SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop combination that raises interesting questions about where the performance ceiling actually sits. The CPU lands in the 82nd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU occupies the 72nd percentile against all GPUs, producing a combined percentile of 77. No measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing in the database — the fact pack contains no measuredFps entries and dataIsMeasured is false — so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded game runs. With that caveat stated, the data still tells a coherent story about a mid-range desktop build anchored by a 65 W eight-core Zen 4 processor and a 145 W Blackwell-based graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5060's PassMark G3D score of 20891 and 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 3628 place it in the 72nd GPU percentile, which suggests comfortable 1080p performance and viable 1440p play in most titles, though the absence of measured FPS figures means these expectations are inferred rather than recorded. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3872 and Geekbench single-core result of 2290 indicate the per-core throughput needed to feed high frame rates in esports-style titles, where CPU responsiveness matters as much as raw GPU throughput.

Streaming: Streaming adds simultaneous video encoding to the gaming load, and here the CPU's 16 threads across 8 cores become relevant. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6559 versus the 16-thread score of 7883 shows scaling that holds up reasonably well under parallel load, while PassMark multithread performance at 30893 suggests headroom for game plus encoder workloads without one starving the other. The GPU's 120 tensor cores may also assist with AI-assisted encoding pathways, though the database does not record NVENC-specific results.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26646 and Geekbench multi-core at 13523 point to capable timeline scrubbing and export performance for 1080p and moderately demanding 4K projects. The RTX 5060's Vulkan compute score of 113321 and OpenCL score of 112787 indicate GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will run smoothly in applications that dispatch work to those APIs. The 8 GB of GDDR7 is a constraint worth questioning for heavy 4K multicam work.

3D rendering: PassMark GPU compute at 10899 and the FP32 figure of 19.18 TFLOPS describe a card that can render viewport previews responsively, while the CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11191 supports overnight CPU-based renders. Neither component ranks as a workstation-class part — the CPU sits at the 82nd percentile, high but not elite — so professional rendering farms would look elsewhere, but solo artists will find the combination workable.

Software development: Compilation benefits from parallelism, and the near-linear thread scaling in 3DMark results (1008 single-thread, 3839 at 4 threads, 6559 at 8, 7883 at 16) indicates the 8700F handles parallel builds efficiently. The 83.2 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth supports fast in-memory builds and containerized workflows.

Student and office work: For documents, browsing, video calls, and light photo work, the single-thread strength (Geekbench 2290, Cinebench R23 single-core 3761) means everyday responsiveness is excellent. The 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool, and the absence of integrated graphics is irrelevant here since a discrete GPU is present.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5060 is built on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 21,900 million transistors into a 181 mm² die — a density of 121.0M transistors per mm². The GB206 chip carries 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units, producing a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s. Clocks run from a 2280 MHz base to a 2497 MHz boost.

Memory is the more curious specification. The card ships 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for a total of 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure is generous for the class, but the 8 GB capacity raises questions about longevity as texture budgets in modern games grow. At 1080p this is unlikely to bind; at 1440p with ultra textures, capacity rather than bandwidth may become the limiter — though without measured FPS data, this remains an inference from the specs rather than a recorded observation.

Ray tracing and AI workloads have dedicated hardware: 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, with FP16 throughput at 19.18 TFLOPS running 1:1 with FP32. The benchmark picture supports capable rendering performance — Geekbench Vulkan at 113321 and OpenCL at 112787 are nearly identical, suggesting consistent compute behavior across APIs, and the PassMark G3D score of 20891 places the card in the 72nd percentile. Against nearest rivals, the data is striking: the Radeon 860M (deltaPct -0.3), the GeForce MX550 (-0.3), the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (-0.8), and the RX 6750 XT (+1.2) all cluster within roughly one percent of its average score of 26331, meaning the RTX 5060 performs as an archetypal mid-tier card with no daylight between it and its closest statistical peers.

Balance and Bottleneck

Which component limits which workload? The percentile spread provides the first clue: the CPU sits at the 82nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 72nd, a ten-point gap that implies the graphics card is the more common limiting factor in graphically demanding tasks. In CPU-bound scenarios — high frame rate esports at low resolutions, physics-heavy simulation — the 8700F's strength (PassMark physics at 1553, single-thread at 3872) will keep feeding frames, and the GPU becomes the ceiling.

The reverse case is heavy multi-threaded production work, where the GPU's compute scores (PassMark GPU compute at 10899) do not substitute for CPU throughput in tasks that scale with cores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26646 describes the practical render ceiling of the build. Since dataIsMeasured is false, there is no recorded FPS scaling evidence by resolution; the estimate from the score spread is that 1080p gaming will occasionally brush against CPU limits in the most lightweight titles while 1440p ultra settings shift nearly all titles toward GPU limitation, with the 8 GB VRAM buffer being the first spec to saturate.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Socket AM5, which is notable: AM5's continued use across AMD's desktop lines suggests the socket has forward life for CPU upgrades. The 8700F supports DDR5 in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. One caveat from the specs: PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the RTX 5060 uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface — meaning the card runs at Gen 4 speeds on this platform. The database does not record the performance delta from this mismatch, but the x8 link width is worth noting for anyone moving the card between platforms.

Power is undemanding. The CPU's 65 W TDP plus the GPU's 145 W TDP, with a single 8-pin connector on the card and a suggested PSU of 300 W, leaves clear headroom in any reasonable modern system — the suggested PSU figure already accounts for the whole platform. A sensible next upgrade is a higher-percentile GPU, since it is the lower-ranked component; the card's dual-slot, 241 mm length means most standard cases accommodate a larger successor. ECC is not supported, so this is not a workstation-verification platform. The CPU's unlocked multiplier also permits tuning on a capable cooler, discussed here only qualitatively.

Benchmark Performance

The full picture from the database:

CPU: 3DMark single-thread 1008, 2-thread 1989, 4-thread 3839, 8-thread 6559, 16-thread 7883, max-threads 7861; Cinebench R15 multi 2685 / single 378; R20 multi 11191 / single 1579; R23 multi 26646 / single 3761; Geekbench multi 13523 / single 2290; PassMark single-thread 3872, multithread 30893, physics 1553, integer math 100371, floating point 62629, data compression 378160, encryption 22117, extended instructions 28474, string sorting 45425, prime finding 98. Average benchmark score: 30746, at the 82nd percentile.

GPU: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 3628; Geekbench OpenCL 112787, Vulkan 113321; PassMark G3D 20891, GPU compute 10899, Direct3D 9 at 225, Direct3D 10 at 127, Direct3D 11 at 200, Direct3D 12 at 77, G2D at 1154. Average benchmark score: 26331, at the 72nd percentile. Combined percentile: 77.

The combined picture is that of a mid-range desktop performing slightly above the middle of the field. The CPU's average of 30746 sits within a fraction of a percent of its nearest rivals — the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS at 30879 (-0.4%), the Core i5-13600H at 30548 (+0.6%), the Core Ultra 5 225T at 30468 (+0.9%), and the Core i7-13700TE at 31028 (-0.9%) — a remarkably tight cluster. The GPU's rivals are similarly compressed. Neither part escapes its statistical neighborhood, which is precisely what a coherent mid-tier build should do.

FAQ

Q: Does this build have measured FPS data?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS entries for this pairing, and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its rivals?

A: Its average score of 30746 lands within one percent of the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (-0.4%), Core i5-13600H (+0.6%), Core Ultra 5 225T (+0.9%), and Core i7-13700TE (-0.9%).

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each component have?

A: The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 provides 83.2 GB/s; the GPU's GDDR7 provides 448.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No — integrated graphics is listed as N/A, so the RTX 5060 is required for display output. The GPU offers one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Q: What PSU is suggested?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W. The CPU's TDP is 65 W and the GPU's is 145 W, so a 300 W unit leaves headroom.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the platform is Socket AM5 with DDR5 support.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of each part?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F launched at a MSRP of $270; the RTX 5060 launched at a MSRP of 299 USD.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 8700F is a Zen 4 (Phoenix codename) part built on TSMC's 4 nm node, carrying 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It runs 8 cores and 16 threads, from a 4.10 GHz base to a 5.00 GHz boost. Cache allocation is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 — a compact hierarchy consistent with a monolithic Phoenix-derived design rather than a chiplet layout.

What do the scores mean for real workloads? The thread-scaling curve is the most telling: 1008 single-thread, 3839 at four threads, 6559 at eight, and 7883 at sixteen — near-linear gains through eight threads and only mild saturation beyond, suggesting the sixteen-thread capacity is genuinely usable rather than nominal. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26646 with single-core at 3761 indicates well-balanced throughput and responsiveness, useful for both batch rendering and interactive work. The PassMark integer math (100371) and data compression (378160) results point to strong general-purpose and memory-adjacent performance, relevant to compilation and file processing. The find-prime-numbers score of 98 is an outlier worth noting — a reminder that specific synthetic subtests can diverge sharply from headline averages. At the 82nd percentile, this is an upper-mid-range CPU, and the launch MSRP of $270 frames its positioning.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing an 82nd-percentile CPU with a 72nd-percentile GPU for a combined percentile of 77. The CPU contributes an average benchmark score of 30746; the GPU contributes 26331. The pairing is coherent rather than lopsided: a ten-percentile spread between components is modest, indicating neither part dramatically overshadows the other. Both are listed as Active production status, meaning this is a current, purchasable configuration rather than a legacy pairing. The overall tier is mid-range with upper-mid CPU strength — a build positioned just above the median of all systems in the database.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p, and 1440p with adjusted settings, are the natural fit: the GPU's 72nd percentile standing and 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth support modern titles at those resolutions, with the caveat that 8 GB of VRAM may require texture adjustments in the heaviest 1440p scenarios. Content creators working in 1080p video and moderate 4K projects benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26646 and the GPU's OpenCL/Vulkan compute results above 112000 each. Developers get sixteen usable threads and 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth for compilation and virtualized environments. Students and small-business workstation users get quiet, efficient operation — the 65 W CPU TDP keeps thermals modest — with single-thread scores (Geekbench 2290) that make everyday office applications feel instant. Users needing ECC memory or workstation-class rendering throughput should look higher in the respective product stacks.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS figures for this CPU and GPU combination, so the following is estimated from benchmark scores rather than recorded testing. The RTX 5060's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3628, PassMark G3D result of 20891, and 72nd percentile standing collectively suggest strong 1080p ultra performance in most current titles, with 1440p ultra viable where the 8 GB VRAM buffer is not saturated and adjusted settings where it is. The texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s describe the raw rendering ceiling, while the 30 RT cores indicate ray-traced effects are supported, likely at reduced settings at higher resolutions. On the CPU side, the PassMark single-thread score of 3872 and physics score of 1553 suggest frame delivery stays consistent even in CPU-heavy open-world and simulation titles at 1080p, where lower GPU load shifts the burden toward the processor. Esports titles at high refresh rates should be well served given the 5.00 GHz boost clock and strong per-core results. Until measured FPS entries are added to the database, these expectations should be treated as score-derived estimates, not validated measurements — a gap worth closing for a pairing this statistically well-defined.