SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 8700F

30,746 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 8700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

This pairing combines an 8-core, 16-thread AMD Ryzen 7 8700F based on the Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, a 16 GB GDDR6X graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The combined build percentile sits at 84, indicating that this configuration outperforms the vast majority of desktop systems in the benchmark database. The CPU holds an 82nd percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions that follow are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It uses TSMC's 4 nm process node and contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The thermal design power is 65 W, which is modest for an 8-core part. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, allowing for overclocking headroom. This processor uses AMD Socket AM5 and has been in production since its release in 2024-03-31.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales strongly with thread count. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 rises to 1989 for 2-thread, 3839 for 4-thread, 6559 for 8-thread, and 7883 for 16-thread workloads. The max-thread score of 7861 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score, indicating that the processor's 16 threads are efficiently utilized. Cinebench R23 results reinforce this picture: a multicore score of 26646 versus a single-core score of 3761. The ratio between these scores shows an 8-core part that maintains strong scaling without significant thermal throttling. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 13523 and a single-core score of 2290. PassMark results are extensive, with a multithread score of 30893, a single-thread score of 3872, and a floating-point math score of 62629. The integer math score of 100371 is particularly strong, suggesting that the processor handles arithmetic-heavy workloads with ease.

The average benchmark score is 30746, placing the 8700F in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 30879 with a delta of -0.4%, the Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30548 with a delta of 0.6%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468 with a delta of 0.9%, and the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31028 with a delta of -0.9%. This means the 8700F sits in a performance band where it trades blows with several mobile and low-power desktop chips, but its desktop-oriented 65 W TDP and AM5 platform give it a different positioning in terms of sustained workloads and upgradeability.

PassMark data compression score of 378160 and data encryption score of 22117 indicate that the CPU is well-suited for archival and security workloads. The extended instructions score of 28474 shows strong AVX and SIMD performance. The physics score of 1553 and find prime numbers score of 98 are less notable, but these are single-thread-bound tests. For real workloads, the Ryzen 7 8700F delivers strong multi-threaded performance that rivals the best laptop-class chips, but it is not a top-tier desktop part — it sits below the 90th percentile, meaning there are faster options available for those who need maximum core counts.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile suggest a system that is well-matched for high-refresh gaming at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The RTX 4080 SUPER's Geekbench Vulkan score of 260075 and OpenCL score of 219065 indicate strong compute and graphics throughput. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 confirms that the GPU handles modern DirectX 12 titles with ease.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance of 3761 in Cinebench R23 and 1008 in 3DMark single-thread will be the primary driver of frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The 8700F's 5.00 GHz boost clock should provide adequate headroom for most esports titles, but the 82nd percentile CPU position suggests that there are faster processors available that would extract higher frame rates in highly CPU-bound games. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the RTX 4080 SUPER's 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth will dominate. At 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor, and the 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is sufficient for current-generation titles at ultra settings.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 34245 places it well above most competing cards, and the DirectX 12 score of 134, DirectX 11 score of 301, and DirectX 9 score of 381 show a wide range of API support. The RTX 4080 SUPER's 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores will provide strong ray tracing and DLSS performance in supported titles. The estimated frame rates for this system would put it in the high-refresh category for 1440p gaming and the 60-100+ FPS category for 4K gaming at ultra settings, depending on the title. For esports titles at 1080p, the system should deliver well over 144 FPS in most cases, though the CPU's 82nd percentile position means it may not max out the highest refresh rate displays in all scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing where the GPU is the dominant component for gaming workloads, while the CPU provides sufficient multi-threaded throughput for productivity tasks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30746 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 54209 indicate that the GPU represents a significantly larger portion of the system's overall compute capability. In gaming at 1440p and above, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the primary bottleneck, which is ideal because the GPU is the component that scales most directly with resolution and graphical fidelity. At 1080p in CPU-bound games, the Ryzen 7 8700F's 82nd percentile position may limit frame rates, but this is a minor concern for a processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock.

The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 1989 and 4-thread score of 3839 show that lightly-threaded workloads are handled competently. The 8-thread score of 6559 and 16-thread score of 7883 show that the processor scales well up to its full thread count. The max-thread score of 7861 is slightly below the 16-thread score, suggesting that the processor achieves near-peak efficiency with all threads active. The GPU's PassMark compute score of 19822 and the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30893 show that the system is capable of handling both GPU-accelerated and CPU-based compute workloads.

The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU matches the CPU's PCIe Gen 4, 20 Lane support, so there is no bandwidth bottleneck at the bus level. The dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for both the CPU and the GPU to access data without significant contention. The system's combined percentile of 84 indicates that the pairing is better than 84% of all recorded desktop systems, which suggests that the two components are well-matched for a high-end gaming and productivity build.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for gamers who prioritize high-resolution gaming with ray tracing enabled. The RTX 4080 SUPER's 16 GB of VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for 4K gaming at ultra settings in current titles. The 86th percentile GPU position means that only a small fraction of graphics cards offer more performance. Gamers at 1440p will find that this system delivers high-refresh experiences in most titles, with the CPU's 82nd percentile position being sufficient to keep frame rates high in CPU-bound scenarios.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and GPU-accelerated applications will benefit from the combination of the CPU's 26-core-thread throughput and the GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 shows that the CPU handles rendering workloads competently, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 219065 confirms strong compute acceleration. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 100371 and data compression score of 378160, which indicate strong performance in compilation and data processing tasks.

Students and small business users who need a versatile workstation will find that this system handles everything from office productivity to moderate content creation without breaking a sweat. The 65 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP require a 700 W suggested PSU, which is reasonable for a high-end desktop. The system's 84th combined percentile means that it outperforms the vast majority of desktop computers in the benchmark database, making it a strong choice for users who want a single system for gaming, work, and creative tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30746, placing it in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 54209, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 84, meaning this build outperforms 84% of all recorded desktop systems. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS, scores 30879 with a delta of -0.4%, showing that the 8700F is essentially tied with this mobile chip. The Intel Core i5-13600H scores 30548 with a delta of 0.6%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30468 with a delta of 0.9%, meaning the 8700F is slightly ahead of both. The Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31028 with a delta of -0.9%, meaning the 8700F trails this chip by a small margin.

The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, scores 54247 with a delta of -0.1%, showing that the SUPER variant is essentially identical in average benchmark score to the non-SUPER version. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 with a delta of -1.1%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 with a delta of -2.7%, meaning the RTX 4080 SUPER trails these cards by a small margin. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 with a delta of -2.8%. This puts the RTX 4080 SUPER at the lower end of a tight performance cluster, where the differences between cards are within a few percentage points.

The CPU's 3DMark scores range from 1008 in single-thread to 7883 in 16-thread, showing a 7.8x scaling factor from 1 to 16 threads. The Cinebench R23 scores show a 7.1x scaling factor from single-core to multicore. These scaling factors indicate that the 8-core, 16-thread configuration is efficiently utilized across a wide range of workloads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6600 and PassMark G3D score of 34245 confirm that it is a high-end graphics card, but the benchmark data shows that it is not at the absolute top of the performance spectrum — there are faster GPUs available.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is based on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The GPU has 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It features 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz. The memory clock runs at 1438 MHz with 23 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 4K gaming with high-resolution textures and for GPU-accelerated compute workloads. The pixel rate is 285.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 816.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 52.22 TFLOPS, which is also the FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The card is triple-slot, measures 310 mm in length, and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector with a 700 W suggested PSU.

Benchmark results show the GPU performing at a high level, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065 and a Vulkan score of 260075. The PassMark G3D score of 34245 and GPU compute score of 19822 confirm strong graphics and compute performance. The DirectX 12 score of 134 and DirectX 11 score of 301 show broad API support. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 places the GPU in the upper tier of graphics cards. The 86th percentile position among all GPUs indicates that the RTX 4080 SUPER is a high-end card, but not the absolute fastest available. The production status is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series already released. The predecessor is the GeForce 30 series. The launch MSRP is 999 USD.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which provides a clear upgrade path to future Ryzen processors within the same socket generation. The 8700F supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and the platform does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so there is no mismatch in bus generation. The system's 65 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP require a 700 W suggested PSU, leaving headroom for additional components such as storage drives, fans, and peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-core-count Ryzen processor on the AM5 socket, which would improve multi-threaded performance in CPU-bound workloads. The GPU's end-of-life status means that the RTX 4080 SUPER has been superseded by the GeForce 50 series, but the 86th percentile position means that it remains a capable card for current gaming and compute workloads. Users who want more GPU performance would need to look at cards above the 86th percentile, which are few in number. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is sufficient for current titles, but future games with higher VRAM requirements may benefit from more memory. The dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the CPU, and an upgrade to higher-speed DDR5 would provide a modest improvement in memory-bound workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 84, meaning this build outperforms 84% of all recorded desktop systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 8700F compare to its nearest CPU rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS?

A: The Ryzen 7 8700F has an average benchmark score of 30746, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 30879, a delta of -0.4%, meaning the two processors are essentially tied in average performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 80 dedicated RT cores and 320 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W, based on the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 320 W TDP.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the non-SUPER RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, while the RTX 4080 scores 54247, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the two cards are nearly identical in average performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p, this system should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the GPU's 86th percentile position and the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock providing a strong foundation. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6600 and the GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 throughput support this expectation, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with the GPU's 320 tensor cores for NVENC-accelerated encoding, make this system capable of handling simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30893 shows adequate headroom for encoding overhead.

Video editing: The GPU's OpenCL score of 219065 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646 provide strong performance for timeline editing, effects rendering, and export tasks. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is sufficient for 4K video projects.

3D rendering: The GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 80 RT cores make it well-suited for GPU-accelerated rendering, while the CPU's 16 threads handle CPU-based rendering workloads with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26646.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 100371 and data compression score of 378160 indicate strong performance in compilation, testing, and data processing tasks. The 16 GB of system memory and 16 GB of VRAM provide ample workspace for large codebases.

Student and office work: The system's 84th combined percentile means it vastly outperforms typical office machines, handling spreadsheets, document processing, and web browsing with ease. The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a high-performance desktop.