SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a desktop build that combines a modern Zen 4 CPU with a professional Turing-era GPU. The processor sits in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card lands in the 67th percentile, producing a combined system percentile of 75. This is a configuration where the CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers, making it a capable workstation for productivity but a more moderate performer in gaming, where the older GPU architecture shows its age. The following analysis is based strictly on the benchmark data provided, with all FPS figures treated as estimates since no measured game frames exist for this exact pairing.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is limited by the Quadro RTX 5000’s 67th percentile standing. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 is respectable but not elite, and its DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests it will struggle to push very high frame rates in modern titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1008 in 3DMark and 3872 in PassMark single-thread means it will not bottleneck, but the GPU will cap performance at lower refresh rates, likely favoring 1080p over 1440p or 4K for smooth play.

Streaming benefits from the 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 8700F, which posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26646 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 30893. This headroom allows simultaneous encoding and gameplay without significant frame drops, though the Quadro RTX 5000’s Turing NVENC capabilities are not detailed in the data. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is ample for stream buffers and overlays, but its overall compute score of 6525 in PassMark GPU compute is modest for heavy encoding offload.

Video editing is a strong suit for the CPU, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 13523 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11191. The Quadro RTX 5000’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth help with 4K timeline scrubbing and effect previews, but its FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS is dated. The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide some acceleration for AI-assisted tools, but the GPU’s 67th percentile rank means rendering exports will be slower than with newer cards.

3D rendering relies heavily on both components. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2685 and PassMark floating-point math score of 62629 indicate solid ray-tracing CPU workloads, while the GPU’s 3072 shading units and 348.5 GTexel/s texture rate handle rasterization. However, the Quadro RTX 5000’s 12 nm process and 2018 release date mean it lags behind modern GPUs in raw throughput, making it better suited for pre-production rather than final frame rendering.

Software development sees the CPU excel with a PassMark integer math score of 100371 and data encryption score of 22117, which speed up compilation and cryptographic operations. The 65 W TDP of the 8700F keeps thermals manageable during long builds. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is useful for large datasets in machine learning, but its compute score of 6525 is far behind contemporary workstation cards, limiting deep learning training speed.

Student and office work is where this pairing is overqualified. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3872 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 1989 handle spreadsheets and browsers with ease, while the GPU’s idle efficiency is fine for 2D tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is wasted on typical office software, but the system will never feel sluggish, even with many applications open. The 82nd CPU percentile ensures responsiveness, though the GPU’s 67th percentile is irrelevant for these workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26646 and a single-core score of 3761, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its Geekbench scores are 13523 multi-core and 2290 single-core, while 3DMark results show 7883 for 16 threads and 1008 for single-thread. The average benchmark score is 30746, and it edges out the Intel Core i5-13600H by 0.6% (30548) while trailing the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS by 0.4% (30879), showing it is tightly clustered with mid-range mobile and desktop chips.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 posts a PassMark G3D score of 15616 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999, with Vulkan at 92309. Its average benchmark score is 21629, putting it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to rivals, it is 1% slower than the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856) and 1.2% faster than the RTX A4000 Mobile (21379), indicating performance parity with older mid-range gaming cards despite its professional branding.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart by a wide margin. The CPU’s 82nd percentile versus the GPU’s 67th percentile means the processor is the system’s strongest asset, while the GPU holds the system back in graphics-intensive tasks. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 140 and DirectX 12 score of 59 confirm the GPU is better suited for older APIs, which aligns with its 2018 architecture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the clear performance leader, with an average benchmark score of 30746 compared to the GPU’s 21629. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (PassMark score of 378160) and encryption (22117), the 8700F operates without GPU interference. However, in gaming, the GPU’s 67th percentile becomes the limiting factor, as its DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests it cannot feed frames fast enough to utilize the CPU’s single-thread advantage.

The bottleneck shifts by workload. For 3D rendering, the GPU’s FP32 of 11.15 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s cap output, while the CPU’s 8 cores wait idle. In contrast, for software compilation, the CPU’s 100371 integer math score dominates, and the GPU contributes little. The 16 GB VRAM on the Quadro RTX 5000 prevents memory-related stutters, but its 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest, potentially limiting texture streaming in large scenes.

FPS scaling is constrained by the GPU’s age. The Quadro RTX 5000’s 12 nm process and 1620 MHz base clock mean it will scale poorly with resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 67th percentile will drop frame rates significantly. The 550 W suggested PSU indicates the system is power-hungry, but the CPU’s 65 W TDP provides headroom for GPU upgrades.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings will find this build acceptable, as the CPU’s 82nd percentile handles physics and AI, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM prevents texture pop-in. However, those targeting 1440p or 4K high-refresh should look elsewhere, as the Quadro RTX 5000’s DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates poor modern API performance. This is not a gaming-first system.

Content creators working in video editing or 2D design will benefit from the CPU’s 26646 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which accelerates rendering timelines. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM supports large Photoshop canvases or 4K video previews, but its 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 is insufficient for heavy 3D work. Developers compiling code will appreciate the CPU’s 100371 integer math score, and the 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Students and small business workstations are ideal targets. The CPU’s 3872 single-thread score ensures snappy application launches, while the 65 W TDP keeps electricity costs low. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but it enables future light CAD work. The 82nd CPU percentile means this system will handle multitasking without slowdowns, making it a sensible pre-built for productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 Phoenix architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F boosts up to 5.00 GHz from a base clock of 4.10 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 5000 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this build?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 75, with the CPU at 82 and the GPU at 67.

Q: Is there integrated graphics on the CPU?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 8700F has no integrated graphics (N/A), requiring a discrete GPU.

Q: What is the GPU’s power connector requirement?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 needs a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 1989 indicates strong single-core performance for game logic, but the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests it will struggle with modern titles. At 1080p, expect playable frame rates in older or less demanding games, but 1440p and 4K will likely drop below 60 FPS in most AAA releases.

The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 is higher than its OpenCL score of 78999, implying better performance in Vulkan-based games. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause stutters in open-world games with heavy asset streaming. The RTX 5000’s 48 RT cores provide ray-tracing capability, but the low DirectX 12 score means ray-traced effects will severely impact frame rates.

For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU’s 3872 single-thread score can push high frame rates, but the GPU’s 67th percentile caps the ceiling. Competitive players would be better served by a gaming GPU, as the Quadro’s drivers are optimized for stability rather than raw FPS. Overall, estimate 1080p high settings for older games and 1080p low settings for modern ones.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and boost up to 5.00 GHz. It uses the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename) on the AM5 socket, supporting dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, totaling 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark 16-thread score of 7883 and a max-thread score of 7861, indicating excellent scaling across cores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26646 is strong for a 65 W TDP part, while the single-core score of 3761 matches modern desktop rivals. PassMark integer math of 100371 and floating-point math of 62629 confirm its arithmetic prowess, while data compression of 378160 shows strong memory bandwidth utilization.

The CPU’s 82nd percentile places it above the Intel Core i5-13600H by 0.6% but below the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS by 0.4%. Its unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, but the 65 W TDP limits headroom. For real workloads, this CPU handles video editing timelines, code compilation, and multi-tasking with ease, though its 16 MB L3 cache is smaller than some rivals, potentially affecting cache-sensitive games.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F (82nd CPU percentile) with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (67th GPU percentile), achieving a combined percentile of 75. The CPU is a modern 2024 release on the AM5 platform, while the GPU is an end-of-life 2018 product from the Turing generation. This pairing is mismatched in age and performance tier, making it a workstation-focused system rather than a gaming rig.

The 8700F’s 65 W TDP and active production status contrast sharply with the GPU’s 230 W TDP and end-of-life status, suggesting the GPU is the component most likely to be upgraded. The system’s 75th combined percentile indicates it sits above average, but the GPU drags down the overall score. This is a build that prioritizes CPU throughput for productivity over GPU rendering power.

For a desktop user, this system is a solid foundation for future GPU upgrades. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ensures it won’t bottleneck a newer graphics card, while the 16 GB VRAM on the current GPU provides temporary relief for memory-heavy tasks. The AM5 socket offers a clear upgrade path for CPUs, making this a versatile platform despite the aging GPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture GPU on TSMC’s 12 nm process, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The base clock is 1620 MHz, boosting to 1815 MHz, while memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus for 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Benchmark performance shows a PassMark G3D score of 15616 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999, with a Vulkan score of 92309. The DirectX 11 score of 140 is much higher than the DirectX 12 score of 59, indicating this GPU is optimized for older APIs. The FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s are modest by 2024 standards, placing it near the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in average score.

The 16 GB GDDR6 memory is the GPU’s main advantage, providing ample capacity for large datasets and high-resolution textures. However, the 67th percentile rank means it trails most modern gaming GPUs. The 384 tensor cores support AI workloads, but the 6525 PassMark GPU compute score limits deep learning performance. For rendering, the 116.2 GPixel/s pixel rate handles basic rasterization, but the low DirectX 12 score makes it unsuitable for next-gen games.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds