SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a desktop-class combination that leans on a strong mid-to-upper-tier CPU and a power-efficient workstation GPU. The Ryzen 7 8700F sits in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs benchmarked in the database, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada lands at the 50th percentile among GPUs, producing a combined percentile of 66. This is an unusual pairing: a retail desktop processor matched with an embedded-oriented Ada Lovelace graphics solution, which shapes both its strengths and its limits. No measured frame-rate data exists in the database for this exact combination, so all gaming discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than recorded gameplay.

FAQ

Q: What CPU is in this build and how does it rank?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F, an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor on the 4 nm TSMC node. It ranks in the 82nd percentile against all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 30,746.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8700F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The data shows it is essentially locked in a dead heat with its closest competitors. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 0.4 percent higher on average, the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 0.6 percent lower, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 0.9 percent lower, and the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 0.9 percent higher. All four rivals sit within a one-percent band.

Q: What GPU is paired with it?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, built on the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, 9,728 shading units, 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, and a 120 W TDP. It ranks at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs in the database.

Q: Is there measured game frame-rate data for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming figures and expectations discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a listed memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How much power does the CPU draw?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F has a TDP of 65 W, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The GPU adds a 120 W TDP on top of that.

Q: Was this a launch MSRP part at a known price point?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F carried a launch MSRP of $270. No launch MSRP figure is listed for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU-side picture is well-populated with scores. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 7 8700F posts a multi-core score of 26,646 and a single-core score of 3,761 — a ratio that reflects a balanced design where one strong core does not come at the expense of all-out throughput. Cinebench R20 returns 11,191 multi-core and 1,579 single-core, while the older R15 run yields 2,685 multi-core and 378 single-core. Geekbench shows 13,523 multi-core and 2,290 single-core, and Passmark records a single-thread score of 3,872 against a multithread score of 30,893.

The 3DMark CPU scaling data tells a clear story about thread utilization. Scores climb from 1,008 in the single-thread test to 1,989 at two threads, 3,839 at four threads, and 6,559 at eight threads. The sixteen-thread result of 7,883 is nearly identical to the max-threads score of 7,861, confirming that the chip saturates its full thread count effectively and that no additional headroom exists beyond sixteen threads — as expected from an 8-core, 16-thread design.

Placed against all CPUs, this is a 82nd-percentile performer with an average benchmark score of 30,746. The nearestRivals data indicates the competition is extremely tight: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS leads by 0.4 percent, the Intel Core i7-13700TE by 0.9 percent, while the Intel Core i5-13600H and Core Ultra 5 225T trail by 0.6 and 0.9 percent respectively. In practice, this means the 8700F delivers effectively identical aggregate performance to a cluster of mobile and efficiency-tuned parts — a notable result for a 65 W desktop CPU.

The GPU side is thinner on hard benchmark rows: the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation carries no benchmark scores in this pack, and its average benchmark score is listed as zero because no data was recorded. What the data does establish is its 50th-percentile position against all GPUs and its raw specification sheet: 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 510.7 GTexel/s of texture rate, 188.2 GPixel/s of pixel rate, and 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth across a 256-bit bus. The combined build percentile of 66 reflects a CPU pulling the pairing upward against a GPU sitting squarely at the median of the database.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F is a Phoenix-based Zen 4 part, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process, packing 25,000 million transistors into a 178 mm² die. Eight cores and sixteen threads run at a 4.10 GHz base clock with boosts to 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus a shared 16 MB L3. Integrated graphics are absent — the "F" suffix in the part name marks it as a graphics-disabled variant — which makes a discrete GPU mandatory and explains why this build pairs with an embedded Ada card at all.

What do the numbers mean for real workloads? The single-core figures — 3,761 in Cinebench R23, 2,290 in Geekbench, 3,872 in Passmark — place the chip comfortably among strong modern performers for lightly threaded tasks. Applications that favor clock speed and per-core throughput, such as most office software, browsers, and development toolchains, will feel responsive. On the throughput side, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,646 and a Passmark multithread score of 30,893 indicate that the eight cores hold their own in rendering, compilation, and batch processing, even if higher-core-count desktop parts sit further up the percentile ladder.

The 3DMark thread-scaling table quantifies where parallelism pays off. Going from one thread to four multiplies the score roughly fourfold — 1,008 to 3,839 — near-linear scaling that benefits games, which historically load between four and eight threads. The step from four to eight threads (3,839 to 6,559) remains strong, and doubling again to sixteen threads adds a final increment to 7,883. For game engines and creative applications alike, this curve means the CPU rarely becomes the weak link in moderately parallel work.

The specialized Passmark subtests add texture. The integer math score of 100,371 and floating point score of 62,629 point to solid computational throughput, data compression reached 378,160, data encryption 22,117, extended instructions 28,474, random string sorting 45,425, and the physics test 1,553. The find-prime-numbers result of 98 is a reminder that brute-force integer workloads with long dependency chains are not this design's specialty. The unlocked multiplier leaves tuning headroom for users who want to push beyond the stock profile, and the modest 65 W TDP means thermal management demands stay reasonable.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 memory support in a dual-channel arrangement, delivering 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU — enough for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface plus a fast NVMe SSD, though the lane budget rules out exotic multi-drive, multi-card configurations at full link width. ECC memory is not supported, which removes one workstation checkbox for users who need error-checked memory.

Power headroom is generous. The CPU's 65 W TDP plus the GPU's 120 W TDP leaves substantial room within any reasonable desktop PSU, and the fact pack lists no suggestedPsu figure for the GPU — consistent with its embedded nature and its lack of external power connectors. That absence of power connectors is itself an upgrade-path consideration: this is not a card that drops into a standard retail channel build, and anyone assembling around it is likely working with an integrator system or a specialty chassis.

A sensible next upgrade depends on which percentile bothers the owner more. The GPU's 50th-percentile standing is the lower of the two, so graphics is the logical first target for a gaming-oriented refresh. Because AM5 is the socket, the CPU can also be swapped for a higher-tier Ryzen part later without replacing the motherboard — a genuine advantage of this platform. Users constrained by the 16 MB of shared L3 or the eight-core ceiling in heavy rendering workloads would see gains from such a move.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 66 sits below the CPU's individual 82nd percentile and above the GPU's 50th — the arithmetic signature of an imbalanced pairing, with the GPU as the limiting component. In graphically demanding games at higher resolutions, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada will cap frame rates well before the Ryzen 7 8700F runs out of CPU performance. The 3DMark CPU data supports this: with strong four- and eight-thread scores of 3,839 and 6,559, the processor can feed frames faster than a median-ranked GPU can render them in most modern titles.

Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios — simulation-heavy games, streaming encodes on the CPU, code compilation — the 8700F's scores become the ceiling, and the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth sit partially idle. The Passmark data compression result of 378,160 and multithread score of 30,893 indicate file-heavy workflows will complete quickly regardless of graphics performance.

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this pairing, the bottleneck assessment rests entirely on the percentile gap: a CPU in the 82nd percentile driving a GPU in the 50th produces a machine that is CPU-strong and GPU-median, and any user satisfied with the graphics output has processing headroom to spare.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can clearly sustain high frame delivery, but the GPU's median percentile position means high-refresh play at demanding quality settings is estimated to be inconsistent, particularly at higher resolutions. At esports-style settings, the 8700F's excellent four-to-eight-thread scaling suggests the processor will not be the obstacle.

Streaming: With sixteen threads, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,646, and a Passmark multithread result of 30,893, simultaneous gameplay and encode is within reach. The 3DMark sixteen-thread score of 7,883 indicates the CPU can spread a game plus background encode across its full thread count.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and playback lean on single-core snap — 3,761 in Cinebench R23 single-core — while exports use the multi-core score of 26,646. The GPU's 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores are relevant for accelerated effects, and 16 GB of GDDR6 gives editing software room for GPU-accelerated previews.

3D rendering: Cinebench is the direct proxy here, and scores of 11,191 in R20 and 26,646 in R23 describe a mid-tier rendering performer. The 82nd CPU percentile helps, but professionals running long render farms will notice the eight-core limit relative to higher-thread-count parts.

Software development: Compilation is a classic multi-core workload, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 13,523 plus the near-linear thread scaling in 3DMark indicate quick build times. The single-core score of 2,290 keeps IDE responsiveness high, and 16 GB of system-friendly platform features via AM5 and DDR5 round out a capable developer box.

Student and office work: This is overkill in the best way. Single-thread Passmark of 3,872 means documents, browsers, and video calls feel instant, and the 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool under daily load.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: no measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact combination, so every figure and expectation in this section is an estimate derived from benchmark scores, not recorded gameplay.

What the scores permit is a reasoned projection. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth describe hardware that handles modern titles at 1080p and 1440p comfortably at high settings, with 4K ultra play plausible in less demanding engines thanks to the 256-bit bus and 16 GB frame buffer. The 76 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support mean ray-traced effects are available, though the 50th-percentile ranking suggests enabling them fully will cost significant frame rate.

The CPU side will not be the constraint. With an 82nd-percentile ranking, a single-thread 3DMark score of 1,008, and robust scaling through eight threads, the 8700F can drive frame rates above what the GPU is estimated to deliver at ultra settings. CPU-bound titles — large-scale strategy and simulation games — are where the processor's numbers matter most, and those numbers are strong.

Users wanting certainty should treat all of this as directional. The pairing's combined percentile of 66 frames the realistic expectation: solid mainstream gaming performance, estimated well above entry level but short of high-end flagship territory, with the GPU as the definitive performance governor.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, per the buildClass field, combining a retail AMD desktop processor with an NVIDIA embedded-focused workstation GPU. The CPU is the senior partner: the Ryzen 7 8700F's 82nd percentile versus all CPUs, its average benchmark score of 30,746, and its tight rivalry with the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, Core i5-13600H, Core Ultra 5 225T, and Core i7-13700TE — all within a percent — establish it as a proven upper-mainstream performer.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation contributes a serious specification pedigree: the AD103 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, 45,900 million transistors across 379 mm², 9,728 shading units, and a 120 W TDP with no external power connectors. Its 50th-percentile GPU ranking places it at the database median, with the predecessor architecture listed as Ampere-MW and the successor as Blackwell-MW.

The combined percentile of 66 defines the build's overall tier: a mid-tier machine elevated by CPU strength and defined at the median by its graphics. Production status is Active for both components, and the CPU's release date is listed as 2024, the GPU's as 2023, making this a contemporary pairing by database records.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p are the natural fit: the GPU's estimated ultra-settings output at those resolutions aligns with its median ranking, while the 8700F's thread scaling guarantees the CPU will never throttle the experience. High-refresh competitive players benefit most, since lower graphical presets shift the load onto the CPU, where this build holds an 82nd-percentile advantage.

Content creators working with video will appreciate the 26,646 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for exports and the 16 GB of GPU memory for accelerated workflows. Streaming creators get the same sixteen-thread headroom. 3D artists doing moderate-scale rendering can rely on the 11,191 R20 and 26,646 R23 results, understanding that longer render jobs favor higher-core machines.

Software developers — particularly those compiling large codebases — are well served by the Geekbench multi-core score of 13,523 and Passmark multithread figure of 30,893. Students and small business workstation users get a fast, efficient machine with a 65 W CPU TDP that keeps acoustics and thermals manageable. What this build is not: a flagship 4K ultra gaming rig or a many-core rendering station. Within its mid-tier lane — CPU-strong, GPU-median, combined at the 66th percentile — the data describes a capable, modern, and well-balanced-for-work desktop.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds