SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation combination pairs a mainstream 8-core desktop processor with a top-tier professional workstation GPU. The data positions this build at the 90th percentile overall, indicating a system designed for demanding professional workloads where GPU compute power is paramount, rather than a balanced consumer gaming rig.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename) built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power requirements modest for a desktop part. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache, which is modest for the desktop segment but adequate for the processor's target workloads.

Benchmark results show a processor with strong single-threaded performance and respectable multi-threaded scaling. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3761 indicate that the Zen 4 architecture delivers efficient instruction execution, which translates to responsive system operation and solid performance in lightly threaded applications. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1989 shows that even with just two threads active, the processor maintains high per-core throughput.

Scaling from 2 to 16 threads is nearly linear but not perfect. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6559 is approximately 71% of the max-threads score of 7861, suggesting some diminishing returns occur beyond 8 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 is approximately 7 times the single-core score, which for a 16-thread processor indicates excellent parallel scaling efficiency across all cores. The PassMark multithread score of 30893 confirms this, though the PassMark integer math score of 100371 and floating-point math score of 62629 show that the processor handles different workload types with varying degrees of efficiency.

The processor's 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the upper tier of available processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, scores marginally higher with an average score of 30879, representing a 0.4% difference that is essentially negligible. The Intel Core i5-13600H scores 0.6% lower, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T trails by 0.9%. This clustering around the 30500-31000 score range indicates that the 8700F sits in a highly competitive performance band where architectural differences produce minimal real-world separation.

For real workloads, the 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate data throughput for most applications. The 4 nm process node allows the 5.00 GHz boost clock to be sustained without excessive power draw, making the processor suitable for sustained multi-threaded workloads despite its relatively compact 178 mm² die size containing 25,000 million transistors.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures presented in this section are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking indicates strong gaming potential, particularly in titles that favor single-threaded performance. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 and PassMark single-thread score of 3872 suggest that the processor can feed a high-end GPU without becoming a limiting factor in most scenarios. However, the GPU's 98th percentile ranking vastly exceeds the CPU's percentile, creating a significant imbalance that will manifest in gaming workloads.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's Geekbench Vulkan score of 194041 and OpenCL score of 175286 are exceptional, but these are compute-oriented benchmarks rather than gaming-specific metrics. The GPU's 12800 shading units and 400 tensor cores provide immense raw compute power that games can leverage for rendering, but the workstation-class design prioritizes precision and professional validation over the gaming optimizations found in consumer GeForce parts.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU's strong single-thread performance would likely support high frame rates in most titles, but the GPU's sheer power means the processor may become the bottleneck in less demanding games. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 32 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate would allow for maximum settings with high texture quality without memory capacity concerns, but the frame rates would be limited by the CPU's ability to issue draw calls.

The estimated gaming performance suggests that this combination would deliver excellent frame rates at 1440p and 4K in most titles, with the CPU potentially limiting performance at 1080p in CPU-bound scenarios. The lack of measured FPS data makes precise estimates impossible, but the component scores indicate a system that could handle demanding games while also excelling at professional rendering tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 90th, indicating it outperforms 90% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8700F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS?

A: The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS has an average benchmark score of 30879, which is 0.4% higher than the 8700F's average score of 30746. This difference is within measurement noise and effectively makes them performance equals.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation features 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for certain professional workstation applications that require error-correcting memory.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU also utilizes PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184664, which is 0.5% higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's score of 183725. The RTX 5000 Ada is also 1.3% faster than the A100 SXM4 40 GB variant.

Q: What is the processor's release date and launch MSRP?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F was released on March 31, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $270.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 and 8-thread score of 6559 provide sufficient processing power for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU's workstation-class architecture and the lack of measured FPS data make precise frame rate estimates unreliable. The 98th percentile GPU ranking suggests excellent graphical capability, though the processor's 82nd percentile ranking may limit performance in CPU-bound titles.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a PassMark multithread score of 30893 provides adequate headroom for encoding while gaming, though the lack of integrated graphics (N/A) means no Quick Sync equivalent is available. The CPU's 4 nm process and 65 W TDP keep thermal and power overhead low during simultaneous workloads.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 and Geekbench multicore score of 13523 indicate strong performance for video editing software that utilizes multiple cores. The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory for large timelines and effects, while the 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles GPU-accelerated effects efficiently.

3D rendering: This is where the combination excels. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking with 12800 shading units and 100 RT cores delivers exceptional rendering performance, while the CPU's 16 threads handle scene preparation and physics calculations. The PassMark floating-point math score of 62629 indicates robust CPU compute for simulation tasks.

Software development: The processor's 82nd percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1008) provide responsive compilation and IDE operation. The 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support efficient code compilation, though the lack of ECC memory support may be a concern for critical development environments.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and $270 launch MSRP position this as a power-efficient processor for general productivity, but the GPU's workstation-class price point makes this an overkill configuration for typical office tasks. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3872 ensures snappy application responsiveness.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30746, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, scores 30879, a 0.4% difference. Other close competitors include the Intel Core i5-13600H at 30548 (0.6% lower), Intel Core Ultra 5 225T at 30468 (0.9% lower), and Intel Core i7-13700TE at 31028 (0.9% higher). These tight margins demonstrate that the 8700F sits in a dense performance cluster where architectural differences yield minimal score separation.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 184664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183725, a 0.5% difference. The A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187147 (1.3% higher), the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182109 (1.4% lower), and the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050 (3.7% lower). The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 demonstrate strong compute performance across different API environments.

The combined picture shows a system with a 90th percentile ranking, driven primarily by the GPU's exceptional performance. The CPU's 82nd percentile is respectable but significantly lower than the GPU's 98th percentile, creating a performance asymmetry that will manifest differently across workload types.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets professionals and power users who prioritize GPU compute performance above all else. The 98th percentile GPU ranking with 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute makes this suitable for 3D rendering, scientific computing, and AI inference workloads where the GPU is the primary workhorse.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions would benefit from the GPU's immense rendering power, though the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking may become a limiting factor in CPU-bound titles. The lack of measured FPS data makes specific game recommendations impossible, but the component scores suggest a system capable of high-fidelity gaming.

Content creators working with large video files, complex 3D scenes, or machine learning models would find the 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth essential. The CPU's 16 threads handle encoding and scene management tasks, while the GPU accelerates rendering and effects processing.

Developers working on compute-intensive applications, particularly those leveraging CUDA or Vulkan compute, would benefit from the GPU's 400 tensor cores and 100 RT cores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures responsive compilation and debugging sessions.

Small business workstations requiring reliable professional graphics performance, such as CAD, architectural visualization, or medical imaging, would find this combination suitable, though the lack of ECC memory support may be a limitation for certain fields.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path for the CPU. The processor supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The 65 W TDP leaves substantial thermal headroom within the socket's power delivery capabilities, allowing for future upgrades to higher-core-count processors without necessitating a platform change.

The GPU's 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU provide clear power requirements for system builders. The 1x 16-pin power connector and dual-slot design require a compatible power supply and chassis with adequate clearance. The 267 mm (10.5 inches) length and 112 mm (4.4 inches) height should fit in most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Ryzen processor on the same AM5 socket, which would better balance the system's compute capabilities and reduce the CPU bottleneck in multi-threaded workloads. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully utilized with the CPU's Gen 4 support, and the 32 GB VRAM provides ample headroom for future software demands.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket, while the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace architecture card with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking of 90th indicates this system outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations.

The overall tier from the percentiles places this build in the high-performance segment, driven predominantly by the GPU's exceptional 98th percentile ranking. The CPU's 82nd percentile is respectable but represents the weaker component in this pairing. This is a professional-grade configuration suited for GPU-intensive workloads rather than a balanced consumer system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU (82nd percentile) and GPU (98th percentile) creates a clear bottleneck dynamic. The GPU has sufficient compute power to outperform the CPU in virtually all workloads, meaning the processor will be the limiting factor in most scenarios.

In gaming, the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 and 8-thread score of 6559 will likely limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has excess capacity. The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that the GPU could render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls, resulting in the processor becoming the primary bottleneck.

In GPU-compute workloads such as rendering, the CPU's 16 threads handle scene preparation and physics while the GPU executes the main rendering tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 30893 indicates the CPU can keep the GPU fed with data, but the 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth may limit performance in data-intensive scenarios.

The PassMark data compression score of 378160 and data encryption score of 22117 show that the CPU handles these tasks efficiently, but these are not GPU-accelerated workloads. For tasks that leverage the GPU's tensor cores (400) and RT cores (100), the CPU's role is reduced, and the GPU's 98th percentile performance dominates.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The AD102 chip features 12800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 render output units, delivering a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem consists of 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s bandwidth with an effective memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps). This substantial memory capacity and bandwidth support large datasets and high-resolution textures without performance degradation. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 65.28 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1) compute performance indicates exceptional raw processing capability.

The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, making this GPU suitable for professional rendering with ray-traced lighting and denoising, as well as machine learning inference and training tasks. The 5 nm process node allows the 2550 MHz boost clock to be sustained within the 250 W TDP.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286 and Vulkan score of 194041 place this GPU in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 0.5% lower, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 1.4% lower. The GeForce RTX 4090 D, a consumer gaming card, trails by 3.7%, demonstrating that this workstation GPU outperforms even the most powerful consumer offerings. The 32 GB VRAM capacity is particularly notable, exceeding the memory available on most consumer cards and enabling larger models and scenes to be processed entirely on the GPU.