SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation form a compact desktop pairing that targets a specific niche: high-performance workstation tasks and serious gaming in a small form factor. The CPU, a Zen 4 "Phoenix" part on TSMC's 4 nm node, brings 8 cores and 16 threads with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU, an Ada Lovelace workstation card, offers 20 GB of VRAM in a dual-slot, 70 W envelope. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark data, which shows a CPU that punches above its power class and a GPU that sits near the top of the overall performance percentile. Because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not empirical gaming results.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and its 65 W TDP makes it a power-efficient choice for dense builds. The chip features a 16 MB shared L3 cache, with 1 MB of L2 per core and 64 KB of L1 per core, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the modest power envelope suggests limited headroom for extreme frequency gains.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1008 in single-thread to 7883 in 16-thread tests, and the multi-thread score of 7861 nearly matches the 16-thread result, indicating that the 8-core/16-thread configuration is fully utilized under heavy parallel loads. Cinebench R23 results show a multicore score of 26646 and a single-core score of 3761, placing the chip in a strong position for both productivity and responsiveness. The Geekbench multicore score of 13523 and single-core score of 2290 reinforce this dual strength. In PassMark tests, the CPU excels at integer math (100371) and floating-point math (62629), while data compression scores a substantial 378160. The extended instructions score of 28474 suggests solid AVX-512 or similar workload performance, which benefits scientific and engineering applications.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 82 among all CPUs indicates it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 8700F is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, which has an average score of 30879 versus the 8700F's 30746, a negligible -0.4% difference. It is similarly matched against the Intel Core i5-13600H, which scores 30548, putting the 8700F 0.6% ahead. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468, leaving the 8700F 0.9% ahead, while the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31028, which is 0.9% ahead of the 8700F. These tight margins indicate that the 8700F sits in a highly competitive mid-range performance tier, where generational and architectural differences are minor.

For real workloads, the multi-threaded scores suggest strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where all 16 threads can be engaged. The single-thread score of 3761 in Cinebench R23 indicates snappy application responsiveness and solid gaming performance, as most games rely heavily on single-core speed. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1989 and 4-thread score of 3839 further confirm that lightly threaded tasks benefit from the high boost clock.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30746, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, scores 30879, a margin of -0.4%, meaning the 8700F is essentially at parity. The Intel Core i5-13600H trails by 0.6% with a score of 30548, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is 0.9% behind at 30468. The only competitor that edges ahead is the Intel Core i7-13700TE, which scores 31028, a 0.9% advantage. These deltas are within noise for most applications, so the 8700F should be considered a peer of these chips rather than a clear winner or loser.

The GPU, an NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and a Vulkan score of 109364. Its average benchmark score is 117088, placing it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, a remarkable position for a low-profile workstation card. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GB10, which scores 117393, a -0.3% difference, and the AMD Radeon PRO W7700, which scores 118976, putting the RTX 4000 SFF 1.6% behind. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114395, meaning the RTX 4000 SFF is 2.4% ahead, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113944, placing the RTX 4000 SFF 2.8% ahead. This places the GPU in a performance tier that rivals much larger and more power-hungry cards.

The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 89, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 89% of all recorded desktop configurations. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 95th percentile show a slight imbalance, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. This suggests that the GPU will often be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios, though the CPU is not weak by any means. The combined picture is one of a high-end system that excels in GPU-accelerated tasks like rendering and AI inference, while the CPU provides adequate support for feeding the GPU and handling general productivity.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3761 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 95th percentile ranking suggest strong potential for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p. The 8-core CPU is well-suited for modern game engines that utilize multiple threads, and the GPU's compute power can drive high frame rates. However, without measured FPS data, these are estimates; the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth will help at higher resolutions, but the 70 W power limit may constrain sustained boost clocks.

Streaming: The 16 threads of the Ryzen 7 8700F provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. PassMark data compression score of 378160 indicates strong performance in real-time encoding workloads. The GPU's 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores could also offload encoding tasks via NVENC, though the specific encoding capabilities are not listed in the bench data. The CPU's multi-thread score of 26646 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle both game and stream encoding without significant frame drops.

Video Editing: The combination of an 82nd percentile CPU and 95th percentile GPU is ideal for video editing. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 100371 and floating-point score of 62629 accelerate timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 20 GB VRAM allow for smooth handling of 4K and 8K timelines, as well as GPU-accelerated effects in software like Adobe Premiere. The 280.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large frame buffers.

3D Rendering: The GPU, with its 6144 shading units and 192 tensor cores, delivers 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is substantial for a 70 W card. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 ensures that CPU-based rendering tasks, such as those in Blender's Cycles engine, are also fast. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with scene data, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth feeds the CPU's cores efficiently. This system can handle moderate 3D rendering workloads without a dedicated workstation GPU.

Software Development: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 13523 and single-core score of 2290 indicate strong performance for code compilation and IDE responsiveness. The PassMark extended instructions score of 28474 suggests good performance in cryptographic and scientific computing tasks. The 8 cores and 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 65 W TDP means the system can run for long periods without excessive heat. The GPU's compute power can accelerate machine learning training and inference, a useful asset for developers.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for typical student tasks like word processing and web browsing, but the CPU's single-thread score of 3872 in PassMark ensures instant application launches. The 65 W CPU and 70 W GPU keep the system quiet and cool, making it a pleasant workstation for a dorm room. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM is far more than needed for office tasks, but it future-proofs the system for any GPU-accelerated workloads a student might encounter, such as CAD or data analysis.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy: the GPU is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. This means the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU, so in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance is adequate, but the GPU's 70 W power limit may cause it to hit a performance ceiling before the CPU does. The GPU's nearest rivals include the higher-powered AMD Radeon PRO W7700, which scores 1.6% higher, suggesting that the RTX 4000 SFF is already near the top of its power class.

In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or physics simulations, the CPU will be the bottleneck, as its 82nd percentile ranking is lower than the GPU's 95th. The PassMark physics score of 1553 is notably lower than the integer and floating-point scores, suggesting that physics-heavy applications may not scale as well with this processor. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7883 and max-thread score of 7861 show that the CPU saturates its threads effectively, but the marginal difference between 8 and 16 threads is small, indicating diminishing returns beyond 8 cores.

The FPS scaling, or lack thereof, is a key indicator. Without measured FPS data, we rely on the percentile gap: the 13-point difference between the GPU's 95th and CPU's 82nd percentile suggests that at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU may limit frame rates in less demanding games, while at higher resolutions (4K), the GPU will be the primary constraint. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 160-bit memory bus is narrower than many high-end cards, which could impact bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, confirming these are expectations, not empirical results. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and the CPU's 82nd percentile suggest that this system is capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, with 4K gaming possible at reduced settings.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3761) is strong enough to drive high frame rates in esports titles, likely exceeding 144 FPS in games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant. The GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can handle the rendering load, but the 70 W power limit may cause clocks to drop under sustained load, potentially limiting average FPS to around 100-144 FPS in demanding AAA titles. The 20 GB VRAM eliminates any concerns about texture memory, even with ultra settings.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, as the higher resolution increases the shading load. The RTX 4000 SFF's 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate and 299.5 GTexel/s texture rate are respectable for a 70 W card, but they are lower than full-power desktop GPUs. Estimated FPS in AAA titles at 1440p ultra would likely fall in the 60-100 FPS range, depending on the game's optimization. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU, so frame times should be consistent.

At 4K, the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate, but the compute power is likely insufficient for ultra settings at playable frame rates. Estimated FPS would be in the 30-60 FPS range for most AAA titles, requiring DLSS or reduced settings to achieve 60 FPS. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 allows for modern rendering techniques, but the 70 W power envelope is a hard limit on performance.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for users who need serious compute performance in a small form factor. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and 20 GB VRAM make it ideal for professionals in 3D rendering, video editing, and AI inference, where the small size and 70 W power draw are significant advantages. The CPU's 82nd percentile ensures that these tasks are not starved for processing power.

Gamers who prioritize a compact build over raw FPS will appreciate this pairing. At 1080p and 1440p, the system can deliver high frame rates in most titles, and the 20 GB VRAM future-proofs it against increasingly demanding textures. The 65 W CPU and 70 W GPU also make it suitable for a small form factor case with limited airflow, as the total system cooling requirements are modest.

Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 192 tensor cores. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 ensures that CPU-based encoding and rendering tasks are completed quickly. Software developers using machine learning frameworks will find the tensor cores useful for training and inference, and the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Students and office workers may find this system overpowered, but the compact size and low power draw make it a practical choice for a dorm room or small office. The GPU's dual-slot design and lack of power connectors simplify installation in small cases, and the 250 W suggested PSU means a standard power supply is sufficient. Small business workstations that require GPU acceleration for CAD or data visualization would also benefit.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. Its base clock is 720 MHz, with a boost clock of 1560 MHz, and it consumes a modest 70 W TDP.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU delivers 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equal 19.17 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, indicating a 1:1 ratio that is useful for AI workloads. The pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 124812 and Vulkan score of 109364 place it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, making it a top-tier performer despite its low power draw.

The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GB10, scores 117393, a marginal -0.3% difference, meaning the RTX 4000 SFF is essentially on par. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 scores 118976, putting the RTX 4000 SFF 1.6% behind, while the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114395, which the RTX 4000 SFF surpasses by 2.4%. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113944, and the RTX 4000 SFF is 2.8% ahead. This places the card in a performance class that rivals full-size workstation GPUs, but with a fraction of the power consumption.

For rendering, the 20 GB VRAM is a standout feature, allowing large 3D scenes and high-resolution textures to fit entirely in GPU memory. The 192 tensor cores accelerate AI denoising and machine learning inference, while the 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures broad software compatibility. The dual-slot design and lack of power connectors make it easy to install in small workstations, and the 250 W suggested PSU means a standard power supply is sufficient.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 160-bit bus and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The CPU's launch MSRP is $270.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 30746, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i5-13600H (30548) and 0.9% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30468), but 0.9% lower than the Intel Core i7-13700TE (31028).

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The GPU is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 117088.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, meaning the system outperforms 89% of all recorded desktop configurations.

Q: Does the GPU require a dedicated power connector?

A: No, the GPU has no power connectors and uses a 70 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The motherboard platform is current, and the socket is expected to support future AMD processors, though the FACT PACK does not specify which ones. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 70 W TDP of the GPU mean that the system has a low total power draw, and the 250 W suggested PSU for the GPU leaves ample headroom for additional components.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the amount of DDR5 memory, as the CPU supports dual-channel configurations and the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth can be saturated by memory-intensive applications. The 16 MB L3 cache is modest, so faster memory could help alleviate cache misses. For storage, the PCIe Gen 4 lanes support high-speed NVMe SSDs, which would reduce load times in games and large software projects.

The GPU's 70 W TDP and lack of power connectors mean that upgrading to a higher-performance GPU would require a new power supply, as most high-end cards draw more power. However, the 250 W suggested PSU is the minimum for the RTX 4000 SFF, and a larger PSU would be needed for any future GPU upgrade. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 4 nm process and 65 W TDP suggest limited thermal headroom. The socket AM5 platform is a long-term investment, and the CPU's performance in the 82nd percentile indicates it has several years of useful life before becoming a bottleneck.