. The GPU’s lack of benchmark data means no direct performance comparison can be made; the 50th percentile is a specification-based estimate.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements. At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1,008 in 3DMark suggests it can sustain high frame rates in CPU-light games, but the GPU’s 50th percentile rank (with 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth) will likely cap frame rates in demanding titles around mid-range levels — expect playable but not exceptional performance in AAA games. At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the primary limiter; the 16 GB VRAM helps with texture quality, but the 112 ROPs and 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate moderate fill-rate capacity. At 4K ultra, the GPU’s 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for high-fidelity textures at high frame rates; estimates place 4K performance at low-to-mid 30s FPS in most modern titles. Esports titles like competitive shooters will run well due to the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p, but this is speculative without measured data. The CPU’s 16 threads ensure consistent frame pacing in multi-threaded games, but the GPU’s mid-pack position means users should target 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings for smooth gameplay.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds