SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets a specific niche: high-performance workstation tasks in a single-slot, power-efficient package. The CPU is a mainstream 8-core Zen 4 part, while the GPU is a professional-grade Ada Lovelace card with 20 GB of memory. Benchmark data shows the processor sitting near the top of its class, while the graphics card performs in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. This combination is not about raw gaming frames, despite the GPU’s 40-series naming, but about compute reliability and memory capacity. The data indicates a system built for serious work, not just play.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Phoenix) using TSMC’s 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU itself. It does not have integrated graphics, which is notable for a system that already pairs with a discrete GPU. The processor is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted for overclocking, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 82nd percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 30746. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (average score 30879), the Intel Core i5-13600H (30548), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30468), and the Intel Core i7-13700TE (31028). The deltas are small: the 8700F is 0.4% behind the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, 0.6% ahead of the Core i5-13600H, 0.9% ahead of the Core Ultra 5 225T, and 0.9% behind the Core i7-13700TE. This shows a tightly contested mid-range segment where the 8700F is competitive but not dominant. In practice, the scores indicate a processor that can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks without complaint.

Looking at specific workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 is strong for an 8-core part, suggesting that rendering and video encoding tasks will run quickly. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3761 is also respectable, indicating good responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The Geekbench multicore score of 13523 and single-core score of 2290 reinforce this picture. PassMark results show a multithread score of 30893, with strong integer math (100371) and floating-point math (62629) performance. Data encryption (22117) and compression (378160) scores are decent, making this a capable chip for archival or database work. The 3DMark scores, from 1008 in single-thread to 7883 in 16-thread tests, show that the chip scales well with additional threads, which is typical for a modern 8-core design.

The architecture is mature: Zen 4 offers strong instructions per clock, and the 4 nm process keeps power in check. The lack of integrated graphics is a minor inconvenience for troubleshooting but irrelevant in a system with a dedicated GPU. The 65 W TDP means that a capable air cooler is sufficient, which is a boon for compact builds. For real workloads, this CPU will not be the bottleneck in most professional tasks; it provides a solid foundation for content creation, compilation, and simulation, though it is not a top-tier HEDT part. The data suggests it sits comfortably in the upper-mid range, trading blows with mobile and low-power desktop chips from both AMD and Intel.

Balance and Bottleneck

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation GPU is a workstation card, not a gaming card, and the CPU is a mainstream desktop part. The balance between them is unusual. The GPU’s percentile rank is 95, well above the CPU’s 82, meaning the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing. In compute-heavy workloads like rendering or machine learning inference, the GPU will be the primary performer, and the CPU must keep up with feeding it data. The CPU’s 16 threads and high single-thread score (Geekbench single-core 2290) are sufficient for most tasks, but there are scenarios where the CPU could limit the GPU.

In gaming, the situation is reversed. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a professional card, and while it has gaming capabilities, its driver optimization and memory configuration are not aimed at high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is generous for capacity but not for bandwidth compared to gaming cards. The CPU’s single-thread performance is good, but no measured FPS data exists for this combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. Based on the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 7883 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593, the GPU is clearly the more powerful component. In gaming, the bottleneck would likely be the GPU’s driver and compute-oriented design, not the CPU. The CPU can deliver frames; the GPU may not be optimized to display them at high rates.

For professional workloads, the balance is better. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 shows it can handle physics simulations or preprocessing, while the GPU’s FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS handles the heavy lifting. The memory bandwidth of the CPU (83.2 GB/s) is low compared to the GPU’s (360.0 GB/s), but this is expected since they serve different roles. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in tasks that are GPU-bound, such as rendering frames or training small models. However, in tasks that require frequent data transfers between CPU and GPU, the PCIe Gen 4 x16 interface (from the GPU) and 20 CPU lanes are adequate but not exceptional. The data suggests that this is a balanced system for compute, with the GPU leading and the CPU providing solid support. In gaming, the GPU’s professional nature is the limiting factor, not the CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F scores 26646 in Cinebench R23 multicore. Its average benchmark score is 30746, which is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600H, and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T. It is 0.9% behind the Intel Core i7-13700TE.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, running at 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 8700F has integrated graphics listed as "N/A". A discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank, and how does it compare to rivals?

A: The GPU is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135218. It is essentially tied with the NVIDIA A10M (deltaPct 0), 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6800, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V620.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is $270.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and what PSU is suggested?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 130 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W. The GPU is a single-slot card that is 245 mm long.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific pairing. All performance discussions regarding FPS are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This system is for professionals who need a compact, powerful workstation. The GPU’s 20 GB of memory and 95th percentile ranking make it suitable for 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific computing. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646, can handle compilation, simulation, and multitasking without breaking a sweat. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p might find the GPU’s performance adequate, but the lack of measured FPS data and the professional driver focus suggest it is not the primary target. This is not a budget gaming rig; it is a tool for earning money.

Content creators working with large video files will appreciate the 20 GB VRAM, which allows for larger render buffers and complex scenes. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU’s multithreaded performance. Students in engineering or data science fields can use this system for coursework involving CAD or machine learning. Small business workstations that need a single-slot GPU for space-constrained cases will find the RTX 4000 Ada Generation ideal, as it is 245 mm long and single-slot, fitting into smaller chassis. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means that a modest cooling solution suffices, reducing noise and power costs. The benchmark data suggests this is a high-performance pairing for users who value compute capability over gaming frames.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistent across tests. In 3DMark, the 16-thread score is 7883, the 8-thread score is 6559, the 4-thread score is 3839, the 2-thread score is 1989, and the single-thread score is 1008. This shows good scaling from 2 to 16 threads, with diminishing returns after 8 threads, which is expected for an 8-core part. Cinebench R15 yields 2685 in multicore and 378 in single-core. R20 yields 11191 in multicore and 1579 in single-core. R23 yields 26646 in multicore and 3761 in single-core. Geekbench shows 13523 in multicore and 2290 in single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 30893, integer math at 100371, floating-point math at 62629, and data encryption at 22117. The CPU’s percentile rank is 82, with an average score of 30746, placing it just behind the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS and Core i7-13700TE, but ahead of the Core i5-13600H and Core Ultra 5 225T.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 146593, and the Vulkan score is 123842. Its average benchmark score is 135218, which places it in the 95th percentile. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA A10M with an average score of 135230 (deltaPct 0), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135396 (-0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at 135774 (-0.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 at 136472 (-0.9%). The GPU is effectively tied with the A10M and slightly behind the Radeon PRO V620.

The combined picture is a system with a strong CPU and a very strong GPU. The CPU is in the upper-mid range, while the GPU is near the top of the database. The combined percentile for the build is 89. This means that in most professional workloads, the GPU will be the star, while the CPU provides a solid foundation. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance cannot be precisely quantified, but the individual scores suggest that the CPU can handle gaming workloads, while the GPU’s professional design may limit gaming performance. The data supports a workstation use case.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory. The memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s, and the CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This means that a modest power supply is sufficient, leaving headroom for upgrades. The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking is possible, though the stock boost clock of 5.00 GHz is already high.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports DDR5 and the dual-channel configuration is standard. The GPU is already near the top of the database, so upgrading it would be expensive and likely provide diminishing returns unless a specific workload requires more memory or compute. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, which is adequate, but users who need more cores could move to a higher-end AM5 processor, as the socket is current. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU are sufficient for one GPU and a couple of NVMe drives. The system’s power headroom is generous: the 300 W suggested PSU covers the 130 W GPU and the 65 W CPU, leaving room for additional drives or a more power-hungry CPU in the future. The platform is not dead-end; it supports current DDR5 and PCIe Gen 4 standards, making it a viable base for future upgrades.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance is strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2290, which can drive high frame rates. However, the GPU’s professional focus and lack of measured FPS data suggest that gaming performance is not guaranteed. The 20 GB VRAM is overkill for gaming, but the 160-bit bus and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at high resolutions. Estimated FPS is likely acceptable at 1080p, but not competitive with gaming-specific GPUs.

Streaming: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, which can handle encoding, but the lack of integrated graphics means that the GPU must handle both rendering and encoding. The GPU has 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, which can assist with encoding via NVENC. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 indicates it can manage the overhead of streaming while gaming or working, but the GPU’s compute load may cause frame drops. This is a viable, but not ideal, streaming setup.

Video editing: The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM is excellent for video editing, allowing for large timelines and effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 suggests strong acceleration in compatible software. The CPU’s multithreaded score of 30893 in PassMark helps with timeline scrubbing and export. This is a strong use case for the system.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 48 RT cores make it a capable renderer. The 20 GB memory allows for complex scenes. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 score of 26646 is sufficient for CPU-based rendering tasks. The combination is well-suited for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 threads and high integer math score (100371) make compilation fast. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for most development tasks. The GPU is less relevant here, but can be used for testing parallel code. The system will handle large codebases and virtual machines without issue.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3872 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in spreadsheets and browsers. The GPU’s performance is wasted on word processing, but the system will handle any academic workload, including data analysis or CAD, with ease. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps electricity costs low.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs an AMD Ryzen 7 8700F CPU with an NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is from the 8000 series with a Zen 4 architecture, and the GPU is from the GeForce 40-series with an Ada Lovelace architecture. The build class is desktop. The combined percentile is 89, indicating that this system outperforms the vast majority of configurations in the database. The CPU is in the 82nd percentile, and the GPU is in the 95th percentile. This is a high-tier system, but it is not the absolute top of the line. The CPU is a mainstream part, while the GPU is a professional workstation card. The pairing is unusual because the GPU is typically found in workstations, while the CPU is more common in gaming or productivity builds. The result is a system that excels at professional compute tasks but may not be optimized for gaming. The overall tier is high-end, with the GPU being the dominant component.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD104 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and AI workloads. The base clock is 1500 MHz, and the boost clock is 2175 MHz. Memory is 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, running at 18 Gbps effective. The GPU has a TDP of 130 W and is a single-slot card, measuring 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height. It uses a single 16-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 300 W.

Benchmark scores show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and a Vulkan score of 123842. The average benchmark score is 135218, placing the GPU in the 95th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA A10M (deltaPct 0), AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (-0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (-0.4%), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 (-0.9%). This means the GPU is essentially tied with the A10M and slightly behind the Radeon PRO V620. The FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s.

For rendering, this GPU is a powerhouse. The 20 GB of VRAM is more than enough for most 3D scenes, and the 48 RT cores accelerate ray tracing. The 192 tensor cores can be used for denoising and AI-based upscaling. The 360.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures, though it is not the fastest on the market. The single-slot design is a major advantage for compact workstations. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern professional software. The display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, which supports multiple monitors. The data shows that this GPU is designed for compute and professional visualization, not for gaming. Its performance in OpenCL is strong, and its memory capacity is generous, making it a top-tier choice for workstation builds.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds